cacanin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
September 29, 2014, 01:09:02 PM |
|
ANN: I will release an update soon, most speedup (about 5%) is for 280x cards and for old cards.
Any news when we can expect new updated miner? Tnx 1-2 days. How many days?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 29, 2014, 01:09:50 PM |
|
ANN: I will release an update soon, most speedup (about 5%) is for 280x cards and for old cards.
Any news when we can expect new updated miner? Tnx 1-2 days. How many days? I will release new version today, in 1-3 hours.
|
|
|
|
cacanin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
September 29, 2014, 01:19:42 PM |
|
ANN: I will release an update soon, most speedup (about 5%) is for 280x cards and for old cards.
Any news when we can expect new updated miner? Tnx 1-2 days. How many days? I will release new version today, in 1-3 hours. Ok, thanks for your reply .
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 29, 2014, 02:20:39 PM |
|
v8.0 Beta is available:
- Improved speed by 2-20%, depends on card. - Added "-a 4" mode. - Added "-h" parameter and tune mode ("m" key).
I get the following results:
About 785 h/s on stock 290X (Hynix memory). About 690 h/s on stock 290X (Elpida memory). About 520 h/s on stock 280X (Hynix memory). About 390 h/s on stock 270X. About 315 h/s on stock 6950 2GB.
Linux build will be available later.
|
|
|
|
Tiger78
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
September 29, 2014, 02:48:00 PM |
|
On 7790(260x) not speedup.
|
|
|
|
saul.goodman
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
September 29, 2014, 02:52:31 PM |
|
Stock 7850 2GB 330 h/s -> 370 h/s
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 29, 2014, 03:04:48 PM |
|
On 7790(260x) not speedup. Miner does not set optimal "-h" and "-a" options for many cards. It's because I don't have all cards here. Post first 20-30 log lines here so I can see how many compute units your card has and what's its name. Use "m" key to adjust "-h" value, or try to change "-h" values directly if OpenCL crashes. This version requires some time to find optimal settings. Everyone can post optimal "-h" and "-a" values for your cards here (and also card name as it is displayed and number of compute units), I will use this data to improve miner. Right now it knows only 290x,280x,270x and 6950 cards.
|
|
|
|
opossum
|
|
September 29, 2014, 03:39:13 PM |
|
280x - 485 h/s Hynix 270x - 406 h/s
Very strange that I can't get more on 280x
|
▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄█████████████████▄ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ █████ █████▄ ██████████████▄█████████████▄ ████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▄ ████ ███████ ████ ████ ███████ ████ ████ ███████ ████ ████ ███████ ████ ████▄ ███████ ▄████ ▀████ ███████ ▄████▀ ▀████▄▄▄███████▄▄▄████▀ ▀▀███████████████▀▀
| TIDEX | ║ █ ║ | | ║ █ ║ | |
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 29, 2014, 04:05:51 PM |
|
280x - 485 h/s Hynix 270x - 406 h/s
Very strange that I can't get more on 280x
Start miner for 1-2 minutes and PM me the log file.
|
|
|
|
saul.goodman
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
September 29, 2014, 04:17:30 PM |
|
Stock 7850 2GB 330 h/s -> 370 h/s Powercolor HD7850 2Gb GPU #0: name: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 16 units 385 h/s @ 1050/1250 -a 4 -h 512 -li 1 makes windows smooth.. speed still the same ^^
|
|
|
|
Oscilson
|
|
September 29, 2014, 05:02:25 PM |
|
280x - 485 h/s Hynix 270x - 406 h/s
Very strange that I can't get more on 280x
I also cannot get more on 7970. I am using -a 3. That is most efficient for me. If I use -a 4, there is about 5% increase, but the power also increase 5%.
|
|
|
|
fikie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
September 29, 2014, 06:23:20 PM |
|
On 7790(260x) not speedup. Miner does not set optimal "-h" and "-a" options for many cards. It's because I don't have all cards here. Post first 20-30 log lines here so I can see how many compute units your card has and what's its name. Use "m" key to adjust "-h" value, or try to change "-h" values directly if OpenCL crashes. This version requires some time to find optimal settings. Everyone can post optimal "-h" and "-a" values for your cards here (and also card name as it is displayed and number of compute units), I will use this data to improve miner. Right now it knows only 290x,280x,270x and 6950 cards. Same card, can you enhance its output or it has reached its maximum? 20:12:01:806 de8 Cards available: 1 20:12:01:806 de8 GPU #0: name: Bonaire, 1024 MB available, 14 units 20:12:01:806 de8 Total cards: 1 20:12:01:806 de8 Initializing...
