Anyway, whatever the reason of bumping threads is again more likely a case to case basis. Bumping is needed depending on the situation and usually it has a purpose maybe not necessary for you but for sure it is needed for the one bumping the thread.
Let's take this example: I believe this reply was not needed and provides nothing new to the discussion. Why should I feel another way about it? What was your porpuse when posting it? Why was it necessary for you to bump the thread? If there was no bumping people would be motivated to spam threads, which would be even worse. It is done mostly to maintain visibility, as this is a highly trafficked forum and threads get pushed off of the first page fairly quickly, and most do not bother going past that. |
|
|
|
Yes, always. generalizations are not always wrong, broad generalizations by their nature include erroneous conclusions by the very nature of their over inclusiveness. I am not confusing anything, this is just you vomiting up more word salad to try to confuse the situation since you are running out of arguments. Wrong. For instance, "Everything living eventually dies." That's a broad generalization that is 100% correct. That's just one example of many. I am glad you can tell me what my intent was, ever think of working for Mrs. Cleo? No one on this forum really believes Vod was not out of line with what he did, your false equivocation and selective interpretation of my rating to try to sell further abuse is convincing no one.
We're talking about one issue and you keep deflecting it and bringing up another issue. If you were tagging Vod solely on the basis of doxing Og, why wouldn't you have limited your verbiage to that subject? You have some nerve talking about double standards when you yourself pretend your attempt to sell your account is ok while you condemn others for the same act. You are not one to point fingers.
Now you're resorting to bringing up a tired issue which only the trolliest of trolls continue to rehash. I've never tagged people for attempting to sell their own accounts BTW, only for being professional account sellers. But don't let little details get in the way of your righteous indignation. Rather convenient you can dismiss completely arguments you have no retort for isn't it? The history of the issues over the trust system in the past speak for themselves.
Personal attacks aren't "arguments" so yes they are worth dismissing completely. But you're right, the history of issues speaks for itself, which is why you are excluded from DT1. Keep up with the semantic gymnastics, some day you will get the gold kid. I linked a definition of the logical fallacy for reference, but we both know you are only interested in selling your rhetoric and not facts. Holy shit, really? Are you actually that dense that you don't see how totally hypocritical your statements are almost to the point of being hilariously obvious? The thread is about the flag on roach, you keep bringing up Vod, then lecture me about "avoiding the issue" and "deflecting". Then you IMMEDIATELY proceed to criticize me for doing EXACTLY what you just did to me, only my argument is not subjective, you are factually documented to have done it. You have zero credibility. You are a joke. Just because my observations make you butthurt doesn't make them personal attacks. You always argue from a position of Pathos, and almost never from a position of Logos. You are one of those people who thinks emotion and logic are interchangeable. Sorry cupcake, but they're not. You don't get to just summarily dismiss arguments because they offend you. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the heads up. I’ve tagged you as well fella.
Have a good day
+1 3 for the price of 1 Stop being such a lemming. Weren't you just saying about a month ago how you were afraid to piss "them" off? Now you are joining the mall cop toady squad. Either you are full of shit or too much of a puss to speak up, or both, either way its not good. There are plenty of actual cases of fraud around here to work on without dozens of wanna-be internet police who have nothing better to do than to get involved in everyone else's business just so you can get your little red tag powered control freak dopamine hit en mass. |
|
|
|
|
Another fine example why arbitrary and selective enforcement of personally held "rules" by wanna-be internet police is not a good idea.
|
|
|
|
The latest moves to impose financial sanctions on Iran, seem to be a continuation of the plan to move the financial systems of the world over to Asia. I guess this is one way to lose the trillions of toxic debt that is awash in Europe and America. It's a shame that the $170 million that the drone cost wasn't used to repair bridges and roads in the US. Now that a drone has been shot down, I think we can expect to see more instances in the future, and the big score will be the sinking of a US aircraft carrier.
All these sanctions seems to create new alliances, and to strengthen the targets - Russia and China are obvious examples. Huawei will be the stronger for the free publicity that is is getting to confirm its technical superiority, and its sanctioning may lead to the demise of Google and Facebook.
I agree with most of this statement, but wanted to make a correction. Huawei's only strength above US technological development is the fact it has access to unlimited slave labor. Nearly all of its supposed developments were stolen from US and European companies, which is a secondary reason for the sanctions, the primary one being that 5G platforms have dual use as total surveillance and weapons systems. |
|
|
|
Yeah, you're right, everyone knows false alarms are never detrimental to security. Neither are URL redirects.
If only there was a feature that would allow snowflakes to ignore stuff that alarms them... Yeah, because the best way to deal with false alarms is to ignore all alarms right? But this joke sure got me shook according to you, because I object clearly because this scares me, not because I think it is a bad idea. |
|
|
|
Phew, I didn't get rolled this time.
For anyone who thinks this is a funny joke, this kind of thing puts the user base at risk because people may not believe ACTUAL accusations when they happen.
