Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 09:35:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 [199] 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 ... 326 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too  (Read 1601093 times)
[Tycho]
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 06:57:40 AM
 #3961

I hadn't used deepbit in a very long time (2 months :D ), and now submitted a few shares.
From the stats page, I can tell that I should've earned 0.01558598BTC total (I stopped mining more than 1 hour ago). However, my current balance shows as 0.01234512 BTC, even though I had a sub-0.01BTC amount left in there from 2 months ago.
PM me your login name, I'll check it.

Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net - Both payment schemes (including PPS), instant payout, no invalid blocks !
ICBIT Trading platform : USD/BTC futures trading, Bitcoin difficulty futures (NEW!). Third year in bitcoin business.
1713562506
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713562506

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713562506
Reply with quote  #2

1713562506
Report to moderator
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
the joint
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020



View Profile
August 17, 2011, 07:29:00 AM
 #3962

Holy crap how lucky was I?

A block was found in 2 seconds.  I run at 400 m/hash and I got 1 share out of the total 630.  I ended up with .07 BTC.  In 2 seconds.  Sweeeet.
Kermee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 17, 2011, 07:49:18 AM
 #3963

Holy crap how lucky was I?

A block was found in 2 seconds.  I run at 400 m/hash and I got 1 share out of the total 630.  I ended up with .07 BTC.  In 2 seconds.  Sweeeet.

Very lucky considering I have over 40 times your hash rate and only got 1 share out of that 2s block also.

Cheers,
Kermee
Kermee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 17, 2011, 08:21:54 AM
 #3964

Average in last 24 hours: 1512625 (-19.4%)

Definitely making up that last streak of bad luck we had a little over 36 hours ago...

Cheers,
Kermee
d3m0n1q_733rz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 08:24:39 AM
 #3965

Hey, I was wondering if someone could explain to me why when I have all of my miners set for pay-per-share, some of my payouts are still coming out proportional?

Funroll_Loops, the theoretically quicker breakfast cereal!
Check out http://www.facebook.com/JupiterICT for all of your computing needs.  If you need it, we can get it.  We have solutions for your computing conundrums.  BTC accepted!  12HWUSguWXRCQKfkPeJygVR1ex5wbg3hAq
Kermee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 17, 2011, 08:36:47 AM
 #3966

Hey, I was wondering if someone could explain to me why when I have all of my miners set for pay-per-share, some of my payouts are still coming out proportional?

Did you make the switch within the last two hours?

Cheers,
Kermee
d3m0n1q_733rz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 08:46:31 AM
 #3967

Hey, I was wondering if someone could explain to me why when I have all of my miners set for pay-per-share, some of my payouts are still coming out proportional?

Did you make the switch within the last two hours?

Cheers,
Kermee
Earliest PPS use was at 3:39:52 on there.  Most recent Proportional use was 6:28:16.  These are coming from the statistics.

Funroll_Loops, the theoretically quicker breakfast cereal!
Check out http://www.facebook.com/JupiterICT for all of your computing needs.  If you need it, we can get it.  We have solutions for your computing conundrums.  BTC accepted!  12HWUSguWXRCQKfkPeJygVR1ex5wbg3hAq
[Tycho]
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 10:59:04 AM
 #3968

Earliest PPS use was at 3:39:52 on there.  Most recent Proportional use was 6:28:16.  These are coming from the statistics.
PM me your login name please.

Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net - Both payment schemes (including PPS), instant payout, no invalid blocks !
ICBIT Trading platform : USD/BTC futures trading, Bitcoin difficulty futures (NEW!). Third year in bitcoin business.
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 03:36:22 PM
 #3969

Hey, I was wondering if someone could explain to me why when I have all of my miners set for pay-per-share, some of my payouts are still coming out proportional?

I can't answer your question, but, someone a while back had made the suggestion to create two miners for each GPU, one PPS and one Proportional.  I did that and was able to transition reliably when I wanted.  So that was a very good suggestion.
My 0.00000002BTC worth,
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
d3m0n1q_733rz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 07:20:56 PM
 #3970

Hey, I was wondering if someone could explain to me why when I have all of my miners set for pay-per-share, some of my payouts are still coming out proportional?

I can't answer your question, but, someone a while back had made the suggestion to create two miners for each GPU, one PPS and one Proportional.  I did that and was able to transition reliably when I wanted.  So that was a very good suggestion.
My 0.00000002BTC worth,
Sam
It seems to have finished transitioning completely.  I don't know why it didn't do so all at once, but it finished.  Thanks everyone.

