HoldTheLine
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
October 04, 2014, 08:26:09 PM |
|
Stop selling morons! Don't you realize the potential of this thing? Do you know how hard it is to mine 300,000 coins thesedays? Really fucking hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
October 04, 2014, 08:41:05 PM |
|
Anyone know what is going on?
My Alpha-numeric wallet address changed on its own today while my numeric one stayed the same. I have been receiving mine coins to the old one right up and until I did a withdrawal from C-CEX. It changed when I went to withdraw. I'm still getting my coins but this is weird.
So I repeat...Does anyone know what is going on?
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
October 04, 2014, 08:41:53 PM |
|
Stop selling morons! Don't you realize the potential of this thing? Do you know how hard it is to mine 300,000 coins thesedays? Really fucking hard.
If you believe in the coin then it is a great buying opportunity.
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
October 04, 2014, 08:43:14 PM |
|
Anyone know what is going on?
My Alpha-numeric wallet address changed on its own today while my numeric one stayed the same. I have been receiving mine coins to the old one right up and until I did a withdrawal from C-CEX. It changed when I went to withdraw. I'm still getting my coins but this is weird.
So I repeat...Does anyone know what is going on?
Now it just changed again. WTF?
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
October 04, 2014, 08:44:05 PM |
|
Anyone know what is going on?
My Alpha-numeric wallet address changed on its own today while my numeric one stayed the same. I have been receiving mine coins to the old one right up and until I did a withdrawal from C-CEX. It changed when I went to withdraw. I'm still getting my coins but this is weird.
So I repeat...Does anyone know what is going on?
Now it just changed again. WTF? Is there fuckery going on? Dev what's up? Anyone else having this happen to them? I am scared to sign out of my wallet for fear I get wiped out.
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
crazyearner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 04, 2014, 08:49:37 PM |
|
Cant seem to mine on following pool still passphrase incorrect and submitting shares been like this now for 24 hours and I can mine on other pools perfectly fine however prefer mining on their fanepatent's v2 pool(allows solo plots)(based on uray's source): http://burstpool.ddns.net/fanepatent please fix problems
|
|
|
|
burstcoin (OP)
|
|
October 04, 2014, 09:00:31 PM |
|
Anyone know what is going on?
My Alpha-numeric wallet address changed on its own today while my numeric one stayed the same. I have been receiving mine coins to the old one right up and until I did a withdrawal from C-CEX. It changed when I went to withdraw. I'm still getting my coins but this is weird.
So I repeat...Does anyone know what is going on?
The alphanumeric and numeric ids can be directly calculated from each other, so there's no way one of them could have changed. I'm guessing one of the following happened: you entered your password incorrectly, or your browser is using an incompatible combination of current and old cached files, in which case refresh the wallet, or clear your browser cache.
|
BURST-QHCJ-9HB5-PTGC-5Q8J9
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
October 04, 2014, 09:20:49 PM |
|
Anyone know what is going on?
My Alpha-numeric wallet address changed on its own today while my numeric one stayed the same. I have been receiving mine coins to the old one right up and until I did a withdrawal from C-CEX. It changed when I went to withdraw. I'm still getting my coins but this is weird.
So I repeat...Does anyone know what is going on?
The alphanumeric and numeric ids can be directly calculated from each other, so there's no way one of them could have changed. I'm guessing one of the following happened: you entered your password incorrectly, or your browser is using an incompatible combination of current and old cached files, in which case refresh the wallet, or clear your browser cache. Here is the problem with your explanation....
I have been logged in for the past 72 hours straight. I copy and paste the password. It was coming into the old address. And then it just changed. My numeric one is still the same. There have been 3 different alpha-numeric ones. I'll PM you a screen shot. You can verify my numeric one on your pool.
This is freaking me out DEV!Never mind. I'm a fucking idiot!
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
jamoes
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
|
October 04, 2014, 09:26:45 PM |
|
Anyone know what is going on?
My Alpha-numeric wallet address changed on its own today while my numeric one stayed the same. I have been receiving mine coins to the old one right up and until I did a withdrawal from C-CEX. It changed when I went to withdraw. I'm still getting my coins but this is weird.
So I repeat...Does anyone know what is going on?
