Bitcoin Forum
October 21, 2017, 09:05:03 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 [282] 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 865092 times)
arorts
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 387


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 05:58:47 AM
 #5621


Unfortunately he doesn't state that it will be the same amount as you paid though.



That goes without saying: he's actually confirming that ORDERS are taken on BTC (unless you did some kind of USD wire transfer or such) and since those orders were PAID on BTC and he isn't referring to any USD exchange crap and the REFUND applies to 100% of that PAYMENT just as the TOS state, then the refund applies to 100% of the BTC order. Anything else is FRAUD and DECEIT. End of debate.

 Do man up, Simon/HF and do as you promised!!   Angry
1508576703
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508576703

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508576703
Reply with quote  #2

1508576703
Report to moderator
1508576703
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508576703

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508576703
Reply with quote  #2

1508576703
Report to moderator
1508576703
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508576703

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508576703
Reply with quote  #2

1508576703
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508576703
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508576703

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508576703
Reply with quote  #2

1508576703
Report to moderator
texasaggie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 06:34:08 AM
 #5622

Youtube Description

Quote
Published on Dec 29, 2013

Our Baby Jet in Action!! Watch our two internal test Baby Jet systems perform mining for the Eligius bitcoin mining pool.

Eligius Link: http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats...

(If you are following our Eligius account, you will notice an average that is more than 1,000 GH/s. Please know that this is the aggregate of two internal test Baby Jets. The good news is we seem to get a solid 500 GH/s of mining performance.)


http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1KSZMq1L9ZWEBKEHuW7ACXWZJYdxiTdaVt

Check it out now, is this three modules coming online?

BTC Tip Jar: 1QDNtSZH1iKj5Gk4Yz1mzqqTvAexgUNxCa
smoothie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058


LEALANA Monero Physical Silver Coins


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 06:56:05 AM
 #5623

Got the following email from sales@hashfast.com:

Quote
Don't Miss Out!
As shipping is about to begin, prices in the HashFast Store will soon increase dramatically.

Take advantage of the prices of Baby Jets and Sierras available now. They won't last long!

Payments must be received by 5PM PST Jan 3rd.
Visit HashFast Store Now and Complete your Order today!

Gave me a good chuckle.

███████████████████████████████████████

            ,╓p@@███████@╗╖,           
        ,p████████████████████N,       
      d█████████████████████████b     
    d██████████████████████████████æ   
  ,████²█████████████████████████████, 
 ,█████  ╙████████████████████╨  █████y
 ██████    `████████████████`    ██████
║██████       Ñ███████████`      ███████
███████         ╩██████Ñ         ███████
███████    ▐▄     ²██╩     a▌    ███████
╢██████    ▐▓█▄          ▄█▓▌    ███████
 ██████    ▐▓▓▓▓▌,     ▄█▓▓▓▌    ██████─
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─  
     ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩    
        ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀       
           ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀`          
                   ²²²                 
███████████████████████████████████████

. ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM        My PGP fingerprint is A764D833.        SMOOTHIE'S HEALTH AND FITNESS JOURNAL          History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ .
LEALANA  PHYSICAL MONERO COINS 999 FINE SILVER.
 
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310



View Profile
December 30, 2013, 07:04:20 AM
 #5624

Same here. I can provide proof. I have saved every e-mail communication from them.

at Buyer's request and Hashfast will refund the payment [...]

Payment: 100% via BTC

I love this.

I have the same line, too.

Also, unit price is explicitely specified in BTC, like this:

UNIT PRICE:

xx.xxxxxxx BTC [$x,xxx USD)

Shipping is specified in USD.

Total is xx.xxxxx BTC [$X,XXX USD]

Payment: 100% via BTC

(TOS in received confirmation, from late August.)

Quote
2.(A):

All of the 550 Baby Jet units from Hashfast's first production batch are guaranteed for delivery by December 31, 2013. If Buyer ordered one or more units of such Baby Jets, and Hashfast does not deliver such units by that date, then Buyer may cancel the undelivered portion of the order at Buyer's request and Hashfast will refund the payment for the units that Buyer purchased but did not receive and cancelled.

No word here about any kind of conversion or rates or exchanges or anything like that. They will refund the payment, and that's all.

And payment was xx.xxxx BTC, so...



crashoveride54902
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770


Dream become broken often


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 07:09:34 AM
 #5625

feel for ya guys...good luck

Dreams of cyprto solving everything is slowly slipping away...Replaced by scams/hacks Sad
Minor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85



View Profile
December 30, 2013, 07:17:06 AM
 #5626

We all paid different amounts by different means and at different times (and are thus subject to different TOS).
We all have different records of our transactions with HashFast so it is not really possible to put up a united front on getting full BTC refunds.
If Cedivad, actually sues and wins his case, it will not, by any means, guaranty that anyone else will win their slightly different cases.

But one thing seems to be clear: the end of October delivery date was never a possibility and was actually fraudulent false advertising that affects us all equally.

