DiabloMiner GPU Miner

[neptop]

and i always thought it's best to not change a running system.

A popular quote, but nonsense, if you care for things like security.

Must be from a script kiddie, angry because his scripts didn't work any longer

@DiabloD3: Thanks again. If you have spare time you could prevent it from spamming so much when there is no connection (replacing the old message instead of just adding something new) and make him not print the whole JSON-RPC answers when Bitcoin is not connected, but only the message. Just cosmetic things.

Oh, one more thing. Java is in PATH.

[1713880599]

1713880599

[1713880599]

1713880599

[1713880599]

1713880599

[1713880599]

1713880599

[BitLex]

and i always thought it's best to not change a running system.

A popular quote, but nonsense, if you care for things like security.

well, i prefer a running system over a secure one, even if theres some risks involved.
whats the point in security if the stuff you want to use, or the things you want to do dont work, or are not allowed anymore?
security at all costs? no thanks.

but we get a bit offtopic here.
i just thought i'd give it a try and it didnt work for me.
nevermind, m0mchil's works fine.

i appreciate all efforts to create new miners, keep up the good work.

[DiabloD3]

and i always thought it's best to not change a running system.

A popular quote, but nonsense, if you care for things like security.

Must be from a script kiddie, angry because his scripts didn't work any longer

@DiabloD3: Thanks again. If you have spare time you could prevent it from spamming so much when there is no connection (replacing the old message instead of just adding something new) and make him not print the whole JSON-RPC answers when Bitcoin is not connected, but only the message. Just cosmetic things.

Oh, one more thing. Java is in PATH.

Thats not something that can be fixed usefully, consoles don't work that way without heavy manipulation (such as using curses). Bitcoin does not output a JSON message if it is not connected, it only says that it can't connect, and I'm not going to remove the JSON output when it DOES connect and fail because it is a useful debugging tool.

[neptop]

Thats not something that can be fixed usefully, consoles don't work that way without heavy manipulation (such as using curses). Bitcoin does not output a JSON message if it is not connected, it only says that it can't connect, and I'm not going to remove the JSON output when it DOES connect and fail because it is a useful debugging tool.

I get the feeling you didn't understand what I meant.

Can't connect to Bitcoin: Failed to communicate with bitcoind: {"result":null,"error":{"code":-1,"message":"Bitcoin is not connected!"},"id":1}

could be:
Bitcoin is not connected!

Just paring the JSON you get and printing the message.
I had a look on you code and think you already wanted to do this:

System.out.println("\rCan't connect to Bitcoin: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());

should be

System.out.print("\rCan't connect to Bitcoin: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());

I guess. It doesn't make a lot of sense to do a carriage return after starting a new line, right? 

[DiabloD3]

Thats not something that can be fixed usefully, consoles don't work that way without heavy manipulation (such as using curses). Bitcoin does not output a JSON message if it is not connected, it only says that it can't connect, and I'm not going to remove the JSON output when it DOES connect and fail because it is a useful debugging tool.

I get the feeling you didn't understand what I meant.

Can't connect to Bitcoin: Failed to communicate with bitcoind: {"result":null,"error":{"code":-1,"message":"Bitcoin is not connected!"},"id":1}

could be:
Bitcoin is not connected!

Just paring the JSON you get and printing the message.
I had a look on you code and think you already wanted to do this:

System.out.println("\rCan't connect to Bitcoin: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());

should be

System.out.print("\rCan't connect to Bitcoin: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());

I guess. It doesn't make a lot of sense to do a carriage return after starting a new line, right? 

That doesn't make any sense because it will just overwrite the entire error a second later. The error is supposed to be part of the ongoing log.

Not only that, I don't know if the exception is JSON or an actual error due to how I hand the exception down, which is actually the correct behavior for designing such an app; you're trying to fix it in the wrong spot. What you really want to suggest is getting the message out of the JSON and then handing that down, which CAN be done.

I'm still. however, not changing the log behavior, this is exactly the way it should work in ANY app designed like this.

[neptop]

But then it shouldn't get spammed all over. Once is enough and if it's a known message, you don't have to print it that often. If it is something like "Bitcoin isn't there" it's something that can be deleted in the next second.


If you want to do real debugging, it's better to use some kind of debugging code, which not only shows what the replies look like, but also what the code actually does or at least what happened when the exception occurred. Maybe creating a log file would be better. This would also allow people to study the behavior over longer time frames (beyond restarts).

However, I don't really care. So do what you think is right. I could simply change to code for different behavior.

[DiabloD3]

So, I just installed Cat 10.10... on my miner, -w 64 -v 2 is no longer optimal... -w 256 -v 1 is, and my speed is lower than it should be (about 66 mhash vs 70). So, they improved one issue (-v 2 should not have been performing better than -v 1), but got worse somewhere else. Bleh.

