Bitcoin Forum
December 04, 2016, 10:39:39 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 63 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bryan Micon's List of BTC Ponzi Schemes that should not be listed as "Lending"  (Read 107875 times)
finkleshnorts
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
July 30, 2012, 05:41:26 AM
 #161

Whats the chance all the ponzis will collapse at once ?  Cheesy

7% ish
1480891179
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480891179

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480891179
Reply with quote  #2

1480891179
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480891179
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480891179

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480891179
Reply with quote  #2

1480891179
Report to moderator
1480891179
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480891179

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480891179
Reply with quote  #2

1480891179
Report to moderator
1480891179
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480891179

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480891179
Reply with quote  #2

1480891179
Report to moderator
vuce
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


View Profile
July 30, 2012, 05:45:22 AM
 #162

"lending" is not what I or any reasonable man of science would call this.  
You call yourself a man of science yet you provide no  hard proof? Not sure if serious  Roll Eyes

Quote
Further more, who runs this board?  

why can Pirateat40 lock his giant ponzi thread?
It's his thread, he can do whatever he wants with it (and so can you with yours)

Furthermore this whole thread should be moved to speculation  Roll Eyes

1)  does it alarm you in any way that Pirateat40 locked his thread?  Why do you think he would do that when he is holding $1M USD worth of BTC?   I think it's because he doesn't want the forum members that understand his scam explaining it in his thread.  
I would do the same if I were him. People were spamming his thread with fud, what else is he going to do, when he has absolutely no control over the thread (this really is a shitty forum)?

Quote
2) You ask me for hard proof.  A Ponzi scheme, as defined by Wikipedia:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme  some highlights:

-- Typically extraordinary returns are promised on the investment,[5] and vague verbal constructions such as "hedge futures trading," "high-yield investment programs", "offshore investment" might be used. The promoter sells shares to investors by taking advantage of a lack of investor knowledge or competence, or using claims of a proprietary investment strategy which must be kept secret to ensure a competitive edge.
-- A Ponzi scheme claims to rely on some esoteric investment approach and often attracts well-to-do investors
-- Ponzi schemes can survive simply by persuading most existing participants to reinvest their money
-- Initially the promoter will pay out high returns to attract more investors, and to lure current investors into putting in additional money. Other investors begin to participate, leading to a cascade effect. The "return" to the initial investors is paid out of the investments of new entrants, and not out of profits.
-- Promoters also try to minimize withdrawals by offering new plans to investors, often where money is frozen for a longer period of time, in exchange for higher returns.

sound at all like BCST?

Proof Ponzi

Exactly as you said, it might sound like it, but this is no proof, only speculation.

Quote
3)  you seem to either be invested in BCST or running your own Ponzi - which is it?
Well, that really is none of your business Smiley
JoelKatz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386


Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2012, 06:06:14 AM
 #163

Whats the chance all the ponzis will collapse at once ?  Cheesy
It's possible they'll collapse like dominoes and possibly even take down some legitimate funds with them. When one collapses, people might fear that others are going to collapse too and make a large number of simultaneous withdrawals, forcing others (whether Ponzi or legitimate) into an equity or liquidity crisis.

I am an employee of Ripple.
1Joe1Katzci1rFcsr9HH7SLuHVnDy2aihZ BM-NBM3FRExVJSJJamV9ccgyWvQfratUHgN
Micon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


I'm not the law, but I represent justice


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2012, 06:15:49 AM
 #164

we're in the Wild West days of open-source currency.  I expect people will get burned by scams, imitators, ponzi schemes and price bubbles..

I tend not to worry about things that are out of my control; I don't think there's a whole lot that can be done about scammers, imitators, and ponzi schemes besides warning people to be careful with their money (whether dollars, euros or bitcoins).

there are many people who hold an opinion on the matter but they aren't outspoken about it.  when each of these ponzi fund house of cards falls, some people will be hurt badly, others (those who have made most or all of their money back already) will barely be nicked and most will feel no impact at all as they were smart enough to keep a healthy distance.  you don't hear from them.  you probably won't, even if they were asked for their opinion.

this is definitely a circus but it is nowhere near to being significant in bitcoin's progression. just as few today remember or care much about the mtgox hack or mybitcoin fiasco, this too shall pass.

agree on macro level but still hold true to my original points in this thread:

1)  on the scale of "will BTC work" these ponzi's are minor.  Andresen's used similar words when describing the currency:  "wild, wild west" and in the poker parlance of our times "a no-limit currency"  A poster in this thread said something to the effect of "this will help weed out the stupid" - indeed, but at the extreme benefit of a scammer who will try and scam again after being so successful and easy this time.  

