If all the statistics are coming from the front page of the Bustabit website (and you are applying those formulas) at least we understand where the data is coming from and how you are using it. I would still not be sure about the future potential bankroll profits but it is a great tool to look up past profits based on the date and amounts invested.

Apart from the explanation below do you have any other updates on the website?

I just noticed this post. Your babprofitcalculator is a very good website if the calculations are correct.

It is understandable that the future bankroll profits will not be accurate simply because fluctuations will occur but if the historical data from the Bustabit website is being used to provide accurate profits between two past dates, then surely that is something bankroll investors (and possible investors) can benefit from.

It is a difficult question to answer but have you decided what will you do with the DAI? How much time will you allow for the Whirlwind representative to get in contact with you to have the funds sent to a destination of their choosing? If they do not get in contact with you what happens to the escrow funds?

Not many would have thought Chelsea would be beaten that badly by Newcastle United but it just goes to show the Premier League is the most exciting and unpredictable football league in the world.

I am surprised there is no mention of the amazing goal Garnacho scored for Manchester United when they went to Everton. The 0-3 scoreline flattered them because they did not play excellent and were helped along the way by Everton playing so bad.

This is an interesting situation to be in after the funds have been on the move. How many member would have thought anything like this would happen so close to the period after the mixer owners stopped communicating within the forum (or with Hhampuz). If anything, I would have expected the funds to just sit there untouched forever.

The Whirlwind onion and clearnet websites are not working therefore they might not return to make any statements or comments.

They are still under the control of minerjones right?

It was nice to have that competition with you, congratulations 

These are the results of the games played today 26th November 2023:

Tottenham Hotspur 1-2 Aston Villa
Everton 0-3 Manchester United

Tottenham took the lead and were in a position to win the game even with goals disallowed for off-side. Full credit to Aston Villa, they came out after half-time and tried to charge of the game, they did well to win the game 1-2.

In the other game, Garnacho scored a brilliant overhead kick to give Manchester United the lead after just two minutes. The game ended 0-3 but Everton have been deducted 10 points by the Premier League for breaching financial fair play rules therefore they need to make up the points they have lost by winning games if they want to avoid relegation.

This is how the Premier League table currently stands:

It is not only the attention that this troll craves for, he clearly feels his actions (past, present and future) are vindicated because for the fact he managed to get on to a signature campaign.

If it were not for hitting campaign quota targets, he would have faded away in to obscurity therefore the question is asked: why would a particular campaign manager enrol him and many others that have received negative tags to their campaigns when no other campaign manager would have enrolled any of them?

After reading this thread I remembered I sent Blitzboy a PM some months ago asking for an explanation since he did not post in this thread. I cannot recall why I did not follow it up, maybe it was because of things happening outside this forum in real life.

Back then, I was the on the verge of tagging the Blitzboy account if not for anything else then for at least ban evasion just as yahoo62278 did but now I will go through some of the threads/posts to re-familiarise myself before I come to a decision.

I will also send him a PM asking him to post here to clarify what happened.

We will never know how many of those VIP left the forum because literally made enough millions of USD$ as a result of Bitcoin they might have made but if they are not online there cannot be too many reasons as to why. If 50 BTC is worth around $1.85 million today, let us not forget is would have been worth over $3 million at the all time high price so that could be telling.

Maybe some genuinely donated as a gesture of goodwill without realising how drastic that donation would affect their lives many years down the line and regret it, therefore have left the forum. Some probably made phenomenal amounts of money and decided they no longer needed (or wanted) to use it.

For the sake of curiosity and view a timeline, is there any way of finding out the specific dates/times when each of those 115 donations and 38 VIP donations were made?

Those might not be your funds but as a forum member you have the same right as any other to make suggestions or ask questions right? What struck me was the question you asked about the new forum and would like to know what exactly is going on with it. Has there ever been a realistic estimated release date?

With the amount donated over the years surely it should have been ready by now.

If you put yourself in the same position as any lender would be in, what would you do if a newbie who made two posts asked you for a loan? Would you give a loan to a member that had no trade history, no forum history, provided no collateral and was completely anonymous? At least if a reputable member of the forum vouched for the newbie it might change your mind but in this case this did not happen.

