I wanted to test out a segwit wallet on electrum, but when I broadcast a new transaction I get the this error.
[code]
error: {'code': 1, 'message': 'the transaction was rejected by network rules.\n\n16: bad-txns-vin-empty
Steps to reproduce 1. Create new segwit wallet with electrum 2. Send funds to an andress from this wallet 3. Send funds from this address What does this error mean and how can I fix it?[/code] I think the error here in this case is related to you trying to spend coins with a segwit scrip/adress, while the wallet/server you are using doesn't recognize the script, and is thus unable to broadcast it. Which is pretty weird, considering i also use Electrum segwit and never had any issues. Try switching electrum servers, see if that does anything? See https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/75942/16-bad-txns-vin-empty-code-26/75944 |
|
|
|
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1839037
According to my activity on bitcoin, I don't remember any such activity that can get me rewarded with negative trust. Please look into this matter.
P.S. Yes, I am using account on 2 pc at home and other place. That has nothing to do about it. Check the reference of your trust feedback. You clearly tried to sell a service on a third party website that is highly frowned upon by a lot of users here, and might even be against forum rules (ICO bumping). See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4651326.0 |
|
|
|
Your personal data can not be traced with BTC address, but everyone can know the time and amount of bitcoin transaction you do.
Well, that really depends on who's looking into it. As others have already said, alot of exchanges/other places where you can buy bitcoin require KYC, aka your personal data. So if that adress traces back to an adress of an exchange that enforces KYC laws ( coinbase, bitstamp et al), there's a good chance law enforcement agencies will find out who you are. There are obviously ways to break that chain, but it usually involves another 3rd party that you'll need to put trust in... See mixers as others have already mentioned. |
|
|
|
Looking at his post history, i think this guy is actually somewhat "serious" and does actually (atleast up to some degree) believe in what he is posting. (Not that any of his points/posts have merit imo) So where exactly do you draw the line between trolling and spreading misinformation simply because you do not know better/ believe in something that is different from popular opinion.. If you ban this guy, are you also going to ban this guy? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=244104We need more clarification under that heading regarding what is allowed under that heading. If even jokes are not allowed, that will make this place quite boring.
Or if any opinion that has no factual basis is/should be allowed or not. |
|
|
|
The site has all the warning signs of being a scam. Promising good ROI + the fact that they have come up with a "saving" accelerator which lets them trade with less risk and more reward really sounds like a fairy-tale to me, and is something every ponzi claims to have (Some ludicrous method to justify the amount of money they are giving out/generating.) I would personally stay a mile away from this site and it's team. From their website: The team brainstormed and came up with the investment automation concept for their first app, Heleum, in November 2015: a mesh network of currency values that would reduce the risk of trading while increasing the reward, compared to the inverse risk/reward inherent to the world's prevailing binary paradigm. I always ask myself for what they would need my money if they really have found such a unique and revolutionary way to make lots and lots of money.. Surely there would be some big funders jumping up on this if it was actually real, which would ask way less ROI.. |
|
|
|
By being careful you mean not linking your wallet id anywhere? How do they generate wallet ID's in the first place?
Well being careful just means that you don't make a connection between the ''bitcoin'' world and your own ''world'', which basically comes down to not linking any sensitive information to any of your adresses.. How do they generate wallet ID's in the first place? Who is ''they''? What is it that you're asking here exactly? How the government agencies link wallet adress to people? Or services like https://walletexplorer.com ? There really isn't such a thing as a wallet ID, it really doesn't exist on the blockchain level itself. AFAIK, Walletexplorer.com does it through "adress clustering" See; What walletexplorer does is called address clustering. When you spend bitcoins, your wallet will take input from several txouts belonging to several addresses depending on amount to be spend. So walletexplorer works on a simple heuristic:
If two addresses appear as inputs in any given transaction, they belong to same user
More detail about this method can be seen in this paper by Reid and Harrigan. Of course, this method will fail in case of mixers and coinjoin transactions. There are advanced ways to even detect transaction that go through mixers, but I don't think wallet explorer does that
To find name of wallets it can scrap forums like bitcointalk, some addresses are tagged publicly in blockchain.info, also it can has bots trade on major exchanges to get their addresses. I doubt this would work very well on individuals, but it's very effective to ID large exchanges this way. |
|
|
|
If you're not careful with your keys & spending, it might be (Since the private key could be cracked if the attacker has your public key, right(?)), but then again, when the time of quantum computing is here we might have already implemented some kind of "resistance" against it. See the answer below, and the SE link for some more discussion & useful answers from people that are much more knowledgeable than me on the topic. You have a good discussion in: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=133425.0Basically, ECDSA is compromised, hashing isn't. With a quantum computer, you could easily deduce the private key corresponding to a public key. If you only have an address, which is a hashed public key, the private key is safe. Anyway, to spend a transaction, you need to send the public key. At that point you are vulnerable, but the attack is not straightforward. In general, quantum computers are not exponentially better than classical computers. You cannot access all the states in the superposition, only global properties. You can read http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/The_Limits_of_Quantum_Computers.pdf to get a good idea of what they can and cannot do. And, as mentioned in the quote above, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=133425.0 is pretty informative about the topic as well. |
|
|
|
I'm planning to run two nodes sometime soon, but I have to decide which solution is better.
