If you are thinking about Bitcoin had made a reversal then think again since this might just be a bull trap and  some whales might just be pumping the market. I would still observe the market and see where will Bitcoin will go since 8,266$ isn't on any support level right and the next known support is around 8,500$+. And just by looking at the chary now its obvious that we are still in a bearish momentum any hints of a bull run are highly unlikely to happen.

Price increases on basic goods and needs are basically caused by inflation but you need to considere other factors why it had even increased in the first place. First look for the current inflation rate your country has if the rate ranges around 2 to 5% then it is considered healthy and its not one of the main factors why the prices went up secondly you can look at other factors such as tax increase most specifically excise taxes related to that product if an excise tax is issued on the most basic of the goods like gas then a lot of industries including housing can be affected.

It's too late for them now, even before this happened they have already accepted other fiat currencies in their country as a mode of payment but even that didn't stopped inflation in their country. Exploring on high risk high reward asset such as Bitcoin would be like a double-edged sword for then if they don't know how to trade it properly. But I'm still giving them the chance that they can still do something because if the current price level we are in, if they trade properly they might somehow earn something from it but it cannot really stop the hyperinflation they are experiencing.

Well it sucks that AC Milan got my hopes up against Torino but it sucks even more that they lost against Fioerentina who isn't even as strong compared to Torino. Now they look like a team who is more fit in the bottom table and as a fan I don't feel comfortable seeing them near that place. I don't know who or what can save them now if this kind of performance continues because even if they have spent millions during the last transfer window it doesn't look like they have even improved at all.

Misleading headline again and this time they have taken an important piece out of the context of the article. The exploit that was found from this iOS devices are from jailbroken devices only and that is the main issue why crypto wallets aren't safe to use from these kinds of devices. In the first place it's not even right to jailbreak your device and it is one of the owners choice of doing so because just by doing it voids any kind of warranty claims from Apple, Jailbreaking your own iOS device is just exploiting it to unlock some restricted features as well as download paid apps for free. Just by that description you already know that there will be some certain issues that comes with it and there is really no guarantee that your device will still be 100% protected once jailbroken.

If the text was created after the date that text from Wikipedia was created then the permaban was wrongly placed but if it was the opposite and he literally just copied the content from Wikipedia then he did really commit plagiarism on his part. And since that the edit history was in Russian I can't really confirm nor deny what post came first whether it was from kolinyaka or from Wikipedia, but judging how the post was copied word for word I doubt that kolinyaka did create his own post and I really doubt that someone just edited a Wikipedia page just to make him look like a plagiarizer here in the forum.

Ang unang concern lang naman talaga kaya nawala yung Yobit sa Bitcointalk nung unang re-launch nila dahil sa contribution ng spam ng mga members nito, may mga ilang members din nito ay nag pla-plagiarize. Now with yahoo being the one checking the quality of posts from each participant may masasabi na tayong control sa spam na makikita sa forum, once na nakita ni yahoo na bumaba yung quality ng member then maaari nya itong tanggalin. It's really a good thing that a trusted signature manager is managing this campaign that has no limits with its participants kasi may magbaback na sakanilang reputable member.

The thing is a DT member can come up with his own opinion on how s/he issues his negative feedback to someone, it would be good if some DT members views the situation the same way but there won't really be anything bad if they don't share the same opinion on the matter. Their power to paint red and green on to anyone's account is still their own decision on how he sees the rules and if it applies on the situation. I've seen this in a lot of cases mostly related to alt accounts being connected through a wallet and they still have varying opinions on whether or not those accounts are worthy of their own red tag. After all the trust system isn't moderated and the power of the DT is given by other members trusting that person in the forum there is really no rule about them coming up on an agreement on how they would tag a person based on any given situation.

Aside from Barcelona having the game at home Inter as well didn't have a good start in the Champions League they only manage to came out with a draw against Slavia Praha and they were lucky that they got that last minute goal to get the draw. That kind of luck won't work with Barcelona at home and they need to do their best like they are just playing a match in Serie A where their performance is at best. This would be a deciding factor where Inter will be in the table and this 2nd match for them will determine if they will continue in the knock out phase especially when all teams in their group are all with 1 point only.

Thirty minutes left before the match officially starts and although a lot of people think that it will go to a draw I still think that Milan has a slight edge over here even though that almost all of their previous matches came into a draw the Milan team Torino will be facing now is completely different compared last season in terms of new transfers they have. I am honestly bias with my opinion since I am a Milan fan but as a fun you'd expect your team to win every match and that is what I am hoping for as soon as the match starts.

