|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
|
|
tastycakess
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 26, 2019, 09:34:26 PM |
|
Does anyone know why my Cortex hashrate differs so much? Tried out a few diff pools.
Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
|
|
|
|
arielbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1054
|
 |
November 26, 2019, 10:36:35 PM Last edit: November 26, 2019, 10:56:34 PM by arielbit |
|
Does anyone know why my Cortex hashrate differs so much? Tried out a few diff pools.
Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
same here, cortex in gminer is broken. maybe dev misplaced the 5% to the miner and 95% to the dev fee LOL 
|
|
|
|
tastycakess
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 27, 2019, 05:12:17 AM |
|
Does anyone know why my Cortex hashrate differs so much? Tried out a few diff pools.
Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
same here, cortex in gminer is broken. maybe dev misplaced the 5% to the miner and 95% to the dev fee LOL  I think it's just his math is bad. I'm doing about 8.5g/s on gminer, I think it's just reporting hashes a minute not second. If you divide 8.5 by 60 you get .141 and my accepted speed is hovering around 0.145h/sec on the pool.
|
|
|
|
Zminer777
Member

Offline
Activity: 446
Merit: 37
|
 |
November 27, 2019, 07:01:48 AM |
|
I think it's just his math is bad. I'm doing about 8.5g/s on gminer, I think it's just reporting hashes a minute not second. If you divide 8.5 by 60 you get .141 and my accepted speed is hovering around 0.145h/sec on the pool.
Miner display graph per second, pool display hashes per second. To compute one hash miner should find solution, to find solution miner need compute on average 42 graphs. Thus H/s ~ G/s / 42
|
|
|
|
JFoxOne
Member

Offline
Activity: 633
Merit: 56
minerstat 4 pros
|
 |
November 27, 2019, 09:34:17 AM |
|
I think it's just his math is bad. I'm doing about 8.5g/s on gminer, I think it's just reporting hashes a minute not second. If you divide 8.5 by 60 you get .141 and my accepted speed is hovering around 0.145h/sec on the pool.
Miner display graph per second, pool display hashes per second. To compute one hash miner should find solution, to find solution miner need compute on average 42 graphs. Thus H/s ~ G/s / 42 Consider doing that on the client side. I'm sure you'll have less users confused.
|
|
|
|
coinminery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 27, 2019, 10:46:00 AM |
|
Hi I Use some P106-090 6Gb/3Gb Gminer performs poorly on these video cards. Cards may not respond for more than a minute and then shows that everything works. On almost all algorithms. http://prntscr.com/q2qrun
|
|
|
|
coinminery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 27, 2019, 11:28:13 AM |
|
Algorithm: Cortex Stratum server: host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008 user: 0x89c27a***************** password: x Power calculator: on Color output: on Watchdog: on API: off Log to file: miner.log Selected devices: GPU0 Intensity: 100 Temperature limits: 90C ------------------------------------------------------------------ 19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory 19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
|
|
|
|
fistsofgod
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 27, 2019, 02:11:06 PM |
|
could you please update your distributed readme to include all available options
|
|
|
|
tastycakess
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 27, 2019, 02:23:14 PM |
|
Algorithm: Cortex Stratum server: host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008 user: 0x89c27a***************** password: x Power calculator: on Color output: on Watchdog: on API: off Log to file: miner.log Selected devices: GPU0 Intensity: 100 Temperature limits: 90C ------------------------------------------------------------------ 19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory 19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Win 7 or Win 10, I have no luck with 8gb cards on Win 10 but they all work on Win7.
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
 |
November 27, 2019, 04:17:03 PM |
|
Algorithm: Cortex Stratum server: host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008 user: 0x89c27a***************** password: x Power calculator: on Color output: on Watchdog: on API: off Log to file: miner.log Selected devices: GPU0 Intensity: 100 Temperature limits: 90C ------------------------------------------------------------------ 19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory 19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Win 10 eats GPU memory a lot, win 8.1 - less.
|
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
tastycakess
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 27, 2019, 06:04:28 PM |
|
I think it's just his math is bad. I'm doing about 8.5g/s on gminer, I think it's just reporting hashes a minute not second. If you divide 8.5 by 60 you get .141 and my accepted speed is hovering around 0.145h/sec on the pool.
Miner display graph per second, pool display hashes per second. To compute one hash miner should find solution, to find solution miner need compute on average 42 graphs. Thus H/s ~ G/s / 42 As a miner, should I care about graphs per second? Obviously I care a lot about Pool accepted h/sec so I care about miner reported h/sec. But do I need to care about graphs/sec?
|
|
|
|
KartingProfi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 28, 2019, 10:28:26 AM |
|
Ethash+EagleSong: After 25-30 hours of normal work - no shares from EagleSong. 2 Times i have this problem with 1.81.
|
|
|
|
coinminery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 28, 2019, 10:56:42 AM |
|
Algorithm: Cortex Stratum server: host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008 user: 0x89c27a***************** password: x Power calculator: on Color output: on Watchdog: on API: off Log to file: miner.log Selected devices: GPU0 Intensity: 100 Temperature limits: 90C ------------------------------------------------------------------ 19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory 19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Win 10 eats GPU memory a lot, win 8.1 - less. Yes 1080 in linux OS
|
|
|
|
ceasarmadini
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 28, 2019, 01:09:06 PM |
|
Why 1080ti only "selected 8G solver" also titan selected 11G
|
|
|
|
Zminer777
Member