2) The next major headline about bitcoin will likely be about BCST & the derivatives (so shameful, but at the same time laughable - this scammer has a huge affiliate program for his scam).  Think about the scale of the previous BTC thefts and sites that scammed and ran away with the coins - I think mid 6 digits is our current record - and the BTC writers that  know their shit like Jon Matonis will write the story with a headline something like this "$1M+ USD bitcoin ponzi scheme collapses" and the first paragraph will be about a guy named "Pirateat40" with a fake entity called "Bitcoin Savings & Trust" posting that he pays 7% weekly interest and can do so because:


Q: What are my coins used for?
A: Coins are primarily used for large investment transactions but may also include the following:
Market Arbitrage
Private Loans To Network Members
Never Criminal/Illegal Related

Q: How do you make enough money to pay these rates?
A: If I told you then I couldn't do what I do.


and stupid internet nerds sent him $1M USD in BTC.  Pirateat40?  Bitcoin Savings & Trust? - now just making me laugh.  He is openly mocking any of you that in any way sent him money.  If you ran or do run a pass-through to make .1% for helping a scammer scam the entire community, you are shameful and I hate you.  If you didn't think you were doing a bad thing when you started and now understand that you are helping an evil scammer scam, please PM me and I can help guide you on how to best dismantle your operation and return max value to your investors.  The few that will listen to me will save their investors at least some of the principle.  If you are running a pass-through, know it's a scam and feel the need to blindly defend Pirate because your .1% per week is at stake then you are also shameful and I also hate you.

2)  these have infected and made laughable the bitcoin stock exchange.  GLBSE cannot possibly allow derivatives of scams to be listed as "bonds."  Again, making BTC in general appear foolish, childish, and with scams around every corner so watch out.

3) IMO, net effect extremely -EV (negative expected value as us stupid gamblers use to describe future equity) to allow these to continue as is and keep them labeled as Lending.  Do we know who the top moderators are on this forum?  who owns it?  This forum is extremely important to spreading BTC.  We must make sure it is in safe hands.

Chairman SwCPoker.eu Bitcoin Poker 2.0 |  Pro Poker Player  |  blog & podcas DonkDown.com | @BryanMicon | 2015- PGP Key
Micon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


I'm not the law, but I represent justice


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2012, 06:19:17 AM
 #165

Whats the chance all the ponzis will collapse at once ?  Cheesy
It's possible they'll collapse like dominoes and possibly even take down some legitimate funds with them. When one collapses, people might fear that others are going to collapse too and make a large number of simultaneous withdrawals, forcing others (whether Ponzi or legitimate) into an equity or liquidity crisis.

 BCST is so big and there are so many pass-throughs and derivatives of this gigantic scam when this one falls everything will go boom

I will be watching from the sidelines trying to warn all I can before it explodes.  And the explosion will be an awesome train wreck to watch.  I will be brutally "I told you so"-ing so you fucks listen to me the next time some scammer takes a $1M USD shot at this community.


Chairman SwCPoker.eu Bitcoin Poker 2.0 |  Pro Poker Player  |  blog & podcas DonkDown.com | @BryanMicon | 2015- PGP Key
CoinCidental
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


View Profile
July 30, 2012, 06:27:23 AM
 #166

i read pirate has over 300k btc ,some think he has over 500K of them

If thats correct and he scams ,its going to be a lot bigger than 1 million $

at current prices
hgmichna
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 598



View Profile
July 30, 2012, 06:30:20 AM
 #167

wait you think because Pirateat40 has a $1M+ USD ponzi scheme it's not bad for bitcoin because it's only ~ 1% of total BTC?  you should say it like this:

"HOLY SHIT HE HAS 1% OF ALL BTC "INVESTED" IN HIS SCAM!  Over $1M USD!  HE MUST BE STOPPED"

you don't care at all that a guy is scamming anyone stupid enough to send him BTC right here on these forums, and he has already acquired $1M USD+ ?  this seems alarming, extremely wrong, horrible for bitcoin, and something should be done about it.

We have the same opinion. I just have a few minor reservations.

  • Bitcoin is in its early stage. It seems that the bitcoin community is bound to repeat all mistakes that happened in the history of all pre-existing financial markets.
  • I do care, but I don't see what more we could do. Publishing clear and explicit explanations and warnings apparently has to suffice. But if you have any better idea, let's try it.

