silvermetal
|
|
January 01, 2015, 08:49:34 PM |
|
Hilux, what a surprise you pop up again!! You forget to tell that "I am a liar" or similar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
maok
|
|
January 01, 2015, 08:52:45 PM |
|
3. You are partly correct. Everybody can indeed mine and contribute to the Quark hashing rate. But if you want to collect Quarks you need a powerful CPU (at least an i7). With my i5 laptop I have never earned one single Quark. My laptop only went very hot.
Well thats good news, the Quark network is not that weak to be mined with a laptop, you do need a PC for that. :-) 4a. Of course you have also scammers in the bitcoin world, but you can't compare the bitcoin community in size with the Quark community.
Well the major difference is that In Quark there have been scam attempts while in Bitcoin there have been major fraud with hundred of millions of dollars stolen from people! So take a look at the bigger picture and think again if you want to keep recommend Bitcoin lol. Of course it isn't Bitcoin or Quark fault that these scams were attempted or even successful but in your wrong mentality of crypto currencies you blame one but close your eyes at the other. 4b. Maybe you want to place a rectification by yourself. Who threw Kolin's scam out to the public without consulting the Quark members? Well? One hint, that wasn't coinmama. She just informed (by e-mail!!) you and abdell, because you were moderators at reddit and should know with who you had to deal with.
I truly hope you're not blaming me for informing the world of Kolin scam attempts? Well, actually if I wouldn't had made those public then Abel would have anyways. But without coinmama we wouldn't had known anything and people would have still trusted Kolin words. 5. Adam and Geoffrey left the Quark community long time ago. You make it sound like there are more active developers active for Quark now.
No, you're wrong, Adam left Quark due to financial reasons of not being able to spend his time without getting paid(like most bitcoin devs are btw) but Geoffrey is still involved with Quark as far as I know. I called Max a "baby" maybe read my quote again I'm sorry, I thought you insulted Max for walking away. Calling him a baby I thought was part of the insult :-) Anyway you did let him know `face to face` what you thought about him, in the chat, right? Max wants to solve all problems for Quark? Maybe, but not for free. Do you want me to look up what Max asked to merge mine Quark with another coin? I have his quotation somewhere stored in my archive Wink
Maybe ?? Look at the github dates and you won't find the maybe in there, you'll find work done almost in every month of Quark existence, work that was not paid for as you know Max never mined Quark so he never had anything to benefit from improving and maintaining the network's code. Bitcoin developers are paid, why wouldn't Quark devs get paid if someone from the community wanted Max to do the work for other coin to merge mine with Quark?
|
QRKHn6UK3ToS53V6jD1rYWRYS4mxQ1mako ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▀▄▀▄▀ Quark core wallet updates ▀▄▀▄▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|
|
|
silvermetal
|
|
January 01, 2015, 09:35:24 PM Last edit: January 03, 2015, 08:25:07 AM by silvermetal |
|
I truly hope you're not blaming me for informing the world of Kolin scam attempts? Well, actually if I wouldn't had made those public then Abel would have anyways. But without coinmama we wouldn't had known anything and people would have still trusted Kolin words.
At that moment it was inappropriate to do that. You hardly knew who Kolin was (or you pretended that you hardly knew him). Then it raised a few question marks why you did that. Abdell is a complete different story, he was moderator long time before you arrived. And I am sure Abdell, would have first contacted coinmama and the rest of the community before publishing it. Abdell asked me also a few times advice before he banned Kolin from reddit. No, you're wrong, Adam left Quark due to financial reasons of not being able to spend his time without getting paid(like most bitcoin devs are btw) but Geoffrey is still involved with Quark as far as I know.
Lol, how do you know about Adam? You were not copied in the e-mail when I received an explanation from Adam what we should know more about Quark. But what does it matter. Adam doesn't want to be correlated with Quark.. ever...whatever the reason is according to you. I'm sorry, I thought you insulted Max for walking away. Calling him a baby I thought was part of the insult :-) Anyway you did let him know `face to face` what you thought about him, in the chat, right?
What are my thoughts about Max according to you? You make it look like I hold negative feelings towards him? During the IRC I was thrown out of the chat, and when I returned Max left. I had no chance to speak with him. The only thing what the foundation found very disturbing, was that he was very absent and it was hardly impossible to make an appointment with him. He just did not react to the e-mails (EDIT: Except when you asked Kolin whether Max could answer his e-mail lol). Bitcoin developers are paid, why wouldn't Quark devs get paid if someone from the community wanted Max to do the work for other coin to merge mine with Quark?
