Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2017, 11:08:14 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bryan Micon's List of BTC Ponzi Schemes that should not be listed as "Lending"  (Read 117106 times)
gene
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 10:07:51 PM
 #541

The burden of proof is on pirate and his shills. It is a ponzi until proven otherwise as far as any reasonable person is concerned.

Why? [additional bullshit omitted to spare humanity]

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_burden_of_proof

Quote
When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. "If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed".[1] This burden does not necessarily require a mathematical or strictly logical proof, although many strong arguments do rise to this level (such as in logical syllogisms). Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.[2][3]

*processing payment* *error 404 : funds not found*
Do you want to complain on the forum just to fall for another scam a few days later?
| YES       |        YES |
1508713694
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508713694

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508713694
Reply with quote  #2

1508713694
Report to moderator
1508713694
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508713694

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508713694
Reply with quote  #2

1508713694
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508713694
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508713694

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508713694
Reply with quote  #2

1508713694
Report to moderator
1508713694
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508713694

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508713694
Reply with quote  #2

1508713694
Report to moderator
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 574

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.


View Profile WWW
August 10, 2012, 10:09:21 PM
 #542

The burden of proof is on pirate and his shills. It is a ponzi until proven otherwise as far as any reasonable person is concerned.

Why? [additional bullshit omitted to spare humanity]

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_burden_of_proof

Quote
When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. "If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed".[1] This burden does not necessarily require a mathematical or strictly logical proof, although many strong arguments do rise to this level (such as in logical syllogisms). Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.[2][3]

Are you not asserting the claim that Pirate is a ponzi?  Guess that means its on you.

Coming Soon!™ © imsaguy 2011-2013, All rights reserved.

EIEIO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60117.0

Shades Minoco Collection Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65989
Payment Address: http://btc.to/5r6
gene
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 10:10:22 PM
 #543

miscreanity is spouting vague salesman-type Ponzi gibberish like its his job

lmao

nothing he says makes any sense

"churn at the margins is being capitalized upon"

[industrial quantities of horseshit]


Your arguments aren't... compelling. Coherence usually helps.

*processing payment* *error 404 : funds not found*
Do you want to complain on the forum just to fall for another scam a few days later?
| YES       |        YES |
gene
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 10:15:38 PM
 #544

The burden of proof is on pirate and his shills. It is a ponzi until proven otherwise as far as any reasonable person is concerned.

Why? [additional bullshit omitted to spare humanity]

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_burden_of_proof

Quote
When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. "If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed".[1] This burden does not necessarily require a mathematical or strictly logical proof, although many strong arguments do rise to this level (such as in logical syllogisms). Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.[2][3]

[vomit, diarrhea, more farts from the mouth...]


Permit me to simplify:

E_p > E_np

where E_p = N (for large positive values of N) is evidence of being flaming ponzi
and E_np = 0 is evidence of not being a flaming ponzi

*processing payment* *error 404 : funds not found*
Do you want to complain on the forum just to fall for another scam a few days later?
| YES       |        YES |
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 574

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.


View Profile WWW
August 10, 2012, 10:16:44 PM
 #545

The burden of proof is on pirate and his shills. It is a ponzi until proven otherwise as far as any reasonable person is concerned.

Why? [additional bullshit omitted to spare humanity]

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_burden_of_proof

Quote
When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. "If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed".[1] This burden does not necessarily require a mathematical or strictly logical proof, although many strong arguments do rise to this level (such as in logical syllogisms). Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.[2][3]

[vomit, diarrhea, more farts from the mouth...]


Permit me to simplify:

E_p > E_np

where E_p = N (for large positive values of N) is evidence of being flaming ponzi
and E_np = 0 is evidence of not being a flaming ponzi


Oh right, once again, no facts.

Coming Soon!™ © imsaguy 2011-2013, All rights reserved.

EIEIO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60117.0

Shades Minoco Collection Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65989
Payment Address: http://btc.to/5r6
CoinCidental
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204


Si vis pacem, para bellum


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 10:17:30 PM
 #546

I'm pretty sure Maged knows what he's talking about on that part. But still, I don't understand if people have data, why don't they share it. I mean, you guys are asking for proof of pirate business, but you don't provide much on your part either.
I wish that they would, but I'm not authorized to.

