Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2020, 03:46:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How many BottleCaps do you own?
None - 86 (39.3%)
1-1k - 29 (13.2%)
1k-10k - 28 (12.8%)
More than 10k - 76 (34.7%)
Total Voters: 219

Pages: « 1 ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 [141] 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 ... 216 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bottlecaps 2.1 UPDATE REQUIRED - HARDFORK JULY 4 2014 to 200% Annual PoS  (Read 382359 times)
Tranz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052


May the force bit with you.


View Profile
November 19, 2014, 03:18:38 AM
 #2801

I think everyone has to make up his own mind about this unfortunate discussion. But please, let's leave it there. This is the cap-thread and I suggest that's what we talk about. Bottlecaps. If you think they are crap, then I respectfully disagree but it's everyone's own call. Me, I am just looking forward to the 2,3 version Tranz is working on and in the mean time I am having a stake-party:)

Speaking of which I think things are pretty stable right now in Hobo land, so I will be beginning some development here this week.  I'll post some of the relevant code changes as they are done, so people can be free to test them out or comment.

HBN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303749.0 hobonickels.info
Personal Donations: F1TranzWqFGZyFeTMu6iLbtTQgdXuJPsiL
Donations to the HBN Fund: EhbNfund4PrRFLHMxsnbGLhP25hizJGHEE or 1LVFtCX4a83dMLjd8S7imKKKC58QaG83kw
1590810417
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1590810417

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1590810417
Reply with quote  #2

1590810417
Report to moderator
1590810417
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1590810417

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1590810417
Reply with quote  #2

1590810417
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1590810417
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1590810417

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1590810417
Reply with quote  #2

1590810417
Report to moderator
1590810417
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1590810417

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1590810417
Reply with quote  #2

1590810417
Report to moderator
ElTomeko27
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 371
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 19, 2014, 07:52:08 AM
 #2802

I think everyone has to make up his own mind about this unfortunate discussion. But please, let's leave it there. This is the cap-thread and I suggest that's what we talk about. Bottlecaps. If you think they are crap, then I respectfully disagree but it's everyone's own call. Me, I am just looking forward to the 2,3 version Tranz is working on and in the mean time I am having a stake-party:)

Speaking of which I think things are pretty stable right now in Hobo land, so I will be beginning some development here this week.  I'll post some of the relevant code changes as they are done, so people can be free to test them out or comment.

Tranz any chance to add coin control to CAPs?? Roll Eyes
Palmdetroit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting


View Profile
November 19, 2014, 10:39:43 AM
 #2803

I think everyone has to make up his own mind about this unfortunate discussion. But please, let's leave it there. This is the cap-thread and I suggest that's what we talk about. Bottlecaps. If you think they are crap, then I respectfully disagree but it's everyone's own call. Me, I am just looking forward to the 2,3 version Tranz is working on and in the mean time I am having a stake-party:)

Speaking of which I think things are pretty stable right now in Hobo land, so I will be beginning some development here this week.  I'll post some of the relevant code changes as they are done, so people can be free to test them out or comment.

Tranz any chance to add coin control to CAPs?? Roll Eyes

Was added months ago, check settings.

Also for whoever might do themes, noticed a fallout app (google fallout app) and look at images for some great ideas.




ElTomeko27
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 371
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 19, 2014, 10:59:26 AM
 #2804

I think everyone has to make up his own mind about this unfortunate discussion. But please, let's leave it there. This is the cap-thread and I suggest that's what we talk about. Bottlecaps. If you think they are crap, then I respectfully disagree but it's everyone's own call. Me, I am just looking forward to the 2,3 version Tranz is working on and in the mean time I am having a stake-party:)

Speaking of which I think things are pretty stable right now in Hobo land, so I will be beginning some development here this week.  I'll post some of the relevant code changes as they are done, so people can be free to test them out or comment.

Tranz any chance to add coin control to CAPs?? Roll Eyes

Was added months ago, check settings.


Right, now I see.! Bless You Palmdetroit Smiley Smiley Smiley
vegasguy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1003


"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!


