Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:14:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 ... 841 »
1461  Economy / Reputation / Re: I've been hacked (Electrum 4.3.2) on: June 21, 2023, 03:02:50 PM
With the greatest respect to everybody here especially to the OP, I think he should consider locking the thread and letting it move down the page listings. We can all see he has repaid the amounts that were involved and both affected businesses (Coinomize and YoMix) have moved on too therefore if the reputation of the OP is intact then he should probably consider locking this thread.
1462  Other / Meta / Re: My password was changed on this forum on: June 20, 2023, 10:42:21 PM
Well, the OP used an address today when applying to join a signature campaign. He used an address he has used previously for joining signature campaigns: bc1qalv6lg6qt7g72jx35th694zzfa98gc6d9zm0w5

He should be able to sign this address otherwise he would not have applied to join another campaign with it today therefore in this particular instance would it really matter?

Today when I tried to login, my  old password was not working. Was my account hacked ? Do I need to worry about it.

I was able to reset password as email was not changed.

Can you sign a message using an address you posted a while ago ? You can use the below format  Grin

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
My account krishnaverma is OK and I have no more issues. The current date is <date>
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
<insert address here>
<insert signature here>
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----


1463  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: 1XBIT SCAMMED for 30.69mBTC on: June 20, 2023, 10:12:58 PM
If you received back your total deposited funds but did not receive any winnings (because they were contested by 1xbit/1xbit1) then that is something of an event for you hold on to. Such is the scale of allegations regarding selective scamming by 1xbit/1xbit1 that it would be easy to forget things but reading they actually returned deposited funds after they alleged fraud in the first place, it really is not a common move by them.

You should be happy you managed to get something back from them because not many people do.

UPDATE while writing this: It seems that I can log into my account again, they refunded all my bets and I have only deposit amount of my account.
So basically they stole 28.69mBTC, everything I made over this day they decided to not pay me out, I bet on 7 events at all and every bet got refunded, I did not use any software or I did not abuse any bug with odds, most of bets were live-bets based on what I saw watching cs:go matches.
1464  Economy / Reputation / Re: I've been hacked (Electrum 4.3.2) on: June 20, 2023, 09:58:55 PM
Congratulations, it must be a very big stress and pressure finally off your shoulders to be told you are no longer liable to be paying funds for the hack. The fact that you and Coinomize have also settled the issue is truly remarkable. From being in the dire situation you were in when the funds were no longer in your wallet (to where you find yourself today), it is a day for you to be proud of.

You may have unfortunately lost one of the two to a competitor campaign manager but at least you carried on managing one of them.

Rather than simply walk away from the issues in the aftermath of the incident you posted about it to inform us and then you made amends by repaying those that initially trusted you with their funds before they went missing therefore congratulations once again.

I just received a piece of great news from the Yo!Mix team.
I honestly do not know how to phrase it so I am just going to quote what they've said here.

Quote
i mean lets consider the case is closed, we no longer need payments from you for that hack



While this is unprecedented, I can wholeheartedly say that it's news I welcome with open arms.
I'm not gonna lie, these past few months have been a struggle trying to keep up with the reimbursements, and judging by my slow pace, it might even take more than a year for me to fulfill the full reimbursement for Yo!Mix.
So far, I have only been able to reimburse $1347 worth of BTC.

The generosity of both Coinomize and Yo!Mix team for understanding my situation and what had happened; I am forever in their debt.
The same goes for numerous members of this forum who pushed me not to give up.

Thank you.
1465  Economy / Reputation / Re: 'John Abraham ≈ naim027' Coincidence or Connection? on: June 20, 2023, 09:47:18 PM
As the John Abraham is no longer in a signature campaign the person using the account will probably let it fade away soon because if it cannot generate any income (or money) for the person controlling the account, it will be of no use.

That at the very least is one positive to appear from this thread that naim027 was posting using strong religious beliefs as a way of conducting himself as well posting complete paradoxical explanations certain opposite conduct. Add to the compulsive lying and attempted manipulations along with the using of profanities then it is a reminder of the reasons why he was distrusted by many members (and it was not just because he had many alt-accounts).
1466  Other / Meta / Re: Please permaban naim027 on: June 20, 2023, 09:33:45 PM
Somethings to say, first of all i think the forum NEEDS to ban the Naims account the most fast as possible because he is going to make new accounts (or maybe he has a few more in the shadows) and its gonna send all the smerits remaining in that accounts to the farm.
Without a doubt the moderators should take a tough stance against him and ban him then look at banning his known alt-accounts too.

