Dispelling LN FUD from Rizun For others that care to research -
Rizun is not a chief scientist lol..
Well, that's his title. For all it is worth. Of course, the title is not as important as the content. Do you want to talk about that, or just sling shit?
this guy is on Rogers payroll
Quite literally the first time I have come across this assertion. May be true, but I'm not going to just take your word for it. Want to back up your assertion?
shilling bigger blocks,
It ain't 'shilling', if it is something in which you believe. By definition. Or do you mean to denigrate any advocacy of any position that you personally do not agree with?
he's trying hard
Well, he may be trying hard. Though we've known about and discussed these issues with Lightning for years - though perhaps not condensed into five pithy points as he has.
to discredit LN
Well, to point out flaws within the Lightning design which seem to be shouted down rather than discussed. If you want to refer to this process as 'discredit', then knock yourself out.
which is all FUD.
If it is just FUD, it should be easy to provide a convincing rebuttal. None yet in evidence.
Funny thing is that Jbreher rather listen to him than the actual engineers who's working on LN itself..lol.
Are you lying or just intentionally ignorant? I provided a summary of one of Lightning Labs' important engineer's weaksauce 'rebuttal' just a handful of posts upthread. In case you don't understand the significance, Joost is one of "the actual engineers who's working on LN itself". As just one example which proves how wrong you are. lol, indeed
When Bitcoin SV has been experiencing new problems due to 6 consecutive orphan blocks
I don't see how this is relevant to LN, but I'll bite. What 'problems'?
not even a singel word from Jbreher.
Again, I have responded to this issue upthread. Intentionally ignorant again? Lying again?
Like i said before; just tunnel vision big blocks without understanding the consequences.
Oh, I understand the consequences. By your refusal to engage on the actual issues raised, however, it would seem tacit admission that you have no
understanding of the
consequences of design decisions behind Lightning.