View Profile
November 19, 2014, 02:50:30 PM
 #2805

I see on the op it says "200% yearly degrading stake, with 1000 coin max reward". What is the largest block size to get that 1000 cap reward.. is it 10,000 coin block, is that right?

Also I tried the pools on the op , and the only live 2 pools are:

https://www.multipool.us
http://cap.coinmine.pl

Any others?


Vegas

I want to make sure everyone knows that I just released my software called "Yobit pump alert". THis is custom software that uses an algo to detect the start of a pump here on yobit, the second it starts. YOu can even filter the coins you see by price. Most pumps start less than 100 sats , so you can easily filter the cheap coins, so they are the only ones displayed Smiley https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1945937.msg20241953#msg20241953
PressF1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 19, 2014, 03:11:55 PM
 #2806

I see on the op it says "200% yearly degrading stake, with 1000 coin max reward". What is the largest block size to get that 1000 cap reward.. is it 10,000 coin block, is that right?

This is the way to calculate it: 200% yearly and maturity age of 15 days means: 200%/(365/15) = 8,2% stake at 15 days.

So if your block is 10K your stake would be 820, just below max. So I'd say you're exactly right stating 10K block is maximum block size because blocks never stake right away as soon as they reach maturity. Let's say you stake 1 day after maturity, so day 16, the percentage at that point will be 8,2% * 16/15 = 8,7% = 870 coins which is still below the 1000 coins maximum.

Happy staking!

HBN & CAP: F1PressF1PCxEyESGk6Fe1om1RfiHqX5gg
silvermetal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 487
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 19, 2014, 07:31:31 PM
Last edit: November 19, 2014, 10:27:59 PM by silvermetal
 #2807

Lol, See what happens here;

Digitalindustry and family working at full steam posting nonsense messages, to bury a sensitive post about CAP from coinmama.

The post of coinmama reminds me on an e-mail conversation between Digitalindustry and Adam (aka Shake, the coincreator of CAP).
The Quark foundation discussed which coins should be listed at QEX.la (A Quark exchange, which doesn't exist anymore I think).
Adam (Shake) was in that time together with MAX the developers of Quark (and therefore a member of the foundation).
Digitalindustry suggested to include CAP. In that time I didn't know what CAP was, therefore I ignored the discussion and focussed more how to launch QEX.

Now I know something more about CAP, I think the following discussion might be relevant to post where it belongs; in the CAP thread.
In this way future investors (I doubt whether they will ever come) know the complete story about CAP:


Quote from: DigitalIndustry June 14,2014
re Qex read this last page here - i have my finger on the pulse of whats happening re spam crypto world - Caps are crying out for another exchange its up about 100% with a lot of work done https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241445.2140

Quote from: Adam June 14,2014
Bottlecaps are literally the definition of Cryptsy in house scam coin.

Quote from: Victor June 14,2014
Oh, thanks for the heads up on that Adam :/

Vic

Note: Victor was in June 2014 considered as the leader of the Quark Foundation


Quote from: Adam June 14,2014
Yea, no problem, I made them (hahah) for Bitjohn to make a few bucks--guess what, they never paid me anything for them either, and Kopimi was there from the get go, so I'd think he may hold a few of them. If we're looking for "clean" coins that with no ill backstory, CAPs are NOT them...
note: kopimi = Kolin Evans = digitalindustry (Kolin once started kopimicoin, maybe Adam refers to that?)

Quote from: DigitalIndustry June 14,2014
yeah i know Adam - he didn't even change the name ha ha  "John edan" ha ha
Note: DI refers to the OP of this CAP thread (JohnEden).

Quote from: Adam June 14,2014
I think its nowhere else because BitJohn and Mullick are the biggest
holders lol...I agree on that though, QEX shouldn't go down the road
of scamcoin central ala cryptsy/cryptorush/coinex/etc but I understand
they are in it to make the $$ so eh.

Quote from: DigitalIndustry June 14,2014
Caps technically may be "owned" by the cryptsy crowed but its start was clean anyone and everyone had a chance to mine from dot - it was abandoned then Tranz took it over, so for all intents it is "clean" people are trying to get away from Cryptsy right now, if Qex can fill a bit of that void they win i think.