I think they are exploiting the generosity of some users, we can see a ton of accounts from the south asian (indonesia/Bangladesh) and Nigeria, who are making this movement of multiplir between them the merits.
There are many good members that from local boards you mentioned therefore it would be difficult to support the theory you have about merit abuse but on the subject of naim027 I think the moderators should have kept the original ban.

First they have some good or primary account, who took merits from serious post, second their have a secondary account or third account and when a pizza or pumpking event appears they op up and collect all the merits in a big ammount from very reputed merits sources.
After that they go to the "ladder" of local board and redistribuied the merits between them.

So like Naim are a few guys behind some accounts.

How you can detect them? Easy, you can see they have a very low activity but a very high merits (they have like 1 activity 1 merit rate). And when you see from where that merits comes its allways the same, pizza BTC or events related, local boards redistribution of merits, beg for merits on the threads when you can put your best posts/threads and received merits to reach X rank.

Obviusly im not putting all in the same box, i know we have some very usefull users here who makes a big effort and really good post, but for example the account of LDL i was following that account for farming a lot of merits, and ended up being one more account of naim......

So in resume their break the rule of not share merits between your own accounts and also exploit the generosity of the communitty to give them merits in the contests.
You are right they have been exploiting the generosity of the community for far too long but as long as the process of banning and then possibly removing the ban on appeal is concerned, it gives hope to account farmers that even their banned accounts stand a small chance of reprieve.

Thank you for not putting all members that are posting particular threads (and in particular boards) in the same box.
1467  Economy / Reputation / Re: 'John Abraham ≈ naim027' Coincidence or Connection? on: June 20, 2023, 03:28:12 PM
Blah, blah, blah.

This is my answer:

That is a good answer considering the circumstances Grin

I know Royse777 had a good relationship with naim027 and probably still does, but the rest of us can't view the latter through the former's eyes.  Homeboy naim027's actions and words made in public are all we can go by, and it does seem like he's probably got a stable of alt accounts that have yet to be sniffed out.  Luckily the forum detectives can be as persistent and focused as an Adderall-sniffing, crack smoking fiend who can only pay extremely close attention to one thing, i.e., one or more of them is gonna be laser-focused on finding those alt accounts.  And they will, I've no doubt.
From time to time some alt-account or another belonging to naim027 will eventually be found out and tagged, you are right about that. Whatever the real relationship between them it does not interest many of us here, they both can trust each other as much as they want but most of distrust one because of his compulsive lying and farmed alt-accounts while the other one has outgrown his ego and shown levels of increasing narcissism as he began managing multiple signature campaigns.

Personally, I trust neither of them.
1468  Other / Meta / Re: Please permaban this scumbag. on: June 19, 2023, 06:02:04 PM
Honestly, this is a piss poor excuse for administration/moderators. It would take 1 hour max to review this case. The guy admitted his alts and ban evasion, CASE CLOSED. They fucked up unbanning him and don't wanna look foolish, or just being lazy about it.
If they thought he was that much of a problem they probably would have banned (again) him by now and added all of his known alt-accounts to the ban list too. Maybe they do not see him as too much of a nuisance but I would request they re-evaluate their decision.

Bump.

Honestly, this is a piss poor excuse for administration/moderators. It would take 1 hour max to review this case. The guy admitted his alts and ban evasion, CASE CLOSED. They fucked up unbanning him and don't wanna look foolish, or just being lazy about it.

Why does everyone act like admins and mods are toooooo busy and running multi billion dollar corporations? Most are regular people not too busy doing much of anything.

I agree 100%.

