Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining

[LMGTFY]

I've not said you have an agenda - I'm enquiring as to what purpose your post served. And "it served no purpose and it isn't my intention to dissuade others from posting" is a perfectly reasonable answer (assuming that is your answer) - thank you.

You can't seriously expect people to be willing to give you an answer for such a nosy question.   In fact I'm sure most people, including myself don't have any real motivation.   This is a forum is supposed to be about discussion.    Hmmm, well maybe that is a motivation.   I personally feel that at a time where discussion could be most helpful, the scam police are trying to drown out any useful or even reasonable discussion.  

Right now the MHs held by users is only worth 165 BTC since the price of MHS is currently at .00033 BTC / MHS.  

That is just a statement.   There isn't any pro or con bias in it.   It is just a fact of the current situation.   It does show that if this continues there isn't any hope of much BTC being recovered.   It just puts things into perspective.    

True, but people could simply say "that's a nosy question and I'd prefer not to answer". You'll appreciate, I'm sure, that that would have been preferable to the better part of a day's worth of evasion and tangents. Though obviously a discussion would have been the ideal outcome from my perspective (and perhaps from yours, too). I don't recall the scam police drowning out any part of our dialogue - maybe I simply didn't notice it, in amongst the Mark Twain bon mots and the not very subtle comparisons with National Socialism.

[D4RK5T4R]

Right now the MHs held by users is only worth 165 BTC since the price of MHS is currently at .00033 BTC / MHS.  

Can I ask where did you get this data from?
How do you know how many total MHS there are in the ledger, both for sale and in individual accounts not for sale?

[chunker]

i have my btc back! ...but not back in my wallet but back on my account . Happened two times. Marcelo have not money.  Please, everybody, dont be silly and dont even think about to send him more BTc. You will ROI, double, tripple, but only on your account!

My transaction was not even seen on blockchain and is not even back in my account about 0.601 btc
Hope admin do the same to me,, or else its gone...

The point is, even he do the same to you, its the same as he never send it to you. I can just hope, but, f*ck that. I can leave my virtualBTC rotting on my account and do not care. I will not hope, pray or whatever, and waisting my time.  I liked scrypt.cc a lot when it works, now it DO NOT WORK, so f*ck off and move on.. I cant understand why still so many people here, furthermore most of them have no money there, but have to write five articles everyday. Because everyday here comes some new dummies "investors". Scrypt.cc is dead, get your lifes . I wish all the best and good luck to all /expect thePhner and cryptodevil, the biggest cripple nerds I have ever see./  

[suchmoon]

Right now the MHs held by users is only worth 165 BTC since the price of MHS is currently at .00033 BTC / MHS.  

Can I ask where did you get this data from?
How do you know how many total MHS there are in the ledger, both for sale and in individual accounts not for sale?

He's just multiplying 500 GH/s by the current price. Because admin would never lie and would never sell more fake MHS.

[Karpeon]

Quote from: ValleyOfTheWolves on September 16, 2015, 09:40:35 PM
Quote from: chunker on September 16, 2015, 09:37:00 PM
i have my btc back! ...but not back in my wallet but back on my account Cheesy . Happened two times. Marcelo have not money.  Please, everybody, dont be silly and dont even think about to send him more BTc. You will ROI, double, tripple, but only on your account!


My transaction was not even seen on blockchain and is not even back in my account about 0.601 btc
Hope admin do the same to me,, or else its gone... Angry


The point is, even he do the same to you, its the same as he never send it to you. I can just hope, but, f*ck that. I can leave my virtualBTC rotting on my account and do not care. I will not hope, pray or whatever, and waisting my time.  I liked scrypt.cc a lot when it works, now it DO NOT WORK, so f*ck off and move on.. I cant understand why still so many people here, furthermore most of them have no money there, but have to write five articles everyday. Because everyday here comes some new dummies "investors". Scrypt.cc is dead, get your lifes Smiley . I wish all the best and good luck to all /expect thePhner and cryptodevil, the biggest cripple nerds I have ever see./  


You know. The thing is that script.cc is not dead. I mean you can still log in, recover some money if you get lucky and continue buying or selling, even if it's nonsense. That's why I write about it. If I read something useful, like for instance wd are coming or price is going up or down, then I don't think anyone from here will deposit New coins after all said and done. But it might be helpful for those (me included) who has a ton of BTC inside and are desperate looking for the best in a worst case situation we are in.

