Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2016, 08:32:18 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 426 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers  (Read 828840 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498


Crypto is the separation of Power and State.


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 06:27:36 AM
 #1161

Where's the 'I hate Namecoin and want it dead' option?   Angry

Just kidding, I fully support the dot.bit project and think it will eventually find its killer application.

The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy.  David Chaum 1996
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014
"Monero" : { Private - Auditable - 100% Fungible - Flexible Blocksize - Wild & Free® - Intro - Wallets - Podcats - Roadmap - Dice - Blackjack - Github - Android }


Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016
Blocks must necessarily be full for the Bitcoin network to be able to pay for its own security.  davout 2015
Blocksize is an intentionally limited resource, like the 21e6 BTC limit.  Changing it degrades the surrounding economics, creating negative incentives.  Jeff Garzik 2013


"I believed @Dashpay instamine was a bug & not a feature but then read: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg13017231#msg13017231
I'm not against people making money, but can't support questionable origins."
https://twitter.com/Tone_LLT/status/717822927908024320


The raison d'être of bitcoin is trustlessness. - Eric Lombrozo 2015
It is an Engineering Requirement that Bitcoin be “Above the Law”  Paul Sztorc 2015
Resiliency, not efficiency, is the paramount goal of decentralized, non-state sanctioned currency -Jon Matonis 2015

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016

Technology tends to move in the direction of making surveillance easier, and the ability of computers to track us doubles every eighteen months. - Phil Zimmerman 2013

The only way to make software secure, reliable, and fast is to make it small. Fight Features. - Andy Tanenbaum 2004

"Hard forks cannot be co
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
dmcurser
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 502


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 07:06:14 AM
 #1162

ok just figured i might ask

1Q7TPBHHVmGCvqffYHpXCCBgbcBQ4NwXdW
beekeeper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


LTC


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 06:27:03 PM
 #1163

Man, I think you have a very nasty bug in workers management.
If I use de server (176.9.42.247), and I have one worker working (my client connected to it and mining), and I change its name, then hell breaks loose. The old worker will still be available and new worker name wont be usable anymore (anything I send trough it isnt recorded), even if I change it later, create a new worker with this new name after I freed the name. More, any worker which was somehow in contact with this scheme wont be usable anymore. Check user 41599, worker with extension _h3m5.

25Khs at 5W Litecoin USB dongle (FPGA), 45kHs overclocked
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310926
Litecoin FPGA shop -> http://ltcgear.com
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 09:15:49 PM
 #1164

Man, I think you have a very nasty bug in workers management.
If I use de server (176.9.42.247), and I have one worker working (my client connected to it and mining), and I change its name, then hell breaks loose. The old worker will still be available and new worker name wont be usable anymore (anything I send trough it isnt recorded), even if I change it later, create a new worker with this new name after I freed the name. More, any worker which was somehow in contact with this scheme wont be usable anymore. Check user 41599, worker with extension _h3m5.

Old workers will still be available and still work because the server caches them.  Similarly, BAD worker logins are cached.  You obviously renamed your worker but tried to connect before renaming it, causing it to get added to the bad worker list.  The server caches bad logins to prevent somebody from flooding the server with bad logins and forcing constant MySQL lookups to bog the server down.  Old mining software used to reconnect with no delay when a connection failed, which resulted in flooding the pool server -and- database server due to the worker lookups.

If you were using the DE Stratum server (which can be connected to by ANY stratum supporting client by just pointing them at de.btcguild.com), this problem would only persist for about a minute before the bad worker cache was cleared.  I don't recall how often the getwork pool clears its worker cache.  At this point the getwork pool is barely supported, and simply left online while people upgrade to stratum mining clients.

Either way, this only occurs because you were trying to connect to the pool using invalid credentials initially, THEN renamed the worker later, leaving the old name in the bad worker cache.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
beekeeper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


LTC


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 10:36:29 PM
 #1165

Ok, its a defensive mechanism. However, even if the worker was flagged, or whatever, its shares were accepted, not rejected, so I had very little clue about whats happening.

PS: No, I'm not using stratum, I think vardiff is bugged, however, I cant tell you exactly how. I need to add some extra logging module and perform more logging. I think the vardiff algs rounds down somehow, especially when the miner client has itself a variable speed (e.g. FPGA with variable clock).
Again, right now it is just some feeling.

25Khs at 5W Litecoin USB dongle (FPGA), 45kHs overclocked
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310926
Litecoin FPGA shop -> http://ltcgear.com
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
November 09, 2012, 03:05:46 AM
 #1166

I've started a poll regarding Merged Mining (Namecoins).  As I stated recently in slush's thread, the namecoin project feels like it's abandonware.  Very little work has been done since merged mining was released last year, usage is not picking up, and the value of NMC continues to become a smaller and smaller percentage of income.  I'm likely going to drop NMC merged mining and stick purely to BTC unless there is a demand for it to remain available.  In that case, I may setup a special getwork-only enabled server for people who want to continue mining NMC.