Mods, theymos, we are still waiting for a reply on why the rules have not been applied in this case. He is now engaged, again, in trying to manipulate people in the Reputation section. As if it wasn't enough that when he gets banned he continues to create alts, to leave his main account active and go around messing around even more.
I hope the moderators actually look at what is being said in these previous posts and hope they will take action because naim027 and his known alt-accounts are not productive to the wider community.
1469  Other / Meta / Re: Ban Appeal For DiMarxist on: June 19, 2023, 05:53:41 PM
I am against lifting the ban too regardless of the OP citing begging for mercy. I wonder how many accounts the OP is using in the forum.

This is yet another example (as you put it) of paradoxical conduct. What has to be said is that it is not the only post that shows the strange manner in which the mind of some people works.

Another so-called Marxist, who has not read Marx's ideas and if he has read them he has not understood them. For Marx religion is the opium of the people, a consequence of the material conditions and the organization of private property, which according to him would eventually disappear as societies move towards the dictatorship of the proletariat. In other words, using Dimarxist as a nickname and appealing to God as he is doing is paradoxical to say the least.

That aside, I do not support a lift to the ban. I don't quite see how a half year old account that has been plagiarizing like this can have any significant, positive importance to the forum.
1470  Other / Meta / Re: Ban Appeal For DiMarxist on: June 18, 2023, 10:41:23 PM
So he actually knew what he was doing and even pointed out the post that he was sure could have led to his ban. What is worse is trying to lie that it was a one-off mistake. This is clearly not a mistake and there could be more posts he copied and paraphrased

Perhaps a lesson learned for OP, though a little too late now, since it's a permanent ban.
The OP has lost the DiMarxist account and it will be rendered useless as far as making any income from signature campaigns and bounties are concerned even if for reason the ban is lifted in future. This is most probably not his only account therefore it is safe to say he will concentrate on being far more careful with his remaining accounts as he tries to maximise income from bounties and signature campaigns.

If you think that a ban should be ended, make your case in a new topic from a "good for the forum as a whole" perspective.
Have mercy everyone. Please it will never happen and repeat itself again. Please I am on my knees. I use the Almighty God (Jesus Christ) to beg everyone. My fellow Christ and Muslim, and other Religions Brothers and Sisters please! Please!! Please!!! have mercy and forgive me as the Holy Bible and Qur'an also forgive Sins. It will never happen again. 🙏🙏🙏
I literally am speechless after reading this Grin

1471  Economy / Reputation / Re: 'John Abraham ≈ naim027' Coincidence or Connection? on: June 18, 2023, 10:28:07 PM
I can understand it most probably would be account strength in the hope of getting more merits for when he took the account to Legendary but why would he do it now when he is far from that goal?
I am not sure why that surprises you so much, that someone who is far away from Legendary rank (activity wise) wants to reach that 1k merit mark asap, or that he wants to keep farming merit. I mean, we all know more merit earned in 120 days often means better signature campaign so its only natural for account farmer to keep on farming merit in every possble way he can, and he became pretty decent at that. 
The Whirlwind signature campaign pays $125 with avatar for Snr Members and it moves to $150 for Legendary therefore I overlooked the crucial part. No doubt it would probably be the driving factor in this game of building up as many accounts as possible to be farmed to be used for either signature campaigns or for nefarious purposes.

Hello.
I am Seva from Paradice.in
Naim sent me a DM asking me to say something here.
I can only say that Naim and John worked for Paradice.in
John resigned on 26th March 2021. While Naim worked with us till 5th May 2023.
Both handled our BitcoinTalk profile. John handled our profile from 2020 to 2021, and Naim handled it from 2021 to 2023.
Naim asked me at least to say that they worked for us. Yes, they worked for us, and we never suspected they could be the same person. During their working time, they worked at different times while our support agents tried not to overlap.
A timely intervention from you therefore thank you for doing it (even if it was at the request of naim027) but all you have added by your own volition is that as far as you are concerned naim027 and John Abraham could effectively be the same person.

To clarify some things, John has been working with us since 2020 and resigned on March 2021. Naim worked for us from 2020 to 2023, and we had to remove him.

While we don't want to reveal anyone's nationality, John Speaks the native local languages of mine and the CEO.

John was getting more than 3x Salary than Naim when he resigned. It's not a good business for someone to leave the high-salary job and continue doing the same job for a 3x low salary. I don't think John could be Naim.

