Bitcoin Forum
December 03, 2016, 08:00:22 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Will you support Gavin's new block size limit hard fork of 8MB by January 1, 2016 then doubling every 2 years?
1.  yes
2.  no

Pages: « 1 ... 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 [332] 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 ... 1560 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.  (Read 1803802 times)
Spaceman_Spiff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386



View Profile
November 19, 2013, 11:06:23 PM
 #6621

My "most-awesome" reward of today goes to Warner, for implying bitcoin could become the world reserve currency  Grin .
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. Server-assisted clients like blockchain.info rely on centralized servers to do their network verification for them. Although the server can't steal the client's bitcoins directly, it can easily execute double-spending-style attacks against the client.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480795222
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480795222

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480795222
Reply with quote  #2

1480795222
Report to moderator
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2128



View Profile
November 19, 2013, 11:20:15 PM
 #6622

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35r9VHUblVM&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Wtf? Is Mike maloney coming around? I thought he'd be one of the last ones.

PGP key molecular F9B70769 fingerprint 9CDD C0D3 20F8 279F 6BE0  3F39 FC49 2362 F9B7 0769
jojo69
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728



View Profile
November 19, 2013, 11:21:51 PM
 #6623

My "most-awesome" reward of today goes to Warner, for implying bitcoin could become the world reserve currency  Grin .

for a while there they were more like "as" not "if"

electrifying stuff

This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable.
Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile WWW
November 19, 2013, 11:25:22 PM
 #6624

My "most-awesome" reward of today goes to Warner, for implying bitcoin could become the world reserve currency  Grin .

for a while there they were more like "as" not "if"

electrifying stuff

Wtf, only "can" and "if"?

Give me a call when he says: "will" and "when".

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 19, 2013, 11:29:41 PM
 #6625

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35r9VHUblVM&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Wtf? Is Mike maloney coming around? I thought he'd be one of the last ones.

well now, that's interesting.

still so much confusion in the comments.
Zangelbert Bingledack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022


View Profile
November 19, 2013, 11:35:07 PM
 #6626

cypherdoc,

There are many levels to "getting it." The crypto part is fine to just understand as magic, and "can't print it" is nice given the recent anti-banker sentiment, but most of the US and the world still believe that deflation is disastrous, for example.

Now I've heard some theories that the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans, etc. actually understand Austrian economics simply because they've been at the money printing game for so long and were bankrolling Keynes and the general mainstream corruption of economics as a science. But even so, why give up their power so easily? They obviously haven't bought in yet or else the price would be a lot higher...unless they're doing it right now. Buying in a major way would be the only way to preserve the level of power they now enjoy, so I can only conclude that very few of them understand the full implications.

And even if they grokked the implications, they'd probably be like most people and assume it will fail, due a lack of understanding of antifragility, emergent order, open source, etc. I just don't think that many people will get this so quickly due to the sheer number of subjects they have to master.

The main thing: if a sizable portion of the government and power elite were really privy to the full extent of what is happening and the likelihood that it really will happen, the price would be a lot higher now than it is. I can't see the world's most powerful people greenlighting or being comfortable with this thing until they've bought in. Maybe we're witnessing soe of the elites jumping in and pulling strings in an effort to outcompete the rest.
Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330



View Profile
November 19, 2013, 11:43:47 PM
 #6627

They get it! I wouldn't expect them to drop terms like sha-256 and ecdsa but they get the basic concept! And with the Senator knowing that a stolen private key can be used to modify the public ledger! How far we have come

edit: YES! they even get that you can use Bitcoin to hedge against unstable inflation!

the best part was that Shassky understands that Bitcoin can be used as a legitimate store of value.

She is pro Bitcoin it makes here job way easier, it puts the responsibility of identifying criminal public key holders on all levels of law enforcement.  Today I wish she would have held her toung and just corrected fud.

Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
Spaceman_Spiff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386



View Profile
November 19, 2013, 11:45:13 PM
 #6628

She is pro Bitcoin it makes here job way easier.
I think she is neutral.  She just wants to do her job well.
jojo69
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728



View Profile
November 19, 2013, 11:54:54 PM
 #6629

My "most-awesome" reward of today goes to Warner, for implying bitcoin could become the world reserve currency  Grin .

for a while there they were more like "as" not "if"

electrifying stuff

Wtf, only "can" and "if"?

