joulesbeef
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
moOo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 03:12:32 PM |
|
the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do
|
mooo for rent
|
|
|
Clipse
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 03:16:26 PM |
|
the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do Ive been testing flowers poclbm mod out since last night and waiting for new bitclockers block to start, will let you know if this solve the issue for me (as it apparently did for flowers)
|
...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> ClipseWe pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 03:17:46 PM |
|
the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do man you force me do this ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ... from where you're mining ? give the coast at least or something... like plains of the purple buffalo edit: and the third ?
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
bitcoindaddy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 03:24:07 PM |
|
the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do man you force me do this ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ... from where you're mining ? give the coast at least or something... like plains of the purple buffalo edit: and the third ? Isn't the problem with the API and not the pool address?
|
|
|
|
Starlightbreaker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 03:56:32 PM |
|
Hm. bithopper refuses to hop from digbtc, even after i disabled digbtc.
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 03:59:28 PM |
|
Hm. bithopper refuses to hop from digbtc, even after i disabled digbtc.
He fixed that issue last night, did you get latest?
|
|
|
|
Clipse
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 04:04:24 PM |
|
When using pools that use mine_slush and altslicescheduler, shouldnt it remove the slice part on the pool if it starts to mine there and the pool allready went above the predefined 10.35% ?
What I notice is that it gives slush for instance a slice of 300sec(or whatever it sliced at) then it would eventually hop to slush even if its at >10.35% (my example it was at 40%) and then finish the 300sec slice. I think it should be able to notice the pool is assigned mine_slush (or atleast its defined something other than just mine) and clear the slice as soon as it hops there(or before it hops there)
|
...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> ClipseWe pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
|
|
|
bitcoindaddy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 04:08:58 PM |
|
When using pools that use mine_slush and altslicescheduler, shouldnt it remove the slice part on the pool if it starts to mine there and the pool allready went above the predefined 10.35% ?
What I notice is that it gives slush for instance a slice of 300sec(or whatever it sliced at) then it would eventually hop to slush even if its at >10.35% (my example it was at 40%) and then finish the 300sec slice. I think it should be able to notice the pool is assigned mine_slush (or atleast its defined something other than just mine) and clear the slice as soon as it hops there(or before it hops there)
See my posted issue regarding this topic: https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper/issues/128
|
|
|
|
Clipse
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 04:16:32 PM |
|
Man I know ive said it before(alot!) but I really miss the ryo_dynamicpenalty system, from what I can tell it worked much more efficient across pools using poolspeed/sharesize and duration as factors.
I think I will move back to that version for now until it is added to the main bithopper version of c00w.
|
...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> ClipseWe pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 04:34:16 PM |
|
@user5716 Update. A bunch of those errors should be fixed.
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
gnaget
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 04:40:59 PM |
|
Ok, now slicing is picking up bitcoins.lc which is over 50% when there are 2 pools under 30%. Is there something I am not understanding about slicing? For the time being, I'm moving back to the old default scheduler
|
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 04:48:17 PM |
|
"We don't need grasshoppers... We need miners..." MaGneT, when are you going to admit that we really do need grasshoppers? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I think he's referring to your signature MaGNeT ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) I know ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 05:51:32 PM |
|
"We don't need grasshoppers... We need miners..." MaGneT, when are you going to admit that we really do need grasshoppers? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I think he's referring to your signature MaGNeT ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) I know ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) and ?... ahh I get it, you don't change sides atm
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
Starlightbreaker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 05:54:17 PM |
|
Hm. bithopper refuses to hop from digbtc, even after i disabled digbtc.
He fixed that issue last night, did you get latest? i just downloaded it early this morning though.
|
|
|
|
Clipse
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 06:06:31 PM |
|
Latest version of c00w hopper using altslicer, took a while before an error cropped up with latest version ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) [20:04:33] received lp from: digbtc Traceback (most recent call last): File "./bitHopper.py", line 298, in <module> main() File "./bitHopper.py", line 294, in main reactor.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 1158, in run self.mainLoop() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 1167, in mainLoop self.runUntilCurrent() --- <exception caught here> --- File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 789, in runUntilCurrent call.func(*call.args, **call.kw) exceptions.TypeError: pull_lp() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)
|
...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> ClipseWe pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 06:24:11 PM |
|
I apologize. That error should be fixed now. I made a change but wasn't thinking about it and since I don't have my test server errors that don't crop up immediately are not apparent.
EDIT: And the bug was causing getworks to lag out. So poclbm runs a lot smoother and bitclockers shouldn't be triggered as rapidly.
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
EskimoBob
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 06:33:25 PM |
|
feature request ( https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper/issues/121) 5) reload config files without stopping the script
|
While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head. BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 06:36:35 PM |
|
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
hawks5999
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 06:58:09 PM |
|
I apologize. That error should be fixed now. I made a change but wasn't thinking about it and since I don't have my test server errors that don't crop up immediately are not apparent.
EDIT: And the bug was causing getworks to lag out. So poclbm runs a lot smoother and bitclockers shouldn't be triggered as rapidly.
Can I recommend some sort of release management get introduced to the c00w master? There's a negative incentive to use bithopper when the master is getting committed with bug fixes several times a day and overnight: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FG9Zzq.png&t=665&c=g-YCaq2s25xAGg) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FGKxgs.png&t=665&c=0l6pOlpz0Lm9Wg) This is 25 changes to the master in less than 24 hours. Could you consider doing all new features and bugfixes in a test branch and only merge back into the master when the defect density dies down. I understand this is all agile and whatnot but this process is going to burn out c00w and turn off users. A stable release branch that just works and updates slowly and a test branch that can be hacked away would allow for proper regression testing and require a lot less time spent updating to the absolute newest version every 2-3 hours. Less time downloading/configuring. More time mining.
|
■ ▄▄▄ ■ ███ ■ ■ ■ LEDGER WALLET ████ ■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■ LEDGER WALLET Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Decentralized. Open. Secure.
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 05, 2011, 07:05:11 PM |
|
Well the idea is I would tag the stable releases similarly to how the linux kernel works. But well we've only had one spot where it was semistable and its been tagged as 0.1.
Also this isn't agile or anything. Its just me writing code and adding features. Sometimes I mess up. Sometimes other people mess up. Thats life.
Burnout? Maybe. If it happens I'll probably turn the github page into an organisation and let someone else start managing it.
But if we wanted real release management it'd work something like this: I merge changes over the weekend and monday. Tuesday and later I only merge bugfixes. Once its tested sufficiently I release a stable version.
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
|