Bitcoin Forum
October 21, 2017, 08:09:56 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 [266] 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 865204 times)
jddebug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 444



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 07:23:01 AM
 #5301

Eligius has just recovered from some downtime and could be displaying incorrect stats.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508616596
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508616596

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508616596
Reply with quote  #2

1508616596
Report to moderator
1508616596
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508616596

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508616596
Reply with quote  #2

1508616596
Report to moderator
1508616596
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508616596

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508616596
Reply with quote  #2

1508616596
Report to moderator
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 07:24:15 AM
 #5302

You are already getting more than you ever dreamed of
Strange, i think to have dreamed of 400GH mining for me at the first of November. Oh, yes, and i forgot, i want the MPP not to be at the __advertised__ speed of a BJ, but at the __advertised twitter speed__.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 07:24:59 AM
 #5303

They are most probably trying to use the smoke machine. Even if it does at 800GH stably (and i don't see that happen in this world), they will delay to death the MPP. If they want me to consider not to start the process that will end on a litigation on the first of Jan i want the MPP to have a guaranteed delivery date, and i want that NOW.
MPP?Huh?
If the chip is performing at that rate your MPP complaints are moot.   You are already getting more than you ever dreamed of


Even if it is 800 GH/s (which nothing is confirmed that it is) it isn't more than we were dreaming about.   Due to dificulty increases 400 GH/s on Oct 20 is the equivelent of not 800 GH/s but 1,532 GH/s on Jan 1.   That's right if HF delivered 1,532 GH/s per BabyJet on Jan 1 miners would be no better off than getting what they promised (400 GH/s) when they promised (20 OCT).

So still think complaints about MPP are moot?   Even 800 GH/s will be a 80%+ loss IF delivered on 1 January AND difficulty only rises 25% per adjustment.  Of course all this is academic but it likely is NOT going to be 800 GH/s delivered and it seems very likely it will be even later too.
ninjarobot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


Mine Silent, Mine Deep


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 07:31:33 AM
 #5304

Come on Cedivad. While I agree with you on many things I do think you are going overboard with the drama sometimes. If you are going the legal route, go the legal route. No need to tell us every day on the forums.

If HF is able to achieve a stable 800GH/s with a single module that would be quite an achievement. It won't put us in the green but hey good news is good news. Let's hope this is the case and not more smoke and mirrors. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for now.
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 07:32:54 AM
 #5305

If you are going the legal route, go the legal route. No need to tell us every day on the forums.
Are you annoyed by that? So i guess that i can't have you to testify about the BTC refunds?

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
ninjarobot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


Mine Silent, Mine Deep


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 07:37:26 AM
 #5306

If you are going the legal route, go the legal route. No need to tell us every day on the forums.
Are you annoyed by that? So i guess that i can't have you to testify about the BTC refunds?

When the time arrives and it makes sense. Sure I'd like to help you out FWIW. At the moment, I think you are just pounding your chest trying to intimidate HF to deliver more and disagree with that strategy. That said, I think HF should find a way to compensate for the delays and give their customers a fighting chance.
aerobatic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 702


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 07:38:00 AM
 #5307

Come on Cedivad. While I agree with you on many things I do think you are going overboard with the drama sometimes. If you are going the legal route, go the legal route. No need to tell us every day on the forums.

If HF is able to achieve a stable 800GH/s with a single module that would be quite an achievement. It won't put us in the green but hey good news is good news. Let's hope this is the case and not more smoke and mirrors. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for now.

i think the 800 GH was an anomaly... however hashfast is tweeting that they're proud of it hitting 600 GH over several days, so it looks like 600 GH is a number they're happy about.   And to over clock something designed for 400 (well 424) to 600 Gh is still an impressive feat.  fingers crossed its reliable running at 600 gh.  (edit: now they're tweeting that they're happy about the 700+Gh it recently hit.. so i guess it does overclock well and much better than i expected!)  Would like to know its power consumption...?  and whether the sierras will over clock as well (they may be power limited)

-- Jez
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 07:40:31 AM
 #5308

I think you are just pounding your chest trying to intimidate HF to deliver more and disagree with that strategy.
No, that was months ago. After that they told me a couple of things about their CEO, i realised that everything was getting worse everyday, now i'm making it a question of principles.

Scammer's company is gonna scam. I don't expect anything else, and everyone that is sincerely positive after this "news" (was that with 1 or 2 chips, again?) will bear with me in a few months.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
jspielberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 08:03:28 AM
 #5309

There are still a number of unanswered questions... but having HF providing updates and proof of progress is a very welcome change.