Funroll_Loops, the theoretically quicker breakfast cereal!
Check out http://www.facebook.com/JupiterICT for all of your computing needs.  If you need it, we can get it.  We have solutions for your computing conundrums.  BTC accepted!  12HWUSguWXRCQKfkPeJygVR1ex5wbg3hAq
Tx2000
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 17, 2011, 07:47:31 PM
 #3971

Anyone else getting connection issues / fail to connect in the last hour or so?  Other pools work fine.
Kermee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 17, 2011, 07:57:01 PM
 #3972

Anyone else getting connection issues / fail to connect in the last hour or so?  Other pools work fine.

Not here.

Cheers,
Kermee
gusti
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 08:36:18 PM
 #3973

Anyone else getting connection issues / fail to connect in the last hour or so?  Other pools work fine.

yes, I see some connection problems too.

If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
CanaryInTheMine
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1060


between a rock and a block!


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 10:36:19 PM
 #3974

Holy crap how lucky was I?

A block was found in 2 seconds.  I run at 400 m/hash and I got 1 share out of the total 630.  I ended up with .07 BTC.  In 2 seconds.  Sweeeet.

I was able to get 3 shares in. LOL
sharky112065
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 383
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 18, 2011, 02:19:37 AM
 #3975

I still think there are hoppers hopping in and out. I notice around 200 to 300 Ghash/s dropping and coming back multiple times I check the stats. Also my payouts vary way more than they used to.

Donations welcome: 12KaKtrK52iQjPdtsJq7fJ7smC32tXWbWr
fcmatt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 18, 2011, 02:25:08 AM
 #3976

I still think there are hoppers hopping in and out. I notice around 200 to 300 Ghash/s dropping and coming back multiple times I check the stats. Also my payouts vary way more than they used to.

well there is nothing stopping a hopper from adding deepbit into their strategy in some fashion.

perhaps they are using long polling in some crude way to predict a solved block by deepbit, or perhaps
they hop into deepbit when every other pool appears undesirable, or they figure that by quickly coming
in and out has a very good percentage chance of getting in on a short block versus a long one?

maybe people use deepbit as a backup pool and when a pool has a short term problem a hundred
ghash/s shows up for a bit?

maybe deepbit is big enough where a couple hundred ghash/s difference every several minutes is normal
churn from the 1000s of users who use it...
jkminkov
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 698
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 18, 2011, 07:24:32 AM
 #3977

I still think there are hoppers hopping in and out. I notice around 200 to 300 Ghash/s dropping and coming back multiple times I check the stats.

balls, run latest poclbm and see your hashrate serverside, that is higher/lower than average, now sum hashrate of all users and you'll get +/- 5% because that stat is updated once a minute, increase that minute to an hour or two and you'll get real pool speed

.:31211457:. 100 dollars in one place talking - Dudes, hooray, Bitcoin against us just one, but we are growing in numbers!
MaGNeT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002


Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na


View Profile WWW
August 19, 2011, 07:06:06 AM
 #3978

we all gave up hoppin and took up mormonism.


but really yall shouldnt notice, we arent even a spec compared to the hash rate here. And the speed of blocks being found makes efficient hoping nearly impossible which is why most hoppers just use deepbit for backup

I tried to hop Deepbit but it's hardly profitable.
gentakin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 08:35:41 AM
 #3979

I hadn't used deepbit in a very long time (2 months Cheesy ), and now submitted a few shares.
From the stats page, I can tell that I should've earned 0.01558598BTC total (I stopped mining more than 1 hour ago). However, my current balance shows as 0.01234512 BTC, even though I had a sub-0.01BTC amount left in there from 2 months ago.
PM me your login name, I'll check it.
I sent it, but so far no response.

1HNjbHnpu7S3UUNMF6J9yWTD597LgtUCxb
[Tycho]
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2011, 11:03:03 AM
 #3980

we all gave up hoppin and took up mormonism.
but really yall shouldnt notice, we arent even a spec compared to the hash rate here. And the speed of blocks being found makes efficient hoping nearly impossible which is why most hoppers just use deepbit for backup
Please don't try to mislead people, I know the truth :)

Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net - Both payment schemes (including PPS), instant payout, no invalid blocks !
ICBIT Trading platform : USD/BTC futures trading, Bitcoin difficulty futures (NEW!). Third year in bitcoin business.
Pages: « 1 ... 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 [199] 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 ... 326 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!