I have no idea if Naim was banned and if he has multiple accounts. I asked him today, and he said yes, he has. I am not an expert on Bitcointalk. We hire workers for their job. We don't know their personal life. This is non of our business being a crypto casino.

I am here on request of Naim. I am not here to prove anything. I just gave my statement, and it's official. If you don't believe me, I am sorry. I don't have time to convince anyone.
Another timely intervention from you once again at the request of naim027. In your opinion naim027 and John Abraham are not alt-accounts, we read it.

In theory: If anyone ask me to recommend Nain027 if he add me on his CV for reference then I don't think I am going to tell them anything negative as he worked very well in my business. I have no complain for the job he does for my service.

Oof. This guy obviously has no problem lying to anybody at any given time -- I'd think that would weigh on your decision to act as a reference for him. What would happen in the case that you vouched for him and then he went on to screw over a future employer?
The way naim027 and his alt-accounts have been operating in the forum, it seems at some point highly probable (if not inevitable) naim027 and his alt-accounts will do something like that but stranger things have happened.


Funny how this turned out to be somewhat prophetic:

I will create 100 more accounts as soon as I can.

I am certain he has more accounts currently at work but he'll be a bit more clever in masking them from hereon out.
Now that it is there in pixels on screen who can deny he ever said it? Having said that he is a compulsive liar and chief manipulator therefore would naim027 really stop at 100 alt-accounts or was he bluffing and would happily stop at 5,10 or 15?
1472  Economy / Reputation / Re: 'John Abraham ≈ naim027' Coincidence or Connection? on: June 17, 2023, 02:34:47 PM
What would you say to forum members (including myself) that are very much of thought that you are another accounts by naim027 and that you are making these comments to display a sign of anti-naim027 for misdirection and smokescreen purposes? Is there anything you can say that will give members any confidence in your conduct?

but why would he do it now when he is far from that goal?

I think the answer to this is very simple he did all of these simply because of Greed.

A liar and a cheat will never be satistified with what they have and will always seek more even if it involves deceiving others to get what they want.
1473  Economy / Reputation / Re: 'John Abraham ≈ naim027' Coincidence or Connection? on: June 17, 2023, 05:40:29 AM
The question is, how long will his manager keep him in the signature campaign? Lately it seems that he doesn't kick people out for a couple of red tags.
The name John Abraham has been removed from the spreadsheet since this current week began therefore he is no longer on the Whirlwind campaign.

As to why he would ask me for more merits....reputation-building, perhaps?  
Account strength building globally, I would say, because he already has enough merits for Hero member.

Now he is in the whirlwind campaign but if in the future the campaign ceases or whatever, if he is in the top merit earners he could access Royse777's campaigns that have the green zone, with similar payout, or custom deals.
The distance between Hero and Legendary ranks is huge and he was just about at Hero range with 500+ merits as long as he reached the correct Activity.

The part that confuses me is that since he was not in a position to become Legendary rank any time soon and he was also on his way to become Hero in due-course by simply remaining active (as he reached the 500 merits threshold), I cannot understand what was there in benefit for naim027 to ask for his John Abraham account to be reviewed for more merits.

I can understand it most probably would be account strength in the hope of getting more merits for when he took the account to Legendary but why would he do it now when he is far from that goal?
1474  Economy / Reputation / Re: 'John Abraham ≈ naim027' Coincidence or Connection? on: June 16, 2023, 07:02:03 PM
As to why he would ask me for more merits....reputation-building, perhaps?  And though he's in the highest-paying sig campaign he is 'only' a Sr. Member and I assume Whirlwind pays more for Hero/Legendary members, and even if they don't other campaigns do, so wanting to rank up and increase his available sig space makes sense.  Usually the motives around here come down to money, just as they do in the real world.
True, it is difficult to argue with that point, as far as members within the forum is concerned it does in most cases come to money just as it would in the real world. Ranking up to Legendary would be the ultimate goal as those ranks to in some campaigns earn more than Snr Member and Hero rank but why risk asking for posts reviews when maybe the one doing the reviewing might connect the style of writing with another member? Maybe it is just him believing he will not get caught out.