The alphanumeric and numeric ids can be directly calculated from each other, so there's no way one of them could have changed. I'm guessing one of the following happened: you entered your password incorrectly, or your browser is using an incompatible combination of current and old cached files, in which case refresh the wallet, or clear your browser cache. Here is the problem with your explanation....
I have been logged in for the past 72 hours straight. I copy and paste the password. It was coming into the old address. And then it just changed. My numeric one is still the same. There have been 3 different alpha-numeric ones. I'll PM you a screen shot. You can verify my numeric one on your pool.
This is freaking me out DEV!Never mind. I'm a fucking idiot! So, what was it? Were you typing in the wrong password, or was it the caching issue?
|
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
October 04, 2014, 10:53:43 PM |
|
Anyone know what is going on?
My Alpha-numeric wallet address changed on its own today while my numeric one stayed the same. I have been receiving mine coins to the old one right up and until I did a withdrawal from C-CEX. It changed when I went to withdraw. I'm still getting my coins but this is weird.
So I repeat...Does anyone know what is going on?
The alphanumeric and numeric ids can be directly calculated from each other, so there's no way one of them could have changed. I'm guessing one of the following happened: you entered your password incorrectly, or your browser is using an incompatible combination of current and old cached files, in which case refresh the wallet, or clear your browser cache. Here is the problem with your explanation....
I have been logged in for the past 72 hours straight. I copy and paste the password. It was coming into the old address. And then it just changed. My numeric one is still the same. There have been 3 different alpha-numeric ones. I'll PM you a screen shot. You can verify my numeric one on your pool.
This is freaking me out DEV!Never mind. I'm a fucking idiot! So, what was it? Were you typing in the wrong password, or was it the caching issue? Sleep deprivation. I went on an all night attack at C-CEX until I got my coins back. I was mistaken the source address of the depositor for my own. Like I said: I'm a fucking idiot!
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
Yanakitu Tenatako
|
|
October 04, 2014, 11:21:03 PM |
|
Hello Bipben and miner friends,
Sorry for taking You time on this topic, but I dare to ask You for advice. I am in mining for long time, but with GPUs, now, with HDD PoC mining, I am missing something.
I just got 8 pcs of 4Tb HDD WD40PURX sata drives. And have motherboard for it, A88X chipset. All drives are going to same mobo. I also got 16Gb of ram (2x8Gb). And some low end CPU (A4-3700). It is dedicated PoC miner machine.
I also have 280X graphic cards ans I 3770k CPU on other comp (where I work).
What I am missing, or do not understand is this:
1) Plotting HDDs. Should I use wplotgenerator to plot hdd? Or Gpuplotgenerator? Is result same? Can You please tell me parametars for gpu plot for configuration on my machine with R9 graphic. Cpu ram size is actually CPU cache size (on 3770k cpu it is 8Mb)? And I have 8Gb RAM DDR3. Radeon is with 3072Mb ram. Platform 0 device 0. I know rule of plotting and done it with earlier version of Gpuplotminer on 1tb spare drive. But it is different.
2) Is 16Gb ok for mining machine, or is also 8Gb ok. On that machine will be 8x4Tb drives? And what miner to use for optimal results?
Thank You.
@Yanakitu Tenatako 1) As you seem to have a great amount of GPU power, it could be a good idea to use the GPU plotter. They both produce the same output files. The only thing that varies is the device used for plot generation. When I speak about CPU RAM size, I mean the available amount of main memory, not CPU cache size. 2) About mining, you most likely should use one of the C ones, as they are faster and more stable in memory. With higher staggerSize values at plot generation, you will reduce the disk stress when mining. @Alex Coventry I've looked at your code. I think that the N CPU buffers are really bottleneck as it will require a lot of RAM to plot N disks at the same time, or will force the user to reduce its <staggerSize> value, thus increasing disk-stress when mining. Maybe a limted amount of rotating buffers would be enough and more RAM efficient. Maybe a stagger-less version (staggerSize = fileSize / PLOT_SIZE) of the plotter could solve this RAM issue (need some tests as it will increase IO operations). Anyhow I will work on that part with the already implemented multi-GPU support, begining with the ideas behind your version. What do you mean by "much faster"? Do you speak about a performance difference between the 3.0.0 and the 2.1.1 or between the 2.1.1 and your modded one?
