pazsion
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
March 30, 2014, 03:18:33 AM |
|
When you can please re-implement an updated cpu miner.
1.4.2 is what is available. and this error that was corrected prevents us from conecting to the servers.
I used other miners, but the work does not seem to be getting turned in, as accurately as your software you provide. even though the hashrates are faster in some. none have come close to te 1.4mhs i was able to get with the provided software. cpu only.
i realize it may be a pain to put it in now, i'd be fine with a stand alone cpu only version of the same software.
Would there be any other reasons the java client is not able to connect to your servers? it's almost as if we are ddosing ourselves or something. By loggining in .... i can't imagine the servers being overloaded yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
PCMiner
|
|
March 30, 2014, 04:18:23 AM |
|
When you can please re-implement an updated cpu miner.
1.4.2 is what is available. and this error that was corrected prevents us from conecting to the servers.
I used other miners, but the work does not seem to be getting turned in, as accurately as your software you provide. even though the hashrates are faster in some. none have come close to te 1.4mhs i was able to get with the provided software. cpu only.
i realize it may be a pain to put it in now, i'd be fine with a stand alone cpu only version of the same software.
Would there be any other reasons the java client is not able to connect to your servers? it's almost as if we are ddosing ourselves or something. By loggining in .... i can't imagine the servers being overloaded yet.
Did I just read that you are trying to mine bitcoin using CPU so you can get 1.4mhs? If so, I'll spare you the normal reasons why you shouldn't use a CPU and just leave this one reason here: Even if you mined for 10 years at that speed, you wouldn't ever make enough to be able to withdraw it from the Bitminter website.
|
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
March 30, 2014, 10:17:32 AM |
|
When you can please re-implement an updated cpu miner.
1.4.2 is what is available. and this error that was corrected prevents us from conecting to the servers.
1.4.2 should connect fine. Two reasons not to CPU mine: 1. It uses much more in electricity than what you earn. The more you mine, the more money you lose. 2. Like PCMiner just said, it is so slow that what you earn will probably never be more than "dust" which is not enough to withdraw. And if you still want to CPU mine, don't use Bitminter client. The best CPU miners are 10 times faster. I never had time to implement fast CPU mining, and it doesn't make any sense now.
|
|
|
|
pazsion
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
March 31, 2014, 03:07:18 AM |
|
this makes me sad now. I had much better earnings when i was able to use the software provided dependably. this is why i keep asking for it to return. But dr says it should work fine. it must be something on my end causeing issues.
i already obtained 1.4mhs. cpu with your software. it's not just the software but system configurations (unlocking your os) and hardware potential.
i've already withdrawn,,,for last year...i was hopeing to enable better earnings this year. I guess you can pm me suggestions for other cpu miners. google hasn't been helpful. i end up finding virueses and trojans instead.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1630
Ruu \o/
|
|
March 31, 2014, 03:11:46 AM |
|
this makes me sad now. I had much better earnings when i was able to use the software provided dependably. this is why i keep asking for it to return. But dr says it should work fine. it must be something on my end causeing issues.
i already obtained 1.4mhs. cpu with your software. it's not just the software but system configurations (unlocking your os) and hardware potential.
i've already withdrawn,,,for last year...i was hopeing to enable better earnings this year. I guess you can pm me suggestions for other cpu miners. google hasn't been helpful. i end up finding virueses and trojans instead.
How on earth are you making money CPU mining bitcoin now? That hasn't been profitable in years. Even with free electricity you can only earn about 1 cent per month with a modern CPU.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
jfederkins
Member
Offline
Activity: 296
Merit: 10
|
|
March 31, 2014, 08:08:59 PM |
|
this makes me sad now. I had much better earnings when i was able to use the software provided dependably. this is why i keep asking for it to return. But dr says it should work fine. it must be something on my end causeing issues.
i already obtained 1.4mhs. cpu with your software. it's not just the software but system configurations (unlocking your os) and hardware potential.
i've already withdrawn,,,for last year...i was hopeing to enable better earnings this year. I guess you can pm me suggestions for other cpu miners. google hasn't been helpful. i end up finding virueses and trojans instead.