I think this is the point. Just because you two have 8-foot 2x4s up your asses doesn't mean others can't enjoy actmyname's quirky humor. Yeah, you're right, everyone knows false alarms are never detrimental to security. Neither are URL redirects. A personal message just for me? You shouldn't have. [quote author=actmyname link=topic=5158058.msg51588901#msg51588901 date=1561407900]
Most trusted members on Bitcointalk? I think not.
[b][size=15pt]This thread is not a joke! Minerjones and Lauda have gone rogue![/size][/b]
[quote="[url=http://oh]minerjones on November 05, 2018, 06:33:11 PM[/url]"]After we secure enough merit sources, it will be easy to create a cycle without having it be obvious. All that is necessary is a 4 to 6 cycle loop between the major players, suchmoon and Lauda. Then, the distribution can get to the tail-end where we'll hit [url=http://te]users[/url] [url=http://cs]like[/url] [url=http://ha]these[/url].[/quote]
[quote="[url=http://re]Lauda on November 05, 2018, 07:14:48 PM[/url]"]LoyceV can serve as an external member. They can act as a proxy by creating lots of analytics threads and redirect the merit to our accounts. The Russian local forum is quite lenient on account sales, so we can direct our approach there.[/quote][hr][right][sub][sub][sub][sub][sup][sup][sup][sub][size=1px][i][color=beige]a joke it was, and how we laughed
[/quote] |
|
|
|
I'd say that there was a good chance that the whole attack/revoke thing was stated. But if not, two things seem most possible to me:
- High credibility info that the drone+poseidon+? had invaded Iranian airspace was threatened to be released.
- The U.S. was, at the last minute, made aware of Iranian capabilities to retaliate, and willingness to do so, which made the costs to high to be borne without further prep.
Being lied into war is one thing. We've all seen it before and it didn't collapse the country. Being lied into a war which resulted in the loss of our Navy, for instance, is quite another
US drones invading another country's air space with a drone is fairly routine, and IMO is not sufficient to cause much international backlash from those not already opposed to the US. Regarding your second point, IMO the only reason they have not already gone in is because they are fully aware of their capabilities to retaliate. As I stated elsewhere, this war would not be like Iraq or Afghanistan, Iran has very capable mobile SAM systems which are well hidden. If some one like me is privy to this information, it is nonsense that the president would also not have this intelligence. |
|
|
|
I think that his many war-hawk neocon advisors basically ordered the airstrike for him, but he realized that it was insane and called it back. From reporting about the inside of the Administration, I get the sense that everyone is just doing whatever they want, often ignoring what Trump says, and Trump himself is a pretty weak force on most issues. I'm glad that he pushed back on this one, but I still see the machine of war moving constantly in the direction of Iran.
I don't believe they have the authority to do that. That kind of action is the sort of thing that can see you at the far end of a firing squad in the military, and chain of command is not something the military toys with. |
|
|
|
For anyone who thinks this is a funny joke, this kind of thing puts the user base at risk because people may not believe ACTUAL accusations when they happen.
I don’t know either of them personally but you’d think that surely, their accounts & reputations here are way too important to risk with a bull shit stunt like this. Like I said I’m leaning towards thinking it’s a joke at the moment. Let’s see what develops though. While I wouldn't doubt Lauda is up to this kind of crap, I have my doubts about Minerjones being up to this kind of activity, but no one is providing anything but broken links as far as I can tell. EDIT: the links have been edited several times. One of the originals was https://bit.ly/31RMJyx the other https://www.shorturl.at/vDJP7 |
|
|
|
|
For anyone who thinks this is a funny joke, this kind of thing puts the user base at risk because people may not believe ACTUAL accusations when they happen.
|
|
|
|
Um....what's with the Rick Rolled Youtube link? What am I missing here?
This appears to be a joke based on that link, though I did not click on the other one. WTF would minerjones or Lauda care about merits, really? It's not like either one needs them. Certainly not enough to do something like what's posted here. Will watch with bated breath.
Does one of the links lead to Rick? I can't get any of them to work, but I am not clicking them without tons of script restrictions. |
|
|
|
Most trusted members on Bitcointalk? I think not. This thread is not a joke! Minerjones and Lauda have gone rogue!After we secure enough merit sources, it will be easy to create a cycle without having it be obvious. All that is necessary is a 4 to 6 cycle loop between the major players, suchmoon and Lauda. Then, the distribution can get to the tail-end where we'll hit users like these. After closer investigation I can confirm that following message is posted in this thread. This is something I would never expect to see but as I see it and I can clearly read it I can't step over it. Good work actmyname for posting this. Can some one include a direct forum link please? Why are link shorteners being used? |
|
|
|
Because broad generalizations are a logical fallacy
Not always. Besides, you are confusing V8's opinion with roach's opinion. We're talking about two separate things. "Last of the V8s alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with realr0ach is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions."
Again, for literally the 4th time the rating was left for his abusive and doxing behavior, something Theymos himself said was reasonable.
