soy
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
 |
November 25, 2013, 02:35:39 PM |
|
Ok the Noob , (thats me) got it working....
So i upgraded the modules and my saturn is hashing at a jupiter speed ...only one prob ...the front fans on casing have stopped working ...any idea why and solution ?
12v to the 4 pin molex is missing or needs a common ground. |
|
|
|
|
|
joeventura
|
|
November 25, 2013, 02:45:53 PM |
|
Heads-up for tomo BTW - incoming...
Day is almost over, what ya got? |
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1014
|
|
November 25, 2013, 02:48:21 PM |
|
Heads-up for tomo BTW - incoming...
Day is almost over, what ya got? +1 |
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
canth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:04:23 PM |
|
 No details. Coming Soon TM |
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:05:07 PM |
|
Heads-up for tomo BTW - incoming...
Day is almost over, what ya got? +1 On the page: Announcing Neptune our 20nm product for early 2014. Bitcoin Mining Hardware Search |
|
|
|
|
|
puffer
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:06:28 PM |
|
|
Quibus in rebus duo maxime fugienda sunt – ne quid effeminatum aut molle, et ne quid durum aut rusticum sit
|
|
|
|
AFox
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:12:16 PM |
|
I just saw that the controller as two 4 pin fan connectors for the box fans.  But the box fans have only 3 pin connectors. On a computer motherboard, a 4 pin connector allows the computer to control the fan speed to reach a targeted temperature. Could it be the same on a Jupiter/Saturn ? If yes, what is the target temperature ? |
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1014
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:17:18 PM |
|
this is big  |
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
|
robix
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:19:01 PM |
|
Hmmmm, BTC Guild and GHash.IO 28% Hashrate respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dplusf
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:20:40 PM |
|
No details. Coming Soon TMAaaah. What dows coming soon mean? How soon is soon??? |
|
|
|
|
|
puffer
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:23:27 PM |
|
I would'nt be a competitor of KNC right now....
Don't wanna think also how many people wasted money in vanishing pre-orders.
|
Quibus in rebus duo maxime fugienda sunt – ne quid effeminatum aut molle, et ne quid durum aut rusticum sit
|
|
|
felix64
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:43:43 PM |
|
KnC: core 3-0 was disabled due to 3 HW errors in a row
core 3-82
core 3-162
core 3-52
core 3-87
core 3-50
core 3-179
core 3-177
core 3-45
core 3-27
core 3-188
core 3-35
core 3-77
core 3-40
core 3-58
This is with cgminer-3.8.2 tuned. It makes no difference between stable and tuned.
My die 3 is the problem one.
I get an occasional errors from die 4 and 0 with one bad thread
KnC: core 4-0 was disabled due to 3 HW errors in a row
KnC: core 4-130 was disabled due to 3 HW errors in a row
KnC: core 4-118 was disabled due to 3 HW errors in a row
KnC: core 4-64 was disabled due to 3 HW errors in a row
KnC: core 4-113 was disabled due to 3 HW errors in a row
KnC: core 0-33 was disabled due to 3 HW errors in a row
But my die 3 is the troublemaker.
(5s) 502.8G (avg): 498.6Gh/s | A:4567616 R: 38764 HW: 221371 WU: 6965.5/m
[/quote]
felix is it 15 bad cores or 5?
You know that with the tuning cgminer it turns cores on and off to try and find a stable medium.
What are your HW error %'s?
I've given up on the firmwares that pump the voltage up (>0.97) and tune the cores, I'm sticking with 0.96 and the non tuning 3.8.2 cgminer and my HW errors are down from 4.5% to 1.3% and dropping.
[/quote]
|
|
|
|
|
Ghrindy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:44:16 PM |
|
Wow! 20nm AND early 2014! That MUST be the "incoming news" announcement from 'orama. |
|
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:44:35 PM |
|
I just saw that the controller as two 4 pin fan connectors for the box fans. But the box fans have only 3 pin connectors. On a computer motherboard, a 4 pin connector allows the computer to control the fan speed to reach a targeted temperature. Could it be the same on a Jupiter/Saturn ? If yes, what is the target temperature ? Ah, I assumed the 4th pin was for speed feedback so as to allow a notification if the fan failed. |
|
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:47:53 PM |
|
No details. Coming Soon TMWow! 20nm AND early 2014! That MUST be the "incoming news" announcement from 'orama. anyone care to speculate on the other specs and prices? just for funI'll get us started, 2TH @ =< 0.5 watt per ghs and selling for $3999. or less  |
Signature for hire!
|
|
|
|
vesperwillow
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:48:30 PM |
|
20nm in 2014? Not only is that amazing, it's almost hard to believe. It would be beyond most current GPU OEM's specs.
|
|
|
|
|
AFox
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:50:28 PM |
|
I just saw that the controller as two 4 pin fan connectors for the box fans. But the box fans have only 3 pin connectors. On a computer motherboard, a 4 pin connector allows the computer to control the fan speed to reach a targeted temperature. Could it be the same on a Jupiter/Saturn ? If yes, what is the target temperature ? Ah, I assumed the 4th pin was for speed feedback so as to allow a notification if the fan failed. the fan is driven with a constant supply voltage; the speed control is performed by the fan based on the control signal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_control#Pulse-width_modulation |
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:52:04 PM |
|
20nm in 2014? Not only is that amazing, it's almost hard to believe. It would be beyond most current GPU OEM's specs.
GPUs are not selling for $5000/each nor are they as simple as SHA-256 engines It's already been proven that there's more than enough money our there to cover the NRE and much more on this project. Kind of exciting. |
|
|
|
|
edgar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1859
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:54:17 PM |
|
reading between the lines it was obvious after all............ (toned down ed)
|
|
|
|
|
Ghrindy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
November 25, 2013, 03:54:52 PM |
|
20nm in 2014? Not only is that amazing, it's almost hard to believe. It would be beyond most current GPU OEM's specs.
GPUs are not selling for $5000/each nor are they as simple as SHA-256 engines It's already been proven that there's more than enough money our there to cover the NRE and much more on this project. Kind of exciting. I wouldn't be surprised if they just taped out or are about to. |
|
|
|
|
|