I doubt that is what causing Coinbase on having an inaccurate calculation on your taxes. If the inflows of the intial cryptocurrencies is the the problem why don't they just create a software where they leave out the succeeding transactions from the trades of their clients and the user itself will be the one inputting the value they have bought the cryptos for. It's a simple solution where the clients only have to do one thing and that is to apply the purchase cost of their crypto. There will be no time wasted for both sides if this happens.

Since we broke down from the symmetrical triangle our last line of defense here is really 7,900$ which is just around the EMA 50 moving average. If we don't recover at the price soon and we retest the 7,900$ support level and BTC failed then expect it to go down as far as the 7,200$ which is the next know support level for Bitcoin. Right now I don't see any indicators pointing out another sell off will happen but I won't get too complacent on BTC not retesting the EMA 50 level.

I'm with bitmover on this one, I'll rather suggest this site for education purposes only but I wouldn't recommend anyone using it to create their private keys. 256 outcomes for a hacker is like an hour or two of his life before he can crack an operating wallet which the outcomes for the private keys will come directly from your website. I would rather prefer the private keys being generated by the wallet itself because I know that I'm the only one who have seen or now the combination of my own private key.

If you look the reason why you will see that AC Milan's dominance feel in a deep decline you will see that the owners are the ones at fault here. It all started when Berlusconi got greedy and started to sell their top stars like Ibra and Thiago Silva and after they made money he almost kept all of it for himself and didn't find any replacements for them they still in continued to offload a lot of their players and they didn't became competitive since then. After that they had a lot of financial issues and we bounced off to two other owners before Elliot Management bought of the team. This will be a slow rebuild but I know we are in the proper hands now and I hope they get it right this time before AC Milan's name becomes just a legend in World Football.

Have you registered anything about establishing your own business with your government for you to trade? If the answer is no then you already know the answer you are looking for. In trading the most they can ask for you is KYC while if you want to put up a business then the process would entirely be different which will require you to have licenses and permits depending on what type your business you are building up. In trading even on stocks or foreign exchange what you earn is not income the gains you will receive or profit from it are capital gains which has a different tax compared to income. If you still insist of making it into a "business" then I don't see any benefit from it since income taxes are considerably higher compared to capital gains tax.

What a dumb fine made by NBA again, I really don't get the point on why they would give a fine on plan for a player they already have. It's like just saying their plans for the future for their own players I don't see how they violated anything especially when it is still the off season and Giannis is already half way done to his contract. I believe I have seen similar news about opinions from the GMs and the owners but I didn't see any reports of a fine that followed after making the comment. I don't know if this is a new rule or they really have favorites within the NBA.

Doubt that news outlets can create a FUD so fast that it can make miners bail out by this fast. I'm talking about here is that miners being traders in the crypto industry after all miners are not only mining Bitcoin for a living they also trade their Bitcoin in the market and they can make loads of cash by shorting it. They won't create FUD in the market through news but through the lost in hash rate they made in the market which is very effective seeing on the price we have now. I'm just looking all the possibilities here and miners cashing out big by creating FUD is one of them.

The price dip we have experienced today is more related to the 40% drop in hash rate we have in Bitcoin mining and even that is a questionable even on why it had dropped that big too fast. Aside from the date on where the news is posted and when the price dropped happened I doubt that the news about quantum computers didn't even reached to the headlines in the crypto industry, even if there are news about it there wasn't a lot of noise for it to begin with.

Could it that a big group of miners agreed to each to suddenly stop their operations in unison so that they can create a market scare? Of course it is one of the big possibilities out their since I don't see any good explanation how it would dropped that fast, I don't see any notable calamities that had struck any major countries that are big on crypto mining so that couldn't explain the drop. Other thing I see is that a lot of miners are the first ones to bail out on the industry when they think it was bearish, when they are the ones who have triggered it in the first place. It did took a way a lot of market confidence from a lot of people given the price on what we have now.

Lets be real pay rates shouldn't be moderated in the forum it's like forcing out a budget for any willing projects wanting to promote here in the forum. High payments does not equate to higher quality post because the two things are totally irrelevant so what if someone is paying .01 BTCs for Legendaries and .05 BTCs on another project? Does it gives assurance that the ones being paid double will give twice the quality of posts in the forum? It doesn't. If you want a realistic approach then you should request that the campaign managers here in the forum has a commitment on moderating each members part of their campaign and monitor the quality of their post each time they count it, its the best thing to see if the members part of their campaign are actually worth it of what they are paying for.