Bitcoin Forum
November 25, 2017, 02:16:25 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 [128] 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 ... 205 »
  Print  
Author Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy  (Read 351695 times)
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


moOo


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 03:12:32 PM
 #2541

Quote
the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too


pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver
pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago
pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic


I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do

mooo for rent
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! With Bitcoin-Qt, it needs to be backed up at least as often as every 100 transactions (both sends and receipts) or new addresses.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 03:16:26 PM
 #2542

Quote
the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too


pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver
pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago
pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic


I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do

Ive been testing flowers poclbm mod out since last night and waiting for new bitclockers block to start, will let you know if this solve the issue for me (as it apparently did for flowers)

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2011, 03:17:46 PM
 #2543

Quote
the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too


pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver
pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago
pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic


I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do

man you force me do this  Smiley ... from where you're mining ? give the coast at least or something... like plains of the purple buffalo

edit: and the third ?

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
bitcoindaddy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 459


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 03:24:07 PM
 #2544

Quote
the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too


pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver
pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago
pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic


I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do

man you force me do this  Smiley ... from where you're mining ? give the coast at least or something... like plains of the purple buffalo

edit: and the third ?

Isn't the problem with the API and not the pool address?
Starlightbreaker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554



View Profile
August 05, 2011, 03:56:32 PM
 #2545

Hm.
bithopper refuses to hop from digbtc, even after i disabled digbtc.


gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 03:59:28 PM
 #2546

Hm.
bithopper refuses to hop from digbtc, even after i disabled digbtc.



He fixed that issue last night, did you get latest?
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 04:04:24 PM
 #2547

When using pools that use mine_slush and altslicescheduler, shouldnt it remove the slice part on the pool if it starts to mine there and the pool allready went above the predefined 10.35% ?

What I notice is that it gives slush for instance a slice of 300sec(or whatever it sliced at) then it would eventually hop to slush even if its at >10.35% (my example it was at 40%) and then finish the 300sec slice. I think it should be able to notice the pool is assigned mine_slush (or atleast its defined something other than just mine) and clear the slice as soon as it hops there(or before it hops there)

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
bitcoindaddy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 459


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 04:08:58 PM
 #2548

When using pools that use mine_slush and altslicescheduler, shouldnt it remove the slice part on the pool if it starts to mine there and the pool allready went above the predefined 10.35% ?

What I notice is that it gives slush for instance a slice of 300sec(or whatever it sliced at) then it would eventually hop to slush even if its at >10.35% (my example it was at 40%) and then finish the 300sec slice. I think it should be able to notice the pool is assigned mine_slush (or atleast its defined something other than just mine) and clear the slice as soon as it hops there(or before it hops there)

See my posted issue regarding this topic:

https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper/issues/128
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 04:16:32 PM
 #2549

Man I know ive said it before(alot!) but I really miss the ryo_dynamicpenalty system, from what I can tell it worked much more efficient across pools using poolspeed/sharesize and duration as factors.

I think I will move back to that version for now until it is added to the main bithopper version of c00w.

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
c00w
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 04:34:16 PM
 #2550

@user5716
Update. A bunch of those errors should be fixed.

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 04:40:59 PM
 #2551

Ok, now slicing is picking up bitcoins.lc which is over 50% when there are 2 pools under 30%.  Is there something I am not understanding about slicing?  For the time being, I'm moving back to the old default scheduler
MaGNeT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2011, 04:48:17 PM
 #2552

"We don't need grasshoppers... We need miners..."

MaGneT, when are you going to admit that we really do need grasshoppers?

 Grin

I think he's referring to your signature MaGNeT   Roll Eyes

I know  Grin

Unofficial Waves topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2142722   |   My Waves address alias = magnet
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2011, 05:51:32 PM
 #2553

"We don't need grasshoppers... We need miners..."

MaGneT, when are you going to admit that we really do need grasshoppers?

 Grin

I think he's referring to your signature MaGNeT   Roll Eyes

I know  Grin

and ?... ahh I get it, you don't change sides atm

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
Starlightbreaker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554



View Profile
August 05, 2011, 05:54:17 PM
 #2554

Hm.
bithopper refuses to hop from digbtc, even after i disabled digbtc.



He fixed that issue last night, did you get latest?
i just downloaded it early this morning though.

Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 06:06:31 PM
 #2555

Latest version of c00w hopper using altslicer, took a while before an error cropped up with latest version Wink

Code:
[20:04:33] received lp from: digbtc
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./bitHopper.py", line 298, in <module>
    main()
  File "./bitHopper.py", line 294, in main
    reactor.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 1158, in run
    self.mainLoop()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 1167, in mainLoop
    self.runUntilCurrent()
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 789, in runUntilCurrent
    call.func(*call.args, **call.kw)
exceptions.TypeError: pull_lp() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
c00w
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 06:24:11 PM
 #2556

I apologize. That error should be fixed now. I made a change but wasn't thinking about it and since I don't have my test server errors that don't crop up immediately are not apparent.

EDIT: And the bug was causing getworks to lag out. So poclbm runs a lot smoother and bitclockers shouldn't be triggered as rapidly.

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
EskimoBob
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 06:33:25 PM
 #2557

feature request (https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper/issues/121)

5) reload config files without stopping the script

While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head.
BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2011, 06:36:35 PM
 #2558

feature request (https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper/issues/121)

5) reload config files without stopping the script


added

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
hawks5999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168



View Profile WWW
August 05, 2011, 06:58:09 PM
 #2559

I apologize. That error should be fixed now. I made a change but wasn't thinking about it and since I don't have my test server errors that don't crop up immediately are not apparent.

EDIT: And the bug was causing getworks to lag out. So poclbm runs a lot smoother and bitclockers shouldn't be triggered as rapidly.

Can I recommend some sort of release management get introduced to the c00w master? There's a negative incentive to use bithopper when the master is getting committed with bug fixes several times a day and overnight:



This is 25 changes to the master in less than 24 hours.

Could you consider doing all new features and bugfixes in a test branch and only merge back into the master when the defect density dies down. I understand this is all agile and whatnot but this process is going to burn out c00w and turn off users. A stable release branch that just works and updates slowly and a test branch that can be hacked away would allow for proper regression testing and require a lot less time spent updating to the absolute newest version every 2-3 hours. Less time downloading/configuring. More time mining.

■ ▄▄▄
■ ███
■ ■  ■               
LEDGER  WALLET    ████
■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■
              LEDGER WALLET
Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Decentralized. Open. Secure.
c00w
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
August 05, 2011, 07:05:11 PM
 #2560

Well the idea is I would tag the stable releases similarly to how the linux kernel works. But well we've only had one spot where it was semistable and its been tagged as 0.1.

Also this isn't agile or anything. Its just me writing code and adding features. Sometimes I mess up. Sometimes other people mess up. Thats life.

Burnout?
Maybe. If it happens I'll probably turn the github page into an organisation and let someone else start managing it.

But if we wanted real release management it'd work something like this:
I merge changes over the weekend and monday. Tuesday and later I only merge bugfixes. Once its tested sufficiently I release a stable version.

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
Pages: « 1 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 [128] 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 ... 205 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!