What I would like to do is find out who the perpetrator is and who his henchmen are. We know their forum nicknames, but that may not be good enough to bring them behind bars. I particularly dislike that they may get away with the money they stole. I could imagine though that those who lose the most money might track him down.
dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988



View Profile
July 30, 2012, 06:37:15 AM
 #168

Jon Matonis will write the story with a headline something like this "$1M+ USD bitcoin ponzi scheme collapses"

Last week, BS&T paid out 26,000 BTC in interest.

The top tier interest rate is 7%.  Some people get less.  If we assume everyone got 7%, then that means there is 371,428 BTC invested, but since not everyone gets 7%, the true figure is higher.  Also, this doesn't include the people who automatically reinvest their interest.  I've no idea what percentage of the interest is automatically reinvested, but let's assume it's none at all.

Even with these assumptions, the least possible amount invested is 371,428 BTC, or $3,298,280 at the current price of $8.88/BTC.

Micon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


I'm not the law, but I represent justice


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2012, 06:38:58 AM
 #169


"you have no proof Micon!  I want to believe so badly that whatever scam I'm invested in or whatever scam I'm running is really my ticket to riches, so much so that I can easily put myself into a state of denial where I believe 7% per WEEK paid interest is in any way sustainable and not an outright, blatant, and obvious scam"


I must post this again because some of you missed it the first time.  I'm going bold + different color this time for max effect:

This is a statement from the Wikipedia on Ponzi schemes --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme

Quote from: wikipedia
Typically extraordinary returns are promised on the investment,[5] and vague verbal constructions such as "hedge futures trading," "high-yield investment programs", "offshore investment" might be used. The promoter sells shares to investors by taking advantage of a lack of investor knowledge or competence, or using claims of a proprietary investment strategy which must be kept secret to ensure a competitive edge.

Here is what Pirateat40 has listed as the reason he makes money and can pay 7% weekly interest  --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=50822.0

Quote from: pirateat40
Q: What are my coins used for?
A: Coins are primarily used for large investment transactions but may also include the following:
Market Arbitrage
Private Loans To Network Members
Never Criminal/Illegal Related

Q: How do you make enough money to pay these rates?
A: If I told you then I couldn't do what I do.


Any man of science can see this is a slightly updated BTC-version of a Ponzi scheme.

Chairman SwCPoker.eu Bitcoin Poker 2.0 |  Pro Poker Player  |  blog & podcas DonkDown.com | @BryanMicon | 2015- PGP Key
hgmichna
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 598



View Profile
July 30, 2012, 06:42:55 AM
 #170

Whats the chance all the ponzis will collapse at once ?  Cheesy
It's possible they'll collapse like dominoes and possibly even take down some legitimate funds with them. When one collapses, people might fear that others are going to collapse too and make a large number of simultaneous withdrawals, forcing others (whether Ponzi or legitimate) into an equity or liquidity crisis.

I don't think there is any legitimate fund that quotes its interest weekly or monthly. The ones that do that are after those who didn't pay attention to some maths lessons at school and cannot calculate compound interest.

It is really laughable, but I guess if pirateat40 had quoted his gains as 3,300% annually, he would have gotten far fewer "investors".
Micon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


I'm not the law, but I represent justice


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2012, 06:44:57 AM
 #171

Jon Matonis will write the story with a headline something like this "$1M+ USD bitcoin ponzi scheme collapses"

Last week, BS&T paid out 26,000 BTC in interest.

The top tier interest rate is 7%.  Some people get less.  If we assume everyone got 7%, then that means there is 371,428 BTC invested, but since not everyone gets 7%, the true figure is higher.  Also, this doesn't include the people who automatically reinvest their interest.  I've no idea what percentage of the interest is automatically reinvested, but let's assume it's none at all.

Even with these assumptions, the least possible amount invested is 371,428 BTC, or $3,298,280 at the current price of $8.88/BTC.

I assume that some forum users that are +1'ing the "yup Pirate sent me my interest yet again thanks!!!" are shill users in control of the Ponzi owner, which mix extremely well with real users that actually did just get their 7% again this week.  Pirate is a good scammer.  Those numbers are extremely alarming, and if you don't mind please link me to where that information comes from - is it simple addition of forum users that claim to have been paid?  do the numbers come from the block chain? could Pirate be sending BTC from his main wallet to just some other wallet he controls and then claims the transaction as interest?  

