Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2016, 04:52:32 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 426 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers  (Read 828761 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
The LT
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 188



View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 11:08:11 AM
 #1361

Quote

API stats have two entries.  An absolute total and a since_reset total.

That explains it, I didn't take a close enough look at the output, I just used the iOS app GuildView. Thanks for clearing that up!
1480956752
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480956752

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480956752
Reply with quote  #2

1480956752
Report to moderator
1480956752
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480956752

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480956752
Reply with quote  #2

1480956752
Report to moderator
1480956752
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480956752

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480956752
Reply with quote  #2

1480956752
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
DrG
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456



View Profile
December 08, 2012, 11:13:28 AM
 #1362

Are we having a really bad string of luck the last couple of days?  I was averaging over 3.54 BTC/day before the split, figure I should be making at least 1.7/day now even with the 5% PPS figured in.  I switched over to PPLNS and calculated I should be making roughly .07 BTC per shift x 24 to make 1.7 BTC/day, but I barely see a couple shifts where this has happened.  In the past I have been very unlucky (I was on BTCG for 2 months of the bad luck spell and the second I switch to try other guilds lady luck rewarded BTCG).

I also show me as being the #5 user/share contributor on PPLNS with a hash rate of 12.5GH/s roughly - that can't be right can it?   Everybody else is on PPS?

beekeeper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


LTC


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 11:19:24 AM
 #1363

Are we having a really bad string of luck the last couple of days?  I was averaging over 3.54 BTC/day before the split, figure I should be making at least 1.7/day now even with the 5% PPS figured in.  I switched over to PPLNS and calculated I should be making roughly .07 BTC per shift x 24 to make 1.7 BTC/day, but I barely see a couple shifts where this has happened.  In the past I have been very unlucky (I was on BTCG for 2 months of the bad luck spell and the second I switch to try other guilds lady luck rewarded BTCG).

I also show me as being the #5 user/share contributor on PPLNS with a hash rate of 12.5GH/s roughly - that can't be right can it?   Everybody else is on PPS?

Good point, shouldn't pplns get better income than pps because of GPU users who left? I'm trying to decide if to switch to pplns.. Smiley

25Khs at 5W Litecoin USB dongle (FPGA), 45kHs overclocked
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310926
Litecoin FPGA shop -> http://ltcgear.com
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 11:42:32 AM
 #1364

Are we having a really bad string of luck the last couple of days?  I was averaging over 3.54 BTC/day before the split, figure I should be making at least 1.7/day now even with the 5% PPS figured in.  I switched over to PPLNS and calculated I should be making roughly .07 BTC per shift x 24 to make 1.7 BTC/day, but I barely see a couple shifts where this has happened.  In the past I have been very unlucky (I was on BTCG for 2 months of the bad luck spell and the second I switch to try other guilds lady luck rewarded BTCG).

I also show me as being the #5 user/share contributor on PPLNS with a hash rate of 12.5GH/s roughly - that can't be right can it?   Everybody else is on PPS?

Good point, shouldn't pplns get better income than pps because of GPU users who left? I'm trying to decide if to switch to pplns.. Smiley
[/quote


PPLNS users will get more income than PPS because of the reduced fee. Nothing else.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
beekeeper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


LTC


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 12:00:34 PM
 #1365

I'm talking short period, ofc on infinite things converges to same point, but on short term, shouldn't pplns get more reward becouse +10% of miners left (not taking in account pool luck which I understand it is crap and not doing any attempt to calculate myself..)?

25Khs at 5W Litecoin USB dongle (FPGA), 45kHs overclocked
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310926
Litecoin FPGA shop -> http://ltcgear.com
segabtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


View Profile
December 08, 2012, 01:24:41 PM
 #1366

.OK who crossed paths with a black cat? Who walked under the ladder? Who opened an umbrella inside? WTH! No block found for 9 hours??? Got 3 from in one hour and then nothing for the last 9 hours??? Are we really having this much bad luck?
Frequency
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


sheeople


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 02:57:42 PM
 #1367

Are we having a really bad string of luck the last couple of days?  I was averaging over 3.54 BTC/day before the split, figure I should be making at least 1.7/day now even with the 5% PPS figured in.  I switched over to PPLNS and calculated I should be making roughly .07 BTC per shift x 24 to make 1.7 BTC/day, but I barely see a couple shifts where this has happened.  In the past I have been very unlucky (I was on BTCG for 2 months of the bad luck spell and the second I switch to try other guilds lady luck rewarded BTCG).

I also show me as being the #5 user/share contributor on PPLNS with a hash rate of 12.5GH/s roughly - that can't be right can it?   Everybody else is on PPS?

I have the same thoughts about it i have 2/6 rigs @ pplns the rest is pps. Also @ 11,5gh
I think Also the latest updates and ddos attack has to do with some downtime to my rigs (had to switch between vs / eu servers) and so i hope my 24 h earnings get back on track soon :oo

Put your money were your mouth is…       #coinderdotcom
fcmatt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106


View Profile
December 08, 2012, 03:02:11 PM
 #1368

Somin wrong with pplns right now?
bce
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 133



View Profile
December 08, 2012, 03:15:38 PM
 #1369

Somin wrong with pplns right now?

