Bitcoin Forum
December 02, 2016, 08:20:11 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Will you support Gavin's new block size limit hard fork of 8MB by January 1, 2016 then doubling every 2 years?
1.  yes
2.  no

Pages: « 1 ... 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 [305] 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 ... 1560 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.  (Read 1803332 times)
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1862


Revolution will be decentralized


View Profile WWW
October 26, 2013, 08:10:24 PM
 #6081

Indeed. A gold backed cryptocurrency is a worse money than both gold and a cryptocurrency by themselves. This will be attempted (because people for some reason like backing, not understanding that good money doesn't need backing of any kind) but will fail. Good money beats bad money just as rock crushes scissors.

indeed. but real Austrians know that value is subjective. Even gold's
my bet is that both crypto and pm keep winning against funny fiat paper.
now i'm quite all-in in btc, and buying gold-that-i-can-hold with spare fiat.

1480710011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480710011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480710011
Reply with quote  #2

1480710011
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480710011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480710011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480710011
Reply with quote  #2

1480710011
Report to moderator
1480710011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480710011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480710011
Reply with quote  #2

1480710011
Report to moderator
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086



View Profile
October 26, 2013, 08:15:16 PM
 #6082

Bear in mind that in a better freer future with less financial facism or simply some locales, a system of provably gold-backed cryptocurrency, if it was ever allowed to flourish under rule of law, would probably give bitcoin a stiff run for its money, pun intended, dyodd, diversify, imho.

How would that even work? How to prove there's gold backing it? I don't see how to do this, at least not without "3rd party risk".


Yes, it would most likely be some kind of legal proof, which is quite adequate for most people, ask DPR.

Unless there was some kind of crypto-secured automation system at a storage facility that could bail in/out PM, audit, etc ... like an unhackable skynet for gold.

conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1862


Revolution will be decentralized


View Profile WWW
October 26, 2013, 08:18:10 PM
 #6083

Bear in mind that in a better freer future with less financial facism or simply some locales, a system of provably gold-backed cryptocurrency, if it was ever allowed to flourish under rule of law, would probably give bitcoin a stiff run for its money, pun intended, dyodd, diversify, imho.

How would that even work? How to prove there's gold backing it? I don't see how to do this, at least not without "3rd party risk".

it may work being convertible in pm at a fixed rate as fiat money used to be once upon a time.
it just takes an alt.coin easily convertible in pm. Anyone can do it. But yes, it would require trust in a third party for the "backing"/conversion-thing.
and now trust is rightly becoming a rare commodity.

vokain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610


V.V.V.V.V.


View Profile
October 26, 2013, 08:29:42 PM
 #6084

Bear in mind that in a better freer future with less financial facism or simply some locales, a system of provably gold-backed cryptocurrency, if it was ever allowed to flourish under rule of law, would probably give bitcoin a stiff run for its money, pun intended, dyodd, diversify, imho.

How would that even work? How to prove there's gold backing it? I don't see how to do this, at least not without "3rd party risk".

it may work being convertible in pm at a fixed rate as fiat money used to be once upon a time.
it just takes an alt.coin easily convertible in pm. Anyone can do it. But yes, it would require trust in a third party for the "backing"/conversion-thing.
and now trust is rightly becoming a rare commodity.

Figured I should cross-reference this since it's probably interesting, relevant reading and a source of thought exercises for you guys:
[...]
Quote
The most important feature of MasterCoins is the built-in support for users to create their own
currencies out of existing MasterCoins. For the purposes of demonstrating how user currencies will
work, we will use an example currency called “GoldCoins”, which are intended to track the value of one
ounce of gold, and which may be stored, transferred, bought, and sold similarly to MasterCoins.
Stability Concept
So how do we drive the value of these GoldCoins to their target value, when demand for them may
surge and decline? The price of GoldCoins is decided by the balance of supply and demand. Since we
can’t control the demand for GoldCoins, we must control the supply. The key to accomplishing this is to
use an escrow fund which holds MasterCoins

The escrow fund operates like a battery on the power grid, charging when there is excess energy then
discharging where there isn't enough. When there are too few GoldCoins (GoldCoin price is too high),
the escrow fund releases new GoldCoins, and the escrow-battery “charges” by holding MasterCoins in
escrow. When there are too many GoldCoins (GoldCoin price is too low), the escrow fund purchases
some of the excess GoldCoins, thereby “discharging” the escrow-battery as it releases the stored
MasterCoins.

Can you tell me how you could create an escrow with a coin which isn't backed by anything of value? Mastercoins are backed by Bitcoins but not only by Bitcoins. The value of the Mastercoins allow you to create an escrow and to my understanding the whole system works around that, I don't even know if you can do it if it were free. [this particular excerpt is in reference to a question as to why coloredcoin can't do this just as well]

[...]

