What wallet are you using for BCH? Also, which fork of BCH is your wallet on? BCHabc or BCHSV?

No, someone in the Meta thread created it for me to demonstrate how to have an animated avatar. Problem is, I can't see it on my end. LOL. I already cleared my cache but not my cookies.

Edit: Oh there it goes now.  

BTW XhomerX, I appreciate your work. Don't hate me for getting a knock off.  

I gather it is really gross. I don't even want to imagine. Thank goodness for my eyes that curiosity won't get the best of me in this case.

Edit: fuck!

Thanks for the hat.  I'll try it on for a little while.

Hence why I used the term "dusting." 

Meh, last time that address sent or received any BTC was in 2014. and that was only a dusting.

I found this link with an archive to old sec logs.


If you go to this link, http://archive.is/xlZs7 You will see the password was changed on 07/19/2017.

Hmm, I thought R0ach got out just before the finex hack. But the $800 price tag seems to indicate that he stuck around until January 2017. Unless he's rounding up a little. Then that would be in October 2016. Well played on his part. That's at least a 4x gain in couple of years. Of course, he could have stuck around for a year more and made 100x profit. But around the time just before the finex hack, you could tell he was getting sick of the price manipulation.

I'm not particularly concerned.  I gave them an obligatory taunt post in their reputation thread. I'm sure it will be deleted, shortly.

The only problem with Neutral trust is if a person has a zero trust rating,  many people don't even bother to check the trust comments. Perhaps a message under trust to "click here to read peer comments" should be warranted.

     I'm going to use an analogy here. Let's say someone lives in the US and just turned 21 two days ago. They decide to go to a nightclub, and somehow ends up losing their ID along the way. When the 21 years old goes to the nightclub, they discover that their ID is missing and the nightclub does not let them enter. Is the nightclub doing something wrong? After all, the person is 21 years old. They just don't have an ID.
     Unfortunately, it appears JusticeforYou has lost the keys that would have allowed him full reentry into our community. If I am not mistaken, Satoshi himself cannot even access his account here unless he can prove to the satisfaction of theymos that he is indeed Satoshi. So Justiceforyou has a privilege that the founder doesn't enjoy. At least he is free to post on this forum. We must take every precaution possible to ensure that this forum doesn't fall for a big con. You do realize that con is short for confidence, correct?
     I for one would hope that JusticeForYou finds a usb drive tucked away in a junk drawer, and is able to retrieve the private keys. Hopefully multiple keys that have no current UTXO attached to them so he doesn't have to reveal his wealth and can be totally vindicated. Also, JusticeForYou indicated that he sent a PM to theymos. Perhaps theymos himself feels that having access to the original e-mail is sufficient.

What kind of wallet are you using that has access to 1AUQBtHB5sbrsW2cmt4vRVv8aV2Ab1Auou?

I wondered what I was doing wrong.   It's all good though.   At least you didn't leave a rave review on my rimming talents or that I spread doomsday virus.  

However, I have been put on a list of accounts to exclude from people's trust list in reputation. So I suspect the new list Loyce comes out with is going to have many people giving me the ~ bird.

H8bussesNbicycles

Just have to go to profile/ personal message options and add the name to the ignorelist.

I just hope JusticeforYou can find an old usb drive with the backup for the lost private keys. I'm not sure what to think of the red tag.   Maybe the PM to theymos can clear this matter up quickly. However, I'm not certain IP addresses from years ago mean much since many carriers have dynamic IPs.

I can explain what happened with suchmoon. I had just gotten a manicure, so when I went to go scratch suchmoon's back, I grabbed the first thing that was available. I can't help it that it happened to be a meat cleaver.

Well, there is that rare newbie that requests a loan and offers a sufficient amount of collateral (ie an altcoin with good liquidity) I don't think we should exclude them just because there are too many newbies trying to pull a Wimpy.

See, this stat shows that I am a really nice guy. I haven't backstabbed anyone. Apparently, I am only a victim. But since the crime committed on me is at the bottom of the list, it's only a flesh wound. May even be accidental on the perps part for gross recklessness.

Yes, the signature ban may help with sig sliging. However, what solution should we implement for thread bumping bots? Don't some of these get busted because the bots use the same content later on to post fake conversations? A signature ban may hurt them a little because they can't earn a side income from sig slinging. However, they are getting paid to spread prepackaged bullshit to ann threads. Oh well, maybe it doesn't matter because the people running thread bumping services are usually crafty enough to modify their bots and create an army of accounts.

@OP. You must understand. The community just cannot encourage newbie accounts to apply for no collateral loans. There is nothing stopping people from creating new accounts on this forum when another account they have was used to obtain a loan and not pay back. Also, there is no real way for people here to verify your identity and pursue you in court if you should happen to fail to repay the loan. If you must apply for a loan with a newbie account, you will need to surrender some collateral in the form of another altcoin. I know the usual 120% collateral required seems high. However, the person making the loan still has much risk, since the cryptocurrency market is very volatile. I know that your .001 request seems like peanuts. But if someone starts to give newbie accounts .001 no collateral loans, word spreads fast and I suspect that person will get inundated with .001 BTC requests.