Yes, there is a lot of room for improvement. I only took it as far as I needed for my purposes. You only need as many rotating buffers as it takes to max out transfer bandwidth. By much faster, I mean faster than the same code without asynchronous writes. Thanks for publishing your revision history. @fivebells I totally agree with you The only hard part is to guess at runtime which number of buffers would max out bandwidth. I think that I will make it an input parameter to be as polyvalent as possible. Many thanks for explanation. I am generating plot with these parameters: Machine is 4 x R9 280X (but only 2 are generating, no need for more because of HDD speed) + 8Gb ram. devices.txt is : 0 0 8192 128 8192 0 1 8192 128 8192 command line parameters are: gpuplotgenerator.exe generate "D:\plots" 30xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx778 10101000000000 2048000 8192 gpuplotgenerator.exe generate "D:\plots" 30xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx778 10101025000000 2048000 8192 gpuplotgenerator.exe generate "D:\plots" 30xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx778 10101050000000 2048000 8192 gpuplotgenerator.exe generate "D:\plots" 30xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx778 10101075000000 2048000 8192 gpuplotgenerator.exe generate "D:\plots" 30xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx778 10101100000000 2048000 8192 gpuplotgenerator.exe generate "D:\plots" 30xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx778 10101125000000 2048000 8192 gpuplotgenerator.exe generate "D:\plots" 30xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx778 10101150000000 2048000 8192 gpuplotgenerator.exe generate "D:\plots" 30xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx778 10101175000000 2048000 8192 It is 4Tb total per disk (range change for every hdd). GpuPlotGenerator says: ------------------------- GPU plot generator v3.0.0 ------------------------- Author: Cryo Bitcoin: 138gMBhCrNkbaiTCmUhP9HLU9xwn5QKZgD Burst: BURST-YA29-QCEW-QXC3-BKXDL ---- Checking input parameters... ---- Path: D:\plots Nonces: 10101050000000 to 10101052047999 (500GB 0MB) CPU memory: 2GB 0MB ---- Initializing OpenCL devices... GPU[0] memory: 2GB 0MB GPU[1] memory: 2GB 0MB ---- Creating CPU stagger buffer... Creating CPU plots buffer... Opening output file... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dedicated mining machine will be 8 or 16 Gb ram, 8 hdd (32Tb total). Is there something I should change before plotting all drives, considering equipment and ram size? That would be it, final step before mining, after this I should only wait to be done and start mining. Will not bother more
|
|
|
|
aarqa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
October 05, 2014, 01:28:03 AM |
|
"Setting your stagger size equal to 75% of your total memory (or up to the amount of memory you have,) is a decent default. I.E. if my computer has 8GB of RAM, I would set my stagger size to 8192.Setting your stagger size equal to 75% of your total memory (or up to the amount of memory you have,) is a decent default. I.E. if my computer has 8GB of RAM, I would set my stagger size to 8192." huh? 8192 is 75% of 10,922, explain your math, please.
|
|
|
|
DrTrouble
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
October 05, 2014, 02:15:08 AM |
|
...
Just started to use your latest miner for uray's pool2. Just curious about the last line abbreviations, could you please tell what the sdl, cdl, ss & rs stand for, also there is some number in the small brackets so far for me always like (0) what's that number for ?
One more request, could you please try to show the dealines (at least the best deadline) in years:days:hours:minutes:seconds format like it is shown by uray's miner ?
Best Regards & Good luck for your work.
sdl - sent deadlines rdl - recieve confirms deadlines ss - sent getMiningInfo to server rs - recieve getMiningInfo from server (0) - errors years:days:hours:minutes:seconds format - will done. OK, got it. But I have an issue. I frequently get the error message as shown in the attached screen shot & unless I click on ignore, it keeps showing no deadline, without reading any plot file! Edit : Just read your message few posts up, NVM. Please let us know when you fix it. Thanks. I, too, am having the same issues on only SOME of my miners. Eagerly awaiting a fix! FIXED , https://www.dropbox.com/s/qbtha77wq1mucgc/miner-burst-1.141003.zip?dl=0Edit: test & report pls It's still the same Not as frequent as yesterday but I got the message appeared after about 45 min of mining. Same here. Issue persists.
|
What is this "Bitcoin" of which you speak???
