pcexpress4less
Member
 Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
 |
May 10, 2012, 06:40:35 PM |
|
Anyone else seeing this in their router log. The from packet is from deepbit and the xx are one of my miners. I'm not using those ports so I'm unsure why deepbit is trying to connect to them.It's multiple different ports in random order. Almost seems like a port scanner.Any info would be appreciated.
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:45353 as ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:50774 as PSH:ACK received but there is no active connection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
May 10, 2012, 07:36:25 PM |
|
Anyone else seeing this in their router log. The from packet is from deepbit and the xx are one of my miners. I'm not using those ports so I'm unsure why deepbit is trying to connect to them.It's multiple different ports in random order. Almost seems like a port scanner.Any info would be appreciated.
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:45353 as ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:50774 as PSH:ACK received but there is no active connection
I would run Wireshark on your mining rig and see what the source ports on your packets leaving your machine to Deepbit. The router shouldn't be messing with the source ports on the packets. Then I would put a dumb hub between your router and ISP device and see what the source ports are from packets leaving your network and compare with packets coming back from Deepbit to see if they've changed. That way you know for sure where the behavior is introduced. Sam |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
May 10, 2012, 07:47:05 PM |
|
Anyone else seeing this in their router log. The from packet is from deepbit and the xx are one of my miners. I'm not using those ports so I'm unsure why deepbit is trying to connect to them.It's multiple different ports in random order. Almost seems like a port scanner.Any info would be appreciated.
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:45353 as ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:50774 as PSH:ACK received but there is no active connection
To answer your question, I am seeing dropped packets on my router also. Mine are in the 55000+ range. I'll install Wireshark on my rig and see what my source ports are on my packets leaving. Sam |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
May 10, 2012, 10:20:32 PM |
|
It looks like the block times are messing up again. shows 3 and 4 hour+ blocks for small ones on the stats page. Thanks for your report. |
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform |
|
|
|
fydel
|
|
May 11, 2012, 11:22:41 AM |
|
Hi there!
Whats up with the pool? Three invalid blocks in a row?? That's kind of strange...
Cheers!
Fydel
|
hamster
|
|
|
seljo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1178
Merit: 1014
Hodling since 2011.®
|
|
May 11, 2012, 11:28:56 AM |
|
Same question...  11.05 11:00:13 3h 32m - Invalid - 11.05 07:27:48 0h 11m - Invalid - 11.05 07:16:24 0h 49m - Invalid - LoL or? |
Hodling since 2011.®
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
May 11, 2012, 11:52:25 AM |
|
Whats up with the pool? Three invalid blocks in a row?? That's kind of strange... It's a cross-check glitch, actually those blocks are valid. |
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform |
|
|
seljo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1178
Merit: 1014
Hodling since 2011.®
|
|
May 11, 2012, 12:07:46 PM |
|
I'm looking at the pie @ bitcoin watch and it looks wierd... BTC guild with pool speed of 1,591.79 Gh/sec is taking 15% of the pie. Deepbit with pool speed of 3,198.49 Gh/sec is taking 18% of the pie. Unknown is 37% of the pie. Can someone do some math on how much of the unknown is actually deepbit? I suck @ english and math too.  |
Hodling since 2011.®
|
|
|
|
[Tycho]
|
|
May 11, 2012, 12:58:20 PM |
|
I'm looking at the pie @ bitcoin watch and it looks wierd...
BTC guild with pool speed of 1,591.79 Gh/sec is taking 15% of the pie.
Deepbit with pool speed of 3,198.49 Gh/sec is taking 18% of the pie.
Unknown is 37% of the pie. Use this. http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/chart.php |
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net - Both payment schemes (including PPS), instant payout, no invalid blocks ! ICBIT Trading platform : USD/BTC futures trading, Bitcoin difficulty futures ( NEW!). Third year in bitcoin business. |
|
|
|
ddd1
|
|
May 11, 2012, 04:39:38 PM |
|
Can I mine on this pool with cgminer?
I tried connecting but it says it is dead.
I tried username: "username_worker" and just "username" neither get connection.
|
|
|
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
May 11, 2012, 06:18:01 PM |
|
I'm looking at the pie @ bitcoin watch and it looks wierd...
BTC guild with pool speed of 1,591.79 Gh/sec is taking 15% of the pie.
Deepbit with pool speed of 3,198.49 Gh/sec is taking 18% of the pie.