[DiabloD3]

Updated miner. As mentioned in updated op, on ATI 2.1 + 10.10 (which is slower than 10.9), using -w 64 -v 1 (not -v 2), I get almost 75 mhash on my Radeon 4850 which gives me above 95% estimated efficiency; using only 1% CPU in the miner and 0% CPU in X.

Oh, and as a side note, it does not automatically detect Radeon 5xxx on SDK 2.1; for the time being, you have to edit DiabloMiner.cl in the jar, comment the first line and uncomment the second and third lines. This is not required for SDK 2.2.

[slush]

Hi Diablo, I just tried your miner on Nvidia ION; it is quite impressive machine, because your hashmeter showing me 43Ghash/s at this moment . I was playing with -v and -w parameters and because I don't have an idea what it means, after setting up -w 1024 it become crazy. With default settings I have 2000khash/s which is very poor, but reasonable for this machine.

[DiabloD3]

There is a small problem, slush: I wasn't aware Ions supported OpenCL at all. -w and -v should only be used by people who know what they're doing. -w 1024 is too high for any platform I've seen, and the nvidia driver should reject it.

43 ghash/sec sounds like the miner isn't running at all, which I'm not sure how my app arrived at such a point if Nvidia's drivers are written correctly... which, its Nvidia, when have they ever written anything correctly.

[DiabloD3]

Update: You no longer have to edit the OpenCL to enable the bitalign hack for SDK 2.1 and Radeon 5xxx anymore: just start the program with -a

[MrFlibble]

Thanks for the stats - I used the posts above in this thread to compile a table at https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners .  Some data is missing, please feel free to edit.

[DiabloD3]

Update: added Radeon 4xxx mode that splits the OpenCL kernel payload in half... use -s. I am now 99.1% efficient on Radeon 4xxx hardware.

[SmokeTooMuch]

Update: added Radeon 4xxx mode that splits the OpenCL kernel payload in half... use -s. I am now 99.1% efficient on Radeon 4xxx hardware.

gonna test that on my hd4870.

EDIT:
WOW O.O
from ~77mh/s (m0mchil) to 300+mh/s !!!

but somehow it is decreasing continously ... any explanation for that ?
--> stopped decreasing at ~274mh/s (but somehow still slightly decreasing)

btw: desktop responsiveness is still a horror

used:

Code:

java -cp target\libs\*;target\DiabloMiner-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar -Djava.library.path=target\libs\natives\windows com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner -s -u MYNAME -p MYPASSWORD

EDIT2: started it again ans this time it seems like its behaviour is normal.
instead of steadily decreasing, it is now increasing. ~250mh/s

[DiabloD3]

Something is not working right here on your machine. There is no way you should be getting above 94 mhash. What do you get with mine with split not enabled?

Also, yes, -s completely destroys desktop interactivity. Try using -f 240 on top of that until I commit a change to implicitly do that with -s (4xxx needs -f 120 to begin to operate normally without destroying desktop interactivity)

[teknohog]

Something is not working right here on your machine. There is no way you should be getting above 94 mhash. What do you get with mine with split not enabled?

Similarly, my HD5570 shows about 400 Mhash/s with -s, which is quite an improvement from the usual 60 It has succesfully generated blocks on the test network, but much slower than expected. At the moment it does not even run without -s:

Code:

Added Redwood (5 CU, 1x vector, local work size of Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
        at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL10.clGetKernelWorkGroupInfo(CL10.java:1586)
        at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner$DeviceState.<init>(DiabloMiner.java:392)
        at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.execute(DiabloMiner.java:198)
        at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.main(DiabloMiner.java:87)

[SmokeTooMuch]

does diablominer work with the new getwork from the official client ?

[SmokeTooMuch]

Something is not working right here on your machine. There is no way you should be getting above 94 mhash. What do you get with mine with split not enabled?

Code:

java -cp target\libs\*;target\DiabloMiner-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar -Djava.library.path=target\libs\natives\windows com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner -w 64 -u NAME -p PW

leads to ~80mh/s (no matter whether -w 64, -w 128 or -w 256)

[neptop]

Got the same problem.
-w 256 says 3210932050 khashes here
Would be really nice

[DiabloD3]

As a side note, do not try -s on Radeon 5xxx. It is slower, and it can also lead to random segfaults because I think I'm hitting a bug in the driver.

Now, as for the gigantic hash problem is, the hash counter is increased every time a kernel is queued... if the kernel fails to queue (which I just added detection of in the build I just pushed out), it would still increase the hash counter. Now, it quits and bitches.

UukGoblin on IRC found a slight tiny bug in the new code I wrote for split, so I just fixed that, it effected people not using split. This should cure some of the problems some of you were having.

So, everyone upgrade and see if you're still experiencing bugs.