jasinlee
|
|
January 03, 2013, 07:49:45 PM |
|
Tested Devda.ch It does function to receive dvc and send. Waiting on final confirmation for the send. Please send the generation share for the review there below also to ensure that the gen shares can be sent to this web wallet.
1K3kn5xoQfyCnzgaFNTLLpVQBdRVpwwgNx
The account was lost, so the coins sent there were lost. Another test will be made in round 19. I setup a new account and awaiting the next test to confirm devda.ch.
|
|
|
|
Unthinkingbit (OP)
|
|
January 03, 2013, 07:57:47 PM |
|
Is this something I'll need to do every so often? Or is it a one time thing?
The problem might be because this page is down: http://devcoinblockexplorer.info/receiver/receiver_18.csvand indeed the entire site is down. However, devcoin should time out in about 30 seconds and reload the other two receiver pages, so I don't really know why it's not working. In any case, if: http://devcoinblockexplorer.infois not up within four days, I'll ask Jasinlee to take over the third receiver file, and everything should eventually work.
|
|
|
|
Icoin
|
|
January 03, 2013, 08:12:29 PM |
|
Tested Devda.ch It does function to receive dvc and send. Waiting on final confirmation for the send. Please send the generation share for the review there below also to ensure that the gen shares can be sent to this web wallet.
1K3kn5xoQfyCnzgaFNTLLpVQBdRVpwwgNx
The account was lost, so the coins sent there were lost. Another test will be made in round 19. The coins arnt lost at all! The first wallet is D6 compatible. Since devda.ch had to made an upgrade to D7 cause of the opensimulator integration the needed modules had to be made first! The "D6 Wallet" is stil present, and the funds will be loaded to jasinlee's account on devda.ch (I wrote him some days ago to create a new Account). By now there are 56250 DVC present http://www.devda.ch:2750/address/1K3kn5xoQfyCnzgaFNTLLpVQBdRVpwwgNx. It would be great to inform me that you plan of a lontherm test. As far i understand it the test started with the D6 Wallet Module originaly coded by M0ray and adjusted to Devcoin (published). today devda.ch runs with the new D7 module coded by SSM2017 on the basis of bitcoin-php coded by Mike Gogulski.
|
|
|
|
Unthinkingbit (OP)
|
|
January 03, 2013, 08:38:13 PM |
|
Tested Devda.ch It does function to receive dvc and send. Waiting on final confirmation for the send. Please send the generation share for the review there below also to ensure that the gen shares can be sent to this web wallet.
1K3kn5xoQfyCnzgaFNTLLpVQBdRVpwwgNx
The account was lost, so the coins sent there were lost. Another test will be made in round 19. The coins arnt lost at all! The first wallet is D6 compatible. Since devda.ch had to made an upgrade to D7 cause of the opensimulator integration the needed modules had to be made first! The "D6 Wallet" is stil present, and the funds will be loaded to jasinlee's account on devda.ch (I wrote him some days ago to create a new Account). By now there are 56250 DVC present http://www.devda.ch:2750/address/1K3kn5xoQfyCnzgaFNTLLpVQBdRVpwwgNx. If Jasinlee gets all the coins due by the time the next receiver files are made, around block 73,000 about five days from now, then the web wallet bounty will be awarded. If not, then test coins will be sent to the new address. It would be great to inform me that you plan of a lontherm test.
I posted the test: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=34586.msg1383848#msg1383848and I assume you replied to it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=34586.msg1384434#msg1384434although I can't be certain because you removed the link to the post in your quote. As far i understand it the test started with the D6 Wallet Module originaly coded by M0ray and adjusted to Devcoin (published). today devda.ch runs with the new D7 module coded by SSM2017 on the basis of bitcoin-php coded by Mike Gogulski.
The test is simple. Coins are sent to the wallet test address of Jasinlee. If he can access them from his wallet the bounty is granted.
|
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1121
|
|
January 04, 2013, 12:07:53 PM |
|
Is this something I'll need to do every so often? Or is it a one time thing?
The problem might be because this page is down: http://devcoinblockexplorer.info/receiver/receiver_18.csvand indeed the entire site is down. However, devcoin should time out in about 30 seconds and reload the other two receiver pages, so I don't really know why it's not working. In any case, if: http://devcoinblockexplorer.infois not up within four days, I'll ask Jasinlee to take over the third receiver file, and everything should eventually work. I thought it requires a majority of the copies to agree with each other, thus with only two sites left running there is no two out of three agreement as to the correct value of the file? Though indeed if the two copies is does have are identical that ought one would think to count. But maybe even though copies of the same build of the file were uploaded by all three uploaders, maybe of the two copies it is able to get one uses MSDOS line-terminators and the other uses Unix line-terminators, or something like that? What kind of comparison between the files is it relying on, just the local contents as to how many shares each adress gets in what order or something that whatspace could make appear different to it? Or is it simply just not even caring whether two of two agree since it lacks an odd number of sites and does not think to itself aha two of two or two of three either way is a majority... ? -MarkM-
|
|
|
|
Unthinkingbit (OP)
|
|
January 04, 2013, 09:17:04 PM |
|
To everyone who could not get block 72,000 and above, please try again. Is this something I'll need to do every so often? Or is it a one time thing?