Unknown is 37% of the pie. Use this. http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/chart.phpI'm pretty sure the bitcoin watch chart is accurate, but it's because I [believe] they're using the 24 hour chart from blockchain.info . BTC Guild had a -massive- surge of luck in the last 12 hours [after a day of bad luck]. It's just the nature of mining and luck. Tycho's charts are less jumpy, due to using a 2016 block window [roughly 2 weeks], which make them a much more accurate number if you're trying to compare reported speed of pools to their block find %. |
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
May 11, 2012, 07:32:58 PM |
|
I'm pretty sure the bitcoin watch chart is accurate, but it's because I [believe] they're using the 24 hour chart from blockchain.info . BTC Guild had a -massive- surge of luck in the last 12 hours [after a day of bad luck]. It's just the nature of mining and luck. Tycho's charts are less jumpy, due to using a 2016 block window [roughly 2 weeks], which make them a much more accurate number if you're trying to compare reported speed of pools to their block find %. Actually I recommend that site for another reason: Blockchaininfo is trying to guess block origin from possible broadcasting source IP address and blockorigin.pfoe.be is using real data. |
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform |
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
May 11, 2012, 07:41:50 PM |
|
I'm pretty sure the bitcoin watch chart is accurate, but it's because I [believe] they're using the 24 hour chart from blockchain.info . BTC Guild had a -massive- surge of luck in the last 12 hours [after a day of bad luck]. It's just the nature of mining and luck. Tycho's charts are less jumpy, due to using a 2016 block window [roughly 2 weeks], which make them a much more accurate number if you're trying to compare reported speed of pools to their block find %. Actually I recommend that site for another reason: Blockchaininfo is trying to guess block origin from possible broadcasting source IP address and blockorigin.pfoe.be is using real data. Yes, I forgot to mention that reason as well. Blockchain.info has been getting more accurate, though blockorigin.pfoe.be doesn't make any assumptions when assigning blocks to pools which is certainly preferred to 'best guess'. |
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
mc_lovin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
www.bitcointrading.com
|
|
May 11, 2012, 09:06:08 PM |
|
Can I mine on this pool with cgminer?
I tried connecting but it says it is dead.
I tried username: "username_worker" and just "username" neither get connection.
your username is your email address right, like email@addres.com_worker |
|
|
|
|
Chopes
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
May 13, 2012, 09:51:57 PM |
|
Having a weird issue that just started:
All of my miners all of a sudden without any change to my network started returning the following error:
pit.deepbit.net:8332, Deepbit.lib.InfoException: getWork unknown responce: Full(null)
The same error repeats every second.
Any ideas? Was working fine on all miners for awhile now without error, maybe something serverside?
EDIT:
Backonline, problem auto-resolved it seemed.
|
|
|
|
|
Nyaaan
|
|
May 14, 2012, 10:56:51 AM |
|
Damn, 3251 Gh/s? This is scaring me.
|
|
|
|
|
mc_lovin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
www.bitcointrading.com
|
|
May 14, 2012, 03:03:56 PM
Last edit: May 14, 2012, 06:44:44 PM by mc_lovin |
|
7700 MH/s = 3.4 BTC/24h =  edit: awh yea, block 180133 was a good one, now i'm at 4.45 BTC/24h yaay! |
|
|
|
|
bombo999
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
May 14, 2012, 10:15:05 PM |
|
Does your pool allow for all 8 decimal places of a wallet balance to be withdrawn if an account is closed?
|
|
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
May 15, 2012, 12:45:43 AM |
|
Does your pool allow for all 8 decimal places of a wallet balance to be withdrawn if an account is closed? You can request a manual payment with full precision if your balance is at least 0.01 BTC or more - just enter the required amount. |
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform |
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 15, 2012, 03:22:33 AM
Last edit: May 15, 2012, 08:29:16 PM by jjiimm_64 |
|
I may be missing something here. but the blockchain info does not jive with the deepbit transaction page.. not accusing.. just curious, i know i dont know something. blockchain.info 180182 (Main chain) 2012-05-15 01:28:48 00000000000006220ad8fa93d083cf140fe354aa9dbc514c49a3927f15b3c92f Deepbit 13 5.87
180181 (Main chain) 2012-05-15 01:25:30 000000000000085ac97c51cbc08242114f2d7906a45d9e519719ce836e19f581 Deepbit 169 79.79
180180 (Main chain) 2012-05-15 01:36:29 00000000000005e73c77bf82a2fca55d6bf6fcf71d806e1b1758ce0409b7713a Deepbit 116 73.47
180179 (Main chain) 2012-05-15 01:11:46 000000000000009743ecaf0e954afc3d1ee59cebbeb47e22d32bb4f6db52cc17 P2Pool 596 247.65
180178 (Main chain) 2012-05-15 00:53:39 000000000000095ef9d08fd4865082704ee691bf1ae1ae5c427060d0f9a96fb3 Deepbit 122 48.01
deepbit transactions has the top 2 blocks as 180178 and 180182. what happened to 180 and 181 ? 14.05 21:29:22 0h 35m 16241 1596455 0.49339850
14.05 20:53:57 0h 54m 30936 2433274 0.61661613
edit: looks like 180 came after 182: 2012-05-15 01:36:29 but 181 came before: 2012-05-15 01:25:30 |
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
|