Quote from: Adam June 14,2014
Why not send me some CAPs? Maybe having some would change my perspective ;-) Hahaha

Quote from: DigitalIndustry June 14,2014
I never held from the start i sold off , i only purchased some when i saw the takeover happening , i observed what happened with HBN and the "tokyogetto" gimmick they they have going so when Tranz started working on it i purchased some i'm no large holder but a % gain is a gain?


So there are a few open questions I guess about CAP:
- Who is "Johneden". Is that BitJohn? If yes, why did BitJohn create a new account to announce CAP? And why posts BitJohn with two different accounts in the CAP thread?
- Why is nowhere mentioned that Adam is the original creator of CAP?
- Why is Adam not paid for the creation of CAP?
- What is the relationship between Digitalindustry and Cryptsy? Why do members of the digitalindustry family (like Hilux74) use the cryptsy logo?


Also what is wrong with the developers of different coins? With Quark the same thing; when critical comments were placed  by the community about Quark, Max (the developer of Quark) ignored the comments or just disappeared. Where are they afraid of?

Hilux74
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 913
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 19, 2014, 07:43:49 PM
 #2808

Also for whoever might do themes, noticed a fallout app (google fallout app) and look at images for some great ideas.


I like I like  Grin
PressF1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 19, 2014, 08:40:24 PM
 #2809

Lol, See what happens here;

Digitalindustry and family working at full steam posting nonsense messages
Thanks for qualifying my post as nonsense

HBN & CAP: F1PressF1PCxEyESGk6Fe1om1RfiHqX5gg
silvermetal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 487
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 19, 2014, 09:19:01 PM
Last edit: November 20, 2014, 05:49:29 PM by silvermetal
 #2810

Lol, See what happens here;

Digitalindustry and family working at full steam posting nonsense messages
Thanks for qualifying my post as nonsense


No, No, I have to thank YOU for stepping forward and indicate who YOU are.
To make it more specific; Are you Digitalindustry or somebody from his family?

EDIT: See PressF1's reaction below. If PressF1 wants to discuss and talk about CAP why doesn't he quote one of my open questions I posted (or even better: answer some!)?
But no, he only quotes the part of (the) digitalindustry (family)....

PressF1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 19, 2014, 09:41:03 PM
 #2811

Lol, See what happens here;

Digitalindustry and family working at full steam posting nonsense messages
Thanks for qualifying my post as nonsense


Thank you for indicating who you are.
To make it more specific; Are you Digitalindustry or somebody from his family?

You seem to think a lot of people are. I feel offended by it. I am just me and read my history if you are really interested in what i have to say about caps.

which brings me at another thing i mentioned before. I don't know why you are so mad at DI but please take it elsewhere. This is the cap thread. Thank you.





HBN & CAP: F1PressF1PCxEyESGk6Fe1om1RfiHqX5gg
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 20, 2014, 05:11:17 AM
 #2812

which brings me at another thing i mentioned before. I don't know why you are so mad at DI but please take it elsewhere. This is the cap thread. Thank you.

+1

 Cool
eBit
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 20, 2014, 11:37:02 PM
 #2813

I think everyone has to make up his own mind about this unfortunate discussion. But please, let's leave it there. This is the cap-thread and I suggest that's what we talk about. Bottlecaps. If you think they are crap, then I respectfully disagree but it's everyone's own call. Me, I am just looking forward to the 2,3 version Tranz is working on and in the mean time I am having a stake-party:)

Speaking of which I think things are pretty stable right now in Hobo land, so I will be beginning some development here this week.  I'll post some of the relevant code changes as they are done, so people can be free to test them out or comment.

Tranz any chance to add coin control to CAPs?? Roll Eyes


Coin control was added some time ago.  It's in v2.1.0.0 and later.  Go to Settings > Options > Display, then check 'Display Coin Control Features.'  Save your changes, then click on the 'Send Coins' tab.  The 'Coin Control' button will be visible.

Tranz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052


May the force bit with you.