Finally a poll worth voting on.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 10, 2012, 03:30:54 AM
 #1167

I'm starting to deploy some site-wide changes to the pool to prepare for the reduced block rewards.  You may see brief periods of your rewards looking funny, but these should generally only last 30-60 seconds as I tweak the pages to get the calculations to display properly.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 11, 2012, 06:22:43 AM
 #1168

All of the displays on the website and API are now updated to support changes to the block rewards (~Nov 29th before this occurs).  If you're noticing any odd numbers, please report them to me in an email with your  username so I can view it myself to find the problem if there is one.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
fcmatt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106


View Profile
November 13, 2012, 03:32:33 PM
 #1169

The above post is from two days ago so I am not sure it is matters.

Currently my miners appear to be functioning fine but my stats speed page
has 0.00 for every miner. I am not sure why.


As for namecoins I have not even bothered to setup a wallet for it. They just keep
adding up and I would imagine I could not even trade them for a single BTC yet
based on the amount I have so far.
Mapuo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710



View Profile
November 13, 2012, 03:42:42 PM
 #1170

The above post is from two days ago so I am not sure it is matters.

Currently my miners appear to be functioning fine but my stats speed page
has 0.00 for every miner. I am not sure why.



Mine too.
Joshwaa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 489



View Profile
November 13, 2012, 03:45:20 PM
 #1171

Same problem. Stratum workers are working and reporting on the account page. However the non-Stratum mineres are mining but nothing is showing on the account page. Just a heads up. They started not to show at 10:10am EST.

Like what I said : 1JosHWaA2GywdZo9pmGLNJ5XSt8j7nzNiF
Don't like what I said : 1FuckU1u89U9nBKQu4rCHz16uF4RhpSTV
Don't Like BFL's Project Management : 1FuckbFLZpmWLuyHyFJw1RGkWm3yRM1L5D
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 13, 2012, 06:17:49 PM
 #1172

Same problem. Stratum workers are working and reporting on the account page. However the non-Stratum mineres are mining but nothing is showing on the account page. Just a heads up. They started not to show at 10:10am EST.

What servers are you using to connect?  I'm not able to recreate the problem.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
Joshwaa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 489



View Profile
November 13, 2012, 07:47:51 PM
 #1173

One was on mine2 one was on mine3.  Stratum was unaffected. The problem went on for about 45min.

Like what I said : 1JosHWaA2GywdZo9pmGLNJ5XSt8j7nzNiF
Don't like what I said : 1FuckU1u89U9nBKQu4rCHz16uF4RhpSTV
Don't Like BFL's Project Management : 1FuckbFLZpmWLuyHyFJw1RGkWm3yRM1L5D
Mapuo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710



View Profile
November 13, 2012, 09:06:19 PM
 #1174

http://mine2.btcguild.com:8332


What servers are you using to connect?  I'm not able to recreate the problem.
The problem is - your pool cut all non-stratum miners(phoenix and CGMiner 2.7.6 in my case). All stratum versions of CG are minus 10% shares for me, and they are unacceptuble. Migrate to any stratum miner from my other rig - too. The question is - can I use my miners in your pool in the future?
Regards, and sorry for my bad english.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 13, 2012, 09:15:49 PM
 #1175

Was it just the speed that wasn't updating?  The reports sound like regular stats were still showing up (share accepts/rejects).  Were they new workers, renamed worker, or old workers?

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
Mapuo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710



View Profile
November 13, 2012, 09:30:34 PM
 #1176

No, I recieved mail:
"Some of your miners have gone idle on BTC Guild. You will not receive any additional idle worker emails until you reset your idle time. The following miners have not submitted shares recently:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx has not submitted shares for 14 minutes.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx has not submitted shares for 14 minutes."

I edited my previous post, please look on it.
Joshwaa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 489



View Profile
November 14, 2012, 02:10:01 AM
 #1177

Speed and shares were not showing up. Said miners were idle for 44:52 till it started showing up again. The whole time the miners were submitting and having shares accepted.

Like what I said : 1JosHWaA2GywdZo9pmGLNJ5XSt8j7nzNiF
Don't like what I said : 1FuckU1u89U9nBKQu4rCHz16uF4RhpSTV
Don't Like BFL's Project Management : 1FuckbFLZpmWLuyHyFJw1RGkWm3yRM1L5D
fcmatt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106


View Profile
November 14, 2012, 02:32:53 AM
 #1178

Speed and shares were not showing up. Said miners were idle for 44:52 till it started showing up again. The whole time the miners were submitting and having shares accepted.

Fixed for me now.. And what he said.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2012, 03:44:31 AM
 #1179

Speed and shares were not showing up. Said miners were idle for 44:52 till it started showing up again. The whole time the miners were submitting and having shares accepted.

After the 44 minutes, did all of the previously accepted shares show up at once?

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
Mapuo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710



View Profile
November 14, 2012, 04:57:10 AM
 #1180


After the 44 minutes, did all of the previously accepted shares show up at once?
No
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 426 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!