...مكتوب
Escape the plutocrats’ zanpakutō, Flower in the Mirror, Moon on the Water: brave “the ascent which is rough and steep” (Plato).
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1862


Revolution will be decentralized


View Profile WWW
October 26, 2013, 08:55:46 PM
 #6085

Figured I should cross-reference this since it's probably interesting, relevant reading and a source of thought exercises for you guys:
[...]
Quote
The most important feature of MasterCoins is the built-in support for users to create their own
currencies out of existing MasterCoins. For the purposes of demonstrating how user currencies will
work, we will use an example currency called “GoldCoins”, which are intended to track the value of one
ounce of gold, and which may be stored, transferred, bought, and sold similarly to MasterCoins.
Stability Concept [...]

An easier and more transparent way would be to launch an alt.coin, even with centralized mining, at a fixed rate with gold, and actually convertible trough ATM-like machines. So to increase the money supply the issuer would have to increase his gold stock and vice versa.
The utility for users could be liquidity, transferibility, etc. compared to phyzz.

vokain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610


V.V.V.V.V.


View Profile
October 26, 2013, 09:01:11 PM
 #6086

An easier and more transparent way would be to launch an alt.coin, even with centralized mining, at a fixed rate with gold, and actually convertible trough ATM-like machines. So to increase the money supply the issuer would have to increase his gold stock and vice versa.
The utility for users could be liquidity, transferibility, etc. compared to phyzz.

so you still have to trust the issuer? how do you remove that element? I suppose there are things present-day ETF issuers can do further to be transparent, but in the end there's still room for breaching trust, no? I don't see how this would be different.

...مكتوب
Escape the plutocrats’ zanpakutō, Flower in the Mirror, Moon on the Water: brave “the ascent which is rough and steep” (Plato).
ekiro
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
October 26, 2013, 09:09:40 PM
 #6087

very good sign IMO.

Edit : this thread is an extension of this beast:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35956.msg443129#msg443129



Could people simply be getting rid of gold to buy BTC? It's. Great way to go from a physical asset to a virtual one you can redeem anywhere on the planet
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1862


Revolution will be decentralized


View Profile WWW
October 26, 2013, 09:16:38 PM
 #6088

An easier and more transparent way would be to launch an alt.coin, even with centralized mining, at a fixed rate with gold, and actually convertible trough ATM-like machines. So to increase the money supply the issuer would have to increase his gold stock and vice versa.
The utility for users could be liquidity, transferibility, etc. compared to phyzz.

so you still have to trust the issuer? how do you remove that element? I suppose there are things present-day ETF issuers can do further to be transparent, but in the end there's still room for breaching trust, no? I don't see how this would be different.

the difference would be that the day the ATM stop working, you know that you're phucked, not like losing 98% of purchasing power in 100 years.  Grin

...and the ATM may even exchange in 2-way mode, so making the system almost p2p

rocks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1153


View Profile
October 26, 2013, 09:23:28 PM
 #6089

The idea of "backing" blows people's minds.  People feel compelled to locate a persona behind anything and everything.  It's human nature.  

"But who created the universe"  ->  Must be a "God"
"But who 'backs' Bitcoin" ->  Must be a person, business, physical object (a yellow metal) or gov't entity.

If we had to place a persona behind Bitcoin, we'd probably say that it's "backed" by the people, or the users.  A more interesting question would then be "why is it backed by the users?"  Reason and Logic, which lead these users to believe that Bitcoin has intrinsic value as a technology.

Both Gold and Bitcoin are backed by the same entity, the free will of the people that choose to use them and the value the people place on them.

Gold is decentralized in the same manner as Bitcoin. If I have a piece of Gold in my possession, that piece of gold is out of the hands of any central system or government and fully in control by myself. Under a Gold currency system, gold is distributed and controlled by the hundreds of millions of people who each possess a piece of gold, not a central government. And it is these hundreds of millions of people who determine the real value of each unit of Gold. Similarly if I own the private keys to some Bitcoins, those Bitcoins are fully controlled by myself and out of the hands of any other entity.

Bitcoin shares more attributes with Gold than I think most people understand, but which will enable Bitcoin to reach some amazing heights. (Provided the network holds and there are no successful attacks)
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile WWW
October 26, 2013, 09:34:01 PM
 #6090

The idea of "backing" blows people's minds.  People feel compelled to locate a persona behind anything and everything.  It's human nature.  

"But who created the universe"  ->  Must be a "God"
"But who 'backs' Bitcoin" ->  Must be a person, business, physical object (a yellow metal) or gov't entity.

If we had to place a persona behind Bitcoin, we'd probably say that it's "backed" by the people, or the users.  A more interesting question would then be "why is it backed by the users?"  Reason and Logic, which lead these users to believe that Bitcoin has intrinsic value as a technology.

Both Gold and Bitcoin are backed by the same entity, the free will of the people that choose to use them and the value the people place on them.

