Bitcoin Forum
August 18, 2018, 02:57:34 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Where would you prefer the VRC/VRM exchange pair be?
Bittrex
Poloniex
Both
Other

Pages: « 1 ... 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 [492] 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 ... 963 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][VRC] VeriCoin Proof of Stake-Time Currency | New Roadmap Released  (Read 1349964 times)
ofp
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:04:10 PM
 #9821

The problem is not related individually to Mintpal. The whole exchange business is a problem. Making some math you end up understanding that an exchange like MP stores and handles several million dollars while their monthly revenues are limited to some 60-90 thousand dollars. We should support and migrate to P2P exchanges and technologies instead.

And exactly how would that work? You and me agree, through chat or e-mail, that I will transfer you 1,000 VRC for whatever amount in BTC (or other coins, fiat included). Do we use an escrow service? or is the buyer forced to trust the seller will send the coins once the irreversible transfer of payment is done?

Take a glance at the following link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=172705.0
1534604254
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534604254

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534604254
Reply with quote  #2

1534604254
Report to moderator
1534604254
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534604254

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534604254
Reply with quote  #2

1534604254
Report to moderator
1534604254
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534604254

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534604254
Reply with quote  #2

1534604254
Report to moderator
BOUNTY PORTALS
BLOG
WHERE BOUNTY MANAGEMENT
MEETS AUTOMATION
SIGNATURE CAMPAIGNS
TWITTER
FACEBOOK
MEDIA CAMPAIGNS
AND MORE!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1534604254
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534604254

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534604254
Reply with quote  #2

1534604254
Report to moderator
1534604254
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534604254

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534604254
Reply with quote  #2

1534604254
Report to moderator
buy4crypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250

freecrypto.top


View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 10:11:00 PM
 #9822

....
Let's make some math:
- Mintpal's daily volume was around BTC 2.5K, some BTC 5 daily revenues or US$ 2500 (based on 0.2% transaction fee)
- VRC 8M were valued at some US$1.65M
- This means some 660 days of MintPal's revenues
- Let's assume some VRC 12K coins as an average position
- This means some 660 people were holding their coins at MP

Conclusions:
1) MP would never be able to pay and would go bankrupt
2) As an immediate consequence, all 660 VRC holders would loose their money
3) With 30% of VRC coins out there available for further attacks, VRC would crash and all people holding it would loose their money

So, please, let not fool ourselves: It was not about saving MintPal. It was about saving the coin and the investors' money.

Image damage was done on all POS coins from PPC Nova..BC...XC...to VRC will surfer
and with rollback you give all POW coins golden bullet to shot in POS...
Right direction would be improve POS security to 90% resistance like NXT - not magic rollbacks.

And whole black marketing has started like that one:
http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoin/comments/2apsj7/litecoin_developers_will_never_fork_litecoin_to/ciycbhd

Coblee just shot himself in the foot potentially. Does he think saying he won't fork will seperate him from any of the other crypto that are in the game right now? Not even under circumstances that would benefit his community. I wonder how many people will sell out of LTC and move funds here after hearing that. I certainly don't want my money with a "idealist" instead of someone more practical. Not when crypto needs a team more practical to go mainstream.

You are telling me. If the developer is capable, and the whole community votes for it, he won't allow to stop the fraud??

WOW I WILL NEVER BUY LITECOIN!

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
████ - freecrypto.top - btcinfo.top - DIGITAL CURRENCY DIRECTORIES - freeMonero.comfunbtc.xyz  ████
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:15:04 PM
 #9823

The problem is not related individually to Mintpal. The whole exchange business is a problem. Making some math you end up understanding that an exchange like MP stores and handles several million dollars while their monthly revenues are limited to some 60-90 thousand dollars. We should support and migrate to P2P exchanges and technologies instead.

And exactly how would that work? You and me agree, through chat or e-mail, that I will transfer you 1,000 VRC for whatever amount in BTC (or other coins, fiat included). Do we use an escrow service? or is the buyer forced to trust the seller will send the coins once the irreversible transfer of payment is done?

Take a glance at the following link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=172705.0

The idea sounds quite attractive... although there would be fees involved, therefore not so advantageous in that regard.

Problem is that I for one -and I believe billions of people around the world- would trust such an enterprise about 2 minutes AFTER Hell freezes over, so why waste energy -much less resources- on something bound to fail miserably when the solution is already in place many decades ago, in the real world?

