norgan
|
|
June 15, 2014, 06:38:40 AM |
|
this is great, i'll be integrating it into my nodes as soon as I have some time.
|
|
|
|
nreal
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 932
Merit: 100
arcs-chain.com
|
|
June 15, 2014, 10:40:17 AM |
|
Restart, we are going in a loop - no blocks.
|
|
|
|
norgan
|
|
June 15, 2014, 11:26:46 AM |
|
Anyone else seeing more orphans of late?
|
|
|
|
|
bryonp
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
June 15, 2014, 01:27:14 PM |
|
Restart, we are going in a loop - no blocks.
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank You its really bad.......................
|
|
|
|
Littleshop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1004
|
|
June 15, 2014, 02:04:14 PM |
|
Restart, we are going in a loop - no blocks.
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank You its really bad....................... We got a block now!
|
|
|
|
bryonp
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
June 15, 2014, 02:14:29 PM |
|
Restart, we are going in a loop - no blocks.
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank You its really bad....................... We got a block now! Holly smokes I blocked... Looks like its aying around 50.00 for 2 says at 3 TH Am I missing something??? Any Help in understanding??? Thanks
|
|
|
|
bryonp
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
June 15, 2014, 02:29:31 PM |
|
Restart, we are going in a loop - no blocks.
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank You its really bad....................... We got a block now! Holly smokes I blocked... Looks like its paying around 50.00 for 2 days at 3 TH Am I missing something??? Any Help in understanding??? Thanks
|
|
|
|
jedimstr
|
|
June 15, 2014, 04:28:15 PM |
|
Restart, we are going in a loop - no blocks.
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank You its really bad....................... We got a block now! Holly smokes I blocked... Looks like its paying around 50.00 for 2 days at 3 TH Am I missing something??? Any Help in understanding??? Thanks Luck works both ways. There can be days when we can get 3 blocks in a row and get paid more overall than most pools.
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 15, 2014, 04:58:54 PM |
|
Luck works both ways. There can be days when we can get 3 blocks in a row and get paid more overall than most pools.
Is that part I put in bold accurate? Most pools, to my knowledge, pay entirely based on luck. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
nreal
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 932
Merit: 100
arcs-chain.com
|
|
June 15, 2014, 05:25:12 PM Last edit: June 15, 2014, 05:52:09 PM by nreal |
|
Bitcoindqt here is 1 hour behind, node punishes all the time - what is going on? Never ending punishment 2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -2 Safe mode: Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues. 2014-06-15 20:51:42.276634 > ######################################## 2014-06-15 20:51:42.276732 > >>> Warning: (from bitcoind) Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues. 2014-06-15 20:51:42.276794 > ########################################
|
|
|
|
xyzzy099
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1066
Merit: 1098
|
|
June 15, 2014, 06:05:06 PM |
|
Bitcoindqt here is 1 hour behind, node punishes all the time - what is going on? Never ending punishment 2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -2 Safe mode: Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues. 2014-06-15 20:51:42.276634 > ######################################## 2014-06-15 20:51:42.276732 > >>> Warning: (from bitcoind) Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues. 2014-06-15 20:51:42.276794 > ######################################## The last time I saw that error, my bitcoin block chain was corrupted. Rescan didn't fix it, and I had to re-download the whole damn thing.
|
Libertarians: Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
|
|
|
nreal
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 932
Merit: 100
arcs-chain.com
|
|
June 15, 2014, 06:09:48 PM Last edit: June 16, 2014, 08:47:24 AM by nreal |
|
Bitcoindqt here is 1 hour behind, node punishes all the time - what is going on? Never ending punishment 2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -2 Safe mode: Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues. 2014-06-15 20:51:42.276634 > ######################################## 2014-06-15 20:51:42.276732 > >>> Warning: (from bitcoind) Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues. 2014-06-15 20:51:42.276794 > ######################################## The last time I saw that error, my bitcoin block chain was corrupted. Rescan didn't fix it, and I had to re-download the whole damn thing. I did that just yesterday, hardisk is going to give up then maybe, hd passed test... It takes only 5 minutes to take a backup from .bitcoin directory and many hours to do it the hard way It was corrupted perhaps because of kernel options was not up to date with systemd
|
|
|
|
phillipsjk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1001
Let the chips fall where they may.
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:37:30 PM |
|
Does anyone know of a way to capture the password input a miner uses? I'm wondering if it's possible for miners to differentiate workers this way.
I think you should assume that any password sent to a P2Pool node will be known to the node operator. And, no, passwords are not a good way to differentiate users: It’s Me, and Here’s My Proof: Why Identity and Authentication Must Remain DistinctPublished: February 14, 2006 By Steve Riley Senior Security Strategist Security Technology Unit Microsoft Corporation
|
James' OpenPGP public key fingerprint: EB14 9E5B F80C 1F2D 3EBE 0A2F B3DE 81FF 7B9D 5160
|
|
|
ceslick
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 161
Merit: 100
digging in the bits... now ant powered!
|
|
June 16, 2014, 04:21:35 AM |
|
Yeah, got 10 orphans today....
Had only 2 up until then.
|
|
|
|
Hunterbunter
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:13:02 AM |
|
Does anyone know of a way to capture the password input a miner uses? I'm wondering if it's possible for miners to differentiate workers this way.
