Soon? I doubt it will ever happen just like migrating completely to the new forum.

Well, that's what happens if you give control over to an individual/group of individuals. Either way, I don't really want to complain. I have catered my trust-settings to trust like 2 people and don't even judge anybody by the random DT ratings left on their profile.

No, I wouldn't be convenient if not anonymous on any forum on the internet which deals with cryptocurrencies.

You think it's hard to create a fake Gmail/Facebook account?

Giving up our identity online is not worth any money, at least the way I look at it. I wouldn't reveal my personal details to anyone even if offered a million bucks. Not that I do something wrong but it's against the ecosystem the forum is designated for.

Yes, you're correct. The last commit was indeed 13 days ago...I don't know what's stopping theymos from getting it done for just once and then migrate to the new forum completely. Looking at the new developments coming to this forum, I doubt he's planned a release anytime soon.

Frankly speaking, most of the casinos haven't even managed to implement a proper automated withdrawal structure. Implementing Lightning Network should be way ahead of their priorities.

Paying $20 as fees for smaller transactions would be basically the death of bitcoins. How the fuck anyone is cool with paying $20 for a bitcoin transaction?

Pretty sure they won't pay $20 per transaction just to make sure the players receive their withdrawals on time.

How much money do you have to invest if not the skills? Developers don't come for free and to turn your idea into reality is more complicated than you think. I don't know how you can predict your vision is perfect when you haven't even shared the idea with 2 people.

Just quoting a few replies from the experienced members,


I wonder why are we ever relying on a broken system so much that we think it's the only cure for all the problems on the forum. I shouldn't complain though, for I don't have a better alternative to suggest.

So according to your logic posting a thread and instantly bumping it isn't counted as against the rules? Well, that fuckin dissolves the entire point of bumping the thread.

I'm very sure I understand them. Had I reported your "bump", I'm pretty sure it would have been deleted. I'll see you around.

I think the process is even simpler for data-centered websites like facebook... I wonder what investigations can possibly be involved apart from checking the IP logs. IP Logs along with verification from the oldest staked address should be enough. The problem is, this process isn't automated and 2 admins have to process this stuff manually.

GitHub files aren't updated to kill time. If you look at the commits, every commit message has some information along with it which explains what exactly the files are updated for. What scares me is, the last commit  was around July 7th https://github.com/epochtalk/epochtalk/pull/457/commits/91599ad083e33fc0314628fdae9c88f297894760 and not sure if the website is being actively developed.

You want to be a signature campaign manager on bitcointalk and you are not even aware of the basic rules on the forum. You can only bump your thread once in every 24 hours. Do YOU think a person who isn't knowledgeable on the basic forum's rules will ever be a good campaign manager for the forum?

If it's not worth the trouble you should just stop using it maybe? Anyway, you never know how the conversion will work around these payment processors. They don't have a set of constant policies which will work out in every case. You will never know why or when you will be blocked. Personally, I would hate to have my crypto converted to other centralized platforms like Skrill.

You're pretty new here compared to the existing shared pool of bettors. You know, people wouldn't blindly trust you with their monies. You think an escrow would be an essential part here? Also, there is barely any proof for the stuff mentioned in the post.

I don't think charging fees to recover something that belongs to you is an ideal way to go. Maybe if someone wants to recover their accounts on a priority basis then charging them is okay.

They're not being ignored. There's just too much stuff on theymos's plate to give account recovery as a priority.

If not that, the quickest and the easiest way to go about it would be incentivizing newbie accounts in order to manage campaigns. A newbie account has to pay a certain fee to become a campaign manager. After paying the fee, they will be publicly judged after 1st week of their management and decided if they're capable to continue. If they're not capable, the thread should be locked until company hires someone else. Not only newbie accounts but any rank lesser than Hero Member shouldn't be directly allowed to manage signature campaigns.

As a crypto -enthusiast this saddens me. " introduced us to this forum how to earn form bitcointalk. " - Man, why do you want to ruin the place for people who are dedicated to technology, revolution and do things to make a difference in the world? Bitcointalk isn't certainly a place for scums like you who join to the forum with the only goal of spamming the shit out of it. I don't even get mad at this anymore, just sad.

Don't.
 - You have very less amount to start with. Secondly, you are likely to get scammed considering your knowledge about the forum and lending section in general.
 - Instead, try trading or holding which can turn out to be more lucrative than getting scammed by a scum on the forum.

That is likely to be the case. I'm glad coinbase accepted the deal. Are you sure their staff is paid in bitcoins? That's great then! One of the vendor's comments in the thread was like his business have officially started to accept bitcoins after the coinbase payment which is good.

Original Post : https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/999pi1/catered_for_coinbase_got_paid_in_btc/

Quote from the comments

Although I consider them the shittest exchange in the bitcoin scene, this is too important to not to be shared lol I wish all the exchanges followed a similar pay structure towards their staff, event managers, promoters. If nothing else that would truly help promote bitcoin commercially.

¬¬¬Keep the thread spam free¬¬¬ All generic shite posts will be reported.

Why would you want everything to be centralized than it already is? Why should all the control be given to the DT's instead of a proper system that operates on predefined rules? We know the DT system is broken, feedback's are often biased and subjective. You know, if that ever happens, you will only see the members of DT managing the campaigns and not let anybody else to do it. I really have like 3 members in my trust-list whose feedbacks I consider appropriate. I don't mind if a set of rules are defined for one to become a bounty manager or community has to approve on an individual basis.

Not going to work out in the long run. Yes, we have DT, scams still exist, account farmers still exists, bumping services still exists and I can go in. We need an improved system to reduce this drastically.

Exactly. To be honest, we need more bitcoin/blockchain sort of discussions on the forum. And not bitching about the system in Meta. Most of the top merited posters are not even close to writing a single informative post outside of Meta.

You should be if you are keen on keeping your knowledge up to date.