Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 10:45:57 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 [236] 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 ... 326 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too  (Read 1455362 times)
os008
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79



View Profile
February 16, 2012, 02:17:04 AM
 #4701

Indeed, just needed to wait a bit more. Received it, thanks.

2x5850 @ 600[M|K]H/s
1481409957
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481409957

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481409957
Reply with quote  #2

1481409957
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
iamapi
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57


View Profile
February 16, 2012, 06:30:02 AM
 #4702

I found connect to http://f1.deepbit.net always failed while connect to http://f2.deepbit.net always succeeded.

I suffered from the connection problem as you.


 Error 80072EE2:  The operation timed out

Anybody having connection problems?  I am getting really long getwork and submit times (each 300ms+) vs. typically 200ms.  Average hashrate has fallen from 4GH to around 3GH over the last 12 hours (with 3 intermittent outages having to go to backup pool).



DeepBit
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 532


We have cookies


View Profile WWW
February 18, 2012, 08:40:37 PM
 #4703

I found connect to http://f1.deepbit.net always failed while connect to http://f2.deepbit.net always succeeded.
Actually there is no f2 at this moment, so you are effectively connecting deepbit.net when requesting f2.deepbit.net

Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks !
Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
finway
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714


View Profile
February 19, 2012, 07:39:38 AM
 #4704

Then, how many blocks exactly? it's  268(26%) already.  
How many do you need?  may be 300?

It's 366 blocks now,
more than 50% or other 70% of mining power.

When will you support BIP16, DeepBit?

BTC guy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378



View Profile
February 19, 2012, 08:59:35 AM
 #4705

AMERICANS - JOIN team AMERICA.  We MUST beat the RUSSIANS.
dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386

Truth may get delay, but NEVER fails


View Profile
February 19, 2012, 09:21:44 AM
 #4706

AMERICANS - JOIN team AMERICA.  We MUST beat the RUSSIANS.

The main reason for Bitcoin creation is decentralized & independent of countries or continents...
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
February 19, 2012, 10:01:21 PM
 #4707

Then, how many blocks exactly? it's  268(26%) already.  
How many do you need?  may be 300?

It's 366 blocks now,
more than 50% or other 70% of mining power.

When will you support BIP16, DeepBit?


Why?

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
finway
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714


View Profile
February 20, 2012, 03:35:33 AM
 #4708

It's time to support BIP16, [Tycho].

rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


1ngldh


View Profile
February 20, 2012, 03:45:23 AM
 #4709

It's time to support BIP16, [Tycho].
Why do you insist on repeating yourself ad nauseum? All you are doing is being annoying.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
February 20, 2012, 04:01:12 AM
 #4710

It's time to support BIP16, [Tycho].

Why?

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
finway
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714


View Profile
February 20, 2012, 04:40:16 AM
 #4711

Because he promised, and this is his duty.

os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
February 20, 2012, 05:03:37 AM
 #4712

Because he promised, and this is his duty.

Why implement it at all?  Nobody has made a real argument which proves the need.  So, again, why?

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
finway
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714


View Profile
February 21, 2012, 12:37:26 AM
 #4713

Why implement it at all?  Nobody has made a real argument which proves the need.  So, again, why?
That's you, i guess.

os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
February 21, 2012, 05:01:58 AM
 #4714

Why implement it at all?  Nobody has made a real argument which proves the need.  So, again, why?
That's you, i guess.

I'm glad to see that you have thought it through so thoroughly.  That's about par for the course though.
Sad,
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
makomk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


View Profile
February 21, 2012, 04:28:02 PM
 #4715

There are conscious on supporting BIP16, cause it will make bitcoin more safe.
as you can see, slush & BTCGuild are supporting BIP16,
and more than 5 TOP10 pools are supporting BIP16,
You are acting against it, you're not making bitcoin safe.
Errrm, you might want to read my post in the Technical Discussion subforum. Turns out that once BIP16 is enabled, all other miners will be forced to upgrade pronto or risk losing money. (In fact, arguably it's even worse than that - apparently if BIP16 went live with only 55% of mining power supporting it it'd make 6 confirmation double-spend attacks against old nodes quite a bit easier than they ought to be.)

Quad XC6SLX150 Board: 860 MHash/s or so.
SIGS ABOUT BUTTERFLY LABS ARE PAID ADS
finway
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714


View Profile
February 22, 2012, 12:49:57 AM
 #4716

There are conscious on supporting BIP16, cause it will make bitcoin more safe.
as you can see, slush & BTCGuild are supporting BIP16,
and more than 5 TOP10 pools are supporting BIP16,
You are acting against it, you're not making bitcoin safe.
Errrm, you might want to read my post in the Technical Discussion subforum. Turns out that once BIP16 is enabled, all other miners will be forced to upgrade pronto or risk losing money. (In fact, arguably it's even worse than that - apparently if BIP16 went live with only 55% of mining power supporting it it'd make 6 confirmation double-spend attacks against old nodes quite a bit easier than they ought to be.)

OP_EVAL are more disruptive,right? why you like it?



slider1978
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 180



View Profile
February 22, 2012, 06:12:36 PM
 #4717

Hi, why aren't all pools implementing real accounts (payout AND payin) so that they can act like banks with mobile clients that use QR code scanning and transfer money with a click on your smartphone?

Because you haven't started one yet.  Smiley That's the beauty of Bitcoin right now...See a need, fill a need, profit. PM me if your interested in a Bitcoin account.
Definit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 357



View Profile
February 23, 2012, 02:51:10 PM
 #4718

why do i have less shares but more gh/s...is that something that im obviously doing wrong, or missing?

4     Definit (You)       287686   9.99 GH/s
5     ******            33198117   9.53 GH/s
DeepBit
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 532


We have cookies


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2012, 03:14:07 PM
 #4719

why do i have less shares but more gh/s...is that something that im obviously doing wrong, or missing?

4     Definit (You)       287686   9.99 GH/s
5     ******            33198117   9.53 GH/s
Because it's total figure. He just started earlier :)

Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks !
Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
DeepBit
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 532


We have cookies


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2012, 03:19:11 PM
 #4720

Hi, why aren't all pools implementing real accounts (payout AND payin) so that they can act like banks with mobile clients that use QR code scanning and transfer money with a click on your smartphone?
Yes, it's very easy to implement, but I'm intentionally not doing this because it would require a completely different approach on security and responsibility.
I don't want people to store their savings in the pool because it's NOT a bank.

Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks !
Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
Pages: « 1 ... 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 [236] 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 ... 326 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!