The problem might be because this page is down: http://devcoinblockexplorer.info/receiver/receiver_18.csvand indeed the entire site is down. However, devcoin should time out in about 30 seconds and reload the other two receiver pages, so I don't really know why it's not working. In any case, if: http://devcoinblockexplorer.infois not up within four days, I'll ask Jasinlee to take over the third receiver file, and everything should eventually work. I thought it requires a majority of the copies to agree with each other, thus with only two sites left running there is no two out of three agreement as to the correct value of the file? Though indeed if the two copies is does have are identical that ought one would think to count. But maybe even though copies of the same build of the file were uploaded by all three uploaders, maybe of the two copies it is able to get one uses MSDOS line-terminators and the other uses Unix line-terminators, or something like that? What kind of comparison between the files is it relying on, just the local contents as to how many shares each adress gets in what order or something that whatspace could make appear different to it? Two out of three is enough. The whitespace is removed before checking to see if they are identical, so the terminators don't matter. I ran into the problem in early development, and just after you pointed out that I could run into the different terminator problem. Or is it simply just not even caring whether two of two agree since it lacks an odd number of sites and does not think to itself aha two of two or two of three either way is a majority... ?
I removed all receiver files after the first and tested it. It ran correctly through the beginning of the tree, pointing out that it was timing out on the devcoinblockexplorer.info site. Oddly enough, it ran into a problem with receiver file 8, as it turned out that was because I didn't add that file to the github package. The problem was masked when devcoinblockexplorer was working, because it still had two out of three. I then added receiver_8 to github, and everything worked. I speculate that maybe I also didn't add receiver_18 at some point. To be sure I added it again, uploaded and checked to see that it was indeed there. I then tried devcoin from scratch again, and it got to the latest block.
|
|
|
|
Icoin
|
|
January 05, 2013, 04:31:04 AM Last edit: January 12, 2013, 02:32:09 PM by Icoin |
|
Devcoin Logo version 2 made by Icoin under CC rights Devcoin Accepted here Button under CC rights
|
|
|
|
|
Unthinkingbit (OP)
|
|
January 05, 2013, 09:07:24 PM |
|
The problem might be because this page is down: http://devcoinblockexplorer.info/receiver/receiver_18.csvand indeed the entire site is down. However, devcoin should time out in about 30 seconds and reload the other two receiver pages, so I don't really know why it's not working. In any case, if: http://devcoinblockexplorer.infois not up within four days, I'll ask Jasinlee to take over the third receiver file, and everything should eventually work. I received a message that devcoinblockexplorer is being worked on, and the ETA for the return of the site is Jan 10 2013. Assuming that happens, there's no need to move over the third receiver file.
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
January 05, 2013, 09:11:55 PM |
|
The problem might be because this page is down: http://devcoinblockexplorer.info/receiver/receiver_18.csvand indeed the entire site is down. However, devcoin should time out in about 30 seconds and reload the other two receiver pages, so I don't really know why it's not working. In any case, if: http://devcoinblockexplorer.infois not up within four days, I'll ask Jasinlee to take over the third receiver file, and everything should eventually work. I received a message that devcoinblockexplorer is being worked on, and the ETA for the return of the site is Jan 10 2013. Assuming that happens, there's no need to move over the third receiver file. if u need another hoster i can do this.
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
Icoin
|
|
January 05, 2013, 09:35:17 PM Last edit: January 12, 2013, 02:36:16 PM by Icoin |
|
Thank you Unthinkingbit
|
|
|
|
Icoin
|
|
January 07, 2013, 04:28:33 AM Last edit: January 12, 2013, 02:34:28 PM by Icoin |
|
Dropshadow Devcoin accepted here Buttons: 300px 150px Devcoin accepted here shirt example with qr-code:
|
|
|
|
Unthinkingbit (OP)
|
|
January 08, 2013, 08:46:51 AM Last edit: April 09, 2013, 11:25:34 PM by Unthinkingbit |
|
K1773R has agreed to be the fifth file administrator. He uploaded up receiver files at his site, for example receiver_18.csv: http://devcoin.darkgamex.ch/receiver_18.csvHe will get 2/5 of a share as long as he continues to keep the receiver files current. Edit: K1773R has maintained his Windows bundle and helped people install it. For this he's been promoted to general administrator, getting 1 share for as long as he keeps working.
|
|
|
|
Unthinkingbit (OP)
|
|
January 08, 2013, 08:55:10 AM |
|
Dropshadow Devcoin accepted here Buttons: 300px 150px I suggest a 3/5 of a share bounty for the next 3 button texts. In other words, this is for the next three buttons with different text styles, changing the icon of an existing button would not count. Any objections?
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
January 08, 2013, 10:19:56 AM |
|
K1773R has agreed to be the fifth file administrator. He uploaded up receiver files at his site, for example receiver_18.csv: http://devcoin.darkgamex.ch/receiver_18.csvHe will get 2/5 of a share as long as he continues to keep the receiver files current. this mirror will keep itself updated with the following script being run every hour with crontab: http://devcoin.darkgamex.ch/update_receivers.sh
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1121
|
|
January 08, 2013, 12:37:04 PM |
|
How does that script update anything? It looks like it just checks a charity file than recreates some already existing links if the charity file is new. Don't the actual receiver files have to be built out of not just the charity file but some other files? -MarkM-
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
January 08, 2013, 12:58:31 PM |
|
How does that script update anything? It looks like it just checks a charity file than recreates some already existing links if the charity file is new. Don't the actual receiver files have to be built out of not just the charity file but some other files? -MarkM- it automatically updates the charity git (including the receiver files) and links any not linked receiver_*.csv files.
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
Unthinkingbit (OP)
|
|
January 09, 2013, 09:14:08 PM |
|
I received a message that devcoinblockexplorer is being worked on, and the ETA for the return of the site is Jan 10 2013. Assuming that happens, there's no need to move over the third receiver file.
Shattienator has brought his receiver files back up: http://devcoinblockexplorer.info/receiver/receiver_18.csvso there are now three out of three receiver files throughout the receiver tree. Five peers will be listed in the receiver_19 file, and the tree will be at least five wide in round 20 and later.
|
|
|
|
|
|