No matter how much we want to jerk off around the bushes, the solution to most crypto problems, including mass mainstream adoption, passes by REGULATION. When it does arrive -and arrive it will, at least in the US and Europe-, it will be many years too late... even if it were to be imposed tomorrow.
eiskalt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:16:18 PM
 #9824

....
Let's make some math:
- Mintpal's daily volume was around BTC 2.5K, some BTC 5 daily revenues or US$ 2500 (based on 0.2% transaction fee)
- VRC 8M were valued at some US$1.65M
- This means some 660 days of MintPal's revenues
- Let's assume some VRC 12K coins as an average position
- This means some 660 people were holding their coins at MP

Conclusions:
1) MP would never be able to pay and would go bankrupt
2) As an immediate consequence, all 660 VRC holders would loose their money
3) With 30% of VRC coins out there available for further attacks, VRC would crash and all people holding it would loose their money

So, please, let not fool ourselves: It was not about saving MintPal. It was about saving the coin and the investors' money.

Image damage was done on all POS coins from PPC Nova..BC...XC...to VRC will surfer
and with rollback you give all POW coins golden bullet to shot in POS...
Right direction would be improve POS security to 90% resistance like NXT - not magic rollbacks.

And whole black marketing has started like that one:
http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoin/comments/2apsj7/litecoin_developers_will_never_fork_litecoin_to/ciycbhd

Coblee just shot himself in the foot potentially. Does he think saying he won't fork will seperate him from any of the other crypto that are in the game right now? Not even under circumstances that would benefit his community. I wonder how many people will sell out of LTC and move funds here after hearing that. I certainly don't want my money with a "idealist" instead of someone more practical.

You are telling me. If the developer is capable, and the whole community votes for it, he won't allow to stop the fraud??

WOW I WILL NEVER BUY LITECOIN!

Yeah, and I will sell my remaining litecoins as soon as possible.

Thanks Litecoin-DEVs, you just screwed it up.
GridWorker
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:17:12 PM
 #9825

A lot of the action in altcoin seems fear based.

The devs acted without fear of public crticism. They are also the devs not scared to show their faces.

I say they have the balls to get the job done whatever comes their way.

vrc: VBL3M6EzwcYZWeuDpgjG9bDQzTKb4ydiDy
buy4crypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250

freecrypto.top


View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 10:20:20 PM
 #9826

A lot of the action in altcoin seems fear based.

The devs acted without fear of public crticism. They are also the devs not scared to show their faces.

I say they have the balls to get the job done whatever comes their way.

I have more faith in crypto than ever after this. I understand the idealists point of view. But thievery is something we have to be able to address in a more constructive way than letting them get away with it. Especially if its within reason, the technology allows it, and in the end, the most important THE COMMUNITY VOTES TO ACCEPT THE CHANGE.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
████ - freecrypto.top - btcinfo.top - DIGITAL CURRENCY DIRECTORIES - freeMonero.comfunbtc.xyz  ████
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
eiskalt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:28:47 PM
 #9827

All right then, will leave now to sell my LTC.  Cheesy

See you soon VeriFriends.
ofp
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:31:02 PM
 #9828

....
Let's make some math:
- Mintpal's daily volume was around BTC 2.5K, some BTC 5 daily revenues or US$ 2500 (based on 0.2% transaction fee)
- VRC 8M were valued at some US$1.65M
- This means some 660 days of MintPal's revenues
- Let's assume some VRC 12K coins as an average position
- This means some 660 people were holding their coins at MP

Conclusions:
1) MP would never be able to pay and would go bankrupt
2) As an immediate consequence, all 660 VRC holders would loose their money
3) With 30% of VRC coins out there available for further attacks, VRC would crash and all people holding it would loose their money

So, please, let not fool ourselves: It was not about saving MintPal. It was about saving the coin and the investors' money.

Image damage was done on all POS coins from PPC Nova..BC...XC...to VRC will surfer
and with rollback you give all POW coins golden bullet to shot in POS...
Right direction would be improve POS security to 90% resistance like NXT - not magic rollbacks.