How on earth are you making money CPU mining bitcoin now? That hasn't been profitable in years. Even with free electricity you can only earn about 1 cent per month with a modern CPU. CPU mining for Bitcoin is dead. I'm running ~360GH/s of ASIC miners, and will be lucky to mine 1BTC per month at the current difficulty.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1630
Ruu \o/
|
|
April 01, 2014, 06:38:11 AM |
|
The question was rhetorical. Only altcoin miners and botnets are cpu mining these days, neither of which is relevant here.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
April 05, 2014, 09:18:49 PM |
|
Bitminter client v1.6.0 beta1 is ready for testing. New: - Switch to Stratum mining protocol
- Show worker difficulty changes in the log
- Show the block's hash in the log when a block is found
Note: if you were using the "port 80" option to bypass a firewall then this release will probably not work for you. v1.5.0 will still be available in the "tools" menu at bitminter.com for some time. If you have firewall issues, let me know what your needs are, or better yet, fix the firewall. Please check it out:
|
|
|
|
freddyfarnsworth
|
|
April 06, 2014, 03:07:23 AM |
|
Bitminter client v1.6.0 beta1 is ready for testing. New: - Switch to Stratum mining protocol
- Show worker difficulty changes in the log
- Show the block's hash in the log when a block is found
Note: if you were using the "port 80" option to bypass a firewall then this release will probably not work for you. v1.5.0 will still be available in the "tools" menu at bitminter.com for some time. If you have firewall issues, let me know what your needs are, or better yet, fix the firewall. Please check it out: Does the "latest (auto update)" menu selection give 1.5 or 1.6 ?
|
BTC: 1F1X9dN2PRortYaDkq89YJDbQ72i3F5N3h MEOW: KAbvy9jrrajvN5WLo7RWBsYqYfJKyN9WLf DOGE: DAyKSrTiVeRZaReTu1Cyf5Je6qPdKTuKKE
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
April 06, 2014, 08:24:27 AM |
|
Does the "latest (auto update)" menu selection give 1.5 or 1.6 ?
It gives 1.5 until 1.6 is out of beta testing.
|
|
|
|
freddyfarnsworth
|
|
April 06, 2014, 09:05:29 AM |
|
OK testing W7 64bit IE10 Java7. So far it picked up com14, as not in use on first fireup. BFG was using it. So I cleaned all the unused ports in DeviceManager with these commands in command prompt. set DEVMGR_SHOW_NONPRESENT_DEVICES=1 devmgmt tick show hidden in view remove greyed out icons for hubs and com devices... Reran the v6 client and it found all ports being used as it should.. 2014.04.06 [01:54] Cannot probe COM4: port in use 2014.04.06 [01:54] Cannot probe COM17: port in use 2014.04.06 [01:54] Cannot probe COM16: port in use 2014.04.06 [01:54] Cannot probe COM15: port in use 2014.04.06 [01:54] No external devices detected. 2014.04.06 [01:54] BFL drivers: http://www.ftdichip.com/Drivers/VCP.htm ASICMiner and Antminer drivers: http://www.silabs.com/products/mcu/Pages/USBtoUARTBridgeVCPDrivers.aspx On Linux load FTDI driver: "sudo modprobe ftdi_sio vendor=0x0403 product=0x6014". You may lack access to serial ports (Ubuntu: "sudo usermod -a -G dialout USERNAME" then log out and back in). 2014.04.06 [01:54] Cannot probe COM14: port in use 2014.04.06 [01:54] Cannot probe COM3: port in use 2014.04.06 [01:54] Cannot probe COM7: port in use 2014.04.06 [01:54] Cannot probe COM12: port in use 2014.04.06 [01:54] Probe of port COM1 failed: timeout <Not used or connected to anything) 2014.04.06 [01:54] Cannot probe COM5: port in use The BFL message is not needed in this instance silabs is installed. So all is well, next to run some U1 ants with it, all seems well so far.
|
BTC: 1F1X9dN2PRortYaDkq89YJDbQ72i3F5N3h MEOW: KAbvy9jrrajvN5WLo7RWBsYqYfJKyN9WLf DOGE: DAyKSrTiVeRZaReTu1Cyf5Je6qPdKTuKKE
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
April 06, 2014, 10:19:56 AM |
|
So all is well, next to run some U1 ants with it, all seems well so far.