View Profile
November 21, 2014, 05:15:40 AM
 #2814

Updated Auto Savings Tab.

https://github.com/Tranz5/bottlecaps/commit/c4c84f12bcae38c799f3ebd4b0ffd6523acfb1c2

Added Change Address to gui and rpc.
Updated the Auto Savings GUI tab.
If the max amount is set, it will truncate the ATS if it is over
Added Code to prevent double sending
And finally Saved all settings to wallet.dat so they will persist after restart.


HBN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303749.0 hobonickels.info
Personal Donations: F1TranzWqFGZyFeTMu6iLbtTQgdXuJPsiL
Donations to the HBN Fund: EhbNfund4PrRFLHMxsnbGLhP25hizJGHEE or 1LVFtCX4a83dMLjd8S7imKKKC58QaG83kw
digitalindustry
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


‘Try to be nice’


View Profile WWW
November 21, 2014, 06:43:26 AM
 #2815

Updated Auto Savings Tab.

https://github.com/Tranz5/bottlecaps/commit/c4c84f12bcae38c799f3ebd4b0ffd6523acfb1c2

Added Change Address to gui and rpc.
Updated the Auto Savings GUI tab.
If the max amount is set, it will truncate the ATS if it is over
Added Code to prevent double sending
And finally Saved all settings to wallet.dat so they will persist after restart.



this is great .

Great work Tranz.

- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
PressF1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 21, 2014, 03:24:33 PM
 #2816

Updated Auto Savings Tab.

https://github.com/Tranz5/bottlecaps/commit/c4c84f12bcae38c799f3ebd4b0ffd6523acfb1c2

Added Change Address to gui and rpc.
Updated the Auto Savings GUI tab.
If the max amount is set, it will truncate the ATS if it is over
Added Code to prevent double sending
And finally Saved all settings to wallet.dat so they will persist after restart.



Looking good!

Question: Did you by any chance tweaked the priority issue I encountered with HBN? When using autosave or S4C, I discovered it's not 100% certain one of the 2 new blocks are used to sent the stake% from which resulted in loss of maturity.

I gave it some thought and it thought it would be solved when priority would always be 'lowest' for a block with less than let's say 50 confirmations. Or even better an added category 'none' for this condition. Don't know what's easiest to code.

HBN & CAP: F1PressF1PCxEyESGk6Fe1om1RfiHqX5gg
Tranz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052


May the force bit with you.


View Profile
November 22, 2014, 06:44:48 PM
 #2817

Updated Auto Savings Tab.

https://github.com/Tranz5/bottlecaps/commit/c4c84f12bcae38c799f3ebd4b0ffd6523acfb1c2

Added Change Address to gui and rpc.
Updated the Auto Savings GUI tab.
If the max amount is set, it will truncate the ATS if it is over
Added Code to prevent double sending
And finally Saved all settings to wallet.dat so they will persist after restart.



Looking good!

Question: Did you by any chance tweaked the priority issue I encountered with HBN? When using autosave or S4C, I discovered it's not 100% certain one of the 2 new blocks are used to sent the stake% from which resulted in loss of maturity.

I gave it some thought and it thought it would be solved when priority would always be 'lowest' for a block with less than let's say 50 confirmations. Or even better an added category 'none' for this condition. Don't know what's easiest to code.

I have thought about what you have said. But for now I am not going to play too much with that part of S4C. It seems to work perfectly 90%+ of the time.

Also I was thinking about a  situation where you may not want it to use the newest block. As you may just combined or received a big block that you do not want to get used. 

I do have plans to look at this deeper, but most likely will not be until I make the change to allow for more then one S4C per wallet.  That is a bit down the road.

HBN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303749.0 hobonickels.info
Personal Donations: F1TranzWqFGZyFeTMu6iLbtTQgdXuJPsiL
Donations to the HBN Fund: EhbNfund4PrRFLHMxsnbGLhP25hizJGHEE or 1LVFtCX4a83dMLjd8S7imKKKC58QaG83kw
PressF1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 22, 2014, 08:06:19 PM
 #2818

Updated Auto Savings Tab.

https://github.com/Tranz5/bottlecaps/commit/c4c84f12bcae38c799f3ebd4b0ffd6523acfb1c2

Added Change Address to gui and rpc.
Updated the Auto Savings GUI tab.
If the max amount is set, it will truncate the ATS if it is over
Added Code to prevent double sending
And finally Saved all settings to wallet.dat so they will persist after restart.