Give me a call when he says: "will" and "when".

I distinctly remember a couple of them saying basically "as this becomes more prevalent"  not directly in the context of becoming the reserve currency.

This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable.
Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330



View Profile
November 19, 2013, 11:57:09 PM
 #6630

I've long come to terms with the likelihood that if Bitcoin is to have any success, it will be corrupted. The greatest manifestation of this was in March, when a group of developers and pool ops colluded to pick a particular chain over another. While everyone cheered at how well it was handled, I died a little inside over the brainwashing Bitcoiners have subjected themselves to and the ignorance to this problem. We have what I believe to be benign devs and pool ops now, but it will not always be so.

I do not believe for one second that most Bitcoin users are or will ever again be able to read and analyze open source code or even to adequately judge the opinions of those who can and "vote" for that which is in their interest. Neither do I believe that ASIC ownership will stay as distributed as it is now once profit margins tighten and it becomes a game of electricity prices and wholesale.

And then, there is of course the block size issue. We increase the block size, we will increase centralization due to higher requirements for nodes. Block size stays the same, people will inevitably be forced to use third parties to transact BTC as blockchain transaction fees skyrocket.

Decentralization comes with costs. That is why normally, markets favor centralization. It is to be seen how great they are.

As a miner I realised I gave my power to the pool and my pool owner is IMO a simpleton on these political issues.

P2pool seems a little more reliable so it isn't all doom and gloom.

What I concluded was you want old coins as it is the old coins that vote with there spending power. In effect they keep the stability of the network safe. A fork gives old coins serious double spending ability and provide a motive to maintain the Status quo would it not?

Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
Zangelbert Bingledack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022


View Profile
November 19, 2013, 11:58:53 PM
 #6631

Quote
I think many people on here coming from a libertarian (I'm in that category) or full-out anarchy philosophy tend to view government as one giant beast, whose actions are coordinated and deliberate. I think the reality is that gov is a loose collection of individuals, most of whom just want to do their jobs, maybe get some praise every now and then, and take home a paycheck. Regulators want to meet their mandates, law enforcement wants to catch people who break the law, the Fed wants to meet their inflation and employment targets, and politicians want to get re-elected. The notion that there's a coordinated well-thought-out deliberate conspiracy across agencies, involving calculated strategic deception, to twart bitcoin as a threat to a devious fiat banking regime is....naive. Government is not coordinated. The individuals that comprise it are generally not that visionary. Agencies are composed of a wide array of individuals with all manner of their own ideologies.

I've raised this exact point myself. I call it the collectivist fallacy, and it's one most libertarians fall into. Once this misconception is cleared away it becomes apparent that Bitcoin won't necessarily encounter much resistance from petty bureaucrats as it doesn't directly affect them, or at least it won't seem to them that it will be able to affect them by the time they leave office.

Nevertheless, there are powerful people who do see sound money as a direct threat, and they would see Bitcoin as a threat if only they understood it AND believed there was a decent chance it could take over. The ECB report and others suggest at least some of them see the threat. But do they understand how clear and present it is? Maybe they are too slow to care, but if they did understand they only have two options that I can see: 1) Attempt to suppress it, or 2) Buy in massively.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 20, 2013, 12:04:22 AM
 #6632

cypherdoc,

There are many levels to "getting it." The crypto part is fine to just understand as magic, and "can't print it" is nice given the recent anti-banker sentiment, but most of the US and the world still believe that deflation is disastrous, for example.

Now I've heard some theories that the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans, etc. actually understand Austrian economics simply because they've been at the money printing game for so long and were bankrolling Keynes and the general mainstream corruption of economics as a science. But even so, why give up their power so easily? They obviously haven't bought in yet or else the price would be a lot higher...unless they're doing it right now. Buying in a major way would be the only way to preserve the level of power they now enjoy, so I can only conclude that very few of them understand the full implications.

And even if they grokked the implications, they'd probably be like most people and assume it will fail, due a lack of understanding of antifragility, emergent order, open source, etc. I just don't think that many people will get this so quickly due to the sheer number of subjects they have to master.

