Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 07:28:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 [337] 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 ... 814 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2591571 times)
gnar1ta$
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 09, 2013, 11:21:49 PM
 #6721

Yeah I like how everyone sees the hashrate on cgminer and gets excited.  It doesn't really matter. cgminer reports over 530 G for me on btcguild, but the pool only reports 480-490 G.  Maybe I can get Knc to pay the difference since they refuse to prove they didn't make cgminer lie.  At least p2pool pays me more than cgminer is reporting  Tongue

Losing hundreds of Bitcoins with the best scammers in the business - BFL, Avalon, KNC, HashFast.
1710833327
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710833327

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710833327
Reply with quote  #2

1710833327
Report to moderator
1710833327
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710833327

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710833327
Reply with quote  #2

1710833327
Report to moderator
1710833327
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710833327

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710833327
Reply with quote  #2

1710833327
Report to moderator
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a SourceForge forum.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710833327
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710833327

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710833327
Reply with quote  #2

1710833327
Report to moderator
1710833327
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710833327

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710833327
Reply with quote  #2

1710833327
Report to moderator
matthewh3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
October 09, 2013, 11:28:45 PM
 #6722

Yeah I like how everyone sees the hashrate on cgminer and gets excited.  It doesn't really matter. cgminer reports over 530 G for me on btcguild, but the pool only reports 480-490 G.  Maybe I can get Knc to pay the difference since they refuse to prove they didn't make cgminer lie.  At least p2pool pays me more than cgminer is reporting  Tongue

I had a solid 560GH reported by Slush over ten rounds before the board died.  It's due to arrive in Sweden tomorrow and only then can they replace it.  160GH is a lot too loose and I want compo but was planning BabyJets next if they ship this month.

gnar1ta$
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 09, 2013, 11:35:05 PM
 #6723

Yeah I like how everyone sees the hashrate on cgminer and gets excited.  It doesn't really matter. cgminer reports over 530 G for me on btcguild, but the pool only reports 480-490 G.  Maybe I can get Knc to pay the difference since they refuse to prove they didn't make cgminer lie.  At least p2pool pays me more than cgminer is reporting  Tongue

I had a solid 560GH reported by Slush over ten rounds before the board died.  It's due to arrive in Sweden tomorrow and only then can they replace it.  160GH is a lot too loose and I want compo but was planning BabyJets next if they ship this month.
Hmmm....maybe I just have an extra crappy model.  I've tried 3 different pools and get 50-80G difference from what the pool reports and what cgminer reports.  Though they all report much higher than p2pool.

Losing hundreds of Bitcoins with the best scammers in the business - BFL, Avalon, KNC, HashFast.
matthewh3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
October 09, 2013, 11:39:54 PM
 #6724

Yeah I like how everyone sees the hashrate on cgminer and gets excited.  It doesn't really matter. cgminer reports over 530 G for me on btcguild, but the pool only reports 480-490 G.  Maybe I can get Knc to pay the difference since they refuse to prove they didn't make cgminer lie.  At least p2pool pays me more than cgminer is reporting  Tongue

I had a solid 560GH reported by Slush over ten rounds before the board died.  It's due to arrive in Sweden tomorrow and only then can they replace it.  160GH is a lot too loose and I want compo but was planning BabyJets next if they ship this month.
Hmmm....maybe I just have an extra crappy model.  I've tried 3 different pools and get 50-80G difference from what the pool reports and what cgminer reports.  Though they all report much higher than p2pool.

I've currently got 398959MH off just three chips over ten rounds on Slush.  With the fourth board and chip due at KNC in Sweden tomorrow for replacement.

kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4438
Merit: 1794


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 12:34:17 AM
 #6725

Yeah I like how everyone sees the hashrate on cgminer and gets excited.  It doesn't really matter. cgminer reports over 530 G for me on btcguild, but the pool only reports 480-490 G.  Maybe I can get Knc to pay the difference since they refuse to prove they didn't make cgminer lie.  At least p2pool pays me more than cgminer is reporting  Tongue

I had a solid 560GH reported by Slush over ten rounds before the board died.  It's due to arrive in Sweden tomorrow and only then can they replace it.  160GH is a lot too loose and I want compo but was planning BabyJets next if they ship this month.
Post a screen shot
... as I did above, it's easy to work out what it is really doing.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
AtomSea
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 143
Merit: 100


So sexy, it hurts.