[D4RK5T4R]

Right now the MHs held by users is only worth 165 BTC since the price of MHS is currently at .00033 BTC / MHS.  

Can I ask where did you get this data from?
How do you know how many total MHS there are in the ledger, both for sale and in individual accounts not for sale?

He's just multiplying 500 GH/s by the current price. Because admin would never lie and would never sell more fake MHS.

Strange, as that would mean taking admins word for the 500 GHS, but not taking the admins word for the additional 350 GHS, but let's give dyask a chance to answer.
 

[dyask]

Right now the MHs held by users is only worth 165 BTC since the price of MHS is currently at .00033 BTC / MHS.  

Can I ask where did you get this data from?
How do you know how many total MHS there are in the ledger, both for sale and in individual accounts not for sale?

He's just multiplying 500 GH/s by the current price. Because admin would never lie and would never sell more fake MHS.

Considering you were claiming there was around 6 THs, I would say the Admin was much more honest on that point.   Anyway, it doesn't take much effort to verify 500 GHs is much more likely than 6 THs.   Since the conversion there has rarely been more than 100 GHs on the asks.   Right now there is probably about 35 GHs up for sale.  

Also there is a small but important point that we know how much BTC has been deposited at the site. ( < 45000 BTC over the two deposit hotwallets)  That really sets the upper bounds of what was sold.   500000 MHs at .01 BTC/MSH is 5000 BTC with is believable.  (.01 BTC/MSH is actually a low end value, probably closer to 8000 BTC, plus that isn't counting the GPU KHS. )   I know there will be some pretty stupid math using all the BTC from the hotwallets, most likely most of that BTC was already withdrawn.   Withdraws worked well until a couple months ago.

As far as who said what, right now we don't even know if Marcello is the Admin or if there even is an Admin.  That is pretty grim.  

Deposit Hotwallets
----------------------
https://blockchain.info/address/19mcjofGwKxGwhaZwDwPjdWd1KrFCZgoJJ    (6000 BTC & growing)
https://blockchain.info/address/1HWqsgnSd12Gv8SpoUMi1Cj8hp79BTSpW7   (38657 BTC)

[suchmoon]

Considering you were claiming there was around 6 THs, I would say the Admin was much more honest on that point.

Hmmm... no, I was not and no, he was not. Looks like you still can't participate in a discussion (lack of which you decried just recently) without making shit up.

[dyask]

Considering you were claiming there was around 6 THs, I would say the Admin was much more honest on that point.

Hmmm... no, I was not and no, he was not. Looks like you still can't participate in a discussion (lack of which you decried just recently) without making shit up.

You were justifying the 6 THs, not me.   Hmmmm ....

[cryptodevil]

Actually, dyask, I believe the 6TH observation came at the point scrypt.cc had switched from 'khs' to 'mhs' but seemingly hadn't adjusted the figures being displayed on the market listings yet.

So, yeah, your whole obsession about trying to minimise, downplay and generally distract from the ongoing fraud with wildly speculative assertions about how 'most' btc had been withdrawn already, as though you have any fucking idea where those btc were sent, is getting really tiresome and painting you more and more as being either socially autistic or a shill trying to downplay the the size of the criminal scam which is still in operation.

[dyask]

Actually, dyask, I believe the 6TH observation came at the point scrypt.cc had switched from 'khs' to 'mhs' but seemingly hadn't adjusted the figures being displayed on the market listings yet.