The main thing: if a sizable portion of the government and power elite were really privy to the full extent of what is happening and the likelihood that it really will happen, the price would be a lot higher now than it is. I can't see the world's most powerful people greenlighting or being comfortable with this thing until they've bought in. Maybe we're witnessing soe of the elites jumping in and pulling strings in an effort to outcompete the rest.

i haven't had a chance to rewatch today's hearings but i recall the very first words out of Senator Warren's mouth at the beginning was along the lines that Bitcoin has the potential to profoundly change the entire financial and monetary system with huge implications for taxes, the reserve currency status, and the like.  they're starting to put it together.

the one thing we're witnessing though is the parabolic move in the price which is a helpful indicator of what's going on at the hive mind level.  it's happening quicker than most of us thought.  we almost hit $1000 yesterday.  i think we will go back up and clear that level sometime soon.  after that it'll be gold parity and that fact alone will rock the world.  we're close.  then again, it's only 2013.  the 10 yr plan puts us out to 2020 if things move along at the Internet adoption speed but maybe we're moving even faster than we did back then b/c we're talking about a new form of money.

don't forget i got the "we've got to get moving" thing from you. Wink  and i happen to wholeheartedly agree.  even when ppl "get it" it takes them time to act.  Bitcoin is so foreign and new that it will cause them to pause.  these things tend to come in waves.  i convinced 2 of my friends last Spring to buy as the ramp began.  we topped @ 266 and crashed.  did they buy more?  NO.  and what did i hear all this past week?  whining about how they wished they'd bought more.  that's just how ppl act even after they've made an initial commitment.

yes, the timing of all this is debatable but all you have to know is that it's going in the right direction.
Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330



View Profile
November 20, 2013, 12:11:37 AM
 #6633

the gold bugs believe in the end of the world and the internet.  i don't.  that Armageddon play itself is doomed.  Bitcoin doesn't mean Armageddon, it is financial innovation.  i think the US will somehow weave it's way through the mess we find ourselves in and incorporate Bitcoin in some very useful way.  yes, it will take time.  that is indeed optimistic isn't it?  but Bitcoin is going to prove to be a powerful tool that will benefit all of mankind and i think the US realizes it can't afford to shun it.

I'm both more optimistic and more pessimistic or wary than I think you are. I'm more optimistic about what Bitcoin will achieve for the world, but more wary about what the central bankers will do when they realize the extent of the threat. I'm not saying I necessarily expect these government people to be up in arms, but I expect someone in the power elite to be. Probably many people. I'm not necessarily pessimistic, just wary of what kind of attacks will come. I don't think the banking dynasties will give up without an epic fight, if they aren't too blindsided to wage one.

And what if they see the writing on the wall?  And they decide "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em"?  Being in a position of power, if you could see that bitcoin could really become the world reserve currency, how about buying a f*ckload with your own money?
This accounts for much of the speculative value today, given the binary nature of Bitcoin. (And by no means is the writing on the wall.)

But after today's hearing the presentations didn't seem as well prepared. And I felt no definitive understand was reached.

My expectation is the powers that be saw no pillar of strength in Bitcoin and we'll see resistance from the tentacles of the existing power structure managed through the central banks.   

Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
jojo69
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728



View Profile
November 20, 2013, 12:16:43 AM
 #6634

What pool you with Adrian-X ?

This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable.
Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 20, 2013, 12:18:51 AM
 #6635

the gold bugs believe in the end of the world and the internet.  i don't.  that Armageddon play itself is doomed.  Bitcoin doesn't mean Armageddon, it is financial innovation.  i think the US will somehow weave it's way through the mess we find ourselves in and incorporate Bitcoin in some very useful way.  yes, it will take time.  that is indeed optimistic isn't it?  but Bitcoin is going to prove to be a powerful tool that will benefit all of mankind and i think the US realizes it can't afford to shun it.

I'm both more optimistic and more pessimistic or wary than I think you are. I'm more optimistic about what Bitcoin will achieve for the world, but more wary about what the central bankers will do when they realize the extent of the threat. I'm not saying I necessarily expect these government people to be up in arms, but I expect someone in the power elite to be. Probably many people. I'm not necessarily pessimistic, just wary of what kind of attacks will come. I don't think the banking dynasties will give up without an epic fight, if they aren't too blindsided to wage one.

And what if they see the writing on the wall?  And they decide "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em"?  Being in a position of power, if you could see that bitcoin could really become the world reserve currency, how about buying a f*ckload with your own money?
This accounts for much of the speculative value today, given the binary nature of Bitcoin. (And by no means is the writing on the wall.)

