freshzive
|
|
July 24, 2013, 01:09:39 AM |
|
omg, we found one. now 10 more please.
|
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
July 24, 2013, 01:29:00 AM |
|
When is this round going to end Seeing as my nodes have had very bad luck the last couple of days (2.2hrs to share, 6 shares in the last 48 hours!) and my payout has dropped to under half what it was a day ago, I'm predicting a bunch of blocks in short succession! Future mining is unaffected by past mining. Thinking otherwise is called the Gambler's Falacy. I added a BFL SC Single on to p2pool today ... I wonder if that will help (P.S. I run /+64 but I don't put up the true share difficulty) I am aware of that, just pointing out that my luck (in general, not just mining) always seems to be on the bad end of the scale. Maybe I'm just jinxed.
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
July 24, 2013, 03:10:24 AM |
|
Maybe I'm just jinxed.
Told you, my payout is currently at about half the normal level due to the my bad luck in finding shares over the last couple of days and this is when we find 2 blocks in less than 2 hours.
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
July 24, 2013, 03:13:49 AM |
|
Maybe I'm just jinxed.
Told you, my payout is currently at about half the normal level due to the my bad luck in finding shares over the last couple of days and this is when we find 2 blocks in less than 2 hours. There is no such thing as predetermined mining luck or misfortune Though bad software or hardware doesn't help Edit: yes 16 block apart - not too bad. Edit2: see it was making up for your half payout by paying you twice
|
|
|
|
elebit
|
|
July 24, 2013, 06:11:42 AM |
|
How far back does p2pool look at your work share to calculate your share in a solved block?
|
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
July 24, 2013, 06:16:07 AM |
|
How far back does p2pool look at your work share to calculate your share in a solved block?
The length of the share chain is around 8640 shares, which with an average 30s share time, is 3 days.
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
HellDiverUK
|
|
July 24, 2013, 09:42:41 AM |
|
What spec of machines are folks using for p2pool? I'm thinking of setting it up myself, but not sure what machine to use.
I've got a Celeron 847 (dual core 1.1GHz) with 8GB RAM and a 64GB SDD. Is that likely to be enough? Probably running Windows Server 2008R2, so very little OS overhead.
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 24, 2013, 09:58:58 AM |
|
What spec of machines are folks using for p2pool? I'm thinking of setting it up myself, but not sure what machine to use.
I've got a Celeron 847 (dual core 1.1GHz) with 8GB RAM and a 64GB SDD. Is that likely to be enough? Probably running Windows Server 2008R2, so very little OS overhead.
That should be plenty. The SSD will be the biggest help. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
July 24, 2013, 11:17:30 AM |
|
Problem isn't necessarily p2pool, its bitcoind. As long as it can produce work in .1 seconds you're good. For a couple microseconds it will use 100% cpu, and remember disk space as blockchain gets bigger.
|
|
|
|
lenny_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
DARKNETMARKETS.COM
|
|
July 24, 2013, 11:59:22 AM |
|
Catched an error today: 2013-07-24 12:58:36.067043 Pool: 2343GH/s Stale rate: 9.8% Expected time to block: 15.9 hours 2013-07-24 12:58:44.749809 Peer sent entire transaction a4bcbbc4fbed73523e13ba325acd3efe5e706b3fe8b492751f73598c7a5ca603 that was already received 2013-07-24 12:58:51.094497 P2Pool: 17428 shares in chain (17432 verified/17432 total) Peers: 7 (0 incoming) 2013-07-24 12:58:51.097240 Local: 0H/s in last 0.0 seconds Local dead on arrival: ??? Expected time to share: ??? 2013-07-24 12:58:51.097320 Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Stale rate: ??? Efficiency: ??? Current payout: 0.0000 BTC 2013-07-24 12:58:51.097409 Pool: 2343GH/s Stale rate: 9.8% Expected time to block: 15.9 hours 2013-07-24 12:59:06.124648 P2Pool: 17428 shares in chain (17432 verified/17432 total) Peers: 7 (0 incoming) 2013-07-24 12:59:06.124736 Local: 0H/s in last 0.0 seconds Local dead on arrival: ??? Expected time to share: ??? 