There most recent tweet though annoys me...

Quote
Just did the following calculation for the Baby Jet on Eligius. At 0.33 BTC per day, that is almost 7 Bitcoins in only 21 days. Exciting!

I guess whomever wrote that never heard of difficulty retarget (every 10 days recently).

Good news is, it looks like they are owning the 700+ GH performance.

Quote
Ecstatic about the Baby Jet on Eligius 700+ GH/s performance over the last few hours.

They have had more substantive communication in the last 5 hours than they have in the last 3 weeks.  Hopefully this trend continues as they head into delivery.
I am stowing my pitchfork for the time being.

GodHatesFigs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 174


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 08:24:17 AM
 #5310

So no one's getting their rig delivered before 31st December - good luck getting your refunds, guys.  Undecided
minternj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 08:31:08 AM
 #5311

Lol at this update. Pitchforks back out.
https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/416846066068520961
"Hold on. Looks like Eligius stats is having problems. Think we are really around 400-500 GH/s. Waiting for Eligius to fix this."

Warning about Nitrogensports.eu
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=709114.0
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 08:49:14 AM
 #5312

Are you telling me that after weeks of tests they can't detect such an incredible performance as "too good, but we are only drawing about 600W, something must be wrong".

This is the last time i will even remotely trust what the fuck they have to write. "It's the straw that breaks the camel's back."

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
AussieHash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 685



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 08:51:39 AM
 #5313

Lol at this update. Pitchforks back out.
https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/416846066068520961
"Hold on. Looks like Eligius stats is having problems. Think we are really around 400-500 GH/s. Waiting for Eligius to fix this."

They must have modified cgminer so heavily they cannot interpret the results
They earlier published a screen with WU 10,000+ despite a hashrate under 500GH

This is their second big HashOoopsy for the day

cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 08:54:49 AM
 #5314

Yes, and there is some secret nuclear reaction inside the BJ that accounts for the energy needed to reach 800GH. You are a f. startup made of supposedly geniuses and can't even detect such a HUGE logic bug? I really can't f. believe it. We have another useless topic to talk about in the next few days instead of the real problems. Good job, HF.

The only possible conclusion? Everything was plotted. They can't be this ignorant. Even a 14yo here in Italy doing a scientific school would have questioned that result before publishing it on Twitter. They are playing with us.

You know what? I't s a beautiful sunny day here, i'm going out to fly thinking another time what to do against them. F. U., HF. I will make your new lawyer cry like a baby.
http://i.imgur.com/URWMzcA.jpg

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
jddebug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 444



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 09:00:21 AM
 #5315

Lol at this update. Pitchforks back out.
https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/416846066068520961
"Hold on. Looks like Eligius stats is having problems. Think we are really around 400-500 GH/s. Waiting for Eligius to fix this."

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=262052.msg4181673#msg4181673

As I suspected.
plasmoske
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


The realist


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 09:44:55 AM
 #5316

Wow such fail bahahahaha!

Thinking stats from eligius was the real one instead of what was actually shown on cgminer. LOL bloody amateurs
DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 09:52:19 AM
 #5317

Wow such fail bahahahaha!

Thinking stats from eligius was the real one instead of what was actually shown on cgminer. LOL bloody amateurs

Can someone send them a USBee so they have something to practice with?

~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 10:06:19 AM
 #5318

They cannot be and are not be that stupid. You are playing their game with their rules.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
niothor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546


Niothor


View Profile WWW
December 28, 2013, 10:32:33 AM
 #5319

Lol at this update. Pitchforks back out.
https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/416846066068520961
"Hold on. Looks like Eligius stats is having problems. Think we are really around 400-500 GH/s. Waiting for Eligius to fix this."

Probably FailFast staff think they are on the 1st of April. That would explain why they are so relaxed. They still have 9 months to ship those "products" Smiley))

JWU42
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 11:05:54 AM
 #5320

My Eligius stats are fine (not below) - namely the 22.5 min.  

The BJ seems to be in the 700's... http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1KSZMq1L9ZWEBKEHuW7ACXWZJYdxiTdaVt

GPG PubKey | THREEMA | OTC | HeatWare | 1JWU42QLGFESoQCC4iPzUDTRiC9nx5bi95
Pages: « 1 ... 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 [266] 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!