So, yeah, your whole obsession about trying to minimise, downplay and generally distract from the ongoing fraud with wildly speculative assertions about how 'most' btc had been withdrawn already, as though you have any fucking idea where those btc were sent, is getting really tiresome and painting you more and more as being either socially autistic or a shill trying to downplay the the size of the criminal scam which is still in operation.

The could be the source of the 6 THs.  It simply isn't a valid point to be using.

I haven't downplayed anything.  I simply don't share the same views.   I find your use of vulgar language and insults to be also tiresome.     

As far as scams go, scrypt.cc is really small compared to LTCgear, GAW or Mt.Gox.   That doesn't mean that someone wasn't hurt a lot worse at scrypt.cc than others by those scams.    However what is going on is the people on the extreme end of the scam scale are unhappy with anyone not as extreme as them.    Since the "hack", scrypt.cc has been a complete scam and I haven't said it is legit.   Pretty amazing how much I'm attacked just because I don't suck up the scam police.   

[BTC Buddy]

Right now the MHs held by users is only worth 165 BTC since the price of MHS is currently at .00033 BTC / MHS.  

Can I ask where did you get this data from?
How do you know how many total MHS there are in the ledger, both for sale and in individual accounts not for sale?

From the 850 gh/s of total mining power of course.

[D4RK5T4R]

Right now the MHs held by users is only worth 165 BTC since the price of MHS is currently at .00033 BTC / MHS.  

Can I ask where did you get this data from?
How do you know how many total MHS there are in the ledger, both for sale and in individual accounts not for sale?

From the 850 gh/s of total mining power of course.

But he spectacularly missed my question and got straight down to the task of attacking others. Seems too preoccupied in having the same arguments over and over.
Forget the 6Ths thing. I have never stated that and I am not interested in that particular aspect.

To be clear, my question is:

regarding the 165BTC claim, where did you get this data from?




PS. It is a moot point, but has anyone else noticed that you cannot place a sell for more than 0.00034999? well you can, but it will not appear in the sell side.

[suchmoon]

Considering you were claiming there was around 6 THs, I would say the Admin was much more honest on that point.

Hmmm... no, I was not and no, he was not. Looks like you still can't participate in a discussion (lack of which you decried just recently) without making shit up.

You were justifying the 6 THs, not me.   Hmmmm ....

I was not. I think I clearly stated how ridiculous 6 TH/s is (4 times Scrypt hashrate).

The could be the source of the 6 THs.  It simply isn't a valid point to be using.

Then why do you keep bringing it up?

I haven't downplayed anything.  I simply don't share the same views.   I find your use of vulgar language and insults to be also tiresome.     

As far as scams go, scrypt.cc is really small compared to LTCgear, GAW or Mt.Gox.   That doesn't mean that someone wasn't hurt a lot worse at scrypt.cc than others by those scams.    However what is going on is the people on the extreme end of the scam scale are unhappy with anyone not as extreme as them.    Since the "hack", scrypt.cc has been a complete scam and I haven't said it is legit.   Pretty amazing how much I'm attacked just because I don't suck up the scam police.   

... and all that is based on the current value, right? So let's see. Current value of Mt. Gox assets? Probably close to zero. Tiny scam. Current Paycoin marketcap? 250k USD, significantly larger than Mt. Gox apparently but still fairly minor. Current value of LTCGear assets? Zero (your own estimate). Not a scam at all.

Since the "hack" - so what happened to all that mining if it wasn't a scam before the "hack"? Did hackers steal the farm?

[cryptodevil]

The could be the source of the 6 THs.  It simply isn't a valid point to be using.

Then why do you keep bringing it up?

I haven't downplayed anything.  I simply don't share the same views.   I find your use of vulgar language and insults to be also tiresome.     

