Stake.com - The World's largest Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Stake F1 Team

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I wonder what is more popular in steak casinos - sports betting or slot machines?
I think slots come first

Slot machines/games is most popular in most casinos based on my personal experience, and this I think is because, not every gambler are into sports, betting on sports requires that the gambler have a good knowledge of sports in general, like he has to know about different teams and clubs, he has to know their strengths and weaknesses, he has to also know the individual strength of players and so on. This is the only way the gambler have a chance at winning most of his or her bets, anything outside of this, the gambler might just be throwing money away because he or she will just be placing bets on teams or clubs he or she have no clue of.

Slot games on the other hand require non of this knowledge, Infact, one requires absolutely no gambling experience to play and win in slot games, I would say that, majorly every gambler today who started gambling before they started watching and following sports, started their gambling journey with slot games.

[Betwrong]

~

Well, a big congratulations to you bud, and i am ultimately wishing you the best of luck in winning the ultimate prize in the challenge.

Unfortunately for me, slot games at the moment isn't really my thing, there are period i feel so lucky and very eager to try my hands on slot games, and there is other period when i just feel that playing any games that is slot related will mean me just wasting my money.

80x is a very nice multiplier, now, imagine that you had at least $50 bet on that game when you won with that multiplier, that would have been a sweet $4000plus, money good enough to start some really good business.

Anyways, one of the downsides of gambling is that we never know when we are about to win so that we can increase our bet  , once again bud, good luck on winning the ultimate prize in the challenge.

Thank you! I know I will win a regular prize, like $5, but 80x is never enough to win the ultimate prize. From my experience the multiplier must be above 400x to end up in the top 25. But, of course, it's fun, and additional $5 to my already good win wouldn't hurt.

Recently in another challenge on Stake Forum, "Win a bet on Video Poker by hitting 4 OF A KIND", I got 4 Aces with my initial hand:



I see it as a big luck and I'm very happy about it.

[BlackyJacky]

Did anyone else receive an email from Stake that level two verification is not compulsory?

Level two verification is not compulsory, but it will boost your rewards during the promotions that are done. As long as this email is not asking you to click on any link to do some kind of verification, then you should be fine.

A lot of the emails that are send out these days are attempted Phishing attacks, but they come with a section where they want you to click on something to login into your account... so that they can steal your login details.  

Be Safe... do not click on links in email.  

If level two verification is not compulsory, how can they justify to block me from depositing until I delivered level two verification?

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Did anyone else receive an email from Stake that level two verification is not compulsory?

You again.... 

They can ask for KYC whenever they went, email or no email.
It's written in their terms, so no need to complain again.

Unless you have something to I don't know what would be the problem providing KYC.

They said a lot in the past like " once you got it, you will keep your VIP " , "we will never ask for KYC", blablabla. A lot has changed at stake in the past year.

[BlackyJacky]

Did anyone else receive an email from Stake that level two verification is not compulsory?

You again....  

They can ask for KYC whenever they went, email or no email.
It's written in their terms, so no need to complain again.

No, if you used their service based on the written agreement that level two verification is not compulsory, they are not entitled to get it!

Unless you have something to I don't know what would be the problem providing KYC.

Problem 1)

I do not give proof of my personal details to criminals


Problem 2)

I used their service based on our written agreement that level two verification is not compulsory for me and they do not have any justification to demand it.

If someone does not have any justification to demand something from me, I do not give it, simple.

They said a lot in the past like " once you got it, you will keep your VIP " , "we will never ask for KYC", blablabla. A lot has changed at stake in the past year.

Yes, this shows how shady they are, but they can not change the conditions of our relationship without my consent.

In my case for example, they blocked me from depositing after I have cleared 90% of the next VIP level which gives a 6,400 USD bonus.

They can of course decide at any time that they do not want me anymore as their customer, but in this case they have to compensate the 90% of 6,400 USD = 5,760 USD I have already cleared.