Offline
Activity: 446
Merit: 37
|
 |
November 28, 2019, 01:33:03 PM |
|
Why 1080ti only "selected 8G solver" also titan selected 11G
may be because you have used Windows 10? P.S. Windows 10 reserves 1.5GB+ of video memory
|
|
|
|
ceasarmadini
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 28, 2019, 03:09:51 PM |
|
Why 1080ti only "selected 8G solver" also titan selected 11G
may be because you have used Windows 10? P.S. Windows 10 reserves 1.5GB+ of video memory yes, i use w10 but i use igpu
|
|
|
|
Saverenergy
|
 |
November 28, 2019, 05:06:48 PM |
|
Does anyone know why my Cortex hashrate differs so much? Tried out a few diff pools.
Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
Perhaps your problem arises due to ping, it is too big))) But seriously, there is a problem with this algorithm. I hope the developers fix it.
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
 |
November 29, 2019, 01:21:55 PM |
|
Does anyone know why my Cortex hashrate differs so much? Tried out a few diff pools.
Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
Perhaps your problem arises due to ping, it is too big))) But seriously, there is a problem with this algorithm. I hope the developers fix it. No, this works normally. Already explained. 1H/s = 42G/s
|
|
|
|
Zminer777
Member

Offline
Activity: 446
Merit: 37
|
 |
November 29, 2019, 01:49:23 PM |
|
GMiner v1.82 available for download v1.82+ significant performance improvements for Cuckoo29 algorithm(AE, BFC) on Nvidia GPUs (+4-10%, for 5GB+ cards) Performance on stock GPU settings:Cuckoo29:Palit GTX 1060 JetStream 6GB ~3.53 G/s Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti OC 6GB ~4.75 G/s Palit GTX 1070 Dual 8GB ~5.22 G/s Palit GTX 1070 Ti JetStream 8GB ~5.65 G/s MSI GTX 1080 SEA HAWK EK X 8GB ~5.75 G/s Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti AORUS Waterforce WB Xtreme Edition 11GB ~8.66 G/s Palit RTX 2060 Dual 6GB ~6.53 G/s MSI RTX 2070 Armor 8GB ~8.12 G/s MSI RTX 2080 DUKE 8GB ~9.5 G/s BFC:Palit GTX 1060 JetStream 6GB ~84.04 H/s Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti OC 6GB ~133.09 H/s Palit GTX 1070 Dual 8GB ~124.28 H/s Palit GTX 1070 Ti JetStream 8GB ~134.52 H/s MSI GTX 1080 SEA HAWK EK X 8GB ~136.90 H/s Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti AORUS Waterforce WB Xtreme Edition 11GB ~206.19 H/s Palit RTX 2060 Dual 6GB ~155.47 H/s MSI RTX 2070 Armor 8GB ~193.33 H/s MSI RTX 2080 DUKE 8GB ~226.19 H/s Telegram group: https://t.me/gminer_equihashTelegram beta test group: https://t.me/gminer_betaDownload links:GitHub: https://github.com/develsoftware/GMinerRelease/releases/tag/1.82
|
|
|
|
|