Sure sure, what was the price he asked for...hm...from the top of my head...it was equal to a year salary; 40 or 50.000 dollars Then you are in my eyes lost from reality. And then the foundation (a group of volunteers) should have paid him because that happened, the people who donated the most for the Quark projects, were the foundation members... Not the bagholders.... Edit:See reaction maok below...sigh.... As so many times maok and me are not talking at one frequency...not sure whether he is doing that intentional or he really doesn't understand my posts..... 1. Adam was indeed a developer for Quark from November 2013 till about July/Augustus 2014. Did I ever deny that? anyway, to make it clear: In October 2014 Adam sent a long explanation mail and asked whether he could be removed from the Quark websites that he is a member of the Quark foundation. 2. If he doesn't understand the price of 40-50.000 dollars he should ask instead of making his own conclusions. But thanks to the interference of Max it is more clear for him now (I hope).
|
|
|
|
maok
|
|
January 01, 2015, 09:54:02 PM |
|
Lol, how do you know about Adam? You were not copied in the e-mail when I received an explanation from Adam what we should know more about Quark. But what does it matter. Adam doesn't want to be correlated with Quark.. ever...whatever the reason is according to you.
lol, Max acknowledged in a chat you guys had that Adam was very helpful in coding for Quark. Sure sure, what was the price he asked for...hm...from the top of my head...it was equal to a year salary; 40 or 50.000 dollars Then you are in my eyes lost from reality. And then the foundation (a group of volunteers) should have paid him because that happened, the people who donated the most for the Quark projects, were the foundation members... Not the bagholders.... lol, you need to read more carefully what others are talking with you in a conversation. I never said you should have paid Max, I actually said Max never once asked to get paid for continually improving Quark network. I have no idea what the 40-50K salary was about but if it involved doing the work for other coins so they can merge mine with Quark then sure why not raise that money from the big bagholders if they really wanted to merge mine.
|
QRKHn6UK3ToS53V6jD1rYWRYS4mxQ1mako ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▀▄▀▄▀ Quark core wallet updates ▀▄▀▄▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|
|
|
Max Guevara
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
Quark developer
|
|
January 01, 2015, 09:54:44 PM |
|
Sure sure, what was the price he asked for...hm...from the top of my head...it was equal to a year salary; 40 or 50.000 dollars That is a complete fabrication. I have never asked to get paid to work on Quark.
|
|
|
|
silvermetal
|
|
January 01, 2015, 10:27:41 PM Last edit: January 03, 2015, 09:05:06 PM by silvermetal |
|
Sure sure, what was the price he asked for...hm...from the top of my head...it was equal to a year salary; 40 or 50.000 dollars That is a complete fabrication. I have never asked to get paid to work on Quark. Complete fabrication? Really? How come Victor proposed below? That it is not complete fabrication and the 40-50.000 dollars are not made up by me I will show to the others: Below the e-mails I received from Victor (he was part of Max's merge mine team). When I asked Victor how much we have to pay Max for the project (Victor was the spokesman for the merge mine project, because Max didn't communicate). Here the e-mail correspondence: First I asked Victor how much Max wants for the merge mine project, here Victor's answer: 1% of the first years supply at a market cap of $5 million would be ~$50,000; that would be ~3.5 million Quark at this stage. This would not be unrealistic to give to him in a premine scenario.
Then some people from the foundation asked Victor for an explanation about why to pay so much money to Max, and Victor answered: the point is that that is the amount that he could realistically get in many other scenarios if he works either for us or someone else. That has to be taken into account as we plan. $50,000 is one year of salary for a middling job in North America - and we are hoping he will work for us for the next 5+ years... Max is not currently very engaged in Quark for a reason - he has minimal stake in it, and he has repeatedly stated his minimal stake. If we can't re-engage him for real over the long term, then Quark, which he largely has control of, will not survive. Considering how many millionaires Bitcoin has made, $50,000 is not much...
The assumption is not that he has completely abandoned Quark but that given his relative inactivity, we can assume that his attention is very split, or his interest is pretty lukewarm. If we want to secure his efforts over years, then we need to pay him adequately - "adequately" is determined by the market, and that above figure is by no means an unrealistic offer for either us or others to make.
|
|
|
|
Hilux74
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 912
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 02, 2015, 05:51:20 AM |
|
Hilux, what a surprise you pop up again!! You forget to tell that "I am a liar" or similar. Actually I did. First sentence said you were full of shit. Looks like you are once again showing off your spectacular observational skills by missing the glaringly obvious. No wonder you weave such imaginative tales from things you read...because you don't understand what you read. Also notice quite a few people calling you a liar today. shame shame.