You have received both neutral and negative trust on your account, I would advise you to forget this account and create another if you want to contribute to the forum as a helpful member and eventually join a signature campaign.

That sounds very interesting, an exclusive area. I did not know (and am fairly sure most of us did not know) that members that donated have their own private section of the forum. Why is/was it controversial for staff members to participate in that private section? Personally, if donors participated in a nefarious activity of any kind and it needed to have intervention of staff to lock or remove threads, or merge posts then maybe their presence was required but I am not privy to what was being discussed at the time.

The best course of action as far as proving account ownership is concerned is for the member to at least stake a bitcoin address. That way, if the worst should happen and the forum account is compromised, it should be relatively easy to sign a message and have access to the account returned. If becomes a different scenario if the computer was attacked because there is a possibility the wallet information (as well as BTC balances) could have been compromised.

I also noted the OP has not been online for over a month using either of his two known accounts but that does not mean he has not created a new account. Maybe he is already back and would like to keep the new account private and not associate it with his past. I cannot recall interacting with the OP but if he does get access to his banned/stolen account granted, I hope the tags will be removed.
 

There is a possibility that in the middle of all that screaming, the OP lost their way and did not elaborate on the specific issue that made them create the thread. Even if the OP has a valid reason (or point) for this thread, alienating the forum members by posting in a crude manner is not exactly the way to open a debate.

It will be interesting to see the response the OP provides to your third point.

I am curious about this too.

Thank you for sharing your story. Many members have do the same thing when they did not have to but did it to serve as a warning to others about even non-regular gamblers can get into trouble. Another warning sign to the average person to look out for is many casinos give free bets in the hope their customers will lose and then start playing with their own money.

When it starts off as being fun but becomes an obsession or compulsion, people should stop. If they cannot stop because they are addicted, they have to seek help from family members or trusted friends.

I would not state Liverpool are favourites to win at Manchester City but I do think they will win, or the game will end in a draw. West Ham also are playing away at Burnley therefore it will be a difficult game but overall they should take all three point and the same for Chelsea, they are away at Newcastle but should take all three points.

As you have put forward your opinions, I will give mine. Let us see at the end of the games who has more correct 

(A) Manchester City vs Liverpool 
(A) Burnley vs West Ham United
(D) Luton Town vs Crystal Palace
(A) Newcastle United vs Chelsea
(H) Nottingham Forest vs Brighton and Hove Albion
(D) Sheffield United vs Bournemouth
(H) Brentford vs Arsenal

The OP created this harizenbanappeal account to appeal the ban and his last login was on 17th October 2023. It seems as though the OP might have given up because there is no effort on his part trying to claim/reclaim the harizen account. If that is the case it is a shame because members losing their accounts as a result of hacking should not be penalised is this manner.

Most probably their computer was hacked therefore wallets and many other things not even related to this forum could have been compromised. I hope the OP manages to get his forum account back and protect his computer from further attacks.

I think I would state something similar in response the OP. I am unsure what hack the OP refers to but in general, hacks are taking place everyday on some website somewhere and there is not much that can be done to protect this forum than has already been done. The rest is down to the individual themselves and they have to take their own precautions to protect their login credentials and so on.

I am not a gambling person therefore thankfully I have not been gambling addict but that does not mean I do not hope this thread does not get flooded with members that are addicted. All those that are mentioning (and advising others) on responsible gambling are doing the right thing. Anybody that feels their gambling is becoming addictive should speak to their family and friends to find solutions before it spirals.

I am unsure about how many members here are gambling using crypto-only amassed from either trading or signature campaigns. I think those figures if they ever became available would be important to study how gambling is affecting forum members.

I think we are in agreement with each other, for this fight Fury will try to be better than in his performance against Ngannou and to be clear, if he is as bad then he will probably be knocked out by Usyk. Having said that, I expect Fury will be back to his best and also think Usyk will be back to his best after his recent fights. The boxers will be looking forward as they try to make history.

Whatever happens in the ring, the outcome will have a sizeable impact across the boxing world. Will the winner of the fight even make one defence of their unified title? The chances are they will try to make at least one for the money but best really should know when to quit.