2013-07-24 12:59:06.124767 Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Stale rate: ??? Efficiency: ??? Current payout: 0.0000 BTC 2013-07-24 12:59:06.124804 Pool: 2343GH/s Stale rate: 9.8% Expected time to block: 15.9 hours 2013-07-24 12:59:21.151871 P2Pool: 17428 shares in chain (17432 verified/17432 total) Peers: 7 (0 incoming) 2013-07-24 12:59:21.151978 Local: 0H/s in last 0.0 seconds Local dead on arrival: ??? Expected time to share: ??? 2013-07-24 12:59:21.152017 Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Stale rate: ??? Efficiency: ??? Current payout: 0.0000 BTC 2013-07-24 12:59:21.152061 Pool: 2343GH/s Stale rate: 9.8% Expected time to block: 15.9 hours 2013-07-24 12:59:28.991313 Peer sent entire transaction f2f79a3ea9cf95cf4995b7dff8be2c6063706abc00c754b66a5f6fe80d635871 that was already received 2013-07-24 12:59:36.180783 P2Pool: 17428 shares in chain (17432 verified/17432 total) Peers: 7 (0 incoming) 2013-07-24 12:59:36.181005 Local: 0H/s in last 0.0 seconds Local dead on arrival: ??? Expected time to share: ??? 2013-07-24 12:59:36.181121 Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Stale rate: ??? Efficiency: ??? Current payout: 0.0000 BTC 2013-07-24 12:59:36.181265 Pool: 2343GH/s Stale rate: 9.8% Expected time to block: 15.9 hours 2013-07-24 12:59:36.372657 > Error while processing Event callbacks: 2013-07-24 12:59:36.372933 > Traceback (most recent call last): 2013-07-24 12:59:36.373074 > File "/home/pioruns/p2pool/p2pool/p2p.py", line 280, in handle_shares 2013-07-24 12:59:36.373234 > self.node.handle_shares(result, self) 2013-07-24 12:59:36.373369 > File "/home/pioruns/p2pool/p2pool/node.py", line 48, in handle_shares 2013-07-24 12:59:36.373505 > self.node.set_best_share() 2013-07-24 12:59:36.373627 > File "/home/pioruns/p2pool/p2pool/node.py", line 297, in set_best_share 2013-07-24 12:59:36.373749 > self.best_share_var.set(best) 2013-07-24 12:59:36.373864 > File "/home/pioruns/p2pool/p2pool/util/variable.py", line 74, in set 2013-07-24 12:59:36.373986 > self.changed.happened(value) 2013-07-24 12:59:36.374099 > --- <exception caught here> --- 2013-07-24 12:59:36.374213 > File "/home/pioruns/p2pool/p2pool/util/variable.py", line 42, in happened 2013-07-24 12:59:36.374333 > func(*event) 2013-07-24 12:59:36.374444 > File "/home/pioruns/p2pool/p2pool/node.py", line 96, in broadcast_share 2013-07-24 12:59:36.374543 > peer.sendShares([share for share in shares if share.peer_addr != peer.addr], self.node.tracker, self.node.known_txs_var.value, include_txs_with=[share_hash]) 2013-07-24 12:59:36.374664 > File "/home/pioruns/p2pool/p2pool/p2p.py", line 288, in sendShares 2013-07-24 12:59:36.374770 > assert tx_hash in known_txs, 'tried to broadcast share without knowing all its new transactions' 2013-07-24 12:59:36.374875 > exceptions.AssertionError: tried to broadcast share without knowing all its new transactions 2013-07-24 12:59:36.996534 Peer sent entire transaction 1607b548e80dc1aaad5ac47dc263ce0fc2ece8c532eb38a1f1f55fb168fed197 that was already received 2013-07-24 12:59:37.032141 Peer sent entire transaction 1607b548e80dc1aaad5ac47dc263ce0fc2ece8c532eb38a1f1f55fb168fed197 that was already received 2013-07-24 12:59:37.439208 Peer sent entire transaction 1607b548e80dc1aaad5ac47dc263ce0fc2ece8c532eb38a1f1f55fb168fed197 that was already received 2013-07-24 12:59:39.190384 P2Pool: 17429 shares in chain (17433 verified/17433 total) Peers: 7 (0 incoming) 2013-07-24 12:59:39.193220 Local: 0H/s in last 0.0 seconds Local dead on arrival: ??? Expected time to share: ??? 2013-07-24 12:59:39.193264 Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Stale rate: ??? Efficiency: ??? Current payout: 0.0000 BTC 2013-07-24 12:59:39.193307 Pool: 2355GH/s Stale rate: 9.8% Expected time to block: 15.8 hours 2013-07-24 12:59:39.300764 Peer sent entire transaction 1607b548e80dc1aaad5ac47dc263ce0fc2ece8c532eb38a1f1f55fb168fed197 that was already received 2013-07-24 12:59:54.220979 P2Pool: 17429 shares in chain (17433 verified/17433 total) Peers: 7 (0 incoming) 2013-07-24 12:59:54.221136 Local: 0H/s in last 0.0 seconds Local dead on arrival: ??? Expected time to share: ??? 2013-07-24 12:59:54.221191 Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Stale rate: ??? Efficiency: ??? Current payout: 0.0000 BTC
|
|
|
|
HellDiverUK
|
|
July 24, 2013, 12:05:44 PM |
|
Yeah, I think I might use a different SSD, something a little bigger. The little Celeron 847 is pretty quick for what it is.