Ok, fine, I see there's other people in this.

But don't be surprised if some people have a hard time taking you seriously. I've done my own due diligence, taking many, MANY hours to read about pirate business, pro and cons. My current conclusion is that pirate have provided a lot more information and confirmation of his good business than you guys could provide that his business is bad.

I'm open-minded and if I'm wrong, I can assume it. Still, show some meat.

The numbers IS  the meat ,7.7% IS  the meat ,  if after "many,MANY hours" of diligent research you still
think its legit your either supporting it or you need to get a new calculator because your old one is bonked .
gene
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 10:22:09 PM
 #547

The burden of proof is on pirate and his shills. It is a ponzi until proven otherwise as far as any reasonable person is concerned.

Why? [additional bullshit omitted to spare humanity]

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_burden_of_proof

Quote
When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. "If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed".[1] This burden does not necessarily require a mathematical or strictly logical proof, although many strong arguments do rise to this level (such as in logical syllogisms). Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.[2][3]

[vomit, diarrhea, more farts from the mouth...]


Permit me to simplify:

E_p > E_np

where E_p = N (for large positive values of N) is evidence of being flaming ponzi
and E_np = 0 is evidence of not being a flaming ponzi


Oh right, once again, no facts. [to be read in a pathetic, withering squeal]

Facts in bold:

A simple truism: the burden of proof lies on those making incredible statements which contradict all experience. The returns promised require extraordinary explanation.

FACT: No explanation is provided. End of story. One can only conclude that what looks and smells like an utter fraud is, in fact, an utter fraud.

Obviously, much evidence exists that this is a ponzi scheme [as in exhibits literally each and every characteristic of a ponzi scheme], and the lack of any evidence to counter is sufficient for appropriate branding.

Demand for the impossible proof of a negative is a reliable gambit for the conman and also assuages the bedeviling consciences of the naively complicit (and there are many of those, indeed).

*processing payment* *error 404 : funds not found*
Do you want to complain on the forum just to fall for another scam a few days later?
| YES       |        YES |
miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 10:32:32 PM
 #548

Your arguments aren't... compelling. Coherence usually helps.

If you want a Kardashian dog & pony show, you won't get it from me. Ignorance prevents you from connecting the dots and engaging in any argument of substance. Read the links to expand your knowledge.

A buyer at $5 may be a seller at $10. New entrants may be buyers at $10 and sellers at $9. In either situation, supply is replenished and available for acquisition to be redirected as return for investors. Everyone is looking at the total amount of BTC in existence rather than the churn at the margin, where holders of bitcoins sell, reintroducing flow into the market. Once more - that flow becomes fodder to be picked up and supplied to Pirate & investors. There is a recirculating dynamic.

Get it? No? Read the links again. Then read them a third, fourth, and fifth time. Sleep on it. Read it again. Read through my explanations in this thread again. Not an easy concept to wrap your head around when you're stuck in the fiat world, is it? Keep reading.

To help, study the difference between cash/physical market pricing and derivative-driven pricing of underlying assets (esp. options & futures). Bitcoin is almost entirely a cash/physical market, and its stock to flow ratio works nearly identically to gold.
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 574

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.


View Profile WWW
August 10, 2012, 10:33:48 PM
 #549

Demand for the impossible proof of a negative is a reliable gambit for the conman and also assuages the bedeviling consciences of the naively complicit (and there are many of those, indeed).

I guess that means whoever thought up "Innocent until proven guilty" was a conman. 

Obviously, much evidence exists that this is a ponzi scheme [as in exhibits literally each and every characteristic of a ponzi scheme], and the lack of any evidence to counter is sufficient for appropriate branding.

So far, your evidence is an unjustified return and the lack of disclosing trade secrets.  What other characteristics?   Please, document them.  Don't make generic statements, they just repeat whats already been said.

Coming Soon!™ © imsaguy 2011-2013, All rights reserved.

EIEIO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60117.0

Shades Minoco Collection Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65989
Payment Address: http://btc.to/5r6
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 574

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.