And whole black marketing has started like that one:
http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoin/comments/2apsj7/litecoin_developers_will_never_fork_litecoin_to/ciycbhd

Coblee just shot himself in the foot potentially. Does he think saying he won't fork will seperate him from any of the other crypto that are in the game right now? Not even under circumstances that would benefit his community. I wonder how many people will sell out of LTC and move funds here after hearing that. I certainly don't want my money with a "idealist" instead of someone more practical.

You are telling me. If the developer is capable, and the whole community votes for it, he won't allow to stop the fraud??

WOW I WILL NEVER BUY LITECOIN!

Yeah, and I will sell my remaining litecoins as soon as possible.

Thanks Litecoin-DEVs, you just screwed it up.

This is precisely what we'll see: The free market will react to the actions and will declare the winners and the loosers. We'll see this happening in the coming days.

Now, if there's a single thing that made me invest in Vericoin, that thing was the perceived quality of the development team. We might be hammered to some degree by the market but I'm very happy to see how the development team reacted and fully confident of the future of the coin.
pingdigi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:36:22 PM
 #9829


People are worried that this might set precedent for other coins to respond the same. An example would be if Bitcoin did this when Mt.Gox happened.

Bitcoin has forked two times, significantly. One was in 2010 when someone was able to mint billions of Bitcoins. They had to go back 100 transactions and reset the chain. Thankfully, the network was really small then, and all the developers had to do was get to the big pools and tell them to update their codes. Bitcoin was really small, and no one cared about it, so it didn’t get much attention.

The second event was where Bitcoin was updating from, I believe, 0.7 to 0.8. People didn’t like the 0.8 change, so some people didn’t move over. Basically, they were competing on two parallel chains for a long time. Eventually, the developers decided to revert back to 0.7.

When people say we’re abusing our power, that’s fine; they can say what they want to. I don’t think of it that way, because we were going out of our way to prevent the coin from dying off. Most of the people who are critical of this are people that don’t own it and are people that want another coin to succeed. They attack every coin and right now it’s a good opportunity to attack VeriCoin.

------

There is more, read the full article @ http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/vericoin-developer-speaks-ccn-mintpal-hardfork/2014/07/15



That is the mos important part.
The dev decided to make a change but the people didn't.
And in the end it was the users that decided the which chain was the right one.

Here there was decision taken by a few to protect a business , nothing more.

Until it's technically impossible to rollback the chain, this "problem" will continue. The argument of "I don't like what the VeriCoin devs did, I'm going to buy <such-n-such> coin instead" doesn't hold because all other cryptocoins can be rolled back as well. Just because the devs say they won't doesn't mean they can't!

So bravo VeriCoin devs! You did a good thing, and although people are upset you violated some sort of imaginary moral law, the problem that has always been there is now front and centre.

If you don't like it, show me the code to fix the problem.
tigerwood0432
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 481
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:45:34 PM
 #9830



My  answer to LTC dev FUDDER : (http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoin/comments/2apsj7/litecoin_developers_will_never_fork_litecoin_to/ciycbhd ) , i know he will delete the answer , so i post it here for other stupid fudders) :

PEOPLE DIDN'T REALIZE THAT ROLLBACK SAVED THEIR ASSES  = 1.45 MILLION EUROS WILL PUT ANY HUGE EXCHANGER DOWN !!!

1) So mintpal down means  all mintpal's crypto gone : 45% zs , 38% min , 75%mint , 78% tor , 29 % MYR ,  btc , ltc, cloack,rzr,pinkcoin, BOOBSCOIN, Peepeecoin ,psychocoin  ....etc

>>> Results = 90 % of mintpal's investors broken

>>>> creating panic sells on other exchanges (remember gox effects & btc price after what happened : from 1000 usd to 299 $ = HUGE PANIC )

2) Other exchanges will go down also = because they have transfers between them

>>> More investors ruined = MORE PANIC

>>>> Due to panic selling = some currencies will die ..........

>>>> Double PANIC >>> It will attract medias attention >>>> Triple PANIC

>>>> More investors ruined >>> more selling

 .
3) = it will be like subprim crisis with banks

 = pyramid = 90 %  exchanges will close . if you where at mintpal with all your life savings  holding in MINTPAL  and no rollback = you will be crying right now


Imagine if US FEDERAL RESERVE was hacked by 30% of all USD dollar in circulation

 = 3000 (3 THOUSANDS) BILLION DOLLARS (http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12773.htm)

= Dollar will be a monkey currency , you will buy your goods with Bananas, what US government will do in that case ? = think about it !