Looking good!

Question: Did you by any chance tweaked the priority issue I encountered with HBN? When using autosave or S4C, I discovered it's not 100% certain one of the 2 new blocks are used to sent the stake% from which resulted in loss of maturity.

I gave it some thought and it thought it would be solved when priority would always be 'lowest' for a block with less than let's say 50 confirmations. Or even better an added category 'none' for this condition. Don't know what's easiest to code.

I have thought about what you have said. But for now I am not going to play too much with that part of S4C. It seems to work perfectly 90%+ of the time.

Also I was thinking about a  situation where you may not want it to use the newest block. As you may just combined or received a big block that you do not want to get used. 

I do have plans to look at this deeper, but most likely will not be until I make the change to allow for more then one S4C per wallet.  That is a bit down the road.

It occurred with too big blocks anyway and with smaller blocks I don't expect too much trouble indeed. Nice to know that in the future more than one S4C will be possible. Will come in handy! 

HBN & CAP: F1PressF1PCxEyESGk6Fe1om1RfiHqX5gg
Tranz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052


May the force bit with you.


View Profile
November 22, 2014, 08:10:34 PM
 #2819

Updated Auto Savings Tab.

https://github.com/Tranz5/bottlecaps/commit/c4c84f12bcae38c799f3ebd4b0ffd6523acfb1c2

Added Change Address to gui and rpc.
Updated the Auto Savings GUI tab.
If the max amount is set, it will truncate the ATS if it is over
Added Code to prevent double sending
And finally Saved all settings to wallet.dat so they will persist after restart.



Looking good!

Question: Did you by any chance tweaked the priority issue I encountered with HBN? When using autosave or S4C, I discovered it's not 100% certain one of the 2 new blocks are used to sent the stake% from which resulted in loss of maturity.

I gave it some thought and it thought it would be solved when priority would always be 'lowest' for a block with less than let's say 50 confirmations. Or even better an added category 'none' for this condition. Don't know what's easiest to code.

I have thought about what you have said. But for now I am not going to play too much with that part of S4C. It seems to work perfectly 90%+ of the time.

Also I was thinking about a  situation where you may not want it to use the newest block. As you may just combined or received a big block that you do not want to get used. 

I do have plans to look at this deeper, but most likely will not be until I make the change to allow for more then one S4C per wallet.  That is a bit down the road.

It occurred with too big blocks anyway and with smaller blocks I don't expect too much trouble indeed. Nice to know that in the future more than one S4C will be possible. Will come in handy! 

Hmmm ok. Do you happen to have one of the transaction IDs available?

HBN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303749.0 hobonickels.info
Personal Donations: F1TranzWqFGZyFeTMu6iLbtTQgdXuJPsiL
Donations to the HBN Fund: EhbNfund4PrRFLHMxsnbGLhP25hizJGHEE or 1LVFtCX4a83dMLjd8S7imKKKC58QaG83kw
PressF1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 22, 2014, 08:29:22 PM
Last edit: November 23, 2014, 05:56:54 PM by PressF1
 #2820

Hmmm ok. Do you happen to have one of the transaction IDs available?

With the transaction was no problem. At the time I only had blocks of the highest priority. The block that staked was so big that the two new blocks with only 25 confirmations already had the highest priority too. Since I had an older block that was smaller than the ones just produced, that one was used for the S4C.

So I stopped using S4C for a while to let them all split a couple of times. I think they are small enough now to have sufficient low priority to be chosen first. I just started S4C again and today I expect 3 blocks to stake. I'll let you know if they work out fine. Thanks for asking though!

EDIT: I stopped staking due to rise in diff. (it's about hbn) If I encounter anomaly's I'll post it.

HBN & CAP: F1PressF1PCxEyESGk6Fe1om1RfiHqX5gg
Pages: « 1 ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 [141] 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 ... 216 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!