TiborB
Member
 Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 31, 2013, 03:33:56 PM |
|
Make that three invalid blocks in a row.
I would guess this is a sign of work being done in the background. I believe these blocks are not invalid but marked as such on the pool level (so they do not interfere with rewards), so the operator has some headroom to fix things. We can confirm this once blockchain.info gets back up again. |
|
|
|
|
TiborB
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
August 31, 2013, 03:34:59 PM |
|
Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues. actually, the first 2 were invalid at a time when blockchain.info was still up. |
|
|
|
|
TiborB
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
August 31, 2013, 03:37:26 PM |
|
Make that three invalid blocks in a row.
I would guess this is a sign of work being done in the background. I believe these blocks are not invalid but marked as such on the pool level (so they do not interfere with rewards), so the operator has some headroom to fix things. We can confirm this once blockchain.info gets back up again. Bockchain.info is back. My assumption was wrong, these blocks seem to be orphaned indeed. All 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BuhTuglia
|
|
August 31, 2013, 04:09:24 PM |
|
Not a bad run so far...
|
Just another dust miner... Enquiring Gnomes want to Mine!
Send nothing to 16SVa2iQA6HuNPDGYShpmeEvUBRi2gW7f1
|
|
|
console_cowboy
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
August 31, 2013, 04:17:45 PM |
|
Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues. actually, the first 2 were invalid at a time when blockchain.info was still up. I wonder what mechanism they are using to pull the data from blockchain.info. If only part of the site was down, say the mechanism that feeds out block information, then it is possible this could have caused an error on the pool. Could also just be Slush's pool having some issues as well. I am very glad this is now fixed though. |
|
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
|
August 31, 2013, 04:32:36 PM |
|
Not a bad run so far...
Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF. so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff. |
|
|
|
|
T3NU0US
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
August 31, 2013, 05:03:40 PM |
|
Not a bad run so far...
Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF. so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff. *apology* I am new to this whole thing and even though I've been trying to read as much as I can the last few weeks, it's a lot to absorb. Please forgive this possibly stupid question.*/apology* What is DIFF? |
|
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
|
August 31, 2013, 05:29:40 PM |
|
Not a bad run so far...
Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF. so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff. *apology* I am new to this whole thing and even though I've been trying to read as much as I can the last few weeks, it's a lot to absorb. Please forgive this possibly stupid question.*/apology* What is DIFF? (I was being sarcastic) Current Bitcoin block, difficulty: 255299, 65750060 http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.phpsimple terms how hard it is to find a block. next GUESS increase is .... 89 516 328 +24million wow its getting crazy up in here! |
|
|
|
|
crhys
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
Bitcoin Foundation Member
|
|
August 31, 2013, 05:33:52 PM |
|
Not a bad run so far...
Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF. so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff. *apology* I am new to this whole thing and even though I've been trying to read as much as I can the last few weeks, it's a lot to absorb. Please forgive this possibly stupid question.*/apology* What is DIFF? It refers to difficulty, it an automatic thing which makes mining bitcoin more difficult the faster they are found, basically its to keep the bitcoin law true "coins can only be found once every 10 minutes (on average)". That the jist of it, I am also a newb so might have forgotten something :-) |
16JZWC433XRxjWwR7X65uxRVFdLTmoPr4t
|
|
|
unknown.usr
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
August 31, 2013, 06:27:37 PM |
|
Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF.
so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff.
+1  |
|
|
|
|
|
Trongersoll
|
|
August 31, 2013, 06:46:27 PM |
|
Not a bad run so far...
Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF. so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff. *apology* I am new to this whole thing and even though I've been trying to read as much as I can the last few weeks, it's a lot to absorb. Please forgive this possibly stupid question.*/apology* What is DIFF? (I was being sarcastic) Current Bitcoin block, difficulty: 255299, 65750060 http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.phpsimple terms how hard it is to find a block. next GUESS increase is .... 89 516 328 +24million wow its getting crazy up in here! Everytime we have a run of bad luck people blame it on the difficulty, which isn't likely. so he was being funny. |
|
|
|
|
TiborB
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
August 31, 2013, 07:27:06 PM |
|
Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues. actually, the first 2 were invalid at a time when blockchain.info was still up. I wonder what mechanism they are using to pull the data from blockchain.info. If only part of the site was down, say the mechanism that feeds out block information, then it is possible this could have caused an error on the pool. Could also just be Slush's pool having some issues as well. I am very glad this is now fixed though. Actually, I am rather surprised to see those blocks valid on blockchain.info, then after an outage as orphaned, then later as valid again. What I saw there made me draw premature conclusions... I would not take if for granted that the pool uses blockchain.info services to decide if a block is valid (on the main chain, not orphaned) or not... AFAIK any bitcoin client can give you that information. |
|
|
|
|
console_cowboy
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
August 31, 2013, 08:01:57 PM |
|
Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues. actually, the first 2 were invalid at a time when blockchain.info was still up. I wonder what mechanism they are using to pull the data from blockchain.info. If only part of the site was down, say the mechanism that feeds out block information, then it is possible this could have caused an error on the pool. Could also just be Slush's pool having some issues as well. I am very glad this is now fixed though. Actually, I am rather surprised to see those blocks valid on blockchain.info, then after an outage as orphaned, then later as valid again. What I saw there made me draw premature conclusions... I would not take if for granted that the pool uses blockchain.info services to decide if a block is valid (on the main chain, not orphaned) or not... AFAIK any bitcoin client can give you that information. This is very true. I imagine that someone with Slush's knowledge would not be relying on an external service. Good call. |
|
|
|
|
|
cosurgi
|
|
September 01, 2013, 10:33:57 AM |
|
190% luck! Incredible. Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days): 190%, 100%, 101% |
|
|
|
unknown.usr
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
September 01, 2013, 03:36:23 PM |
|
Just curious, why does this happen?
19854 2013-09-01 15:26:31 0:09:01 5753209 none none 255501 25.18890280 99 confirmations left
Never mind, it updated a few moments later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BuhTuglia
|
|
September 01, 2013, 05:57:49 PM |
|
Great run until that six hour iceberg hit. Well, can't have everything.
russell
|
Just another dust miner... Enquiring Gnomes want to Mine!
Send nothing to 16SVa2iQA6HuNPDGYShpmeEvUBRi2gW7f1
|
|
|
|
Behemot
|
|
September 01, 2013, 10:14:57 PM |
|
If I'd delete my account in pool, will I be payed off automatically?
|
|
|
|
pembo210
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
September 01, 2013, 10:58:12 PM |
|
If I'd delete my account in pool, will I be payed off automatically?
I think if you set your Send Threshold to lower than your Confirmed Reward, it will auto payout. Same with leftover NMC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Trongersoll
|
|
September 01, 2013, 11:31:29 PM |
|
If I'd delete my account in pool, will I be payed off automatically?
I think if you set your Send Threshold to lower than your Confirmed Reward, it will auto payout. Same with leftover NMC. except that some of us have less NMC than the smallest allowable threshold. I think i remember slush saying that account deletion was a way to get what was left. but that was a while ago considering how quiet slush has been. |
|
|
|
|
|