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
October 05, 2014, 02:20:01 AM |
|
Look at all of the tards dumping. Great buying opportunity. I've sold some when the price was higher but I am back to holding.
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
Irontiga
|
|
October 05, 2014, 02:25:28 AM |
|
--Announcement--new blockex, still has problems with the balance of assets showing up wrong, but value is right. Will keep making it better, this is just a start. http://blockex.burstcoin.info Whole lot better now, gives accurate data . Shows assets(which Uray's one doesn't....yet)
|
|
|
|
hero18688
|
|
October 05, 2014, 02:54:06 AM |
|
I just tried piloting.2 hours only 60GB pilot generated on g1830,painfully slow.When will it finish 1600GB,lol.Any faster way?
|
|
|
|
Irontiga
|
|
October 05, 2014, 02:57:08 AM |
|
I just tried piloting.2 hours only 60GB pilot generated on g1830,painfully slow.When will it finish 1600GB,lol.Any faster way?
Got a nice GPU? And it's called plotting, not piloting PS. No need for big text, we can all see it
|
|
|
|
jzhoulon
|
|
October 05, 2014, 03:40:21 AM |
|
Stop selling morons! Don't you realize the potential of this thing? Do you know how hard it is to mine 300,000 coins thesedays? Really fucking hard.
it is not hard for those who owns hundreds of idle TB, you will found several miners in thread who owns hundreds of TB easily, even some guys reach 800TB+ ,the hdds are just idle for them, they can mine 10+ ,45+block a day, they can get free 0.5-1BTC a day with little electricity, that's a greate profit for them, if you mine BTC with asic, it may be take with months to mine a btc and cost a lot of electricity, of course it is not hard for them, difficulty is still too low for burst
|
|
|
|
Irontiga
|
|
October 05, 2014, 03:43:02 AM |
|
Stop selling morons! Don't you realize the potential of this thing? Do you know how hard it is to mine 300,000 coins thesedays? Really fucking hard.
it is not hard for those who owns hundreds of idle TB, you will found several miners in thread who owns hundreds of TB easily, even some guys reach 800TB+ ,the hdds are just idle for them, they can mine 10+ ,45+block a day, they can get free 0.5-1BTC a day with little electricity, that's a greate profit for them, if you mine BTC with asic, it may be take with months to mine a btc and cost a lot of electricity, of course it is not hard for them, difficulty is still too low for burst A sad truth.
|
|
|
|
Blago
|
|
October 05, 2014, 03:47:41 AM |
|
[ MINER] Thank you guys for testing, working on a solution to the problems [ MEMORY] I have three computers with Win7 x64, all parameters and EnablePrefetch EnableSuperPrefetch set to 0. Theoretically, the system should not be left in memory to read the file for caching, but in practice it is not. The system leaves the data in memory, but begins to actively unload when you start another process running with a disk and a large amount of data. On this screenshot is running miner (big peaks) and dcct's merge tool, memory gradually released ... (RAM 16 G, plots: 10 Tb) On this screenshot dcct's merge tool finalized (red), a miner is in idle (blue), was replaced by a block (green), and then came another new block (yellow) - the memory is consumed to the maximum limit is not being released. I think this is the problem of the memory manager Win 7, on Win XP x64 this behavior was not observed. Conclusion: there is nothing wrong, the system will clear the memory, if necessary, the rig I have not rebooted for a week. [ TIME] At the expense of staggersize / plot size: especially is not affected by if the file merged. Example: 17930413153828766298_22500000_800000_800000 [@ 3084 ms] 17930413153828766298_21700000_800000_800000 [@ 4373 ms] 17930413153828766298_26900000_800000_8000 [@ 25558 ms] As can be seen, not merged files are read and processed several times longer. CacheSize desirable value must be a multiple of the nonces file, since Miner reads CacheSize pieces of the file.
|
Relax, I’m russian!... BURST-B2LU-SGCZ-NYVS-HZEPK
|
|
|
|