Bitcoin Forum
October 23, 2017, 03:42:50 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 [267] 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 865554 times)
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 11:13:45 AM
 #5321


MPP?Huh?
If the chip is performing at that rate your MPP complaints are moot.   You are already getting more than you ever dreamed of


pretty sure the MPP is calculated at 400, no matter the actual hashrate.

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
1508773370
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508773370

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508773370
Reply with quote  #2

1508773370
Report to moderator
1508773370
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508773370

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508773370
Reply with quote  #2

1508773370
Report to moderator
1508773370
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508773370

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508773370
Reply with quote  #2

1508773370
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508773370
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508773370

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508773370
Reply with quote  #2

1508773370
Report to moderator
1508773370
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508773370

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508773370
Reply with quote  #2

1508773370
Report to moderator
jelin1984
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 11:52:08 AM
 #5322

What final is the speed of miner 400gh or 600gh??...
ImI
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 11:53:18 AM
 #5323


MPP?Huh?
If the chip is performing at that rate your MPP complaints are moot.   You are already getting more than you ever dreamed of


pretty sure the MPP is calculated at 400, no matter the actual hashrate.

pretty sure the MPP is calculated at 4x the BJ, no matter the actual hashrate.
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 12:27:51 PM
 #5324

The MPP says "up to 4x advertised hashrate". Advertised hashrate = 400GH. Please correct me if wrong.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
JWU42
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 12:29:46 PM
 #5325

The MPP says "up to 4x advertised hashrate". Advertised hashrate = 400GH. Please correct me if wrong.

I believe this to be correct - 4x advertised (i.e., 400 Gh/s).

GPG PubKey | THREEMA | OTC | HeatWare | 1JWU42QLGFESoQCC4iPzUDTRiC9nx5bi95
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 12:48:02 PM
 #5326



The mpp is probably going to be 4x..  which means we get an extra 3 modules for each baby jet. correct?


orig 400.
mpp 1200.
final modules for each jet.  4.

4x700 actual.  2.8Th final hashrate for each jet..

sounds like finally some better news.


1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
ImI
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 12:49:49 PM
 #5327


honestly, i expect 4 additional modules per BJ

maybe i am wrong, but thats what we all should be looking forward
niothor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546


Niothor


View Profile WWW
December 28, 2013, 12:51:41 PM
 #5328


Well, if the chip can do 800Gh/s and they give us 4 extra chips in addition to the BJ then that would be 800% MPP (900% if you include the extra 400Gh/s from the original BJ). I would be ok with that as long as they delivered it with-in a relatively short time frame (before Feb)



Deliver what before that time?
The order or the MPP ? =)))))

jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 12:56:14 PM
 #5329



The mpp is probably going to be 4x..  which means we get an extra 3 modules for each baby jet. correct?


orig 400.
mpp 1200.
final modules for each jet.  4.

4x700 actual.  2.8Th final hashrate for each jet..

sounds like finally some better news.



I stand corrected... it is 4 more modules.. for a grand total of appox  3.5th for each jet... sweet!

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:04:58 PM
 #5330

a) who said that the chip does 800GH? someone that said ops, i'm wrong, 2 hours after that? And yet people keep think that the chip does 800GH?
b) read the MPP how many times you want to understand that it's as vague as possible and __apart from the undefined delivery dates__ they can either ship you 4 chips or 400GH*4, depending on how they read it. Do you want your opinion to count? Get a lawyer.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:13:43 PM
 #5331

a) who said that the chip does 800GH? someone that said ops, i'm wrong, 2 hours after that? And yet people keep think that the chip does 800GH?
b) read the MPP how many times you want to understand that it's as vague as possible and __apart from the undefined delivery dates__ they can either ship you 4 chips or 400GH*4, depending on how they read it. Do you want your opinion to count? Get a lawyer.

#1.  i calculated at 700, not 8
#2  http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1KSZMq1L9ZWEBKEHuW7ACXWZJYdxiTdaVt

(this is the right link, yes?)

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
jspielberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:22:40 PM
 #5332

There must be something wrong with eligius... the test unit is currently showing 1200GH/s for the most recent time intervals.
Multiple machines?

JWU42
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:24:39 PM
 #5333

There must be something wrong with eligius... the test unit is currently showing 1200GH/s for the most recent time intervals.
Multiple machines?

Refresh page - it will fix it...

GPG PubKey | THREEMA | OTC | HeatWare | 1JWU42QLGFESoQCC4iPzUDTRiC9nx5bi95
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:35:15 PM
 #5334

I have to admit that 800GH/chip, if stable, would be impressive to say at least. I wonder how the sierra is supposed to dissipiate 3kW of heat in its 4U. Not even recent and ultra high density datacenters can handle 30kW/rack.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
jspielberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:35:38 PM
 #5335

With all the bad new/lack of news... and now the sudden outpouring of good news... I am not quite prepared to believe completely.
Maybe they could point a 2nd one (or a sierra) against a different pool to see if the numbers are consistent.

jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:37:19 PM
 #5336

I have to admit that 800GH/chip, if stable, would be impressive to say at least. I wonder how the sierra is supposed to dissipiate 3kW of heat in its 4U. Not even recent and ultra high density datacenters can handle 30kW/rack.

I am still going to do my calcs on 700....  anything over that would be a bonus

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:45:13 PM
 #5337

What if they ship those amazing 1PH/s BJ after the 31 of Dec and you accept the delivery anyway, refusing the refund, and you discover that they only go at 600GH top?
I think i could should expect such a move from them.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
fubly
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 534



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:46:07 PM
 #5338

source: HF Twitter account
1KSZMq1L9ZWEBKEHuW7ACXWZJYdxiTdaVt

source: Eligius.st
1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX

open in blockchain this:

https://blockchain.info/de/address/ecf0dfe07072afaed4135e99c70072cce2235a7f#

then search on the site for this:
1KSZMq1L9ZWEBKEHuW7ACXWZJYdxiTdaVt

You will find it there.

Is it now absolutely clear that HF is this:
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX

and this:
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1KSZMq1L9ZWEBKEHuW7ACXWZJYdxiTdaVt

 Huh Huh Huh

Yes or No ?
jspielberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:46:46 PM
 #5339


I am still going to do my calcs on 700....  anything over that would be a bonus

Ignoring power costs, my projections at 700GH on Jan 1st, and 4x (2800 GH) on Feb. 3rd give a total lifetime loss of 17BTC.  Which is a much smaller loss we were looking at before.

With 800GH the loss narrow to 11BTC/BJ1.

JWU42
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:48:39 PM
 #5340

I have to admit that 800GH/chip, if stable, would be impressive to say at least. I wonder how the sierra is supposed to dissipiate 3kW of heat in its 4U. Not even recent and ultra high density datacenters can handle 30kW/rack.

Would probably need to just space the units in the rack and limit it to like 14KW/rack densities.




Not aware of many DC that can accommodate 14kW.

GPG PubKey | THREEMA | OTC | HeatWare | 1JWU42QLGFESoQCC4iPzUDTRiC9nx5bi95
Pages: « 1 ... 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 [267] 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!