To build a physical machine home or get a VPS.
And here comes the question about the Internet bandwidth.
I have a shitty ADSL line with no more than 7Mbit connection, in the best cases.
What is the real bandwidth required for the Full node and same question for the LN node, does the number of open channels affect the bandwidth.
I believe it heavily depends on the number of simultaneous connections you'll allow. (Default = 125?), https://bitcoin.org/en/full-node#reduce-maximum-connectionsFor the exact requirements on full nodes, see https://bitcoin.org/en/full-node#minimum-requirements , which states A broadband Internet connection with upload speeds of at least 400 kilobits (50 kilobytes) per second As far as lightning goes, i would assume so, but perhaps someone with more knowledge than me can answer that. |
|
|
|
Hi!I am seeking for your help to teach me how to start my campaign management service. I am new to this field so I hope you can help me guys. Thanks
Honestly, i think what companies/ICO ''teams'' are mostly looking for is someone who is trusted and somewhat experienced on/with this forum. I don't think that's something you just "learn" or get ( trust ), but rather something that grows over time. so there really isn't that much to teach. Also, why should we help you/explain to you how you need to do your job? Seems like that's the other way around... For what would "we"(the team that hired you) need you for? |
|
|
|
Maybe someone who is a bit more active in the faucet world can correct me, but didn't adalso went offline/didn't display ads & scammed alot of their userbase by not paying for traffic? For those wondering, check https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1200263.260 Adalso ANN And, Cetobeto was also owned by the same person as adalso, right? (CetoBeto went for sale and i believe they neglected to pay some of their users, right?) Who exactly are you and how did you manage to get your hands onto these scripts? |
|
|
|
Hi all,
As the topic says, from where I can buy anonymous hosting and domains?
Thanks!
Maybe https://njal.la/?Haven't personally used them since i just use namecheap myself, but AFAIK these are the only ones that offer to be a broker for your domain that have somewhat of a reputation. See https://news.bitcoin.com/pirate-bay-founders-njalla-offers-anonymous-domain-registration-for-bitcoin/Also some critique/discussion i found around the service that is definitely worth a read. It's looks like it is something very ground breaking, but in reality it really isn't. It's just them registering a domain for you, with their own details (whatever those may be), but you have access to these domains whenever you want. Important factor here is that you agree that legally, they (Njalla) are the rightful owner of the domains you purchase through them. As far as their pricing levels go, it's €15 for the most common domain extensions (e.g .com, .org, .net, etc), and then increases up to €75 for a bunch of garbage domain extensions. It will definitely serve some people, but it's an incredibly small market they have put themselves into. People in most cases have no problems registering domains, knowing that they can put themselves behind a whoisguard wall.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2192127 I don't really get their business model either, or how this is profitable, especially with all the shady stuff users are probably doing with this service that njalla is going to be "responsible" for...  |
|
|
|
Frustrated with the lack of realistic price predictions for your favorite coins?
How exactly do you calculate this? You expect bitcoin to be 10 Million in Dec 2023, and ~13000 in just 3 months from now. Seems like you just took some numbers or increased it with a formula.. You have bitcoin cash at 1.2 million in DEC 2023?  I guess that proves that this isn't really based on anything. Or better yet, a coin that has suffered numerous 50% attacks and has an arguable bad dev team (XVERGE), should be worth 38.8$ by 2023?? That's a huge increase from 0.02$.. |
|
|
|
First, I found my Old HDD and on this, there somes coins since 2014/2015.
Generally I made somes saves on Hard disk and store it In a safely way (disconnect)
My question is how to resend old transactions?,cos they seems to old to be resend, untill I Fully synced up and -rescan -reindex -addressindex (all command line)
I'll try everithing I know, In the dump wallet file there is entries with privkey and an address.
I'm talking about mining transaction, cos I've Antminer SHA (running good) and Asic script. Sometimes I mine witth GPU.
So? How to resend old transactions? Is there in cache.dat file?
