2tights
|
|
May 07, 2014, 10:09:45 PM |
|
no worky. failed to connect. U used http? setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 10 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 sgminer.exe -k groestlcoin --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345 -u 2tights.username -p password --xintensity 300 -g 1 -w 512 --auto-fan --temp-target 82 --lookup-gap I haven't modified the script and it worked fine the other day
|
|
|
|
ninja registrator
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2014, 10:16:39 PM |
|
no worky. failed to connect. U used http? setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 10 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 sgminer.exe -k groestlcoin --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345 -u 2tights.username -p password --xintensity 300 -g 1 -w 512 --auto-fan --temp-target 82 --lookup-gap I haven't modified the script and it worked fine the other day I run Groestl on a bamt miner just fine and have been for a while! I also run a small NVidia from windows and neither can connect or mine on his pool as I just tried........ Ahmed whats up? tried with cpu , NVidia, and 7950 so nope its a NO GO!!!!!!!! { "pools" : [ { "url" : "stratum+tcp://mine1.coinmine.pl:3000", "user" : "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "pass" : "XYZ DO YOU SEE ME" }, { "url" : " http://192.168.1.103:17772", "user" : "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX", "pass" : "XYZ DO YOU SEE ME?" } ] , "auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "temp-cutoff" : "84,80", "temp-overheat" : "80,76", "temp-target" : "70", "gpu-fan" : "75-100,50-90", "intensity" : "22,22", "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256", "kernel" : "groestlcoin", "lookup-gap" : "2", "thread-concurrency" : "21712", "shaders" : "1792", "api-listen" : true, "api-port" : "4028", "api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1", "expiry" : "120", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7", "gpu-platform" : "0", "gpu-threads" : "2,2", "gpu-engine" : "1150", "gpu-memclock" : "1500", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "log" : "5", "no-pool-disable" : true, "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "60", "scrypt" : true, "shares" : "0", "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" } WITH THIS I AM GETTING OVER 7.1 M/H EACH 7950 ccminer30.exe -q -s 1 -a groestl -o stratum+tcp://mine1.coinmine.pl:3000 -u OKOKOKOKOKOKOK.660 -p KOKOKOKO -v 512 AND THIS GIVES ME OVER 3.0 M/H NOT BAD FOR AN OLD GTX 660 SIMPLE NOT EVEN TI MODEL
|
|
|
|
ECM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2014, 10:27:09 PM |
|
Hi, I just had to sign up to add to this discussion. Was getting a bit frustrated with some ppls unability to understand the complexity of things. Guys, some positive attitude please. They are trying their best to fix this. I managed to connect. What you have to do is change the "stratum+tcp://" for "http://". The stratum is acting weird remember. @Ahmed: Im logged on but i get all rejects or stale. States "target-miss". Hopefully that helps your troubleshooting. And if I understand correctly, you are trying to set up a P2pool? I could prob run a node if you got all the software working Im on a solid connection in Northern Europe. And the increase in hashpower could come from vultures that see a weak network where no one is mining. That's a definition of a party
|
|
|
|
2tights
|
|
May 07, 2014, 10:29:01 PM |
|
Hi, I just had to sign up to add to this discussion. Was getting a bit frustrated with some ppls unability to understand the complexity of things. Guys, some positive attitude please. They are trying their best to fix this. I managed to connect. What you have to do is change the "stratum+tcp://" for "http://". The stratum is acting weird remember. @Ahmed: Im logged on but i get all rejects or stale. States "target-miss". Hopefully that helps your troubleshooting. And if I understand correctly, you are trying to set up a P2pool? I could prob run a node if you got all the software working Im on a solid connection in Northern Europe. And the increase in hashpower could come from vultures that see a weak network where no one is mining. That's a definition of a party thanks I can connect now nothing but rejects
|
|
|
|
ninja registrator
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2014, 10:35:59 PM |
|
ccminer-v0.5\x64>ccminer30.exe -q -s 1 -a groestl -o http ://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345 -u xxxxxx-p xxxx -v 512 *** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. *** This is version 0.5 (beta) based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler based on pooler-cpuminer extension for HVC from https://github.com/heavycoin/cpuminer-heavycoin and http://hvc.1gh.com/ Cuda additions Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H. LTC donation address: LKS1WDKGED647msBQfLBHV3Ls8sveGncnm BTC donation address: 16hJF5mceSojnTD3ZTUDqdRhDyPJzoRakM YAC donation address: Y87sptDEcpLkLeAuex6qZioDbvy1qXZEj4 [2014-05-07 15:32:55] 1 miner threads started, using 'groestl' algorithm. [2014-05-07 15:32:57] Long-polling activated for http://dmd.cryptopools.com:3345/LP [2014-05-07 15:33:03] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 2059 khash/s (booooo) [2014-05-07 15:33:22] accepted: 0/2 (0.00%), 2640 khash/s (booooo) [2014-05-07 15:33:49] accepted: 0/3 (0.00%), 2330 khash/s (booooo) [2014-05-07 15:33:50] accepted: 0/4 (0.00%), 47.12 khash/s (booooo) [2014-05-07 15:34:06] accepted: 0/5 (0.00%), 2597 khash/s (booooo) [2014-05-07 15:34:14] accepted: 0/6 (0.00%), 2398 khash/s (booooo) [2014-05-07 15:34:18] accepted: 0/7 (0.00%), 2610 khash/s (booooo) [2014-05-07 15:34:36] accepted: 0/8 (0.00%), 2732 khash/s (booooo) [2014-05-07 15:34:38] accepted: 0/9 (0.00%), 2797 khash/s (booooo)
|
|
|
|
ECM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2014, 10:40:24 PM |
|
Good, then it wasnt only me getting rejects. Now we know that. And they will keep getting it wrong until they get it right (duh!). So Ahmed, we are at your disposal as soon as there are any new changes in your code. Keep up the good work!