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 03:56:50 AM
 #6726

Just wanted to say thanks to everyone here.
We have a strong & free Litecoin and Bitcoin mining site because of your work.
Very, very appreciative.
matthewh3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
October 10, 2013, 09:33:44 AM
 #6727

Yeah I like how everyone sees the hashrate on cgminer and gets excited.  It doesn't really matter. cgminer reports over 530 G for me on btcguild, but the pool only reports 480-490 G.  Maybe I can get Knc to pay the difference since they refuse to prove they didn't make cgminer lie.  At least p2pool pays me more than cgminer is reporting  Tongue

I had a solid 560GH reported by Slush over ten rounds before the board died.  It's due to arrive in Sweden tomorrow and only then can they replace it.  160GH is a lot too loose and I want compo but was planning BabyJets next if they ship this month.
Post a screen shot
... as I did above, it's easy to work out what it is really doing.

I can only post one of the pool as my associate state side is hosting my Jupiter's for import VAT reasons here in the UK.



zvs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000


https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2013, 02:42:09 AM
 #6728

” Graphs

Version: 13.3

Pool rate: 15.9TH/s (12% DOA+orphan) Share difficulty: 70300

Node uptime: 39.446 days Peers: 6 out, 0 in

Local rate: 389GH/s (14% DOA) Expected time to share: 0.216 hours

Shares: 1246 total (183 orphaned, 184 dead) Efficiency: 80.54% “


my speed is  82g,but in p2pool.info it show  my speed is  66g !

does everyone knows about my speed is slower?

why it show :  Efficiency: 80.54%  and  66g ?


that pool has an excessive # of orphans, if you're only going to have 6 outgoing connections and 0 incoming, you should use addnode (ed: --p2pool-node) to make sure you get at least a couple that are good

use http://p2pool-nodes.info/  and look for some that are well connected and allow incoming connections, you should also add that 4.5TH one regardless, if it still allows incoming connections, not sure
oldbushie
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 12, 2013, 04:13:39 AM
 #6729

I'm struggling with latency... for the first 15 hours when I started up p2pool my latency was 0.2 seconds. Then it inexplicably jumped to 1s at 7:30am a couple days ago (I was asleep but my dad turned on his Mac Mini apparently). I'm running it on an idle laptop that's not currently being used for anything else. I've tried:
- Turning off all other internet connected devices in the house to see if one could be the cause
- using QoS to prioritize bitcoind and p2pool packets
- fiddling with max connections, either low (20) or high (80) on both bitcoind and p2pool
- resetting the laptop p2pool is hosted on

I'm just boggling at what could possibly be the cause. The only things left I haven't tried are disabling/tweaking Kaspersky (any suggestions? not quite sure how to fine tune that besides having it exclude those directories from scanning, tho I do have Kaspersky Internet Security and it may be impeding the internal internet connections) or rebooting the router, maybe. I'm just not clear what suddenly triggered the latency to go into overdrive. Is bitcoind somehow remembering a bad node? How do I check for and/or clear bad nodes?

oldbushie
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 12, 2013, 05:34:37 AM
 #6730

I'm trying something different... just turning off all extraneous settings except the ones needed barebones to make the setup work at all. Instead of having a few options turned on that I know nothing about. Let's see how long it stays reasonable.

abbeytim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 438
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 12, 2013, 06:36:31 AM
 #6731

is the laptop on wifi ?? if so maybe the latency is from the wifi connection
zvs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000


https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2013, 06:48:05 PM
Last edit: October 12, 2013, 06:59:21 PM by zvs
 #6732

I'm struggling with latency... for the first 15 hours when I started up p2pool my latency was 0.2 seconds. Then it inexplicably jumped to 1s at 7:30am a couple days ago (I was asleep but my dad turned on his Mac Mini apparently). I'm running it on an idle laptop that's not currently being used for anything else. I've tried:
- Turning off all other internet connected devices in the house to see if one could be the cause
- using QoS to prioritize bitcoind and p2pool packets
- fiddling with max connections, either low (20) or high (80) on both bitcoind and p2pool
- resetting the laptop p2pool is hosted on