If I understand good, orphan tx are stored in a special file and setup standard at 100Mo?
Orphaned transactions are returned to the memory pool, they are never "lost". If the TX did cease to exist from the mempools, it would just be as if they has never been sent, so again they wouldn't be lost.
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/13987/what-happens-when-you-send-a-transaction-that-ends-up-in-an-orphaned-block-is-iThis means your transaction basically never got confirmed. After your wallet is fully synced you should (?) be able to simply rebroadcast it, as jack already mentioned? If not, you can then just make a new transaction, assuming you still hold all the keys, which you said you did.
The easiest/fastest way however to get access to your bitcoins would probably be to import all your keys into a SPV wallet like Electrum, and make the transaction to your other wallet from there. This way you don't have to wait for your wallet to completely sync. |
|
|
|
got also my priv key out from chipmixer. first and last time I used chipmixer.
You were in their sig campaign, you should have used them before then shouldn't you? for quoting. I was never in their advertising campaign. No, but you tried desperately to get in, and when you didn't you started trash-talking other users.. You're obviously jealous of both Chipmixer and it's campaign participants.. Looking at your post history, this week alone you made over 20 posts in their campaign thread.. You're really on some sort of crusade against them, aren't you? look at this guy active since 2015 and behaves like the right hand of GOD (DarkStar_). 
Nope,the campaign manager is in GOD mode and his decisions to elect someone to his disciple are not transparent for anyone.
For anyone still thinking his words are not heavily biased, take a scroll through his post history. |
|
|
|
Reply if you can help and we can talk.
You might want to move this to the Digital Goods section of the forum, see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=93.0There's already a couple of amazon gift card sellers on the first page that have exactly rates you're looking for, see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4629260. However i am afraid that most of these guys, ( including the link i referenced to above, so be aware!) are scammers. I'd advise you to not buy from any autobuyer links, and never do a deal without escrow, ( Also 500$ at once with one buyer? it might be smarter to do several smallers deals, that will severely lower the risk of you getting scammed!) |
|
|
|
Hi friends, Can you please post your experience with https://btcpop.co/ . I am thinking of investing some money in the shares over there . So please post any material or non-material information here Thanks !! The site itself already looks sketchy to me, especially their business model. It seems as if they made it unclear what it really is that they're doing on purpose to conceal that what it is their doing. The loans might be the real deal, but against what price? Your passport information? I wouldn't be so keen to give that to these guys, especially if you read the thread below. The term investment pool is making me really, really anxious, as these usually turn out to be a scam. Googling around a bit, you can find various sources saying negative stuff about them. I'm not saying that all of this is true, but it should be something you want to look into before investing in them... See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1523696.0 for example |
|
|
|
Since the era of ICO's there is so many blockchain projects that call themselves some revolutionized project which aim to solve a problem using blockchain. But by looking at some of them blockchain is clearly not the way to implement the solution. People seems to do it since ICO's are easy money now a days. Is the ICO's are killing the blockchain and Satoshi's dream? You can read more in this Quora thread. https://www.quora.com/Is-Blockchain-overratedWhat do you think Yes, blockchain is indeed VERY overrated as of right now. The hype around it right now is so big that everyone wants to profit from it. Institutional, but also scammy startups. You currently have ICO's for the weirdest things, My guess is that out of 100 ICO's right now, 50 are an outright scam, and many more are just as useless. You can simply scroll through something like Coinschedule and see these kinds of ICO's, https://www.coinschedule.com/ico/greenx#event3059 What exactly is the usecase for this ICO? GreenX Network is a blockchain ecosystem that enables individual and institutional investors to discover and invest in lucrative, low-risk renewable energy projects around the world. So what is the blockchain for? It seems to me that this is just an index fund for renewable energy projects/companies, with a layer/blockchain flavour attached to it. (Good luck ever making profit off that ICO, btw..!) |
|
|
|
Obviously, if I run a full node, I can query the copy of the public ledger locally, and my privacy is very strong. Nobody but myself is able to see what addresses I'm interested in.
On the other end of the spectrum, if I let some centralized system (web wallet) hold my keys, then obviously I have given up my privacy.
But what about if I run a SPV client (wallet)? Then the client has to rely on other full nodes in the system to query for addresses. And let's suppose that the nearby nodes are honest and that I'm not concerned with security. But what about privacy? Can it potentially be compromised by say some third party intercepting my queries and collecting a list of my addresses?
In particular, Electrum, as far as I know, is SPV wallet. How strong my privacy is with Electrum?