I think you should assume that any password sent to a P2Pool node will be known to the node operator. And, no, passwords are not a good way to differentiate users: It’s Me, and Here’s My Proof: Why Identity and Authentication Must Remain DistinctPublished: February 14, 2006 By Steve Riley Senior Security Strategist Security Technology Unit Microsoft Corporation Hmm perhaps I should rephrase the question: If a miner wanted to pass a simple message to the node operator, can they use the the password field? How does a node operator access it? It's not for sensitive information, just trivial stuff.
|
|
|
|
ratty
|
|
June 16, 2014, 06:26:24 AM Last edit: June 16, 2014, 08:17:09 AM by ratty |
|
I'm new to p2pool, I hope someone here can answer this, I've been mining Bitcoin for a day on it, and: Local rate: 171GH/s (1.6% DOA) Expected time to share: 12.6 hours Shares: 0 total (0 orphaned, 0 dead) Efficiency: ??? Payout if a block were found NOW: 0 BTC to [redacted]
Is that normal to have 0 shares for that long? With that hash rate, how long should it take to solve a single share? My miner sees lots of accepted shares, so I don't think its a problem with the miner. The estimate said 12 hours, 12 hours ago, so I can't go by that. 2 blocks have been found by the whole p2pool since I started, so I'm worried I am getting absolutely no credit for hashing. Should I not bother with p2pool unless I have a terrahash or more?
|
|
|
|
IYFTech
|
|
June 16, 2014, 09:24:43 AM |
|
I'm new to p2pool, I hope someone here can answer this, I've been mining Bitcoin for a day on it, and: Local rate: 171GH/s (1.6% DOA) Expected time to share: 12.6 hours Shares: 0 total (0 orphaned, 0 dead) Efficiency: ??? Payout if a block were found NOW: 0 BTC to [redacted]
Is that normal to have 0 shares for that long? With that hash rate, how long should it take to solve a single share? My miner sees lots of accepted shares, so I don't think its a problem with the miner. The estimate said 12 hours, 12 hours ago, so I can't go by that. 2 blocks have been found by the whole p2pool since I started, so I'm worried I am getting absolutely no credit for hashing. Should I not bother with p2pool unless I have a terrahash or more? Yeah, it can be like that - just be patient & they will come - but 171Gh isn't so much nowadays Is anyone using Dragon 1Th on p2pool? Care to share your experiences? Thinking of getting a few if they're compatible......
|
|
|
|
jedimstr
|
|
June 16, 2014, 09:27:13 AM |
|
I'm new to p2pool, I hope someone here can answer this, I've been mining Bitcoin for a day on it, and: Local rate: 171GH/s (1.6% DOA) Expected time to share: 12.6 hours Shares: 0 total (0 orphaned, 0 dead) Efficiency: ??? Payout if a block were found NOW: 0 BTC to [redacted]
Is that normal to have 0 shares for that long? With that hash rate, how long should it take to solve a single share? My miner sees lots of accepted shares, so I don't think its a problem with the miner. The estimate said 12 hours, 12 hours ago, so I can't go by that. 2 blocks have been found by the whole p2pool since I started, so I'm worried I am getting absolutely no credit for hashing. Should I not bother with p2pool unless I have a terrahash or more? Yeah, it can be like that - just be patient & they will come - but 171Gh isn't so much nowadays Is anyone using Dragon 1Th on p2pool? Care to share your experiences? Thinking of getting a few if they're compatible...... Worse than the S2's on p2pool. You'd be lucky to get 800gh per dragon pointing it to a p2pool node. At least that's what I've experienced from rentals. So far the avoid for p2pool list for me includes: S2, dragons, and Cointerra. The goto list for rentals/physical p2pool compatible (full hashrate) include: S1's, KNC and Spondoolies. Haven't seen what the Rockminers (R or Box) do with p2pool yet.
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 16, 2014, 10:20:32 AM |
|
I'm new to p2pool, I hope someone here can answer this, I've been mining Bitcoin for a day on it, and: Local rate: 171GH/s (1.6% DOA) Expected time to share: 12.6 hours Shares: 0 total (0 orphaned, 0 dead) Efficiency: ??? Payout if a block were found NOW: 0 BTC to [redacted]
Is that normal to have 0 shares for that long? With that hash rate, how long should it take to solve a single share? My miner sees lots of accepted shares, so I don't think its a problem with the miner. The estimate said 12 hours, 12 hours ago, so I can't go by that. 2 blocks have been found by the whole p2pool since I started, so I'm worried I am getting absolutely no credit for hashing. Should I not bother with p2pool unless I have a terrahash or more? What newcomers to p2pool usually don't immediately grasp is there are two types of shares in p2pool. The type that you see your miner submitting all the time, and the type that really count. It's the second type that you aren't getting many of. To elaborate, p2pool uses an "alt chain" of shares to keep track of who's submitted shares. You can consider that "alt chain" to be like another coin, with a much much lower difficulty. p2pool adjusts the difficulty required to get on that chain so that miners are getting shares on the chain roughly 30 seconds. (I think that's the number, the wiki might be outdated). That means the more people there are mining, the faster shares are found, so difficulty goes up. Right now that share difficulty is at 1,809,778. Your 171gh/s needs to find a share of that value or greater (at the time of this post), to get on that chain. That's why it's estimating it'll take you 12.6 hours to find a share. The good news is once you get a share, it's good for 3 days. So, at current numbers, making it 12 hours per share to make it easy, you should have 6 shares on the chain at any given point, assuming average luck. That's where variance comes in ... sometimes that number will be higher, sometimes that number will be lower. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
|