So thanks for your topic , that's why = I WILL NEVER BUY LITECOIN = LITECOIN IS DEAD

Ps : Not negociating with terrorists ? ahahahaha ,you are right kid = let the hostages die !! its better Smiley don't try to bring them back  (or to roll them back Wink = let them die = the world will be better without hostages alive Smiley

If you have courage = do not delete my post .

i don't need an hypocrit answer . so please don't answer me = i will not read it .

Trying to promote your dead coin like this ? = its pathetic .Smiley

Regards



▄███████████████████████████████████████████▄
█████████████████████████████████████████████
██username 12345█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████
███▒▒▒▒▒▒▒███████████████████████████████████
███▒▒▒▒▒▒▒███████████████████████████████████
███▒▒▒▒▒▒▒███████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████
██1234567███12345678██12345678███12345678████
█████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████
████▒▒▒▒▒▒███████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████
▀███████████████████████████████████████████▀
CryptoPay


  GET IT NOW
erikbit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:47:29 PM
 #9831

My new wallet shows my coin balance and history but is not synching.. On mac I went to Library/Application Support - and there is no Vericoin folder in there where I can keep the necessary wallet file. Even the old wallet never made it into the application support folder. In Mac Finder - Vericoin Wallet was (and still is) just an item i could eject like a memory stick. So now it has been synching a good 12 hours and nothing. Again, coins are showing but they are not staking and wallet is not synching.

Please Help
GridWorker
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 10:53:19 PM
 #9832

My new wallet shows my coin balance and history but is not synching.. On mac I went to Library/Application Support - and there is no Vericoin folder in there where I can keep the necessary wallet file. Even the old wallet never made it into the application support folder. In Mac Finder - Vericoin Wallet was (and still is) just an item i could eject like a memory stick. So now it has been synching a good 12 hours and nothing. Again, coins are showing but they are not staking and wallet is not synching.

Please Help
My windows wallet was stuck syncing when I woke up. I backed up wallet.dat (just in case) and restarted wallet. It synced fine when it started. Staking resumed.

vrc: VBL3M6EzwcYZWeuDpgjG9bDQzTKb4ydiDy
pingdigi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:06:31 PM
 #9833

To expand on a point I made earlier, I want to relay a story from history:

------
In World War II the allies relied heavily on bombing the enemy to try and turn the tide of the war. However they were losing a lot of planes from ground fire and air combat. When many of the planes returned, they were often shot up so badly it was a wonder they could fly at all.

"We need to reinforce these planes with armour" said the leaders in charge. But the engineers had a problem "If we put too much armour on them, then the planes will be either too heavy to fly or burn too much fuel to be able to make the trip".

A mathematician named Wald was asked to catalogue where all the bullet holes had torn through the plane. He produced a diagram that reflected something similar to this:

http://www.nww2m.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/plane-damage.jpg

The plane on the left represented the undamaged plane, and the plane on the right was where the damaged was being recorded. The superiors said "ah, we need to reinforce the wings, nose and tail because this is where the damage is occurring".

Wald said "I'd reinforce the areas where there are no bullet holes".

"What?" they said incredulously. "But that's where all the damage is!"

"But Sir" said Wald "these are the planes that made it back"

As the obviousness of Wald's observation sunk in, the engineers began the task of reinforcing the remaining planes
------

If cryptocoins are going to win the war and become a viable currency, we have to stop focussing on the holes and start seeing the areas that truly need to be reinforced.
buy4crypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250

freecrypto.top


View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 11:12:18 PM
 #9834

To expand on a point I made earlier, I want to relay a story from history:

------
In World War II the allies relied heavily on bombing the enemy to try and turn the tide of the war. However they were losing a lot of planes from ground fire and air combat. When many of the planes returned, they were often shot up so badly it was a wonder they could fly at all.

"We need to reinforce these planes with armour" said the leaders in charge. But the engineers had a problem "If we put too much armour on them, then the planes will be either too heavy to fly or burn too much fuel to be able to make the trip".

A mathematician named Wald was asked to catalogue where all the bullet holes had torn through the plane. He produced a diagram that reflected something similar to this:



The plane on the left represented the undamaged plane, and the plane on the right was where the damaged was being recorded. The superiors said "ah, we need to reinforce the wings, nose and tail because this is where the damage is occurring".