I do not mind at all if Stake does not want to take my Bitcoin anymore, other casinos will gladly do, but they have to give me 5,760 USD for the 90% I have already cleared.

[TwitchySeal]

Did anyone else receive an email from Stake that level two verification is not compulsory?

You again....  

They can ask for KYC whenever they went, email or no email.
It's written in their terms, so no need to complain again.

Unless you have something to I don't know what would be the problem providing KYC.

They said a lot in the past like " once you got it, you will keep your VIP " , "we will never ask for KYC", blablabla. A lot has changed at stake in the past year.

The guy is just an idiot.  

A player wins 42-43% of hands in black jack but he thinks it's slightly less than 50% of hands, like it's the same as a coin toss minus house edge.  I've done the math for him, and showed him plenty of links, but he insists Stake is rigged because he doesn't win as often as his fantasy math says he should.

Can't blame any casino for ignoring him after he repeats the same stupid thing the first 10 times.

And lol at thinking a casino should pay pro-rated loyalty rewards to a lunatic bc he won't verify.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Imagine, talking shit on the same casino while he think bad for him.

The shit things, he still playing or access the things he think is shit ~XD It's just a same like, you falling into the hole and know the exact location of the hole but still falling into the same hole ~LOL

I blieve, If not wrong he also want to report or make allegation case court. Still waiting until now ~XD.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

In my case for example, they blocked me from depositing after I have cleared 90% of the next VIP level which gives a 6,400 USD bonus.

They can of course decide at any time that they do not want me anymore as their customer, but in this case they have to compensate the 90% of 6,400 USD = 5,760 USD I have already cleared.

I do not mind at all if Stake does not want to take my Bitcoin anymore, other casinos will gladly do, but they have to give me 5,760 USD for the 90% I have already cleared.

Well, have someone send you funds via tip if you can't deposit yourself.
Of course this only would work if you are not blocked from betting.

On the other hand, why would you want to make bets if the casino is a scam. It's a lose lose situation.

About the missing 10%, that are still 500k$ in wager. Taking an "only" 1% house edge in consideration ( obviously it's more ) you will lose over 5k playing while getting the missing 10%. So it doesn't really make sense to chase it yet anyway.

And since there are no "milestones" within the 100% it's impossible to claim 90% of the reward. If they would do that once everybody who is broke at some point wants to do it. It's designed to keep you playing and depositing, "only" some % to go, wager wager wager. 

[Symphonized]

Don't forget, every $1,000 wagered each week gets you 1 ticket into our $75k weekly raffle 🤑



🔗: https://stake.com/promotions/promotion/weekly-giveaway

*Available to .com users only

[BlackyJacky]

In my case for example, they blocked me from depositing after I have cleared 90% of the next VIP level which gives a 6,400 USD bonus.

They can of course decide at any time that they do not want me anymore as their customer, but in this case they have to compensate the 90% of 6,400 USD = 5,760 USD I have already cleared.

I do not mind at all if Stake does not want to take my Bitcoin anymore, other casinos will gladly do, but they have to give me 5,760 USD for the 90% I have already cleared.

Well, have someone send you funds via tip if you can't deposit yourself.

Once a casino breaches our agreement and unjustifiably blocks me from depositing, I will not deposit anymore because they also unjustifiably could block me from withdrawing.

Of course this only would work if you are not blocked from betting.

As explained above, even if I am not blocked from betting, they could block me from withdrawing.

On the other hand, why would you want to make bets if the casino is a scam. It's a lose lose situation.

No, it is a win win situation:

1) I need to wager 500,000 USD to reach the next nevel and receive a 6,400 USD bonus.

Stake claims that their in-house Black Jack has a 0,5% house edge when using the optimal playing strategy.

0,5% house edge plus around 0,3% rewards = 0,2% house edge of 500,000 USD = 1,000 USD loss plus 6,400 USD next level bonus = 5,400 USD plus.