I've looked into this myself a little bit but i wasn't really able to find anything, I primarily rely on the answers of these users, Electrum works differently from a lot of other SPV clients. With Electrum, users are required to connect to Electrum servers. The way blockchain.info track the IP transactions is to see who relayed the transaction to them first. If you're using Electrum, the only possible IP address you would see there is the server's. This does not mean that your privacy is preserved; Electrum servers can see all the addresses in your wallet.
neither!
bitcoin transactions do not contain any IP information and blocks in the blockchain contains these transactions. in other words no IP address is recorded.
if by any chance you mean blockchain.info website then the IP address they list is different, it is the IP address of the node that sent them the transaction first. it may be the Electrum node or it may be another node that is just relaying that tx.
regarding privacy and Electrum the only thing that happens is that when you connect to an Electrum node you are asking them for your transaction history so you give them all your addresses which means that node sees all your bitcoin addresses and can connect them together and also record your IP address and associate these two together. whether they do it or not is another discussion.
in other words there are two things here: they see list of all your bitcoin addresses and link them together even if they are not connected + your IP address. you can hide your IP but you can't hide your address list.
As stated above, i'm not sure if this is actually the case, but i'd be slightly worried if it is, since that would imply that there (potentially) really is no such thing as *privacy* while using electrum without a proxy. It's weird how there's nothing available on this topic, especially if what pooya87 is saying is true. (Think about the information a single node could possibly gather about it's users right?) |
|
|
|
Hi 3rd Space, nope, my private key begins with 5. After entering my private key into bitaddress.org, it gave me 4 different private keys (all of which I photographed for my record). So I am making progress with this but now at Electrum, it will not accept my private key. At Electrum, I have it set-up to Send my coin into my Ledger, but now the issue is Electrum does not give me the button to send anything. Talk about confusing.  It must be something to do with using the incorrect private key (since I have 4 private keys, which one do I use?). Also I need instructions for entering my private key into Electrum.. Do I use the "sweep" function? So you already "loaded" the wallet with the correct balance? -- Is your balance visible in your wallet itself yet? This to me sounds like you made a watch-only wallet, correct? Can't you try importing all 4 of the keys in Electrum? One of them is bound to have some balance that way, depending from which script the adress is derived, right? |
|
|
|
What I know of Mt. Gox is a currency exchange cryptocurrency based in Tokyo and has provided about 70% of Bitcoin transactions worldwide before suffering major cyber attacks, leading to bankruptcy. In 2011, the price of Bitcoin at Mt. Gox Redemption dropped to a record low of one cent for a security breach.
What you know or what https://cointelegraph.com knows about Mt Gox? Mt. Gox was a cryptocurrency exchange based in Tokyo and had been providing about 70% of Bitcoin transactions worldwide before suffering a major cyber attack, which led to its bankruptcy. In 2011, the price of Bitcoin on the Mt. Gox exchange dropped to a record low of one cent due to a security breach. Then a sum of Bitcoins equalling more than $8,750,000 was transferred to the hackers’ accounts. The company continued operating, but due to suspect trading in 2014, the company eventually closed its website, all of its services and applied in court for bankruptcy protection. Mt. Gox is subject to numerous lawsuits from its customers because the debt owed to them still amounts to over $60 million. Mt.Gox’s latest news states that enough Bitcoins were sold to cover the claims of creditors. Yours seems awfully similar. I hope for your sake that you didn't copy paste it, but taking a look at your post history, i'm not so sure... you have a lot of weird posts and differences in your grammar level between posts.. My prediction of future bitcoin.
Bitcoin prospects are a promising long-term prospect. bitcoin prices in the early to mid-2018 will reach more than $ 6,000. He also predicts that Bitcoin prices will continue to rise up to $ 25,000 by 2022.
He believes that several factors will cause Bitcoin to rise to more than $ 6,000. One of them is the increase in public adoption in the use of Bitcoin as a store of wealth and financial investment by 50%. Lee said "We see Bitcoin successfully securing institutional licenses and improving transaction platforms, so that public adaptability is greater.
Russia's Supreme Court has effectively overturned the decision to ban access to the Bitcoininfo.ru website, after a popular Russian portal containing information and news related to crypto. The ruling sets a precedent for more than 40 sites with similar content removed by Russian authorities over the past few years.
Russia’s Supreme Court has effectively annulled a decision to ban access to the Bitcoininfo.ru website, once popular Russian portal containing crypto-related information and news. The ruling sets a precedent for more than 40 sites with similar content taken down by Russian authorities over the last several years. Am i reaching here? It sure seems like you replace words in order to hide the fact that you're blantantly copy-pasting (<?>), but this only creates more errors, making it more obvious it's a copy paste? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