Gold is decentralized in the same manner as Bitcoin. If I have a piece of Gold in my possession, that piece of gold is out of the hands of any central system or government and fully in control by myself. Under a Gold currency system, gold is distributed and controlled by the hundreds of millions of people who each possess a piece of gold, not a central government. And it is these hundreds of millions of people who determine the real value of each unit of Gold. Similarly if I own the private keys to some Bitcoins, those Bitcoins are fully controlled by myself and out of the hands of any other entity.

Bitcoin shares more attributes with Gold than I think most people understand, but which will enable Bitcoin to reach some amazing heights. (Provided the network holds and there are no successful attacks)

BUT, various people can each own the same Bitcoin at the same time (just share your private key) and a number of people can own Bitcoin but only jointly (multi-sig). These things are not really possible with something physical such as gold.

User705
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile
October 26, 2013, 09:38:44 PM
 #6091

I think the proper word is "control" of bitcoin.  Ownership implies governmental permission.  So yes in that regard bitcoin is superior to gold.  In other ways inferior.
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086



View Profile
October 26, 2013, 09:40:24 PM
 #6092

Quote
Ownership implies governmental permission.
WTF? ... are people really this indoctrinated with the facist state these days?

wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile WWW
October 26, 2013, 09:43:31 PM
 #6093

Quote
Ownership implies governmental permission.
WTF? ... are people really this indoctrinated with the facist state these days?

This is not indoctrination. Sadly this is fact. The states actually indoctrinate you to believe otherwise.

Land you "own" isn't really yours.

User705
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile
October 26, 2013, 10:56:02 PM
 #6094

Quote
Ownership implies governmental permission.
WTF? ... are people really this indoctrinated with the facist state these days?
You haven't thought this through.  Lots of buzz words though.  There is control and legal ownership.  Those are two distinct things.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
October 26, 2013, 11:47:38 PM
 #6095

very good sign IMO.

Edit : this thread is an extension of this beast:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35956.msg443129#msg443129



Could people simply be getting rid of gold to buy BTC? It's. Great way to go from a physical asset to a virtual one you can redeem anywhere on the planet

that's what i did.

and i'm sure alot of ppl are now doing it also.
rocks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1153


View Profile
October 27, 2013, 12:09:31 AM
 #6096

The idea of "backing" blows people's minds.  People feel compelled to locate a persona behind anything and everything.  It's human nature.  

"But who created the universe"  ->  Must be a "God"
"But who 'backs' Bitcoin" ->  Must be a person, business, physical object (a yellow metal) or gov't entity.

If we had to place a persona behind Bitcoin, we'd probably say that it's "backed" by the people, or the users.  A more interesting question would then be "why is it backed by the users?"  Reason and Logic, which lead these users to believe that Bitcoin has intrinsic value as a technology.

Both Gold and Bitcoin are backed by the same entity, the free will of the people that choose to use them and the value the people place on them.

Gold is decentralized in the same manner as Bitcoin. If I have a piece of Gold in my possession, that piece of gold is out of the hands of any central system or government and fully in control by myself. Under a Gold currency system, gold is distributed and controlled by the hundreds of millions of people who each possess a piece of gold, not a central government. And it is these hundreds of millions of people who determine the real value of each unit of Gold. Similarly if I own the private keys to some Bitcoins, those Bitcoins are fully controlled by myself and out of the hands of any other entity.

Bitcoin shares more attributes with Gold than I think most people understand, but which will enable Bitcoin to reach some amazing heights. (Provided the network holds and there are no successful attacks)

BUT, various people can each own the same Bitcoin at the same time (just share your private key) and a number of people can own Bitcoin but only jointly (multi-sig). These things are not really possible with something physical such as gold.

You can have the same ownership / control with Gold as well. For example you could store it an account where multiple people are established as owners and who all are required to approve actions, or store it in a safe known only to a number of people where each person's individual key is required to open. This provides the same multi-owner control over Gold.

I agree it is easier to setup this situation with Bitcoin than Gold, but my point that both are decentralized systems because ownership is decentralized holds. It is this decentralized nature of ownership which made Gold such a strong form of money over history, and which will make bitcoin a strong form of money as well.
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400



View Profile WWW
October 27, 2013, 02:07:46 AM
 #6097

So far in 2013 alone, the US Dollar has lost 93% of its value compared to Bitcoin.
HeliKopterBen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 02:44:13 AM
 #6098

So far in 2013 alone, the US Dollar has lost 93% of its value compared to Bitcoin.

Most all assets on earth have collapsed when compared to bitcoin thus far in 2013.

Counterfeit:  made in imitation of something else with intent to deceive:  merriam-webster
dalexc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65


View Profile
October 27, 2013, 03:35:21 AM
 #6099

Cliffs of thread?
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
October 27, 2013, 04:05:49 AM
 #6100

Cliffs of thread?

Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.

Pages: « 1 ... 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 [305] 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 ... 1560 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!