As far as scams go, scrypt.cc is really small compared to LTCgear, GAW or Mt.Gox.   That doesn't mean that someone wasn't hurt a lot worse at scrypt.cc than others by those scams.    However what is going on is the people on the extreme end of the scam scale are unhappy with anyone not as extreme as them.    Since the "hack", scrypt.cc has been a complete scam and I haven't said it is legit.   Pretty amazing how much I'm attacked just because I don't suck up the scam police.   

Hahahaha, this is why I figured if he isn't a shill then he's got to be socially autistic in order to explain how he repeatedly states something and then contradicts it a few sentences later, all the while repeating things that are irrelevant to the discussion and ignoring aspects that are important.

BTW, dyask, a 'tone complaint' is just another form of blatantly fallacious argument which is used to distract from the fact that you fail to rebut the points being raised and choose, instead, to complain about how they are said.

You're being challenged, not because you don't 'suck up to the scam police' but because your posts are largely nonsensical ramblings containing contradictions and irrelevant statements along with assertions which appear to be an attempt to downplay the size of the scam that is scrypt.cc

[Soylent_Green]

As far as scams go, scrypt.cc is really small compared to LTCgear, GAW or Mt.Gox.   

Small is relativ. When you consider that there are still 1900 BTC in Cold Wallet. ($430.852)
And that's just from the new Hotwallet.

But it really makes no difference how much it is. Stolen is stolen.

My account has been locked by the way. Shows "password invalid".
The reset option no longer exists.

But never mind, i'm done with that shit.
Just wanted to mention it.

No attack, but anyone who doubts that this project is a huge fraud, obviously has severe mental problems.

[suchmoon]

mattmorrison over at GH:

Good news and bad news, good news is I finally got into what was my large account, bad news is it does only have 4 MH and all the btc is gone. Checked withdraws, it does not show that BTC leaving my account, checked trade history, it does not show all my KHS being sold. Full on internal thievery is my conclusion.

Shame on that douche and shame on me for focusing on profits instead of legitimacy :wink:

Welp it wasn't too crazy but 250 MHS, I was unable to log in since the whole "Change your password" event, and a few weeks ago I noticed on my little account that the referral went from 250 to 2, so that is when it was cleaned out, again no transactions show in the withdraws or on trade.

Also my previous deposits/withdraws show up, so it is not "the database" being messed up.
https://gyazo.com/7a8cc16344e80938ceed6ddecffe96302
https://gyazo.com/7efef5c0dd4bab7b8f48f691249e28eb1

https://forum.gethashing.com/t/ponzi-scrypt-cc-shorted-payouts-missing-mh-the-lot/1761/1644

[FluffyDorito]

Can I get an honest answer? I tried to withdraw 0.3 like a week ago and it took 4 days and then it was just recredited back to my account. I tried doing it again and right now it still says it's in the queue. If it recredits it back should I just try to withdraw them in like increments of like 0.03 or something? Thanks. I used to use scrypt.cc a bunch and it was great but now it's just bullshit with the whole withdraw issue.

[suparman987]

As far as scams go, scrypt.cc is really small compared to LTCgear, GAW or Mt.Gox.   

Small is relativ. When you consider that there are still 1900 BTC in Cold Wallet. ($430.852)
And that's just from the new Hotwallet.

But it really makes no difference how much it is. Stolen is stolen.

My account has been locked by the way. Shows "password invalid".
The reset option no longer exists.

But never mind, i'm done with that shit.
Just wanted to mention it.

No attack, but anyone who doubts that this project is a huge fraud, obviously has severe mental problems.
[/quote]

same. when try to login. shows: password invalid. scrypt.cc scam

[Dumbasef]

Can I get an honest answer? I tried to withdraw 0.3 like a week ago and it took 4 days and then it was just recredited back to my account. I tried doing it again and right now it still says it's in the queue. If it recredits it back should I just try to withdraw them in like increments of like 0.03 or something? Thanks. I used to use scrypt.cc a bunch and it was great but now it's just bullshit with the whole withdraw issue.

You will receive it like I had.

3 out of five I received.

The other two got reinvested again which is OK though, no worries, life is a scrypt.