|
Saverenergy
|
|
November 26, 2019, 03:41:12 PM |
|
GMiner v1.79 available for download
Do -t for all cards in the rig please! Just "-t 75" for all cards. Tired of making many almost identical bat-files with the same space separated numbers for each rig -t 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 for 13-card rig -t 75 75 75 75 75 75 for 6-card rig -t 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 for 8-card rig -t 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 for 11-card rig (tired of reading? ) Imagine how we are tired of writing) instead of just one universal bat-file with "-t 75" which sets temperature limits for all cards in the rig. I wonder how you haven't done it for more than a year your miner exists ) Unbelievable. This is the oldest flaw GMiner has unresolved yet. Second that. And there's a nifty workaround: you could use '-t 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75' for any rig. Gminer always uses the right amount. You all say correctly, but it’s much more convenient and logical to use one parameter "-t 75" for all video cards in rigs.
|
|
|
|
Nairolf911
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2019, 06:27:26 PM Last edit: November 26, 2019, 06:53:18 PM by Nairolf911 |
|
Hello, Happy to mine cortex with gminer, but got "devfee mining pool are unavailable"... That error stop the GPU, and restart the miner every minutes... Could you solve fastly the problem ?
|
|
|
|
|
Owletek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2019, 07:32:05 PM |
|
Thanks for new algo.
Pls whats performance for Cortex on 1070GTX?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
SergVM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2019, 07:58:52 PM |
|
Gminer 1.81 (and 1.80) Cortex algo - periodically cycles with message "Connection Error: Write timed out". This message appears after the message "Connected to ....". Rebooting not changes anything. miner with 2 mining pools have the same issue. Another cortex miner have no those problem on these pools. Another grin 29 and 31 algos works without these issues. Where is the problem ?
|
|
|
|
tromp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 990
Merit: 1108
|
|
November 26, 2019, 08:51:34 PM Last edit: November 27, 2019, 04:37:35 PM by tromp |
|
Cuckarood29 will no longer be active on Grin's 2nd Hard Fork around Jan 15, 2020, to be replaced by Cuckaroom29: https://www.grin-forum.org/t/next-pow-cuckaroom-unveiled-at-grincon1Cuckaroom miners can first be tested on floonet which hard forks around Dec 19.
|
|
|
|
tastycakess
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2019, 09:34:26 PM |
|
Does anyone know why my Cortex hashrate differs so much? Tried out a few diff pools.
Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
|
|
|
|
arielbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 1059
|
|
November 26, 2019, 10:36:35 PM Last edit: November 26, 2019, 10:56:34 PM by arielbit |
|
Does anyone know why my Cortex hashrate differs so much? Tried out a few diff pools.
Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
same here, cortex in gminer is broken. maybe dev misplaced the 5% to the miner and 95% to the dev fee LOL
|
|
|
|
tastycakess
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2019, 05:12:17 AM |
|
Does anyone know why my Cortex hashrate differs so much? Tried out a few diff pools.
Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
same here, cortex in gminer is broken. maybe dev misplaced the 5% to the miner and 95% to the dev fee LOL I think it's just his math is bad. I'm doing about 8.5g/s on gminer, I think it's just reporting hashes a minute not second. If you divide 8.5 by 60 you get .141 and my accepted speed is hovering around 0.145h/sec on the pool.
|
|
|
|
Zminer777 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 488
Merit: 37
|
|
November 27, 2019, 07:01:48 AM |
|
I think it's just his math is bad. I'm doing about 8.5g/s on gminer, I think it's just reporting hashes a minute not second. If you divide 8.5 by 60 you get .141 and my accepted speed is hovering around 0.145h/sec on the pool.
Miner display graph per second, pool display hashes per second. To compute one hash miner should find solution, to find solution miner need compute on average 42 graphs. Thus H/s ~ G/s / 42
|
|
|
|
JFoxOne
Member
Offline
Activity: 640
Merit: 56
minerstat
|
|
November 27, 2019, 09:34:17 AM |
|
I think it's just his math is bad. I'm doing about 8.5g/s on gminer, I think it's just reporting hashes a minute not second. If you divide 8.5 by 60 you get .141 and my accepted speed is hovering around 0.145h/sec on the pool.
Miner display graph per second, pool display hashes per second. To compute one hash miner should find solution, to find solution miner need compute on average 42 graphs. Thus H/s ~ G/s / 42 Consider doing that on the client side. I'm sure you'll have less users confused.
|
|
|
|
coinminery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2019, 10:46:00 AM |
|
Hi I Use some P106-090 6Gb/3Gb Gminer performs poorly on these video cards. Cards may not respond for more than a minute and then shows that everything works. On almost all algorithms. http://prntscr.com/q2qrun
|
|
|
|
coinminery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2019, 11:28:13 AM |
|
Algorithm: Cortex Stratum server: host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008 user: 0x89c27a***************** password: x Power calculator: on Color output: on Watchdog: on API: off Log to file: miner.log Selected devices: GPU0 Intensity: 100 Temperature limits: 90C ------------------------------------------------------------------ 19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory 19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
|
|
|
|
fistsofgod
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2019, 02:11:06 PM |
|
could you please update your distributed readme to include all available options
|
|
|
|
tastycakess
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2019, 02:23:14 PM |
|
Algorithm: Cortex Stratum server: host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008 user: 0x89c27a***************** password: x Power calculator: on Color output: on Watchdog: on API: off Log to file: miner.log Selected devices: GPU0 Intensity: 100 Temperature limits: 90C ------------------------------------------------------------------ 19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory 19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Win 7 or Win 10, I have no luck with 8gb cards on Win 10 but they all work on Win7.
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
|
November 27, 2019, 04:17:03 PM |
|
Algorithm: Cortex Stratum server: host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008 user: 0x89c27a***************** password: x Power calculator: on Color output: on Watchdog: on API: off Log to file: miner.log Selected devices: GPU0 Intensity: 100 Temperature limits: 90C ------------------------------------------------------------------ 19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory 19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Win 10 eats GPU memory a lot, win 8.1 - less.
|
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
tastycakess
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2019, 06:04:28 PM |
|
I think it's just his math is bad. I'm doing about 8.5g/s on gminer, I think it's just reporting hashes a minute not second. If you divide 8.5 by 60 you get .141 and my accepted speed is hovering around 0.145h/sec on the pool.
Miner display graph per second, pool display hashes per second. To compute one hash miner should find solution, to find solution miner need compute on average 42 graphs. Thus H/s ~ G/s / 42 As a miner, should I care about graphs per second? Obviously I care a lot about Pool accepted h/sec so I care about miner reported h/sec. But do I need to care about graphs/sec?
|
|
|
|
KartingProfi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
November 28, 2019, 10:28:26 AM |
|
Ethash+EagleSong: After 25-30 hours of normal work - no shares from EagleSong. 2 Times i have this problem with 1.81.
|
|
|
|
coinminery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
November 28, 2019, 10:56:42 AM |
|
Algorithm: Cortex Stratum server: host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008 user: 0x89c27a***************** password: x Power calculator: on Color output: on Watchdog: on API: off Log to file: miner.log Selected devices: GPU0 Intensity: 100 Temperature limits: 90C ------------------------------------------------------------------ 19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory 19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Win 10 eats GPU memory a lot, win 8.1 - less. Yes 1080 in linux OS
|
|
|
|
|