20:12:01:822 de8 card 0, m1 1024, m2 767 w 112 20:12:01:822 de8 0 m = 2 20:12:01:822 de8 GPU #0: HashCnt = 448 20:12:01:822 de8 POOL version 20:12:01:822 de8 b120 20:12:02:570 de8 GPU #0: -a 3 mode selected 20:12:02:570 de8 LOW INTENSITY MODE ENABLED 20:12:02:586 de8 5 pools specified. 20:12:02:586 de8 Press "m" key for tune mode. 20:12:02:602 11c8 Stratum - connecting to 'xmr.hashinvest.net' <62.210.84.160> port 1111 20:12:02:617 700 Stratum - connecting to 'xmr.hashinvest.net' <62.210.84.160> port 1111 20:12:02:992 11c8 Stratum - Connected 20:12:03:023 700 Stratum - Connected 20:12:03:444 11c8 got 303 bytes 20:12:03:444 11c8 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"477921936335042","job":{"blob":"0100f6c0a6a105c91bdeb4d89210f6081785a8317da308976f0250a485a4959414204e36b6ded20 0000000c439f38aaaa84f27d1803c04749df790b18fc5dc67e18bed5b84c73df04d92be01","job_id":"773878962569870","target":"169f0200"},"status":"OK"}}
20:12:03:444 11c8 parse packet: 303 20:12:03:444 11c8 new buf size: 0 20:12:03:444 11c8 DevFee: Pool Diff 25000.1 20:12:03:569 10e0 Round 20:12:07:126 a98 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3479 ms, hashrate = 128 h/s 20:12:07:126 a98 Round 20:12:10:589 10e0 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3399 ms, hashrate = 131 h/s 20:12:10:604 10e0 Round 20:12:14:021 a98 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3353 ms, hashrate = 133 h/s 20:12:14:036 a98 Round 20:12:17:484 10e0 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3376 ms, hashrate = 132 h/s 20:12:17:484 10e0 Round 20:12:20:947 a98 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3387 ms, hashrate = 132 h/s 20:12:20:947 a98 Round 20:12:24:488 10e0 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3461 ms, hashrate = 129 h/s
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 29, 2014, 07:31:44 PM |
|
On 7790(260x) not speedup. Miner does not set optimal "-h" and "-a" options for many cards. It's because I don't have all cards here. Post first 20-30 log lines here so I can see how many compute units your card has and what's its name. Use "m" key to adjust "-h" value, or try to change "-h" values directly if OpenCL crashes. This version requires some time to find optimal settings. Everyone can post optimal "-h" and "-a" values for your cards here (and also card name as it is displayed and number of compute units), I will use this data to improve miner. Right now it knows only 290x,280x,270x and 6950 cards. Same card, can you enhance its output or it has reached its maximum? Try "-a 4". NOTE: 1GB cards cannot show good results anyway and in most cases you will not see any improvements.
|
|
|
|
Tiger78
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
September 29, 2014, 07:39:40 PM |
|
The size of the memory is not playing seems to be no difference between
20:30:21:388 cac 20:30:21:391 cac ЙHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH» 20:30:21:397 cac є Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner v8.0 Beta є 20:30:21:406 cac ИHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHj 20:30:23:331 cac Cards available: 5 20:30:23:334 cac GPU #0: name: Bonaire, 1024 MB available, 14 units 20:30:23:336 cac GPU #1: name: Bonaire, 1024 MB available, 14 units 20:30:23:339 cac GPU #2: name: Bonaire, 2048 MB available, 14 units 20:30:23:343 cac GPU #3: name: Bonaire, 1024 MB available, 14 units 20:30:23:346 cac GPU #4: name: Bonaire, 2048 MB available, 14 units 20:30:23:349 cac Total cards: 5 20:30:23:353 cac Initializing...
