Vote here for WDC on vircurex: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=215284.0 (topic by the vircurex owner)

Makes no sense to add DGC instead of WDC, since WDC came first and is slightly faster.

On a separate note, expected trade volumes should be a factor for Kumala... in terms of how many BTC worth of the coin would get traded a day (that's where he gets his money from alongside withdrawal fees). That could make BTB a good pick since it had 20 BTC of volume yesterday on bter, putting it at the same level of trading volume as TRC for that exchange.

He thinks like this because he is clueless and wants instant gratification. PPCoin, Terracoin are two of the more established alt currencies... it took them many months to get to where they are now. PPCoin lingered at 2-4 cents for months as millions of coins were produced.. then it went up to 30 cents and then down to 15 cents and so on.

Cryptos are volatile. The price will level out eventually where the demand meets the rate at which miners sell their mined coins. I believe in the need for faster confirmations and I am buying more when I identify a leveled out price point.

The most important thing is building a community of supporters and believers. That is something Feathercoin did very well.

I'm a WDC supporter but OP doesn't have a clue how the crypto ecosystem works in connection with the markets.

This is a very flawed analysis. The number of coins produced varies with difficulty. Check the block chain yourself for WDC, when the difficulty was above 10 the number of coins produced per minute was 90 whereas it was 140 per minute when the difficulty was lower. Go look for yourself.

DGC is a slower version of WDC and hasn't got any advantages over WDC.

It's a slower version of WDC. If you're expecting miracles with the price good luck.

Suggestion - compile a top 10 list of regulars who use the word scam the most.

WDC is faster (15 second blocks for WDC compared with 20 second blocks for Digital Coin). Digital coin is just a slower version of WDC with less community support. It will go through the typical pump and dump phase and end up lower than WDC.

lol.

I believe you and I have done trades in the past. Check my litecoin wallet address that I used and you'll see over 100k litecoins in it. That is just one of my litecoin addresses and doesn't mention my other crypto holdings which are equally significant. The money I have in WDC is nothing to me 

It actually forked a couple of days ago. Miners who were on the wrong chain lost out, that's it. Obviously not a good thing though. People are slowly starting to realise 15 second blocks for WDC means pools have to have a low percentage of the network has (30% at most or something.. rather than 50% at most).

Terracoin survived worst.

I predict WDC will go down low in price, maybe it will recover maybe it wont.

Yup just keep planting fake buys until a sucker (eg. the OP) excitedly makes the next buy, thinking after all those other quick buys surely more will flood in afterwards. And that's when the operator stops the fake buys now he has hooked in a real profit, and will the let game run it's course.

Not saying that happened here, but I certainly wouldn't play a game that isn't provably fair

All that needs to happen is for people not to all mine in a single pool. WDC needs to issue guidance on what the absolute upper limit on the hash rate of individual pools should be. I would guess it's lower than the usual <50% figure given for other coins... 30% perhaps?

I'm anti-Ripple but I have to say the way you just plucked that $300 million dollar figure out of your ass makes your analysis worthless.

The network hashrate size is irrelevant. It's the ditribution of the hash. It's not good for any coin to have a pool with a huge amount of hash power, but for a coin with 15 second blocks the limit should really be 30-35% max of the network hashrate. Now go back to school and leave the real talk to the adults with money.

Have you tried solo-mining?

edit - like person above

Don't mine your WDC at erundook's pools if you care about WDC at all. Pools with too much hashpower are dangerous for WDC at this stage of the game (15 second block times for WDC mean the block chain can be split by pools that are too powerful)

Give a new pool a chance like this which is already starting to pick up: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=212619.0

No-one is saying close down Verns pool and open another one. We are saying he should limit new users joining so they are forced to use any other pool than his thus distributing the hash rate rather than having half the network hash in a single pool. It's quite simple.

I really wonder about people here sometimes.

Pizza is 100% right. Vern's WDC pool is almost 50% and he doesn't give a fuck that it could split the blockchain. He has a responsibility to manage the hashrate but he is greedy and only cares about his own short term profits.

Don't mine at his pool if you want WDC to have a future. In these early days because WDC has only 15 seconds per block we need to be more careful until hashpower is better distributed. I am boycotting his exchange.

Post your source for this?