|
|
|
|
wizardee
|
|
January 02, 2015, 09:50:16 AM |
|
who is dev of this coin ?
|
|
|
|
silvermetal
|
|
January 02, 2015, 10:11:21 AM Last edit: January 02, 2015, 11:26:43 AM by silvermetal |
|
Hilux, what a surprise you pop up again!! You forget to tell that "I am a liar" or similar. Actually I did. First sentence said you were full of shit. Looks like you are once again showing off your spectacular observational skills by missing the glaringly obvious. No wonder you weave such imaginative tales from things you read...because you don't understand what you read. Also notice quite a few people calling you a liar today. shame shame. Hm, if I am in your words "full of shit", and if according to you other people call me a "liar"....how do other people think about you Instead of twisting other people words and intentions and come with homemade interpretations, I just provide a link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg9895334#msg9895334Then readers can make up their own interpretation of the content of the post and hilux74
|
|
|
|
wizardee
|
|
January 02, 2015, 10:17:50 AM |
|
Sure sure, what was the price he asked for...hm...from the top of my head...it was equal to a year salary; 40 or 50.000 dollars That is a complete fabrication. I have never asked to get paid to work on Quark. i heard you are dev of many other coins? can you confirm this?
|
|
|
|
Hilux74
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 912
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:28:04 PM |
|
Hilux, what a surprise you pop up again!! You forget to tell that "I am a liar" or similar. Actually I did. First sentence said you were full of shit. Looks like you are once again showing off your spectacular observational skills by missing the glaringly obvious. No wonder you weave such imaginative tales from things you read...because you don't understand what you read. Also notice quite a few people calling you a liar today. shame shame. Hm, if I am in your words "full of shit", and if according to you other people call me a "liar"....how do other people think about you Instead of twisting other people words and intentions and come with homemade interpretations, I just provide a link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg9895334#msg9895334Then readers can make up their own interpretation of the content of the post and hilux74 Haha. That proves my point about your intelligence if you cannot understand sarcasm. My comment was an obvious hillarity used to illustrate the ridiculous lies you and your buddies call truths. That both you and coinmama took it seriously lets me laugh to sleep every night.. That wasn't even veiled, it was so obvious...Atari 2600...hahaha. The two of you should get the roles for dumb and dumber 3: the quark conspiracies. Maybe if you click your heels together you will get lucky and travel to Oz and can go on a quest for a brain.
|
|
|
|
JimmyTaylor
|
|
January 03, 2015, 09:06:52 AM |
|
Why not taylor this into magi?
|
|
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
|
January 04, 2015, 10:55:17 AM |
|
Sure sure, what was the price he asked for...hm...from the top of my head...it was equal to a year salary; 40 or 50.000 dollars That is a complete fabrication. I have never asked to get paid to work on Quark. ignore them Max - as it becomes clearer that Quark is one of the only real crypto you have the credit for this code you are a part of this history now. most of these guys are just mumbling disinfo agents, they haven't even bothered to make new users ? they are certainly nervous with the "new" Bitcoin price in fiat, however it won't be until around $150 that volatility will pick up. They "fund" most of this from the "good will" of misinformed Bitcoin buyers. : )
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
nixon99
|
|
January 06, 2015, 10:38:58 PM |
|
How to get Quark onto ANXBTC?
|
|
|
|
ZaZ59
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
January 07, 2015, 08:08:03 PM |
|
Who knows the formula to calculate the profitabilty per day ?
Bcz it seems that the generic formula for altcoins doesnt work ?!
Thx
|
|
|
|
dragonseer
|
|
January 09, 2015, 02:24:45 PM |
|
So I felt a rush of blood just now and thought hey, it's 2015, let's look at alts again! Went to cryptsy, bought some quark, and tried sending to the android wallet.. Can't confirm it works yet, unlike DOGE and LTC, they worked quickly but what's up here?
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
|
January 15, 2015, 12:44:07 PM |
|
Quark keeps equalizing as Bitcoin drops very good sign of a real market and real buyers and seller - it's got to hurt the spammers and disinfo guys - all that work and sweat ? http://bravenewcoin.com/price/price-index/#indexbasically when the VC crash the "east" will own a lot of the quality of crypto out there - expect many "western" and fake exchanges to go up or blow away with the dust.. so be careful only hold immediate trades on exchange.. if you want to be a part of the human transition period to a multi polar earth then quality crypto will be a part of that, most will be "eastern" based.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
Bitock
|
|
January 16, 2015, 07:18:23 AM |
|
I can't sync my wallet. Help, please!!!
|
|
|
|
|