Your trust for Vod wasn't just for doxing Og, you included a bunch of other language that is thoroughly your opinion and not based on Vod's trade history. Seems like you just want everyone else to adhere to a standard while you yourself remain free to do whatever you want. You know this, but what is important is you dig up any tiny morsel of a fault possible to project on my part to justify your abuse. Judging ones opinions also falls firmly under the description of "judging the content of those words". All you are doing is semantic gymnastics to try to make this ok when everyone knows damn well what your motivation is, and it is not protecting the user base or the integrity of the trust system. We have a chance here to form new standards different than the previous clusterfuck of abuse under the old system, and people such as yourselves rush immediately to turn the new system into the old system so you can get your little control freak red tinged dopamine click hit.
This is projection-based stupid talk and not worthy of a response lengthier than this. Yes, always. generalizations are not always wrong, broad generalizations by their nature include erroneous conclusions by the very nature of their over inclusiveness. I am not confusing anything, this is just you vomiting up more word salad to try to confuse the situation since you are running out of arguments. I am glad you can tell me what my intent was, ever think of working for Mrs. Cleo? No one on this forum really believes Vod was not out of line with what he did, your false equivocation and selective interpretation of my rating to try to sell further abuse is convincing no one. You have some nerve talking about double standards when you yourself pretend your attempt to sell your account is ok while you condemn others for the same act. You are not one to point fingers. Rather convenient you can dismiss completely arguments you have no retort for isn't it? The history of the issues over the trust system in the past speak for themselves. Just one question to those that oppose... Isn't it a bit reasonable for someone to @least create that flag and think its a good thing rather than a bad thing?
You can't seriously say that this is a flag being made to do harm to the forum and to the people that wanna learn from the forum about BTC, than it is to protect those and do good for them....? It is not at all reasonable, because every piece of evidence presented was based solely upon his opinion, not any risky actions which may cause a risk during trade. I don't think the flag is intended to harm the forum, I think it is intended to harm realr0ach, but with a very clear side effect that directly harms the integrity of the trust system as well as the preservation of free speech on the forum. Essentially the flag backers are putting their spite and need to fulfill their emotional compulsions above the best interests of the forum. |
|
|
|
|
The quotes link outside the forum. Be careful.
EDIT: I scanned the links on virus total, and they seem to lead to nothing, but I have lots of scripts blocked. Am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
I agree this was probably a strategic move, one intended not only to send a message to Iran without actual escalation, as well as what you stated plugging any leaks. It would also have the additional benefit of allowing the US to monitor their reaction and gain valuable information on their defensive tactics.
|
|
|
|
To a wanker whose ego overrides common sense and rational thinking, everything to be said by anyone is only an opinion if they disagree with it. Likewise, anything to be said by someone is a fact if they agree with it.
Type 1 flags are meant to be subjective, aka opinion based. Get over it. I like how you lecture me about rational thinking as you make broad generalizations in the same breath. How does A exclude B? Its possible to do both simultaneously. Type 1 flags are meant to be "more subjective". More subjective does not mean totally subjective. Additionally the language Theymos used EXPLICITLY EXCLUDED the flag being used to object to people's opinions, making your subjectivity argument moot.
No, he did not. Please share with us where you read that. Again, the situation is no different than you thinking Vod's "mental instability" is a red flag when it comes to trust related issues. Vod has never failed one trade yet you decided to negative trust him on the basis of your opinions. Nobody would make a flag about somebody if they said they hated chocolate ice cream, even though that is also an opinion. Its more than just roach's words being an "opinion" we're talking about here. Its about a user's words suggesting that they should not be trusted based on the content of those words. There is a logical case for this given the content across the breadth of roach's posts. You may not agree with it, but that doesn't mean that everybody else shouldn't. Because broad generalizations are a logical fallacy, hence not based in logic. "Last of the V8s alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with realr0ach is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions." Again, for literally the 4th time the rating was left for his abusive and doxing behavior, something Theymos himself said was reasonable. You know this, but what is important is you dig up any tiny morsel of a fault possible to project on my part to justify your abuse. Judging ones opinions also falls firmly under the description of "judging the content of those words". All you are doing is semantic gymnastics to try to make this ok when everyone knows damn well what your motivation is, and it is not protecting the user base or the integrity of the trust system. We have a chance here to form new standards different than the previous clusterfuck of abuse under the old system, and people such as yourselves rush immediately to turn the new system into the old system so you can get your little control freak red tinged dopamine click hit. |
|
|
|
|
UBI turns the citizenry from the parent of the state to the ward of the state. It is designed to strip nations of independence and rights among other economic dumpster fires.
|
|
|
|
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Mueller's report established multiple links between the Trump campaign and the Russian government... they were working towards the same goal and both benefited from working together!
Collusion delusion for sure...
Pay no attention to the millions of foreign nationals being allowed to flood into the country to manipulate voting demographics! Russia bought $2000 worth of Facefuck ads! That is the real foreign collusion! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