20:30:23:356 cac card 0, m1 1024, m2 767 w 112 20:30:23:359 cac 0 m = 2 20:30:23:363 cac GPU #0: HashCnt = 448 20:30:23:367 cac card 1, m1 1024, m2 767 w 112 20:30:23:370 cac 1 m = 2 20:30:23:373 cac GPU #1: HashCnt = 448 20:30:23:377 cac card 2, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 112 20:30:23:381 cac 2 m = 2 20:30:23:384 cac GPU #2: HashCnt = 352 20:30:23:388 cac card 3, m1 1024, m2 767 w 112 20:30:23:391 cac 3 m = 2 20:30:23:394 cac GPU #3: HashCnt = 352 20:30:23:398 cac card 4, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 112 20:30:23:402 cac 4 m = 2 20:30:23:405 cac GPU #4: HashCnt = 352 20:30:23:409 cac POOL version 20:30:23:412 cac b120 20:30:27:441 cac GPU #0: -a 4 mode selected 20:30:27:444 cac GPU #1: -a 4 mode selected 20:30:27:448 cac GPU #2: -a 4 mode selected 20:30:27:452 cac GPU #3: -a 4 mode selected 20:30:27:455 cac GPU #4: -a 4 mode selected 20:30:27:524 cac 5 pools specified. 20:30:27:527 cac Press "m" key for tune mode. 20:30:27:536 150 Stratum - connecting to '127.0.0.1' <127.0.0.1> port 7777 20:30:27:541 150 Stratum - Connected 20:30:27:902 150 got 303 bytes 20:30:27:911 150 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"855023117759265","job":{"blob":"010097aea6a105ebadd274073c38e1439db6ec9c364abb290771a1d65fbc693bace032cef192b60 00000001bab80585414b68aa00f746c91ee23a98465b8a5a186aef9a5c6a689694c095701","job_id":"721662361826747","target":"b88d0600"},"status":"OK"}}
20:30:27:921 150 parse packet: 303 20:30:27:931 150 new buf size: 0 20:30:27:942 150 Pool Diff 10000 20:30:27:951 150 df has same pool, skip 20:30:28:033 c50 Round 20:30:28:043 cd8 Round 20:30:28:049 d88 Round 20:30:28:054 cc8 Round 20:30:29:884 4d0 GPU 3: HashCnt = 352, time = 1806 ms, hashrate = 194 h/s 20:30:29:907 4d0 round found 1 shares 20:30:29:919 4d0 Round 20:30:29:935 f98 GPU 2: HashCnt = 352, time = 1849 ms, hashrate = 190 h/s 20:30:29:945 f98 Round 20:30:30:006 150 got 63 bytes 20:30:30:016 150 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status":"OK"}}
20:30:30:026 150 parse packet: 63 20:30:30:036 150 Share accepted 20:30:30:046 150 new buf size: 0 20:30:30:328 d88 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 2216 ms, hashrate = 202 h/s 20:30:30:351 d88 Round 20:30:31:686 cd8 GPU 3: HashCnt = 352, time = 1755 ms, hashrate = 200 h/s 20:30:31:708 cd8 Round 20:30:31:739 77c GPU 4: HashCnt = 352, time = 1783 ms, hashrate = 197 h/s 20:30:31:746 2d4 GPU 2: HashCnt = 352, time = 1768 ms, hashrate = 199 h/s 20:30:31:758 2d4 Round 20:30:32:548 cc8 GPU 1: HashCnt = 448, time = 2168 ms, hashrate = 206 h/s 20:30:32:569 dd8 Round 20:30:33:487 4d0 GPU 3: HashCnt = 352, time = 1755 ms, hashrate = 200 h/s 20:30:33:510 4d0 Round 20:30:33:550 7e4 GPU 4: HashCnt = 352, time = 1768 ms, hashrate = 199 h/s 20:30:33:561 f98 GPU 2: HashCnt = 352, time = 1767 ms, hashrate = 199 h/s 20:30:33:573 f98 Round 20:30:34:793 d88 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 2168 ms, hashrate = 206 h/s 20:30:34:818 cc8 Round 20:30:35:289 cd8 GPU 3: HashCnt = 352, time = 1755 ms, hashrate = 200 h/s 20:30:35:312 cd8 round found 1 shares 20:30:35:322 cd8 Round 20:30:35:362 77c GPU 4: HashCnt = 352, time = 1769 ms, hashrate = 198 h/s 20:30:35:372 2d4 GPU 2: HashCnt = 352, time = 1768 ms, hashrate = 199 h/s 20:30:35:385 2d4 Round
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 29, 2014, 07:49:33 PM |
|
The size of the memory is not playing seems to be no difference between
You need to set HashCnt > 512 to see the difference, but you cannot do it because of 1GB. Therefore, no speedup for 1GB cards.