Wald said "I'd reinforce the areas where there are no bullet holes".

"What?" they said incredulously. "But that's where all the damage is!"

"But Sir" said Wald "these are the planes that made it back"

As the obviousness of Wald's observation sunk in, the engineers began the task of reinforcing the remaining planes
------

If cryptocoins are going to win the war and become a viable currency, we have to stop focussing on the holes and start seeing the areas that truly need to be reinforced.


Trully, another way of thinking could benefit the greater good for all of crypto.

Appreciate this post. Very good thought.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
████ - freecrypto.top - btcinfo.top - DIGITAL CURRENCY DIRECTORIES - freeMonero.comfunbtc.xyz  ████
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:13:13 PM
 #9835

I read in the "first press release from Voot coin" that IconicExpert -my supposed alter-ego for some nut cases- has issued and Yahoo financial published, that "VootCoin's NiteSend feature uses a multilayered protection process to help ensure untraceable, hidden, completely private transactions between parties who are not able to know each other's identities." And this brings to my memore the all kinds of vanilla-flavors anons that now plague every single crypto coin out there (including VRC, of course). But what makes me smile most is the part in which "...the parties (transacting) are not able to know each other's identities." This to me is like the gay (or not gay) baths on Melrose, in Hollywood, where people go, insert their dicks in a hole in a wall and someone on the other side sucks it until business is taken care of... Not a bad deal if you are into that kind of stuff but, for the life of me I cannot think of any transaction in which any normal person would want to be involved in which they would go to such extent to avoid knowing who are they buying from -and even selling to-. Not that I care much about who is selling what if the product or service is  known and highly regarded but, if they are, the people I have known all my life take great pains and considerable expense in making it known to everyone that those are indeed their products/services . Just the opposite seems to continue being all the rage in (some) cryptos.

Now I know that VRC, its community and its devs are not interested in transactions involving arms, terrorist services and slavery (sexual, organ or otherwise). So it would leave only porno stuff (and if you need crypto to pay for that you have problems that no amount of anon is going to solve) and drug cartel activities (where you may knot know the identity of the person you are buying the stuff from but you know its proceedings go ultimately to a cartel. I am quite sure that the devs pursuit of mainstream adoption would gladly leave both those sources of "interest" out too.

So quite glad that anon pursuit is NOT one of the priorities of VRC.

Sorry for the somewhat off-topic. Hopefully some would find it if not interesting, at least slightly humorous.

Alphi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:20:26 PM
 #9836


Until it's technically impossible to rollback the chain, this "problem" will continue. The argument of "I don't like what the VeriCoin devs did, I'm going to buy <such-n-such> coin instead" doesn't hold because all other cryptocoins can be rolled back as well. Just because the devs say they won't doesn't mean they can't!


this simply is not true at all...

in a PoW coin you have to convince the miners to adopt the new fork.
If 51% of the miners do not agree then the fork simply does not happen.

due to its size and also its PoW implementation it would be virtually impossible for the bitcoin devs to do something like this with bitcoin without first gaining the consensus from mining community.

miners play a vital role in securing the network not only from outside attacks but from internal misuse of power. they are separate from stake holders with separate interests so they act as a counterbalance.

in a PoS coin there are no miners so there is no separation of powers.
in theory stake holders should play that vital role of making sure that power is not abused.
in practice however.. stake holders do what they are told or get locked out of the system.

this is not just a problem for PoS coins, it does affect all small growing coins, the PoS part merely amplifies problem because some crucial checks and balances are removed.

so I reiterate that it really isn't true at all so say that ANY coin can be rolled back. Some are many orders of magnitude more difficult to roll back than others.

one needs to also consider that rolling the blockchain back isn't just invalidating 1 or two transactions.. it is invalidation every transaction across the entire system that happened after the roll back point.
when people are using the network to buy and sell goods you simply cannot do such a thing without causing major financial damage to the people using the system.

in the case of a small alt coin where the majority of trading is happening off the block chain at exchanges and being done by speculators then there isn't such a big issue with rolling back.