Chairman SwCPoker.eu Bitcoin Poker 2.0 |  Pro Poker Player  |  blog & podcas DonkDown.com | @BryanMicon | 2015- PGP Key
dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988



View Profile
July 30, 2012, 07:19:18 AM
 #172

Those numbers are extremely alarming, and if you don't mind please link me to where that information comes from - is it simple addition of forum users that claim to have been paid?  do the numbers come from the block chain? could Pirate be sending BTC from his main wallet to just some other wallet he controls and then claims the transaction as interest?  

They're from the blockchain, yes.  It's possible pirate has set up some dummy accounts which he pays interest to each week but which go back into a wallet he controls, but what's the advantage to him of making the scheme look bigger than it actually is?

i really wonder how anyone can know this.

the reason is, because when i ask for a withdrawal, it comes in exactly the same transaction as the interest payment.

I didn't realise that.  I thought that withdrawals and interest were separate transactions.

Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
July 30, 2012, 07:43:21 AM
 #173

Those numbers are extremely alarming, and if you don't mind please link me to where that information comes from - is it simple addition of forum users that claim to have been paid?  do the numbers come from the block chain? could Pirate be sending BTC from his main wallet to just some other wallet he controls and then claims the transaction as interest?  

They're from the blockchain, yes.  It's possible pirate has set up some dummy accounts which he pays interest to each week but which go back into a wallet he controls, but what's the advantage to him of making the scheme look bigger than it actually is?

i really wonder how anyone can know this.

the reason is, because when i ask for a withdrawal, it comes in exactly the same transaction as the interest payment.

I didn't realise that.  I thought that withdrawals and interest were separate transactions.

Well dooglus thats the same mistake every other hick tends to make, they "assume" and they "think" and therefore they are all facts to them.

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
CoinCidental
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


View Profile
July 30, 2012, 07:48:31 AM
 #174

wait you think because Pirateat40 has a $1M+ USD ponzi scheme it's not bad for bitcoin because it's only ~ 1% of total BTC?  you should say it like this:

"HOLY SHIT HE HAS 1% OF ALL BTC "INVESTED" IN HIS SCAM!  Over $1M USD!  HE MUST BE STOPPED"

you don't care at all that a guy is scamming anyone stupid enough to send him BTC right here on these forums, and he has already acquired $1M USD+ ?  this seems alarming, extremely wrong, horrible for bitcoin, and something should be done about it.

We have the same opinion. I just have a few minor reservations.

  • Bitcoin is in its early stage. It seems that the bitcoin community is bound to repeat all mistakes that happened in the history of all pre-existing financial markets.
  • I do care, but I don't see what more we could do. Publishing clear and explicit explanations and warnings apparently has to suffice. But if you have any better idea, let's try it.

What I would like to do is find out who the perpetrator is and who his henchmen are. We know their forum nicknames, but that may not be good enough to bring them behind bars. I particularly dislike that they may get away with the money they stole. I could imagine though that those who lose the most money might track him down.

Eventually everyone running a bitcoin "bank " ,exchange ,investment or wallet service   should be mandatory to provide Identification ,authenticated by a local police department ,law firm or notary BEFORE they take in the first deposit ,thats just common sense

Its unfortunate that there will be a few major scams before this happens but its going to have to happen sooner or later

Giving anonymous money **a few million dollars worth**   to anonymous guys on the internet  to anonymously "invest" has got to be a bad idea
Micon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


I'm not the law, but I represent justice


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2012, 07:48:57 AM
 #175

Whats the chance all the ponzis will collapse at once ?  Cheesy
It's possible they'll collapse like dominoes and possibly even take down some legitimate funds with them. When one collapses, people might fear that others are going to collapse too and make a large number of simultaneous withdrawals, forcing others (whether Ponzi or legitimate) into an equity or liquidity crisis.

I don't think there is any legitimate fund that quotes its interest weekly or monthly. The ones that do that are after those who didn't pay attention to some maths lessons at school and cannot calculate compound interest.

It is really laughable, but I guess if pirateat40 had quoted his gains as 3,300% annually, he would have gotten far fewer "investors".

whew!

another guy that gets it and has a fundamental understanding of economics.

the ponzi-defending in this thread was getting absurd.

I understand that there is this thread -->  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=79294.260  about +1'ing the fact that BCST is a ponzi, but it says "probably a ponzi"  which is weaksauce and does not address the many, many derivatives and other completely separate ponzi's and partial ponzis and funds that are exposed to ponzi.  I feel a deep need to expose scams of any sort that I spot.