You've got a much better memory about these things than I do, but I don't recall ever having a personal problem with naim023 (back then, anyway).  I'll be following this situation and will be more vigilant with my merit-giving in the future, at least to the extent that I can identify alts.
Well, maybe your memory is not that good if you keep mentioned naim027 as naim023. We all know he had (and probably still has) many alt-accounts but from him to jumping from 027 to 023 would seriously insulting our collective intelligence  Grin

So, You are telling me; If I said I don't use Payoneer in the past, I should not use that for the rest of my life. Isn't it?
No one has said it here, but the interesting part is that you sold BTC to 'naim027' (your alt) two times before the 25th February, and took the payment in USD on PayPal. Where you said in your 25th February post that you don't use PayPal (pointed out by 'decodx' already). You are proving yourself as a liar on your every post now.
Well, this is another interesting point.

The problem with liars (especially compulsive liars such as naim027) is that they end up digging a hole too deep they cannot climb back out of it. One lie leads to another and then another and then another and then it snowballs in to something much bigger, so big that the chief architect of the lies forgets what he said and to whom as well as where he mentioned the lies.
1475  Economy / Reputation / Re: 'John Abraham ≈ naim027' Coincidence or Connection? on: June 16, 2023, 10:21:42 AM
There's no fakkin' way I'm handing out any merits to an alt account of someone who got banned for plagiarism and then tried to evade the ban.  I just want to be reasonably sure before I make a decision.
What exactly naim027 did was pushing the boundaries by being a chief manipulator as well as a compulsive liar but the matter did not stop there. The fact his ban was removed and then not banned again (after he started his nonsense again) is a failure by the moderators.

But yes, I realize I might be helping some alts to rank up and I've said as much to some members--no one who offers to review posts would know who's an alt of who unless it had already been made public, but I have been in the situation of having given a lot of merits to members who turned out to be malicious alts or plagiarists or what have you, and it sucks.

Got back from my errands, read the rest of this thread, and there's enough evidence for me to conclude that John Abraham is an alt of naim023, and I'm going to tag him after I write this for evading a ban and wasting my time and sMerits.  I'm usually suspicious of accounts that consist of a western-sounding first and last name, and I should have heeded that suspicion last time I did a review for him.  Ugh.
I remember how bad you felt when it was discovered the number of merits you awarded naim027 and his alt-accounts, especially after he wrote to you asking for you to review his post history.

I wonder why he would ask for you to review the post history on the John Abraham account when he was already participating in the highest paying signature campaign (whirlwind), maybe it was a mistake on his part to do that as he was already a Snr Member with 500+ merits and had no immediate need to try to rank up with urgency as it would have happened by itself over time. Strange.
1476  Economy / Reputation / Re: Mahdirakib Insight on: June 16, 2023, 09:03:20 AM
You have taken loan from naim027 a few times and paid them. Naim027 has used the interest from the loan to help poor people.
How sure are you that he has? Apart from naim027 claiming this how can you be so certain?

You have taken loan from naim027 a few times and paid them. Naim027 has used the interest from the loan to help poor people.

How interesting.

So, it turns out that naim027 is now a benefactor of humanity? Could you explain this better? Do you know him in person to be able to affirm it?
The way Little Mouse mentioned it, it was as though it was a statement of fact. I wonder why Little Mouse is so sure that naim027 is a philanthropist.

So he is a plagiarist, merit abuser, ban evader and account farmer, manipulator to the extreme, who gives loans to someone to bet. Mind you, he is not giving loans to found an ethical company, he is giving loans to someone to gamble, despite the fact that gambling is supposed to be a moral conflict with his religious beliefs. It is clear that it is not against his religious beliefs to be a known gambler recognized by him or to participate in gambling signature campaigns, as far as we can see. The case of naim027 is that of lying and open mouth. If you see him open his mouth and move it, he is lying.

And now it turns out that he used the interest to help the poor.

Can you explain this better, Little Mouse?
I hope he can explain it since he seems to be finding it believable.

As for naim027 sometimes he says he never asked for commission and some times he says he used interest as a means to help people in need. According to naim027 himself he gave out loans to people who wanted to use it to bet online and he received interest and not only that he then cited religious beliefs for not doing other gambling related work.