The damage that that false advertising has cost us is the amount of BTC that we have lost from getting our machines delivered in January (hopefully) rather than October, and can easily be computed(*) (once we know for sure how fast the machines are, and when the actual delivery occurs).

I suggest that we get together to sue HashFast for that amount (plus punitive damages?).


Cedivad, what does your lawyer think of that?


(*) I estimate the amount lost due to late delivery to be around 22BTC, assuming overclocking to 500GH/s and an early January delivery.
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994



View Profile
December 30, 2013, 07:18:42 AM
 #5627

The last communication I had was with John via a PM on bitcointalk:

Hi,

You order number is: 1460.

To complete this order, please send 89.27399159 BTC to the address below:

17yLxg2NCBcfPBn9T7PUnEmj21qWdXBxf1


Cheers,
John

This clearly requested payment in BTC with no reference whatsoever to USD.
arorts
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 387


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 07:25:11 AM
 #5628

We all paid different amounts by different means and at different times (and are thus subject to different TOS).
We all have different records of our transactions with HashFast so it is not really possible to put up a united front on getting full BTC refunds.
If Cedivad, actually sues and wins his case, it will not, by any means, guaranty that anyone else will win their slightly different cases.

But one thing seems to be clear: the end of October delivery date was never a possibility and was actually fraudulent false advertising that affects us all equally.

The damage that that false advertising has cost us is the amount of BTC that we have lost from getting our machines delivered in January (hopefully) rather than October, and can easily be computed(*) (once we know for sure how fast the machines are, and when the actual delivery occurs).

I suggest that we get together to sue HashFast for that amount (plus punitive damages?).


Cedivad, what does your lawyer think of that?


(*) I estimate the amount lost due to late delivery to be around 22BTC, assuming overclocking to 500GH/s and an early January delivery.


It's not like there were a million TOS versions. The vast majority of all Batch 1 orders should basically correspond to the same TOS. In any case, all TOS indicate refund of payment, NOT partial refunds of payments or USD conversion crap.
Hoofprint
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 07:35:48 AM
 #5629

gm maxwell i found amy's link

Trust links to most of the Hasfast scammers

Hashfast -main acc
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=139624

Simon- Director of scams
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=39629

Icebreaker - Paid Shill
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=17501

Amy Woodward -Engineer of Vaporware
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=143806

CypherDoc
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=8389

Erin hashfast
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=150904

im sure cara has an account to but i cant find it



Look at all the red  Grin
everytime i see another person add something makes my day a little brighter

MT GOX, WE.exchange (WE.Scam), BFL (Brutally Fkn Last), Hashfast (ScamFast), IceDrill (Licedrill),
No wonder the governments don't like Bitcoin with all these parasites
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 07:35:58 AM
 #5630

is impossible somenone return the refund at btc
no one company can do that

According to Cypherdoc (who was being paid by HF at the time) HF has been holding the customer pre-order BTC until the end of year (as they should since they are not allowed to use it to fund development anyway since we are not investors or backers).

Quote
they want only those committed to leaving their BTC with HashFast until the end of the year.  if they fail to deliver, they have said they will give full refunds in BTC.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270363.msg2894478#msg2894478

once you see details of their Miner Protection Plan and refund details all your fears will melt away.
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 07:56:23 AM
 #5631

source: HF Twitter account
1KSZMq1L9ZWEBKEHuW7ACXWZJYdxiTdaVt

source: Eligius.st
1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX

open in blockchain this:

https://blockchain.info/de/address/ecf0dfe07072afaed4135e99c70072cce2235a7f#

then search on the site for this:
1KSZMq1L9ZWEBKEHuW7ACXWZJYdxiTdaVt

You will find it there.

Is it now absolutely clear that HF is this:
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX

and this:
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1KSZMq1L9ZWEBKEHuW7ACXWZJYdxiTdaVt

 Huh Huh Huh

Yes or No ?

I operate Eligius.

Since I'm not in the business of disclosing private datas, I'll simply point out that 1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX is NOT Hashfast.

-wk

From a public key alone, you could not know for sure who any of your miners are.

unless of course he knows who that miner is, which i inferred from his statement.

Quote
Since I'm not in the business of disclosing private datas, I'll simply point out that 1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX is NOT Hashfast.
From a public key alone, you could not know for sure who any of your miners are.
A pool operator could also state this based on IP address(es), fingerprinting the hardware, etc... or simply knowing who that address really is!

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Here's an interesting tidbit: Of the 12 images generated via Google for 1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX, 1/3 of them are directly rated to me.
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 08:00:28 AM
 #5632

Negative ratings on bitcointalk.org. 

That'll sure show them. 

(Of course give them negative trust, but really, does that get your bitcoins back?)


It seems they strive to use social marketing to gather new customers. Everyone that got defrauded should make it known on Twitter/Facebook and any other platforms they use. When people check out these websites they do often click on these to see "reviews". Much more effective than bitcointalk trust system.

Another option: http://www.ripoffreport.com/
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 30, 2013, 08:32:14 AM
 #5633

Cedivad, what does your lawyer think of that?
If we do a group action against HF we give up to any of the "protections" of the MPP. Not that i care anymore, i'm almost sure that i will refuse the shipment and sue the hell out of them. It's the only rationale solution. I will ask and report back anyway. Thanks for asking.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Searing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512


Clueless!