|
|
|
|
morrisonsa
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 07, 2014, 10:44:19 PM |
|
Our attempt at a pool came up with the usual result:
[Pool] [Diamondcoin] (Thread 1) We thought a block was found but it was rejected by the daemon, share data: {"job":"29","ip":"XXX","worker":"XXXXXX","height":393842,"blockReward":1000000,"poolReward":990000,"difficulty":0.02,"shareDiff":"15839.58450802","blockDiff":10945.29713536,"blockDiffActual":42.755066935,"blockHash":0000000004232de679778fc6eb680536643394d6911dac3175960d1337a3fa5c"}
Granted total time was about 10 minutes of effort and hashing.
I hope I'm a newb, and block rewards really arent 1000000
And thats a very long way of saying percentage...
|
|
|
|
ninja registrator
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2014, 10:51:40 PM |
|
A MILLION DIAMONDS?.... NICE HIT SO PRINT IT AND PLAQY IT FOR ON THE WALL MEMORIES!
|
|
|
|
|
srcxxx
|
|
May 08, 2014, 12:57:31 AM |
|
Hi pool operators trying to set up pool mining for DMD! Maybe a stupid question, but still here I go... Why don't you use testnet? This way difficulty is very low and you can see if you've solved a block or not in a matter of minutes. Why do you need mainnet? Thanks
|
|
|
|
morrisonsa
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 08, 2014, 01:07:07 AM |
|
I don't believe it has testnet?
|
|
|
|
morrisonsa
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 08, 2014, 01:14:10 AM |
|
Not sure, you have this marked as scrypt, its groestl.
|
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
May 08, 2014, 03:47:45 AM |
|
Still solo mining. 24 hours now WITHOUT a single coin though, 36 hours with just 1 (one machine that's never had even one), and that after getting off to a nice start that met with expectations. The overall diff picture hasn't changed in that time (roughly the same as 3 days ago while trending ever so slightly higher). What has changed was the mention of "secret" private pools.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg6552787#msg6552787https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg6550578;topicseen#msg6550578If they're big, then that puts the little solo miner out of business. But is that really true? Statistically speaking, my miners should have the same probabilities of solving a block (as in BLOCK!) regardless of whether the entire network were all one huge pool except for little old me, or the entire network were nothing but solo miners with me included, correct? 1 big pool + little old me = same probabilities = all solo miners with little old me included, correct?
The so called "lottery ticket" is exactly the same for little old me, and it's completely independent of the make-up of the rest of that particular statistical universe, correct? 24 hours with zilch is really stacking the odds though.Something smells fishy. Anyone else experiencing something similar? Got up in the middle of the night to take a piss, and it came to me, it's called: LATENCY and I then proceded to think to myself, "you idiot"! If it's taking forever to submit, you're not going to get anything, even if your theoretical odds are 1 in 75 to 1 in 125 (depending on the diff at any given moment). And that's not to mention what would be happening if huge concentrated hashrates (secret pools) are right next to active nodes. Out of curiosity, I pinged the nodes in the original launch post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg6507800#msg6507800 and they all timed out. I'd post further findings, but since nobody else has had similar problems, why bother? I'm going back to bed. I've got a long, long hard day tomorrow. Good luck to the other two or three of you who are troubleshooting.
|
|
|
|
|
pcmerc
|
|
May 08, 2014, 05:49:08 AM |
|
On it! standby...
|
|
|
|
LeetPoolsOP
|
|
May 08, 2014, 06:12:17 AM Last edit: May 08, 2014, 06:27:46 AM by LeetPoolsOP |
|
What seems to be the issues that the pools are having?
|
|
|
|
|
pcmerc
|
|
May 08, 2014, 06:47:47 AM |
|
Weird! Looking at it some more.
|
|
|
|
pcmerc
|
|
May 08, 2014, 07:34:13 AM |
|
Yes, that's whats odd. openssl version returns 1.0.1g
I've dumped my macports & refreshing it.
I'll kick out a new compile once it completes.
pcmerc~
|
|
|
|
|