2) I get hard proof of my experienced house edge during wagering the 500,000 USD

Based on the bets transaction history in my Stake account I can not see what my experienced house edge is.

The only way I could see it is to take a look at all 180,000 bets and calculate my experienced house edge!

About the missing 10%, that are still 500k$ in wager. Taking an "only" 1% house edge in consideration ( obviously it's more ) you will lose over 5k playing while getting the missing 10%. So it doesn't really make sense to chase it yet anyway.

See above.

And since there are no "milestones" within the 100% it's impossible to claim 90% of the reward. If they would do that once everybody who is broke at some point wants to do it. It's designed to keep you playing and depositing, "only" some % to go, wager wager wager.  

Maybe you missed something, but I do not demand to pay the already cleared 90% of 6,400 USD because I am broke.

I demand to pay the already cleared 5,760 USD because they unjustifiably block me from depositing and clearing the remaining 10%.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

One other thing, and please no more monster replies that congest this thread.

What explanation did you receive that denies you to deposit and basically play at stake. They must have said something and give you a reason.
Obviously, such as everybody that plays casino games, you are a losing player, otherwise you would not complain about the house edge .
If you were winning and they want to get rid of you I would understand, been through that at countless sites actually.
But since you don't win a lot, wouldn't they want you to stick around?
Or did you once maybe make a mistake, showing your "real" IP while logging in and you are from a restricted area and therefor don't want to make KYC because if jeopardies your account and it's VIP perks? No accusation, just a possibility.

[Ojima-ojo]

One other thing, and please no more monster replies that congest this thread.

What explanation did you receive that denies you to deposit and basically play at stake. They must have said something and give you a reason.
Obviously, such as everybody that plays casino games, you are a losing player, otherwise you would not complain about the house edge .
If you were winning and they want to get rid of you I would understand, been through that at countless sites actually.
But since you don't win a lot, wouldn't they want you to stick around?
Or did you once maybe make a mistake, showing your "real" IP while logging in and you are from a restricted area and therefor don't want to make KYC because it jeopardises your account and its VIP perks? No accusation, just a possibility.

It is quite unfortunate that some casinos will exit a player simply because they feel that the player is winning too much on the gambling site, such operational manner because such character exhibition will cause the casino to lose the loyalty and trust of the gambling community at some point, let say we have a few of those scammy site and such we have to avoid such possibility because stake.com is one of the many reputable casinos that we have in the gambling industry today.


But much more also, we have to know that there have not been so many of those cases against stake before and anyone putting up such accusations should be ready to back the claims up with some evidence.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

IMO, It's better not respond to the shit post.

I mean, you give him a spot chance to him for speak more and post a shit things. He are gonna to keep posting, the best way just ignore it the post and he keep posting by him self.

After that he will tried, and not gonna to post. I'ts hapening all the time.

[Symphonized]

NBA Double Winnings 🏀



Warriors Win / Stephen Curry 40+ points
Nuggets Win / Nikola Jokic 40+ points

If your Winner (Incl. Overtime) selection wins, and their respective player hits their target, earn Double Winnings up to $100! 🤑

🔗: https://stake.com/promotions/promotion/nba-double-winnings

[BlackyJacky]

One other thing, and please no more monster replies that congest this thread.

What explanation did you receive that denies you to deposit and basically play at stake. They must have said something and give you a reason.

My deposit option is blocked until I do level two verification.

Obviously, such as everybody that plays casino games, you are a losing player, otherwise you would not complain about the house edge .

I am fine with the advertised 0,5% house edge plus rewards around 0,5% = 0% house edge.

If you were winning and they want to get rid of you I would understand, been through that at countless sites actually.
But since you don't win a lot, wouldn't they want you to stick around?

They want to get rid of me because I complain about this

Though their shady behavior caused exactly the opposite!  

