Have you fully synced your bitcoin core? I'm not an expert on this but i think you need to fully sync your bitcoin core wallet first before it can build those DB'ses.
It seems that this problem also occurs on 32 bit machines, and other instances; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1732347.msg17528990#msg17528990

This.

And it already exists in various ways;

you have https://badbitcoin.org and https://bitcoinwhoswho.com/scams

They're really not that useful, and only cover 0.1% of scams, only after they've already happend. I'm not sure what you're looking to gain by creating another site like these ones.. Ad rev?

Their site looks like it's meant for trading or something though.. I don't see roulette mentioned anywhere?

https://starcoine.com/bitcoin-trading

It's funny though how they have some sort of simulated user trollbox..?

This is a weird story...

You need to explain what happend, since Chipmixer doesn't send any transactions... They either give you your chips, or a voucher.

So, what happend..; you send your funds to the deposit adress, and then you
1. received an incorrect amount of chips?
2. received an incorrect amount of voucher balance?

In which you proceeded to email Chipmixer's support, and which they acted upon by sending the remainder of your "missing" funds to the same adress?
I've never heard about chipmixer sending any funds ever, but perhaps there's a first time for everything.

The chip you received had unconfirmed funds on it when you received it, and then got dropped from the mempool, is that right, or? (I don't think it is, but i don't see any other way in which the conclusion would be you losing your funds due to a mistake from Chipmixer's side of things.)

LTC... Okay... uhhh who even has that anymore...?

What the hell? Why would you promote a debit card with some shitcoins no one has ever heard of.. I seriously don't get it.

Nice way to lock people in your shitcoin. Bleh.

Not big enough of a market to make it worth it for these crypto hobos.
I'm pretty sure VISA and mastercard operate almost everywhere though.

You shouldn't have lost anything. as was already mentioned; USDT operates both on ERC20 tokens, and OMNI. The transaction probably should have been confirmed rather quickly, so if you don't seen any balance at Huobi, check the txid to see if your funds got confirmed.

If they did, you probably should open a support ticket.

So is 95% of the content on Bitcointalk...

---

I like the old-school Bitcointalk UI though.
Perhaps certain fonts could be improved, (and definitely user-readability on iPhone/smartphones in general.) This bitch is giving me mad headaches whenever i try to read for more than 5 minutes.

Lol. This website really seals the deal. -- http://www.bitcoinscashout.com No HTTPS, poor fonts, poor image quality, poor formatting, poor everything.

If you can't even get a half-assed website for your cryptocard V1.000, how do you actually expect anyone to hold any funds on said card without being scared of it getting hacked/"lost"..

Whatever deal you have with visa, or think you have, i can't think of anything other than it being established under false premises, and that visa will shut it down whenever you get any traction with your project.

That's a nice sunk cost for us if your card turns out to be worthless.

Surely it doesn't take 153$ to create one, right? Why the price?

Also, you don't mention KYC anywhere, am i right in assuming that's not required? That would make your card kind of interesting (and sketchy!), otherwise, why wouldn't i use a card from coinbase, which is probably cheapier, more widely accepted, and a hell of a lot trustworthier?

Honestly, with a design and font that is this ugly -- i think most people wouldn't even care how good the product behind it is/was.

The only thing i can see this being useful for is for "shady" individuals, who don't want to pass KYC on any of the 8 exchanges, and use "Magic macafee" to get around that?
Although i kind of doubt that is possible, or a good longterm business model. (I assume they'll get their accounts disabled rather quickly?. but if not, for what would this exchange realistically be used?

I don't get it. Arbitraging? Really?

Or he's using your paypal account to cash out hacked paypal accounts, for only a 10% rate.

 There's so many sketchy things OP could be doing that this is definitely not worth the risk.

OP, if you're serious about wanting to accept Paypal, why don't you use a payment processor? You supply your ID, docs, and they'll create a gateway for your customers to accept PP. That is, if you're actually legit.

Not really though. They didn’t communicate at all as far as i’m aware, and only ran a signature campaign to promote their IEO token spam.

They said they didn’t accept people with red trust, but somehow, they were still able to join, and atleast given the impression that they were getting paid for their posts (Although im pretty certain they were actually getting paid. See mdayonliners post history where he put up some screenshots of him getting paid (IIRC).)

Yobit added balance to their yobit account just like they did to non-redtrusted users.

Poloniex users were also given the affirmation that after the grace period, you could still withdraw funds. Just not trade.
Poloniex users were also given the affirmation that the grace period would be x amount of time, right until it suddenly was y amount of time (0).

The positive thing about implementing KYC was that every minor, anyone from a 3rd world country no longer had access to their funds, potentially forever.

I know for a fact that Poloniex lied to customers about KYC verification, but i’m not sure when exactly that happend anymore.

Read: https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/8mizvf/dear_poloniex_you_specifically_said_you_wont_hold/
They cant be held to their word and due to that i find them extremely untrustworthy. Imo they deserve to be tagged for this alone.

Also more recently all the people margin trading lost 16% of their margin funds due to sudden liquidations of a single low-cap shitcoin.

Quick maths shows this is nearly impossible and likely some sort of scam
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/bxknrf/poloniex_btc_margin_lending_pool_losses/

Is this only for accounts that received negative feedback before, or do you also not get a "Trade With Caution" tag anymore if you receive negative feedback after the update?

Isn't this going to unleash a legion of previously red-trusted bounty farmers/signature campaigners/etc, or am i missing something? The current way of "red-trusting" someone doesn't nearly look as intrusive anymore. I wonder if bounty managers will change their rules due to that.

Well, they probably won't exchange/send the same bitcoin back to you, but that doesn't mean that they don't know the origin of the funds. Especially exchanges such Bitstamp, coinbase, and kraken all use third party chain analysis products, and probably share/won't hesitate to share that info with authorities/other exchanges.

Which means that, yes, the chain might look broken, but these exchanges can and will still keep track of the coins, especially if it's significant amounts not used for trading and send through regulated exchanges as mentioned above, and share that info to LE/other exchanges, which in turn will probably result to the funds being linked.


Hence why i don't think this is such a smart idea, apart from it costing a lot of $$$, and exchanges who probably won't be too happy about it.

Could you name 5-6 anonymous exchanges? The only one i can think of is binance (which does chain analysis, so you'll need to find some more exchanges to effectively mix your coins), and yobit, which i find particularily untrustworthy.

Another problem is that most of these exchanges usually ask for .5 or 1% withdrawal fee. multiple that by 5x, or 6x, and you'll be paying massive amounts of fee for what might be just very little improvements in privacy.

It makes no sense to destroy private keys at all. If the funds were kept in a LE-"unsecure environment" he could, as you suggested, move all the coins to a new adress he generated somewhere safely/offline, then destroy/remove the server in which the "unsecure" keys and adresses were stored, and still keep the funds.

Then he could either mix those funds using coinjoin, wasabi, monero, chipmixer, or simply wait until a provably-fair "privacy"-provider mixer comes into the market.

Wouldn't a referrer be useful for companies tracking where their traffic is coming from? I'm sure they'd been keen to know that advertising on Btalk actually garners results. Or is that not what you're removing by using the "noreferrer" tags?

I guess they could just use url.com/utm_campaign_x in their url, although i don't think all of them do so.

It surely didn't stop you from promoting Bitblender so what are you trying to say here?