View Profile WWW
August 10, 2012, 10:35:14 PM
 #550

A buyer at $5 may be a seller at $10. New entrants may be buyers at $10 and sellers at $9. In either situation, supply is replenished and available for acquisition to be redirected as return for investors. Everyone is looking at the total amount of BTC in existence rather than the churn at the margin, where holders of bitcoins sell, reintroducing flow into the market. Once more - that flow becomes fodder to be picked up and supplied to Pirate & investors. There is a recirculating dynamic.

I already brought this up.  Clearly it isn't a compelling argument.  Roll Eyes

Coming Soon!™ © imsaguy 2011-2013, All rights reserved.

EIEIO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60117.0

Shades Minoco Collection Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65989
Payment Address: http://btc.to/5r6
Maged
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 10:35:22 PM
 #551

Maged: I have a proof that this is a ponzi. But I will not tell ya, coz people who dug it up did not give me permission.
I made no such assertion. I was merely saying that we had proof that imsaguy's claim that pirate is discouraging deposits and is being effective in doing do is patently false. Of course this was the case, because apparently the discouraging hasn't started.
He's penalizing deposits as well as withdrawals.  How many times do I have to say this before you actually acknowledge it?
You can say it all you want, because the unofficial audit team has irrefutable proof that this is absolutely not the case. For example, despite growing over 10% per week, BitcoinMax is still making 7.7% per week in interest.

The rules don't take effect until the middle of the month...
Weird that you never brought that up... Well, guess we now know what is happening on the 14th.

gene
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 10:37:18 PM
 #552

Oh right, once again, no facts.

Assuming arguendo that Pirate is operating a Ponzi, the burden of proof is still on those asserting such because Pirate has not, to my knowledge, made a statement regarding his Ponzosity.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

You and your ilk are not fooling anyone.

Your arguments aren't... compelling. Coherence usually helps.

[dog and pony show]


Did you go to night school to learn to talk like that?

Demand for the impossible proof of a negative is a reliable gambit for the conman and also assuages the bedeviling consciences of the naively complicit (and there are many of those, indeed).

[wet fart]

Obviously, much evidence exists that this is a ponzi scheme [as in exhibits literally each and every characteristic of a ponzi scheme], and the lack of any evidence to counter is sufficient for appropriate branding.

[squeaky fart]


See the above link.

*processing payment* *error 404 : funds not found*
Do you want to complain on the forum just to fall for another scam a few days later?
| YES       |        YES |
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 574

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.


View Profile WWW
August 10, 2012, 10:37:41 PM
 #553

Maged: I have a proof that this is a ponzi. But I will not tell ya, coz people who dug it up did not give me permission.
I made no such assertion. I was merely saying that we had proof that imsaguy's claim that pirate is discouraging deposits and is being effective in doing do is patently false. Of course this was the case, because apparently the discouraging hasn't started.
He's penalizing deposits as well as withdrawals.  How many times do I have to say this before you actually acknowledge it?
You can say it all you want, because the unofficial audit team has irrefutable proof that this is absolutely not the case. For example, despite growing over 10% per week, BitcoinMax is still making 7.7% per week in interest.

The rules don't take effect until the middle of the month...
Weird that you never brought that up... Well, guess we now know what is happening on the 14th...

Did you miss the posting where Pirate said trust accounts are pushed back?  I didn't think I had to regurgitate public knowledge.  Contrary to public opinion, I don't have some special access to Pirate and only know what he announces to everyone else.

Coming Soon!™ © imsaguy 2011-2013, All rights reserved.

EIEIO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60117.0

Shades Minoco Collection Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65989
Payment Address: http://btc.to/5r6
miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 10:41:20 PM
 #554

<Pure ignorance>

You're giving Atlas a run for being the most obnoxious troll around.

Ignore.
gene
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 10:52:50 PM
 #555

<Pure ignorance>

You're giving Atlas a run for being the most obnoxious troll around.

Ignore.

I'll say this for Atlas: at least he wasn't an eager participant in the biggest bitcoin fraud to date.