I will go after Bijan, Edward and Mladen until I have at least the 30,000 USD back I unjustifiably lost from my pocket.

Or did you once maybe make a mistake, showing your "real" IP while logging in and you are from a restricted area and therefor don't want to make KYC because if jeopardies your account and it's VIP perks? No accusation, just a possibility.

You can not login if you visit the website from a restricted area.

[TwitchySeal]

I will go after Bijan, Edward and Mladen until I have at least the 30,000 USD back I unjustifiably lost from my pocket.

So this guy did some math that only makes sense in his imagination and concluded that black jack on stake is a profitable game, and since he lost 30k after wagering ~9 million it must be rigged...

But as I lost around 30,000 USD from my pocket instead of winning 180,000 USD, bets won and lost can not refer to dealer hands won and lost!

Interesting line to cry about how rigged the site is and at the same time cry about not being able to deposit and gamble at the same time.

[TwitchySeal]

Yes, I cry how it is rigged until I get the 30,000 USD back Bijan, Edward and Mladen have illegally taken from me.

They didn't take it from you, you lost it.  And you ran on the good side of variance and got some generous bonuses considering you only lost $30k after wagering over $9 million. 

You see, when the house has an edge, it means you don't.  That means in the long run you will lose.  The more you wager, the more you will lose.

So stop crying.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

He also doesn't realize it.

Card counter with fewer decks comparing evolution-games (8 decks), while they play with few decks like 3+ and still losing a thousand dollar: https://www.youtube.com/@stevenbridges ~XD

It's actually funny, I guess (Card-counter) will say the BJ-game (especially while they playing live on landbase) are rigged. Because my count is right.

[BlackyJacky]

Yes, I cry how it is rigged until I get the 30,000 USD back Bijan, Edward and Mladen have illegally taken from me.

They didn't take it from you, you lost it.  

I lost it from my pocket and they found it?  

Yes, I lost it because of their provably rigged in-house Black Jack system, but first they took my Bitcoin.

And you ran on the good side of variance and got some generous bonuses considering you only lost $30k after wagering over $9 million.  

If losing 4,6% of the bets instead of the advertised 0,5% is "ran on the good side of variance", how much % is running on the bad side of variance?

Losing 10 or 15% of the bets?

You see, when the house has an edge, it means you don't.  

If you would have read my posts, you should have realised that a 0,5% house edge minus rewards is fine for me:

I am fine with the advertised 0,5% house edge minus rewards.

I complain about this

That means in the long run you will lose.

But only the advertised 0,5% bets and not 4,6% of the bets, right?

The more you wager, the more you will lose.

But only the advertised 0,5% bets and not 4,6% of the bets, right?

[TwitchySeal]

Yes, I cry how it is rigged until I get the 30,000 USD back Bijan, Edward and Mladen have illegally taken from me.

They didn't take it from you, you lost it.  

I lost it from my pocket and they found it?  

Yes, I lost it because of their provably rigged in-house Black Jack system, but first they took my Bitcoin.

And you ran on the good side of variance and got some generous bonuses considering you only lost $30k after wagering over $9 million.  

If losing 4,6% of the bets instead of the advertised 0,5% is "ran on the good side of variance", how much % is running on the bad side of variance?

15%? 20%?

Your math is idiotic and your explanation doesn't make sense. Blackjack isn't the same as flipping a coin.  Sometimes you win even money, sometimes you push, sometimes you're paid 3:2. 

If you're playing a game with a 0.5% house edge, that means over the long run you can expect to lose
50 cents for every $100 wagered.

If you wager $50,000 your expected losses would be $250

If you wager $200,000 your expected losses would be $1,000

If you wager $8,019,299.22 (in crypto at todays value),

your expected losses would be $40,096.50





Whatever calculation you made that resulted in you thinking you would profit over $100k was wrong.
Being down $30k with this much wagered is well within the range of possible outcomes.

You lost, get over it.