KARMA: KSc9oGgGga1TS4PqZNFxNS9LSDjdSgpC1B      VERT: VgKaooA5ZuLLUXTUANJigH9wCPuzBUBv9H
DOGE:   DRN7pXid34o6wQgUuK8BoSjWJ5g8jiEs4e
pingdigi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:26:13 PM
 #9837


Until it's technically impossible to rollback the chain, this "problem" will continue. The argument of "I don't like what the VeriCoin devs did, I'm going to buy <such-n-such> coin instead" doesn't hold because all other cryptocoins can be rolled back as well. Just because the devs say they won't doesn't mean they can't!


this simply is not true at all...

in a PoW coin you have to convince the miners to adopt the new fork.
If 51% of the miners do not agree then the fork simply does not happen.

due to its size and also its PoW implementation it would be virtually impossible for the bitcoin devs to do something like this with bitcoin without first gaining the consensus from mining community.

miners play a vital role in securing the network not only from outside attacks but from internal misuse of power. they are separate from stake holders with separate interests so they act as a counterbalance.

in a PoS coin there are no miners so there is no separation of powers.
in theory stake holders should play that vital role of making sure that power is not abused.
in practice however.. stake holders do what they are told or get locked out of the system.

this is not just a problem for PoS coins, it does affect all small growing coins, the PoS part merely amplifies problem because some crucial checks and balances are removed.

so I reiterate that it really isn't true at all so say that ANY coin can be rolled back. Some are many orders of magnitude more difficult to roll back than others.



But they *CAN* be rolled back. That's the point.
criptix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1040


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:27:49 PM
 #9838


Until it's technically impossible to rollback the chain, this "problem" will continue. The argument of "I don't like what the VeriCoin devs did, I'm going to buy <such-n-such> coin instead" doesn't hold because all other cryptocoins can be rolled back as well. Just because the devs say they won't doesn't mean they can't!


this simply is not true at all...

in a PoW coin you have to convince the miners to adopt the new fork.
If 51% of the miners do not agree then the fork simply does not happen.

due to its size and also its PoW implementation it would be virtually impossible for the bitcoin devs to do something like this with bitcoin without first gaining the consensus from mining community.

miners play a vital role in securing the network not only from outside attacks but from internal misuse of power. they are separate from stake holders with separate interests so they act as a counterbalance.

in a PoS coin there are no miners so there is no separation of powers.
in theory stake holders should play that vital role of making sure that power is not abused.
in practice however.. stake holders do what they are told or get locked out of the system.

this is not just a problem for PoS coins, it does affect all small growing coins, the PoS part merely amplifies problem because some crucial checks and balances are removed.

so I reiterate that it really isn't true at all so say that ANY coin can be rolled back. Some are many orders of magnitude more difficult to roll back than others.



the best example are all the miners mining at ghash.io with 51+% am i right? Roll Eyes
pos/pow have the same problems

Bounty Management & ICO Consulting
Inquire | Smart Contract Audits
MAD945
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:29:29 PM
 #9839


Until it's technically impossible to rollback the chain, this "problem" will continue. The argument of "I don't like what the VeriCoin devs did, I'm going to buy <such-n-such> coin instead" doesn't hold because all other cryptocoins can be rolled back as well. Just because the devs say they won't doesn't mean they can't!


this simply is not true at all...

in a PoW coin you have to convince the miners to adopt the new fork.
If 51% of the miners do not agree then the fork simply does not happen.

due to its size and also its PoW implementation it would be virtually impossible for the bitcoin devs to do something like this with bitcoin without first gaining the consensus from mining community.

miners play a vital role in securing the network not only from outside attacks but from internal misuse of power. they are separate from stake holders with separate interests so they act as a counterbalance.

in a PoS coin there are no miners so there is no separation of powers.
in theory stake holders should play that vital role of making sure that power is not abused.
in practice however.. stake holders do what they are told or get locked out of the system.

this is not just a problem for PoS coins, it does affect all small growing coins, the PoS part merely amplifies problem because some crucial checks and balances are removed.

so I reiterate that it really isn't true at all so say that ANY coin can be rolled back. Some are many orders of magnitude more difficult to roll back than others.



But they *CAN* be rolled back. That's the point.

Damn...you beat me to it lol

If a disastrous event happened that effected miners and holders of Bitcoin and the only way to fix the problem was the Devs to hard fork....what do think would happen?
GridWorker
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 11:30:03 PM
 #9840

You know what's funny, if the fud were invested enough they could have swung the wallet the other way.

vrc: VBL3M6EzwcYZWeuDpgjG9bDQzTKb4ydiDy
Pages: « 1 ... 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 [492] 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 ... 963 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!