What cannot be denied is naim027 is a compulsive liar and it cannot be known when he tells the truth. Maybe even if some or part of what he wrote about his philanthropy is/was correct it will never be widely accepted or trusted within the forum.
1477  Economy / Reputation / Re: Mahdirakib Insight on: June 15, 2023, 10:46:02 PM
Listen, Mr. Jolly Fuck!
If this is the best he can do I guess there in no need to even read any replies from naim027 or any of his known alt-accounts unless it is to simply find something trivial enough to laugh at.

When I see this sort of conduct from a farm account operating compulsive liar and chief manipulator I have a small degree of satisfaction that his known alt-accounts are not in a position to bring him any income or even be considered to join any signature campaigns or bounties.

Edit: @John Abraham, I know you don't have much to share. But I have many things to share. I got many old screenshots, but this will disclose your personal things about yourself because those conversations were in the middle of the deal. I can blur them. But I don't think they will be satisfied if I edit the photo. I wish I kept the chat history.
A new spin on wishful thinking?

Edit 2: Motherfucker Mahdirakib
Another profanity?

How do you use it, basterd?
He spelt the word he applied as an insult to Mahdirakib incorrectly. It would not be the only thing he did incorrectly in this forum or this thread.
1478  Economy / Reputation / Re: 'John Abraham ≈ naim027' Coincidence or Connection? on: June 15, 2023, 11:44:45 AM
The timing of the thread that naim027 created (to attack you) was highly suspect and it failed to divert from the core subject: Evidence heavily suggests John Abraham is an alt-account operated by naim027

Granted over the months since naim027 and his known alt-accounts were discussed he has tried to change his writing style a little but it does not cloud enough to add to any uncertainty that might be there. If he already spent most of yesterday using his naim027 account to attack you then I think he will soon give up on the the John Abraham account and concentrate on whatever alt-accounts he currently operates.

'naim027' is trying to insult me by creating this thread instead of providing the conversation proof from his 'John Abraham' account here. He is also using aggressive words towards me. The fun fact is that 'John Abraham' hasn't made any post in the forum yesterday as he spent his whole day (from 'naim027' account) to create a thread about me.
1479  Economy / Reputation / Re: The whole reputation system is pure garbage on: June 15, 2023, 11:36:33 AM
It looks as though the OP has had his moment of venting his frustration at the demise of his trust list. He has not logged in again after creating this thread.

If he were to at least post here with a valid debate or argument it would be possible to engage with him but as the feedback cites the OP making death threats amongst other things, is it appropriate for him to even question why he received the negative feedback in the first place?
1480  Economy / Reputation / Re: Mahdirakib Insight on: June 15, 2023, 11:31:26 AM
It's remarkable how people can suddenly find their religious convictions when it suits their personal interests. Who knew religion could be so flexible?  Cheesy

It's worth mentioning that Naim had a well-established history with casinos and gambling long before all this "religious stuff" nonsense came into play. I can't help but wonder what his religion has to say about fundamental values like honesty, integrity, and fairness.
Yes he seems to change his religious convictions but we all know naim027 is a compulsive liar, we simply do not know when he is telling the truth or partial truth.

Oh really, mother fucker?
Well, this doesn't quite align with the image of a devoutly religious individual, now does it?
He cannot get his story straight because of being a compulsive liar. Using profanities and insults is not productive. If you have to present a view or argument it should be done without resorting to that level but naim027 is a compulsive liar therefore we do not know what nonsense he will spout next.

You have misunderstood the second part of the above quote. I think everyone will be confused here as the way he described it. I didn't receive the offer from anyone to work with the Casino Critique team. I had only showed curiosity that why he is working with the Casino Critique team (casino review site) while he refused similar proposal from me. I didn't mention anything about the religion there.
It was naim027 that made that comment and I personally do not believe with conviction anything he says. He has lied too much in the forum.

Neither Casino Critique is a failed project nor it's abandoned. It's abandoned from the way it started but as a Casino review website, the work is still ongoing. I'm not active as a team member due to my real-life activities but the team is still there and working on the project.
Oh ok. So what exactly is it going to become now?
It will be interesting to read the reply
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 ... 841 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!