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
September 29, 2014, 07:51:12 PM Last edit: September 29, 2014, 09:24:49 PM by qqqq |
|
On 7790(260x) not speedup. Miner does not set optimal "-h" and "-a" options for many cards. It's because I don't have all cards here. Post first 20-30 log lines here so I can see how many compute units your card has and what's its name. Use "m" key to adjust "-h" value, or try to change "-h" values directly if OpenCL crashes. This version requires some time to find optimal settings. Everyone can post optimal "-h" and "-a" values for your cards here (and also card name as it is displayed and number of compute units), I will use this data to improve miner. Right now it knows only 290x,280x,270x and 6950 cards. Same card, can you enhance its output or it has reached its maximum? Try "-a 4". NOTE: 1GB cards cannot show good results anyway and in most cases you will not see any improvements. I got some good results on my 6950 1GB with -h 512 -a 4 sorry -h 480 -a 3 (win 7). It's 266 H\s (8.0) vs 146 H\s (6.1) before! And even for 5870 1GB 210 H\s vs 115 H\s. But for 6770 1GB and win 8.1 i have no luck Btw i also have no luck with R9 290 on Win 8.1, so i think it's some sort of OS problem, cause every rigs with win 7 increasing hashrate (R9 270, 7850, 6950, 5870 and very little on 7950)
|
|
|
|
Tiger78
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
September 29, 2014, 07:54:58 PM |
|
The size of the memory is not playing seems to be no difference between
You need to set HashCnt > 512 to see the difference, but you cannot do it because of 1GB. Therefore, no speedup for 1GB cards. I tried to 2Gb cards all possible values of the parameter h. And compared with 1Gb cards only in the negative (or 0 difference) 20:22:58:140 e20 parse packet: 303 20:22:58:148 e20 new buf size: 0 20:22:58:173 e20 Pool Diff 10000 20:22:58:178 e20 df has same pool, skip 20:22:58:283 da0 Round 20:22:58:302 2ec Round 20:23:00:605 c08 GPU 1: HashCnt = 448, time = 2258 ms, hashrate = 198 h/s 20:23:00:619 da0 GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 2228 ms, hashrate = 201 h/s 20:23:00:628 c08 Round 20:23:00:639 da0 Round 20:23:00:651 f60 GPU 3: HashCnt = 448, time = 2265 ms, hashrate = 197 h/s 20:23:00:661 f60 Round 20:23:02:441 cd8 GPU 2: HashCnt = 768, time = 4047 ms, hashrate = 189 h/s 20:23:02:470 cd8 Round 20:23:02:617 77c GPU 4: HashCnt = 800, time = 4200 ms, hashrate = 190 h/s 20:23:02:650 77c Round 20:23:02:825 4d0 GPU 1: HashCnt = 448, time = 2166 ms, hashrate = 206 h/s 20:23:02:848 4d0 Round 20:23:02:864 ee4 Round 20:23:02:907 2ec GPU 3: HashCnt = 448, time = 2206 ms, hashrate = 203 h/s 20:23:02:919 2ec Round
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 29, 2014, 08:29:20 PM |
|
The size of the memory is not playing seems to be no difference between
You need to set HashCnt > 512 to see the difference, but you cannot do it because of 1GB. Therefore, no speedup for 1GB cards. I tried to 2Gb cards all possible values of the parameter h. And compared with 1Gb cards only in the negative (or 0 difference) I don't have such cards here so I cannot investigate it deeply, but if you have 2GB and it does not help - it means that card cannot use entire memory bandwith, too few computing units for that. If so, it's useless to use "-h" parameter, miner will select optimal value automatically.
|
|
|
|
ZXSpectrum
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:36:31 PM |
|
Cards available: 1 GPU #0: name: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 units Total cards: 1 GPU #0: HashCnt = 896 POOL version GPU #0: -a 4 mode selected
Speed: 429 h/s, TotalHashes: 126K, DevHashes: 5K Mining time: 00:05 @ 64c 150watts*
Version 6.1 was getting 396 h/s @ 67c 170watts*
*Power readings taken from back of PSU LED display
I haven't hit tune mode or anything, going to leave it running 24 hours and see what happens.
|
|
|
|
Xdragon
|
|
September 29, 2014, 10:40:55 PM Last edit: September 29, 2014, 11:09:45 PM by Xdragon |
|
claymore 6.1 works better than 8.0 on windows 8.1. speed decreased for me a lot, also looks like temps are lower too.
edit: after I restarted my machines it works better! -a3 works almost the same as -a4(~3% difference) on 270x, naturally it consumes less power, and less heat.
claymore 8.0 270x -a3 375hs @ 1030/1000 270x -a4 383hs @ 1030/1000
claymore 6.1 270x -a3 315hs @ 1030/1000
|
|
|
|
|