*processing payment* *error 404 : funds not found*
Do you want to complain on the forum just to fall for another scam a few days later?
| YES       |        YES |
gene
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 11:00:45 PM
 #556


Ad hominem. If you want to contribute anything of substance, you need to have comprehension of the dynamics I'm talking about. The critical concepts:

Capital flow

Stock to flow ratio

Video discussing S:F

Everyone is concentrated exclusively on the stock, which not where the action is. The margins are where the flow becomes most important, and also where the profit is gained. It's very similar to hydraulics, where a marginal effort amplifies results.

Woah, that's really interesting, I didn't knew about those dynamics.

I'm a newbie at that sort of thing, here's a theory coming from my ass, tell me if I'm wrong:
So, the value of pirate business is not about how many BTC he have, but how many BTC he can circulate between USD and BTC? If BTC was a water tank, it is not about how big is the water tank, but mainly how big are the pipes?

[...]




Did I understood correctly? Or I'm completely wrong?

More info for this amazing investment opportunity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfW0ke4bwI4

*processing payment* *error 404 : funds not found*
Do you want to complain on the forum just to fall for another scam a few days later?
| YES       |        YES |
totaleclipseofthebank
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 11:13:51 PM
 #557

Clearly, Pirate is recirculating the flows of the gross BTCUSD capital-flow ratios through a proprietary securities algorithmic trading process by which the future net present value discounted interest rate is projected onto present equity value market-velocity parameters!

Thanks, it all makes so much sense now!

also xfd at the scuba

AMBROSUS

..................................`.-://█oo█████████████████o█/:-...................................
............................`.:/██████████████████████████████████████:.............................
.........................-:███████████████//:-..````..-:/█████████████████/-`.......................
....................`-:█████████/:████:-`..`.-://////::-`.``-█████████████████/.....................
.................`-/███████/-.`.`.--.``.:██████████████████/-``.████/.-/█████████/..................
..............`-/██████/-.`..-██:..../████:.``........``-/█████-.`:███:..`./████████/`..............
.............:██████/-`....`/██-`.-███/.`..................`-████:.`/███....`.:████████-............
.........../█████/-`.......██/`..███:`.........`....`.........`/███...███-......./███████-..........
........./█████:.`........██/`.-██/`.........-████████/`.........███:.`███-.......`-███████-........
.......:█████:`.........`██/`.:██:.........`████████████-........./██/.`███...........███████-......
....`:█████:`.........../██`.-██:..........██████████████`........./██:.`███............███████`....
..../████:..............██-.`███...........██████████████`..........███`.████:............██████:...
.`:████/................██`.-██............██████████████............██:`█████`............:██████`.
`/████:`................``../██`............████████████`...........`███./███/..............`██████`
`█████................./██:./██..............`████████-..............███..``.................-█████.
../████-`.............█████.:██`..............████████/.............`██/..██:..............`/█████-.
..`:████/.............-████`.██:.............██████████.............:██-..██:.............-██████...
....-█████/............`███..███.............██████████............`███..███`............██████/`...
.....`:█████/...........:██-.`███`...........██████████/..........`███`.-██/...........███████......
......../█████/.`........███...███..........████████████..........███...███........`-███████-.......
........../██████-`......`███-.`███/`.......████████████.......`/███`.-███`......`:███████-.........
............/██████/-`....`/██/`.-███/......................../███:.`/███`....`-████████-...........
.............`:████████-`...-███-``:████/.`..............`.:████:`..███-...`-████████/..............
................-█████████/-``/███:`../██████:--.....-:██████/..``.`/:``./█████████-`...............
..................`-███████████/█████:```-/██████████████/-`.`-███:.:███████████-`..................
......................./█████████████████:.`````....`````.:█████████████████/.......................
...........................:████████████████████████████████████████████:...........................
..............................`.:/████████████████████████████████/-................................
......................................`.-://███████████//::-.`......................................


TRUSTED QUALITY OF FOOD & MEDICINE
  Bitcointalk | Web | Bounty | Blog | Twitter | Facebook
ICO date 13 September
BorderBits
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 275


View Profile
August 11, 2012, 12:18:53 AM
 #558

Quote
Did I understood correctly? Or I'm completely wrong?

The latter.  Dude is running a Ponzi scheme. 
Serge
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050


View Profile
August 11, 2012, 12:29:40 AM
 #559

Your arguments aren't... compelling. Coherence usually helps.