I am going to ask the users with strong economics backgrounds to please also +1 this thread.  Also feel free to assign weight to your thoughts, i.e. for my own perosnal:

"I 100% think that BCST is a classic Ponzi scheme and anyone running a pass-through is helping Pirateat40 steal large amounts of BTC"

Chairman SwCPoker.eu Bitcoin Poker 2.0 |  Pro Poker Player  |  blog & podcas DonkDown.com | @BryanMicon | 2015- PGP Key
vuce
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


View Profile
July 30, 2012, 07:58:31 AM
 #176

Quote from: Micon
"you have no proof Micon!  I want to believe so badly that whatever scam I'm invested in or whatever scam I'm running is really my ticket to riches, so much so that I can easily put myself into a state of denial where I believe 7% per WEEK paid interest is in any way sustainable and not an outright, blatant, and obvious scam"

Thank you for manufacturing my posts.

No one said it was sustainable, in fact, even pirate himself said it isn't, and he will stop when it becomes unprofitable for him.

You also seem to think that everyone investing into this is an idiot. Majority of people have made money of it already and cannot lose anymore, since everything else is actually not their money anymore.

Anyway, that's all I'm going to say. This thread is hilarious Smiley
miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
July 30, 2012, 08:02:46 AM
 #177

Why didn't all the "anti-pirate" crowd not send even one single representative to Vegas?

They're too busy wallowing in poverty and trying to convince everyone else to join them.
finkleshnorts
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
July 30, 2012, 08:11:53 AM
 #178

Whats the chance all the ponzis will collapse at once ?  Cheesy
It's possible they'll collapse like dominoes and possibly even take down some legitimate funds with them. When one collapses, people might fear that others are going to collapse too and make a large number of simultaneous withdrawals, forcing others (whether Ponzi or legitimate) into an equity or liquidity crisis.

I don't think there is any legitimate fund that quotes its interest weekly or monthly. The ones that do that are after those who didn't pay attention to some maths lessons at school and cannot calculate compound interest.

It is really laughable, but I guess if pirateat40 had quoted his gains as 3,300% annually, he would have gotten far fewer "investors".

whew!

another guy that gets it and has a fundamental understanding of economics.

the ponzi-defending in this thread was getting absurd.

I understand that there is this thread -->  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=79294.260  about +1'ing the fact that BCST is a ponzi, but it says "probably a ponzi"  which is weaksauce and does not address the many, many derivatives and other completely separate ponzi's and partial ponzis and funds that are exposed to ponzi.  I feel a deep need to expose scams of any sort that I spot.

I am going to ask the users with strong economics backgrounds to please also +1 this thread.  Also feel free to assign weight to your thoughts, i.e. for my own perosnal:

"I 100% think that BCST is a classic Ponzi scheme and anyone running a pass-through is helping Pirateat40 steal large amounts of BTC"


I 87% think it's a Ponzi. So what. Let's talk about something else now. This was only fun to talk about the first 11 times around. I enjoyed the drama, but now I've got other dead horses to beat.

Anyone who runs a pass-through doing the community a favor. Whoever wants a slice of that pie should be able to have it.

Now, either I am going to be extremely pissed off that I missed out on the investment of a lifetime, or a lot of people are going to be robbed. Everything has been said that can possibly be said about it, now we just have to ride it out.  You came to the party about a month too late. It is good to raise your concerns, they are they same as about 40 other people on this forum, including me. But Every single one of your posts is FUD. Suckers will be suckers no matter how much you scream (that said, you and I may be the suckers here).

Ponzi Bob
miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
July 30, 2012, 08:14:33 AM
 #179

You also seem to think that everyone investing into this is an idiot. Majority of people have made money of it already and cannot lose anymore, since everything else is actually not their money anymore.

Exactly. It takes just under 3 months to double the initial investment. After that, withdrawing the principal means the rest is pure profit.

Micon would've nearly doubled his money by now if he weren't such a maladroit. Some "pro" gambler.
koin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 874


View Profile
July 30, 2012, 08:24:42 AM
 #180

Why didn't all the "anti-pirate" crowd not send even one single representative to Vegas?

They're too busy wallowing in poverty and trying to convince everyone else to join them.

oh?


Thanks for the invite guys, that showed some real top class elitism...  

AFAIK, all you had to do was contact Pirate for details on where he'd be when. Did he deny you?

He took my number... said he would call with details..

Its all good I see how this works now, us common folk were not welcome I guess...

looks like some, particularly any who had expressed a whiff of concern, were not welcome.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 63 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!