I'm just boggling at what could possibly be the cause. The only things left I haven't tried are disabling/tweaking Kaspersky (any suggestions? not quite sure how to fine tune that besides having it exclude those directories from scanning, tho I do have Kaspersky Internet Security and it may be impeding the internal internet connections) or rebooting the router, maybe. I'm just not clear what suddenly triggered the latency to go into overdrive. Is bitcoind somehow remembering a bad node? How do I check for and/or clear bad nodes?


wait, you mean the getblocktemplate latency is 1000ms?   remote stuff like google.com or something is 1000ms?  local network is 1000ms?

if it's #3, that should be easy to troubleshoot.  if it's #2, your upstream is probably becoming saturated (or your dad might be torrenting pr0n), so you should leave p2pool at 6 outbound connections and firewall 9332, change bitcoin.conf to listen=0, maxconnections=4, have enough connects (connect=xx.xx.xx.xx) so you dont get random connections (stuff i've been using for like a year, some like 5.9.24.81, 69.195.155.227, 188.40.112.72, 5.9.157.50, 89.238.64.139, 50.31.149.57).. some of those might not allow incoming connections anymore, i haven't maintenanced my addnode list in like 3 months..  but, uh, luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/seeds.txt is a good reference (ignore any node that's using something older than 0.8.2, or maybe 0.8.1 is ok..  the bitpeer node doesnt do any transaction verification (or blocks), so that's nixed too)

if it's #1, you either need to update your bitcoind version (it's probably taking all those horse staple battery transactions), change the fees, or reduce maximum block size.  most likely the first
oldbushie
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 12, 2013, 07:33:56 PM
 #6733

Yeah just changing everything to default settings fixed it... all I have set now on bitcoind is server mode and user/pass. I also got rid of the max-conns argument in my p2pool batch file.

amer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 12, 2013, 11:27:43 PM
 #6734

Can someone post a 24 hour chart of a BE blade's Hashrate+DOA rate? I want to see what "normal" is.

tips: 1amerApYUVjsKSuVUtfjxaoi7QXG7Zwao
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2013, 02:51:05 AM
 #6735

BE BLADE will have like 30% doa/orphans. It is NOT supporting LP so it is NOT good for P2pool.

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
Some stuff on https://github.com/Rav3nPL/
zvs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000


https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2013, 09:27:49 PM
 #6736

I like how it shows the 'my shares' on the web interface now..

Any chance of getting it to retain local shares that are declared orphans?  i.e. I see today that one share was orphaned, but when I click on it in 'my shares' it's already been deleted by p2pool.  I'd like to see what orphaned it and why (was it the same person getting two shares in a row, is there some other node I need to connect to, just bad luck, or what)..

re: I used to get like 0-5% orphans, now it's more like 5-10%.     http://www.nogleg.com:9332/static/graphs.html?Year  vs  http://www.nogleg.com:9332/static/graphs.html?Week

jedimstr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 17, 2013, 08:25:58 AM
 #6737

Is there any way to manually add a node for outgoing without bringing my node down?  I tried running a parallel p2pool process after editing my configuration file with additional -n entries and  switching over by exiting the original process to minimize downtime (one of the suggested ways to minimize downtime when upgrading p2pool as p2pool can reconnect to the recently vacated ports) but this method seriously raised DOA count and killed efficiency more than just sequentially bringing down and restarting p2pool.

Hypothetical: would an optimized Multi-threaded C version of p2pool be a better future path, possibly reducing inefficiencies and latency versus the current Python version and allowing configuration changes like peer node additions and maintenance on the fly? 

rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2013, 09:03:27 AM
 #6738

You can run second instance, wait till it will cry about busy worker port then kill old instance.
You will lose like 10-15 seconds.

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
Some stuff on https://github.com/Rav3nPL/
jedimstr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 17, 2013, 12:29:35 PM
 #6739

You can run second instance, wait till it will cry about busy worker port then kill old instance.
You will lose like 10-15 seconds.

Yeah, I mentioned I did that in my original post and mentioned that it killed efficiency for the node and raised DOA to a crazy number. That's why I was asking for any possible OTHER way of doing it.  Trying to do it this way gives worse results than just sequentially shutting down and restarting a single instance.

rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2013, 01:06:15 PM
 #6740

To avoid "large doa amount" you need shut down node for more than 1 minute to break all miners.
So kill, wait 30 sec, restart (will take like 1 minute), be happy of good stats.

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
Some stuff on https://github.com/Rav3nPL/
Pages: « 1 ... 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 [337] 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 ... 814 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!