If you want a Kardashian dog & pony show, you won't get it from me. Ignorance prevents you from connecting the dots and engaging in any argument of substance. Read the links to expand your knowledge.

A buyer at $5 may be a seller at $10. New entrants may be buyers at $10 and sellers at $9. In either situation, supply is replenished and available for acquisition to be redirected as return for investors. Everyone is looking at the total amount of BTC in existence rather than the churn at the margin, where holders of bitcoins sell, reintroducing flow into the market. Once more - that flow becomes fodder to be picked up and supplied to Pirate & investors. There is a recirculating dynamic.

Get it? No? Read the links again. Then read them a third, fourth, and fifth time. Sleep on it. Read it again. Read through my explanations in this thread again. Not an easy concept to wrap your head around when you're stuck in the fiat world, is it? Keep reading.

To help, study the difference between cash/physical market pricing and derivative-driven pricing of underlying assets (esp. options & futures). Bitcoin is almost entirely a cash/physical market, and its stock to flow ratio works nearly identically to gold.



Ad hominem. If you want to contribute anything of substance, you need to have comprehension of the dynamics I'm talking about. The critical concepts:

Capital flow

Stock to flow ratio

Video discussing S:F

Everyone is concentrated exclusively on the stock, which not where the action is. The margins are where the flow becomes most important, and also where the profit is gained. It's very similar to hydraulics, where a marginal effort amplifies results.

Woah, that's really interesting, I didn't knew about those dynamics.

I'm a newbie at that sort of thing, here's a theory coming from my ass, tell me if I'm wrong:
So, the value of pirate business is not about how many BTC he have, but how many BTC he can circulate between USD and BTC? If BTC was a water tank, it is not about how big is the water tank, but mainly how big are the pipes?

I'm starting to understand. BTC <-> USD flow is somewhat jammed, because the pipes between them are too small. You can't purchase 100 000 BTC without blowing up the price on Mt. Gox, and we can forget about the smaller exchanges. You're stuck moving small amount of BTC because the flow BTC <-> USD have a limit.

So pirate, with his business, found a way to make fucking big pipes, to have a big flow between USD and BTC. His money is made, not on the amount of BTC he have, but on the amount of BTC he can move. His pipe have a maintenance cost (the 7%/week), so, if somebody want to use his big pipe, he simply charges more money to cover his cost of using the pipe.

His current BTC stock is probably relatively small, something toward 10% to 20% of the BTC lend. He can pay interest and withdrawal with relative ease, since he has that big fucking pipe that move big amount of USD - BTC really fast. That's why he's telling he will repay everybody, since he can move USD - BTC really easily. Probably that if you would look at the blockchain, you would find the BTC tank almost empty and wonder where is the money. But pirate capacity is not in having a lot of BTC in the same address, it's his capacity to move money around. Even a blockchain analysis would be flawed, since you're looking at only one side of the pipe (the BTC side) and you don't have the data on the other side (the USD side).

At the end, pirate would never have all the BTC in existence, even if it last 10 years, because he's not stocking them. The interest are a representation of how much money is flowing through his business. If he generates 100 000 000 000 BTC in interest, it's because those BTC, at a certain period of time, used the pirate pipe.

Did I understood correctly? Or I'm completely wrong?


very interesting. thanks  Smiley
miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


View Profile
August 11, 2012, 12:34:12 AM
 #560

A buyer at $5 may be a seller at $10. New entrants may be buyers at $10 and sellers at $9. In either situation, supply is replenished and available for acquisition to be redirected as return for investors. Everyone is looking at the total amount of BTC in existence rather than the churn at the margin, where holders of bitcoins sell, reintroducing flow into the market. Once more - that flow becomes fodder to be picked up and supplied to Pirate & investors. There is a recirculating dynamic.
I already brought this up.  Clearly it isn't a compelling argument.  Roll Eyes

Yeah, nothing like a closed mind to make you want to leave the sheep behind. At least some can maintain a productive discussion.

So, the value of pirate business is not about how many BTC he have, but how many BTC he can circulate between USD and BTC? If BTC was a water tank, it is not about how big is the water tank, but mainly how big are the pipes?
very interesting. thanks  Smiley

Yup, the pipes analogy is great. Smiley
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!