If there are no other sources backing up what Tuttosport said I won't believe it. Tuttosport is something that you don't really want to pay attention too especially when it comes to news about Serie A. Almost 90% of the transfers they are reporting are all just rumors at best. They have a habit of getting the hopes up for fans who follow Serie A teams and they don't really care about it. Just search Paul Pogba's name right now in Google and you will see that there is really no official news about it as of the moment.

Ayy ngayon ko lang ito napansin kasi usually pag nagcacashout ako diretso na kaagad ako sa “payment profile” ng bangko ko, di sya lumilitaw pag di mo pinili yung “bank” na option. So I can also confirm na may instapay feature nga sya may gastos nga lang na 10 pesos and nagpapapanget pa ng cash out method ng Coins.ph ngayon is yung kailangan mo pa iconvert yung BTC mo to PHP na dati hindi naman.

@OP nice workaround for the long direct bank withdrawal process meron ang coins.ph di lang sya matagal may time limit pa sya kada bangko. Actually naghahanap na talaga ako ng alternative para sa pang emergency funds ko dahil matagal ng offline/di available ang Cardless withdrawal para sa Security Bank, never ko na itong nakitang nag online. Yung masasabi ko lang na hassle dito is yung dagdag na verification process sa globe na parang dadaan ka sa two wallets para lang maka withdraw ng pera. I'm still hoping that coins.ph will improve their bank withdrawal methods and make it instant like Gcash or kahit hanggang midnight man lang hahaha.

Big CEOs like this one are have either good or bad opinion for cryptocurrencies. The one saying bad opinion and negative comments don't really want anything to do with the crypto industry. The ones saying favorable opinions and positive comments are the ones which has plans on being involved with the industry or at least just at the least the blockchain technology behind it. It's that too obvious for this guys, just take a look at Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk they are very vocal with crypto and they are also involved with the industry. Don't be surprised if Forbes would have some kind of partnership with a project soon or have a blockchain system part of their business it's inevitable to happen when CEOs and owners of businesses are into crypto.

Since UNICEF's headquarters is situated in the City of New York I immediately went back to the rules of the BitLicense being required for the New York residents and businesses before they can even be involved in the crypto industry and I was surprise that they are not covered by such requirement since they will be receiving cryptocurrencies as a form of donation which is not covered by the BitLicense requirement. So maybe the city of New York have seen this coming or maybe UNICEF was part of the plan all along. I just hope that they have given the same treatment for their own residents conducting normal activities related to cryptocurrencies because they are treating them like a corporation conducting a big business in the crypto industry.

I was away for a while in BCT and when I just opened the forum TalkStar's pm greeted me that I have a flag coming from the two accounts of Hatch Support (the other being Hatch Exchange) but after visiting my trust page that's when I realized I have nothing to worry about because I really got surprised that other members have opposed the two flags given to me even without me posting the links here. I just want to say thank you that you have agreed on my findings on the case that started this flag spree of Hatch Support and for having my back.

Do you mean the .05$ drop to CND/USD compared to last year? I wouldn't even consider that a big of a drop and the Canadian Dollar is really playing closely to .80$ as it moves around .76 to .78 to a USD. Maybe you could expound a little bit on your explanation why a fiat currency would go up when the rest of the economy would fall down? I just don't see in anyway how a fiat currency would be successful when it depends really on the economy of the country that being said you must know that a big reflection on that economy also is the performance of all of their domestic companies not to mention other industries as well.

Isn't a fake identity for your CEO running the "project" already a scam enough? If you are a true project you wouldn't be hiding or faking anything since you aren't afraid to show who you are on representing your project. And what requested proof are you talking about? What will be your reason this time why you have another man's picture for your team member? Is it another one of those excuses where one of your team member have accidentally put someone else's picture? I really don't buy that shit anymore therefore you will be receiving a red tag from me and the only thing that will convince me is a video of your real Ceo explaining the project with proof of his identification

Well that sucks I didn't really expect that Marco Giampaolo will get the axe this early in the season and even if he did I was hoping for Spalletti for be the one to replace him but what do we get? A guy who is managing another troubled team which is Stefano Pioli. I really didn't get the logic out of this one especially when Spalletti was just waiting for Inter's approval to officially sign with Milan. This was really a mistake and I really have tiny bit of hope that this Pioli guy could turn some things around, if he don't then I know that the only solution for Milan and Elliot Management is rebuilding the team from ground up. Oh and to make this news worst for Milan fans Silvio Berlusconi has been part of the decision on sacking Giampaolo, even if he doesn't own the team anymore he still finds ways of ruining it.

The Canadian dollar will be strong yet the Canadian Stock Market will go down? How will that be possible if both depended on the same economy. Canadian companies are inside their stock market and it's a big reflection on how it can boost their economy which is also affecting the price of their own fiat currency. It's simple if either their stock market or fiat currency is down then both of them will somehow be affected by one another, there is no inverse relationship possible in this scenario when both are just translating what their current economy is.

Done, I actually have forgotten to edit my main post after creating a flag thank you for reminding it for me.


