|
rgsnedds
Member
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 17
raskul
|
|
June 27, 2020, 11:23:33 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
DanGB
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
June 27, 2020, 02:03:11 PM |
|
+ support BeamHashIII algorithm for Nvidia GPUs (for auto-switching use algo --beamhash)
I just tested the newest gminer update. I pointed it to a test pool that is already past block 777777 (so on BeamHashIII) and got 18-19 Sol/s with my 1070ti's (using the same Afterburner settings as with BeamHashII). Now the interesting thing is that I then pointed it to my node (so still BeamHashII) to solo mine and I was getting 18-19 Sol/s on there too. I then ran against my node the previous gminer version that I had been running and it got 40+ Sol/s as I expected (again, no changes in Afterburner settings). Any idea why I am seeing very low hashrate while mining BeamHashII with this latest version?
|
|
|
|
Kringel
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 151
Merit: 7
|
|
June 27, 2020, 06:10:40 PM |
|
+ improved Cuckatoo32 performance (up to 5%-8% dependent on GPU)
Now the difference between the C32 hashrate shown by gminer and that one reported by the pool became even bigger; with 1070s it's about 25% (at least on Nicehash servers). Basically, since you started declaring improved C32 hashrate back in April the actual hashrate stays more or less the same, only numbers reported by the miner "improve".
|
|
|
|
joseph32
Member
Offline
Activity: 418
Merit: 21
|
|
June 27, 2020, 07:07:58 PM |
|
+ improved Cuckatoo32 performance (up to 5%-8% dependent on GPU)
Now the difference between the C32 hashrate shown by gminer and that one reported by the pool became even bigger; with 1070s it's about 25% (at least on Nicehash servers). Basically, since you started declaring improved C32 hashrate back in April the actual hashrate stays more or less the same, only numbers reported by the miner "improve". Same here and also reported weeks ago. Tested 12 hours with a 1080Ti-Rig. Reported hashrate by GMiner = 4.90 G/s. Real hashrate @ Nicehash = 4.52 G/s.
|
|
|
|
jmart123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
June 27, 2020, 07:29:49 PM |
|
Just tested BeamHash as well. Gminer ver 2.05 gets 40 sols and ver 2.11 only gets 17 sols. Test was with a 1070 using same card settings. Tried both beamHashII on regular pool and BeamHashIII on test pool. Hope this gets resolved before the Beam fork.
|
|
|
|
DanGB
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
June 27, 2020, 08:20:20 PM |
|
+ support BeamHashIII algorithm for Nvidia GPUs (for auto-switching use algo --beamhash)
I just tested the newest gminer update. I pointed it to a test pool that is already past block 777777 (so on BeamHashIII) and got 18-19 Sol/s with my 1070ti's (using the same Afterburner settings as with BeamHashII). Now the interesting thing is that I then pointed it to my node (so still BeamHashII) to solo mine and I was getting 18-19 Sol/s on there too. I then ran against my node the previous gminer version that I had been running and it got 40+ Sol/s as I expected (again, no changes in Afterburner settings). Any idea why I am seeing very low hashrate while mining BeamHashII with this latest version? We figured out what the issue is. If you test BeamHashIII on a test pool and it is past block 777777, gminer creates a 0k file in the miner folder. With this file there, gminer will continue to run on BeamHashIII even if you go back to a regular mainnet pool that has not yet hit block 777777. To get your hashrate back and to have it actually mine on BeamHashII again, you must delete that 0k file.
|
|
|
|
psiz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
June 28, 2020, 05:09:17 PM |
|
beamhash-3 : nicehash: share rejected share above target
|
|
|
|
aazmega
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
June 28, 2020, 05:29:48 PM |
|
using a last ver, mining with rx470 4G at simplemining OS at leafpool. Getting all incorrect shares. With and without OC.
|
|
|
|
Wotan Wipeout
Member
Offline
Activity: 438
Merit: 27
|
|
June 28, 2020, 06:19:00 PM |
|
Leafpool works, nicehash not. Share above Target. (BeamV3)
|
|
|
|
Etherion
|
|
June 28, 2020, 07:06:45 PM |
|
i get this on nicehash
Share Rejected: Share above target
|
|
|
|
narousberg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 29, 2020, 06:39:41 AM |
|
i get this on nicehash
Share Rejected: Share above target
Same problem.
|
I AM NOT SELL MY BITCOINTALK ACCOUNT !!!
|
|
|
Etherion
|
|
June 29, 2020, 07:04:38 AM |
|
Looks like gminer auto switch for beam algo does not work on nicehash. it mines the old algo. if you mine to a pool that is passed the 777777 block and then mine on Nicehash it mines the new algo. Due to the 0 file
|
|
|
|
Wotan Wipeout
Member
Offline
Activity: 438
Merit: 27
|
|
June 29, 2020, 12:08:45 PM |
|
It seems I (and maybe more people) read the description wrong.
v2.11 + support BeamHashIII algorithm for Nvidia GPUs (for auto-switching use algo --beamhash) + improved Cuckatoo32 performance (up to 5%-8% dependent on GPU) + lowered fee for Cuckatoo32 algorithm to 2%
To mine BeamV3 the -algo is BeamhashIII
I did --beamhash and this results in invalid shares.
Greetings
Wotan
|
|
|
|
narousberg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 29, 2020, 10:42:48 PM |
|
It seems I (and maybe more people) read the description wrong.
v2.11 + support BeamHashIII algorithm for Nvidia GPUs (for auto-switching use algo --beamhash) + improved Cuckatoo32 performance (up to 5%-8% dependent on GPU) + lowered fee for Cuckatoo32 algorithm to 2%
To mine BeamV3 the -algo is BeamhashIII
I did --beamhash and this results in invalid shares.
Greetings
Wotan
Thanks, its works.
|
I AM NOT SELL MY BITCOINTALK ACCOUNT !!!
|
|
|
bugnotme
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
June 30, 2020, 01:19:56 PM |
|
1060 3GB fails on BeamHashIII algo, while MiniZ miner performs well. Need to be fixed asap.
|
|
|
|
d0n4ald
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 0
|
|
July 01, 2020, 10:43:49 PM |
|
I updated to this version and am getting 25.7 sol using 1080TI (75% TDP, +175 Core, +700Mem) is this normal? i was mining before with version 1.65 and getting around 50 sol.
|
|
|
|
|
bugnotme
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
July 03, 2020, 06:43:43 AM |
|
v2.12 + improved performance for BeamHashIII algorithm (+2%-10% dependent on GPU)
1070ti - 0% improved performance, the same rate as before (~18.5 sol/s) 1060 3gb - still "out of memory" error, using miniZ got about 8.5 sol/s from card
|
|
|
|
|
|