|
|
|
|
freshzive
|
|
July 24, 2013, 02:10:46 PM |
|
The celeron might not be enough. My latency on a 1.3ghz dual core atom (8gb ram, 120gb ssd) was high enough to increase my orphan and DOA rate pretty dramatically. The again, the celeron should be slightly faster.
My getblocktemplate latency was around ~500ms with the Atom. Dropped to ~100ms running on my main i7.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
July 24, 2013, 02:12:18 PM |
|
Idk the celerons, atoms and i5s I've used are trash
|
|
|
|
|
chanson
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 24, 2013, 04:47:06 PM |
|
Idk the celerons, atoms and i5s I've used are trash
I'm running p2pool/bitcoind/altcoinds/cgminer on an Intel Next Unit of Computing with a Celeron 847 @ 1.10GHz, 4GB RAM with 4x AsicMiner USB Eruptors. I had to move the blockchains (bitcoin, devcoin, namecoin, ixcoin) to an external USB hard drive (system drive is 32GB SSD). It took some tweaking, but my get work latency is ~0.2-0.3 and I see DOA of 1.5% and 101.5% efficiency. CPU load seems pretty low (~80-90% idle mostly). Seems fine to me. Biggest problem is that my share luck seems to be inversely proportional to p2pool's block luck.
|
|
|
|
lavajumper
|
|
July 24, 2013, 06:32:10 PM |
|
I'm setting up a p2pool for an altcoin. Mining appears to work well, but I can't get the stat page to display any stats. The stat headings show up, but not the data. The graphs are working. I'm not a python guy, and I'm having a hard time figuring out where to start. There's no errors in the logs. Could someone give a suggestion where to start looking?
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
dc81
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 100
|
|
July 24, 2013, 07:44:24 PM |
|
I'm setting up a p2pool for an altcoin. Mining appears to work well, but I can't get the stat page to display any stats. The stat headings show up, but not the data. The graphs are working. I'm not a python guy, and I'm having a hard time figuring out where to start. There's no errors in the logs. Could someone give a suggestion where to start looking?
javascript enabled?
|
|
|
|
forrestv (OP)
|
|
July 24, 2013, 07:47:28 PM |
|
I'm setting up a p2pool for an altcoin. Mining appears to work well, but I can't get the stat page to display any stats. The stat headings show up, but not the data. The graphs are working. I'm not a python guy, and I'm having a hard time figuring out where to start. There's no errors in the logs. Could someone give a suggestion where to start looking?
You have to wait a while for the chain to get long enough for some of the stats to work, so mine for a few hours first. A screenshot would be helpful.
|
1J1zegkNSbwX4smvTdoHSanUfwvXFeuV23
|
|
|
lavajumper
|
|
July 24, 2013, 08:18:34 PM |
|
Javascript is on. I'm getting this: And this: The only data filled in is the graphs. If I got to /web/tails or /web/head in my browser I get '[]' for both. Is there an idiots guide to setting this up for another coin. I got the .math entries, but I'm thinking I'm missing something big.
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
lenny_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
DARKNETMARKETS.COM
|
|
July 24, 2013, 11:29:19 PM |
|
You're using non-standard UI? can you share node's address?
|
|
|
|
|