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 08:40:38 AM
 #5634

Cedivad, what does your lawyer think of that?
If we do a group action against HF we give up to any of the "protections" of the MPP. Not that i care anymore, i'm almost sure that i will refuse the shipment and sue the hell out of them. It's the only rationale solution. I will ask and report back anyway. Thanks for asking.

just a note as a bfl person who got scammed....bfl has had bbb and ftc which then forwarded it to the local gov't attorney for the county bfl is in ...this is where ftc in usa is sending this stuff ..goes no place the local county attorney is not gonna shut down a multi million dollar corp in its county....also did a direct bid to the high council of paypal fraud officers..some got refunds but such a flood paypal stopped that in like a week and yanked paypal from bfl

in the usa the regulators are basically saying 'you got your unit 9 months or 12 months late go away" time frame late makes no difference

also why no one can get enough traction with lawyers to do a class action suit.....lawyers not interested because 'eventually' may take 1yr bfl will get you an asic unit

so in usa the regulators are asleep at the switch...

just saying you may have same issues with hashfast stuff

I do know that some folk in EU DID get refunds because consumer protection is better ...just saying as applies to usa ...I went thru all this

also people have be 'successful' and won small claims court actions ...bfl just sends them a unit 1 year late or ignores it .......hard to enforce such judgments

anyway hopefully all the above won't apply and you will get your stuff or refunds or extra hash etc

Searing

Hoofprint
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 09:08:22 AM
 #5635

i don't understand why we cant do a class action suit, since scamfast is intent on invalidating their own ToS.
any previous agreements we have with scamfast will be null n void, including that stupid arbitration clause

MT GOX, WE.exchange (WE.Scam), BFL (Brutally Fkn Last), Hashfast (ScamFast), IceDrill (Licedrill),
No wonder the governments don't like Bitcoin with all these parasites
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 30, 2013, 09:14:22 AM
 #5636

The only reason why you should not attempt a class action is if you think the ToS to be there to protect you and you want to enforce what they wrote on it. Points such as full refunds of the payment and payments that are specified to be made in BTC.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 30, 2013, 09:24:27 AM
 #5637

I would like to know if anyone has a snapshot of the ToS around the end of August (like 28 of August). I'm not talking about the ToS they emailed us.

Thanks.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Hoofprint
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 09:32:54 AM
 #5638

I would like to know if anyone has a snapshot of the ToS around the end of August (like 28 of August). I'm not talking about the ToS they emailed us.

Thanks.

ive got version 1.B
http://pastebin.com/EfS9vmRf

version 1.F
http://pastebin.com/SFzPH8AK

if anyone has any other versions post them see if we can get them added to
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=391251

MT GOX, WE.exchange (WE.Scam), BFL (Brutally Fkn Last), Hashfast (ScamFast), IceDrill (Licedrill),
No wonder the governments don't like Bitcoin with all these parasites
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 30, 2013, 09:42:16 AM
 #5639

This is mine. It's probably useless, but yet, here it is.

http://pastebin.com/XbreSGVV

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
defcon23
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120


View Profile
December 30, 2013, 12:01:56 PM
 #5640

I would like to know if anyone has a snapshot of the ToS around the end of August (like 28 of August). I'm not talking about the ToS they emailed us.

Thanks.

had saved all old info before, will look later and post if found

here todays in case it is useful
http://imgur.com/a/om1Xj

and some tweets

Code:
Virtual-Notary.Org hereby notes that Twitter user "HashFast" tweeted
the following messages on the dates and times shown below:
 

  Tests came out very well tonight. Production has been given the go-ahead!
  -- On Date: Sat Dec 28 19:59:41 +0000 2013


  Ecstatic about the Baby Jet on Eligius 700+ GH/s performance over the last few
hours.
  -- On Date: Sat Dec 28 08:01:36 +0000 2013


  Happy about the Eligius Baby Jet performance at 600+GH/s on December
24, 25, 26.  Check it out at http://t.co/NfbWVWRIOe.
  -- On Date: Sat Dec 28 07:02:00 +0000 2013


  GN chip bringup: Running two of the four die in the chip. Clocking it at 700mhz
and .84v core voltage, it's doing 248Gh/s on only 2 dies!
  -- On Date: Thu Dec 12 21:12:19 +0000 2013


 




Factoid-URL: http://virtual-notary.org/log/c38d4d10-bd5a-4e80-a767-cb1ca85a3872/
Factoid-Serial: df11ff09dc7b59318f69ecbc9e9b430054196fad68d11a137595939c57417a56
Factoid-Plugin: tweets v1.0
Factoid-Date: Monday December 30, 2013 06:05.08 EST (UTC-0500)
 

Notary-NextSerial: 7808bc9f5b0fe2f6cd0a55e6e3dbf606c86d3fc12b299391e5d2991efe085d9e

thanx for that  Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 [282] 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!