Good stuff. No network issues? Devices running out of work or connection issues?
|
|
|
|
Fluke.
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2014, 12:13:28 PM |
|
So all is well, next to run some U1 ants with it, all seems well so far.
Good stuff. No network issues? Devices running out of work or connection issues? v1.6 beta running fine for me. seems there are way less rejected pows.
|
|
|
|
freddyfarnsworth
|
|
April 06, 2014, 07:58:51 PM |
|
So all is well, next to run some U1 ants with it, all seems well so far.
Good stuff. No network issues? Devices running out of work or connection issues? v1.6 beta running fine for me. seems there are way less rejected pows. I will report what I find, if anything... The exchange rates tool - site is questioning :: Hey! A lot of the information from this page has been moved to http://bitcoincharts.com. It might be worth visiting if you didn't know about that site yet. I like the simplicity of the first original site tho.
|
BTC: 1F1X9dN2PRortYaDkq89YJDbQ72i3F5N3h MEOW: KAbvy9jrrajvN5WLo7RWBsYqYfJKyN9WLf DOGE: DAyKSrTiVeRZaReTu1Cyf5Je6qPdKTuKKE
|
|
|
Spadger
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2014, 09:18:28 PM Last edit: April 06, 2014, 10:57:24 PM by Spadger |
|
For what it's worth as a noob, I have a lot less rejections using 1.60
|
|
|
|
theweiss
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
April 07, 2014, 07:33:28 PM |
|
If you're talking about not overclocking an AntMiner you have to weight the hash rate against the rejections to find your sweet spot. I guess you should probably factor in power consumption as well for a total picture. Rejections aren't the end of the world when you're trying to get the most out of your gear.
|
|
|
|
GuyllFyre
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
April 07, 2014, 11:02:51 PM |
|
With 1.6.0 b1 I am able to run just about all of my Antminers at 2GHps with no miscalculations and the same or fewer rejections. I need to replace all the resistors and put on a new heat sink array with better cooling and see how far I can go. Anyone have an IR picture of a working Antminer U1/U2?
|
|
|
|
iyare
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2014, 07:29:37 AM |
|
im running v1.5.0 of the client and im getting 1.55Ghps out of my antminer u2, any ideas on how i can push this up to 2Ghps?
|
|
|
|
freddyfarnsworth
|
|
April 08, 2014, 07:50:32 AM |
|
1.6 beta report, got a new U2 today so I popped it into the 5v 5a hub I built, and set port speed to 115200 and Turned off allow computer to sleep this device in device properties. Told BM Client to scan COM6 it was found, and I set the "wrench" icon to 2gh .0981 and it works just fine. Reports about 1.98 to 1.99 gh.
BFG on the older ones gives 2.03 - 2.08 but pool reports 1.99 so it is all evened out.
Works well Doc, Thank You
Oh, I have not tested the "Identify" button, cool feature, I will get to it later.
|
BTC: 1F1X9dN2PRortYaDkq89YJDbQ72i3F5N3h MEOW: KAbvy9jrrajvN5WLo7RWBsYqYfJKyN9WLf DOGE: DAyKSrTiVeRZaReTu1Cyf5Je6qPdKTuKKE
|
|
|
iyare
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2014, 08:26:59 AM |
|
hmm weird thing is i dont have the cog or the wrenches on my client, the only thing i have under controls is the engine start button
|
|
|
|
|