Oh please, any legit project would have replied with a team info and a reason why they have a plagiarized whitepaper. In your case you are just blaming me for finding out the scam in your project.

He ain't a pure point guard in my opinion and it's pretty evident when you watch playoff games when he is the one carrying down the ball. He will always try to force plays if not his only option is not to pass the ball but the drive and score a point, the whole point of having a team is absent when he tries to play point guard in this situations. Just take a look on this one on how he tried to look for a play but he didn't notice that the ball was already rolling out of bounds, I mean would you really be confident enough to make him carry the ball when Rondo is around?

I also have created a flag for people who agrees with my findings on EARTHS project. The bottom line is this project aims to provide a universal basic income to its participants yet they have no team information, no addresses and contacts shown, as well as a heavily plagiarized whitepaper. This project recently woke up without any kinds of updates about the development of their project.

This thread isn't really about the trust system at all but in fact about the recently given negative feedback to you, @marcotheminer IMO you shouldn't have covered that loan in the first place as DadyD already admitted that he is just doing that to "increase his trust" and his original reason for the loan which is to "invest" isn't really true, he is just technically paying .0003 BTC just to get a positive trust rating. Aside from being a newbie he also lied with his first attempt to transact in BCT, you should have backed out from it when you saw that post already.

From what I personally notice with the clipboard/copy and paste virus it only gives you a similar address only to the first few characters of your own address sometimes also the last few characters at the end of your address are also similar as well. But if you look at the middle part you will see that there is no similarity at all in fact they are completely different. For people that has known and used their address for a long time now you can immediately spot the differences. I do recommend people trying it out on there Windows pc if they have the clipboard virus by just simply trying to copy/paste the address you have so that you are always aware that your pc is clean from that malware.
 

He tried to sell his account on a year when account selling wasn't even a thing and he did posted it on his account, nutildah, which only says that he ain't an account seller. Like how other DT members views it they only tag account seller that are just account farmers who basically are just here selling off other farmed accounts to make a living. Based on the archived you gave and how nutildah is still posting today it only means the account wasn't sold at all so basically a sale didn't even happen, there was only an attempt to do so.

Don't you think the best way to handle this kinds of "innovative" project is to have a team that you personally know. Sharing your idea/plan with telegram on strangers even the professionals would just increase the likelihood that they will steal your ideas away from you other than that they can also scam you with your money and recovering them won't be easy at all. There are really no guarantees on having a project being developed online since you really don't know the person you are working for. Just try to look for a team locally as I know there will be a lot of them, the more you know the person who you are working with the more it will be easier to communicate with one another.

Gawa na din siguro yan ng madaming factors like yung pwesto ng business nila and ng kung anong binibenta nila. Di man sa minamaliit ko sila pero matatawag mong parang bangketa lang yung shop nila and di mo naman i-eexpect na mga Bitcoin users yung bibili sa shop nila. They have a good payment method for the wrong audience since hindi mo naman talaga masasabi na hodlers ng crypto yung mga bibili ng charger, sim, cellphone sa mga ganyang shop. The good thing is may option sya nun and sana lang di nag-eexpect yung may-ari ng shop na yan na malaki sa customer base nya ang magbabayad sa crypto.

Ever since the growth of the crypto industry what I have noticed is that the most of the governments have been open-minded with the industry and thankfully they have actually separated the crimes being committed using crypto and crypto itself. Back then you will see bans taking place as the ultimate solutions related to crypto crimes happening but now when a considerable amount of people are involved which is using crypto on regular activities not related to any illicit activities. It's too late for them to make ban as a solution especially when countries like Japan and South Korea and even particular companies like Samsung are taking advantage of the crypto industry. A ban as a solution for them would just mean a step backwards that can ruin an economical opportunity for them.

What happened:: EARTHS who claims to give a Universal Basic Income for its participants provided a plagiarized whitepaper on their Github page while at the same time. They have also not provided any kind of team information ever since they have created their ANN thread.

Scammers Profile Link: Hatch Support
Known Affiliates: Earths Team

Reference Link:

ANN Thread [Archived]
Website [Archived]
Whitepaper [Archived]

FLAG LINK :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=827

Additional Notes:

Note # 1 : Plagiarized Whitepaper
Although they have referenced other sources for their whitepaper not of the plagiarized content have been referenced because it came from another project namely WAVES which most of their content came from it. One of the worst plagiarisms I have ever seen in a whitepaper since they just basically replaced the words "WAVES/ WAVES platform" to "EARTHS/ EARTHS platform". You can see WAVES' whitepaper here (any direct links would be appreciated so I can replace my source).

Example #1



Example #2 Even their footnotes are the same



Example #3 Like I said there footnotes/reference links are the same and even their ending conclusion


Note # 2 : No Team
Aside from their project having no team they have evaded answering the question several times already in their ANN thread and instead answer differently compared to the questions asked by other members. For a project that aims to provide financial support to it's participants but eagerly does not disclosed any of its team members is just really a big red flag.