I just looked up the PPLNS shift history- all open shifts reporting 0.  This matches the BTC Guild block history, and that matches blockchain.info's history for this address.  I think everything is working fine - it's just some really awful bad luck.

http://blockchain.info/address/14cZMQk89mRYQkDEj8Rn25AnGoBi5H6uer?filter=2
fcmatt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106


View Profile
December 08, 2012, 03:58:37 PM
 #1370

Somin wrong with pplns right now?

I just looked up the PPLNS shift history- all open shifts reporting 0.  This matches the BTC Guild block history, and that matches blockchain.info's history for this address.  I think everything is working fine - it's just some really awful bad luck.

http://blockchain.info/address/14cZMQk89mRYQkDEj8Rn25AnGoBi5H6uer?filter=2


Now i recall why i dumped deepbit and came back to btcguild with pps. Variance is outrageous with such a high diff that any prop type setup is hardly worth it. Pplns tho, is much better for pool operator tho :-)

Looks like a block has been solved...
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 07:16:41 PM
 #1371

Double checked everything on Stratum, and it really was just terrible luck.  We had quite a few shares that were >= diff 2097152 [highest power of 2 that is lower than current target], but none of them were able to meet network difficulty.  Really curious if that was a record though.  ~36 million shares, which is slighlty above network difficulty x10.

While PPLNS, Prop, DGM, etc, will have more variance than PPS...last night was an extremely rare situation.  I can't recall a BTC Guild block taking ~11x network difficulty, at least not in the last 6+ months.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 08, 2012, 07:21:02 PM
 #1372

Double checked everything on Stratum, and it really was just terrible luck.  We had quite a few shares that were >= diff 2097152 [highest power of 2 that is lower than current target], but none of them were able to meet network difficulty.  Really curious if that was a record though.  ~36 million shares, which is slighlty above network difficulty x10.

While PPLNS, Prop, DGM, etc, will have more variance than PPS...last night was an extremely rare situation.  I can't recall a BTC Guild block taking ~11x network difficulty, at least not in the last 6+ months.

A record that I would want to make a habit out of setting/breaking. Smiley

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 07:26:48 PM
 #1373

Double checked everything on Stratum, and it really was just terrible luck.  We had quite a few shares that were >= diff 2097152 [highest power of 2 that is lower than current target], but none of them were able to meet network difficulty.  Really curious if that was a record though.  ~36 million shares, which is slighlty above network difficulty x10.

While PPLNS, Prop, DGM, etc, will have more variance than PPS...last night was an extremely rare situation.  I can't recall a BTC Guild block taking ~11x network difficulty, at least not in the last 6+ months.

A record that I would want to make a habit out of setting/breaking. Smiley

No kidding.  Even with PPLNS running, the majority of the pool is on PPS.  That single block cost me over 200 BTC Sad.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 08, 2012, 07:30:37 PM
 #1374

No kidding.  Even with PPLNS running, the majority of the pool is on PPS.  That single block cost me over 200 BTC Sad.

Really sorry to hear that.

You know the old adage "No good deed goes unpunished".

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 07:31:02 PM
 #1375

I had to do a brief restart on Chicago to patch a bug that could have potentially crashed the pool on-demand.  Hasn't been used yet as far as I can see, but I found it when working on the option to set a minimum difficulty.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
segabtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


View Profile
December 08, 2012, 08:10:23 PM
 #1376

are we under attack again?? no shares submitting at all.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 09:35:18 PM
 #1377

are we under attack again?? no shares submitting at all.

No attack going on, everything is fine here.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
Frequency
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


sheeople


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 10:41:46 PM
 #1378

Double checked everything on Stratum, and it really was just terrible luck.  We had quite a few shares that were >= diff 2097152 [highest power of 2 that is lower than current target], but none of them were able to meet network difficulty.  Really curious if that was a record though.  ~36 million shares, which is slighlty above network difficulty x10.

While PPLNS, Prop, DGM, etc, will have more variance than PPS...last night was an extremely rare situation.  I can't recall a BTC Guild block taking ~11x network difficulty, at least not in the last 6+ months.

A record that I would want to make a habit out of setting/breaking. Smiley

No kidding.  Even with PPLNS running, the majority of the pool is on PPS.  That single block cost me over 200 BTC Sad.

In my case that,s becourse of the unknown factor that it brings with it (PPLNS), and we just had the  24 earnings halving a few weeks ago makes me (maybe others a little bit confused if it,s still worth mining), the PPS gives me some holdon to factor for now..

Put your money were your mouth is…       #coinderdotcom
segabtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


View Profile
December 08, 2012, 11:33:23 PM
 #1379

wow just like that the luck switches to the other side 5 blocks in last 2 shifts.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2012, 11:56:43 PM
 #1380

wow just like that the luck switches to the other side 5 blocks in last 2 shifts.

Didn't you know?  Every pool operator has a little switch they can pull that turns on luck.  But once they pull it, it slowly shifts to bad luck and can't be used again until a really bad string.  The trick is making sure the pool operator isn't asleep when it's time to pull the switch.  Grin

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 426 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!