But after today's hearing the presentations didn't seem as well prepared. And I felt no definitive understand was reached.

My expectation is the powers that be saw no pillar of strength in Bitcoin and we'll see resistance from the tentacles of the existing power structure managed through the central banks.   


seems to me that those banks would have taken the opportunity to really hammer home alot of negative implications during these very hearings.

also, why would Bernanke come out yesterday with the positive comment on Bitcoin?

not to mention, Schumer got on the band wagon today inexplicably and flat out said he doesn't want to ban Bitcoin. 
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile WWW
November 20, 2013, 12:20:48 AM
 #6636

Quote
I think many people on here coming from a libertarian (I'm in that category) or full-out anarchy philosophy tend to view government as one giant beast, whose actions are coordinated and deliberate. I think the reality is that gov is a loose collection of individuals, most of whom just want to do their jobs, maybe get some praise every now and then, and take home a paycheck. Regulators want to meet their mandates, law enforcement wants to catch people who break the law, the Fed wants to meet their inflation and employment targets, and politicians want to get re-elected. The notion that there's a coordinated well-thought-out deliberate conspiracy across agencies, involving calculated strategic deception, to twart bitcoin as a threat to a devious fiat banking regime is....naive. Government is not coordinated. The individuals that comprise it are generally not that visionary. Agencies are composed of a wide array of individuals with all manner of their own ideologies.

I've raised this exact point myself. I call it the collectivist fallacy, and it's one most libertarians fall into. Once this misconception is cleared away it becomes apparent that Bitcoin won't necessarily encounter much resistance from petty bureaucrats as it doesn't directly affect them, or at least it won't seem to them that it will be able to affect them by the time they leave office.


I hate governments BECAUSE they're beasts with many heads.

HOWEVER Bitcoin will be victorious because of this very feature as well: one by one everyone will abandon ship governments out of self-interest. (think Soviet Union)

thezerg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


View Profile
November 20, 2013, 12:21:55 AM
 #6637

Quote
I think many people on here coming from a libertarian (I'm in that category) or full-out anarchy philosophy tend to view government as one giant beast, whose actions are coordinated and deliberate. I think the reality is that gov is a loose collection of individuals, most of whom just want to do their jobs, maybe get some praise every now and then, and take home a paycheck. Regulators want to meet their mandates, law enforcement wants to catch people who break the law, the Fed wants to meet their inflation and employment targets, and politicians want to get re-elected. The notion that there's a coordinated well-thought-out deliberate conspiracy across agencies, involving calculated strategic deception, to twart bitcoin as a threat to a devious fiat banking regime is....naive. Government is not coordinated. The individuals that comprise it are generally not that visionary. Agencies are composed of a wide array of individuals with all manner of their own ideologies.

I've raised this exact point myself. I call it the collectivist fallacy, and it's one most libertarians fall into. Once this misconception is cleared away it becomes apparent that Bitcoin won't necessarily encounter much resistance from petty bureaucrats as it doesn't directly affect them, or at least it won't seem to them that it will be able to affect them by the time they leave office.

Nevertheless, there are powerful people who do see sound money as a direct threat, and they would see Bitcoin as a threat if only they understood it AND believed there was a decent chance it could take over. The ECB report and others suggest at least some of them see the threat. But do they understand how clear and present it is? Maybe they are too slow to care, but if they did understand they only have two options that I can see: 1) Attempt to suppress it, or 2) Buy in massively.

In fact re the USA Law Enforcement its well documented that agencies would not work together (they essentially compete for the big bust, that gets your agency the funding) and that individual agents would not share their case files with others for the same reason (big busts -> promotion).  This is one reason they had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the digital age.

jojo69
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728



View Profile
November 20, 2013, 12:27:48 AM
 #6638

What pool you with Adrian-X ?
at the time it was BTCguild I'm not mining at the moment.

I would be very interested to learn the particulars of eleuthria's political naivete.  He has been quite good on network decentralization issues I feel.

This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable.
Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330



View Profile
November 20, 2013, 12:36:56 AM
 #6639

1)seems to me that those banks would have taken the opportunity to really hammer home alot of negative implications during these very hearings.

2)also, why would Bernanke come out yesterday with the positive comment on Bitcoin?

3)not to mention, Schumer got on the band wagon today inexplicably and flat out said he doesn't want to ban Bitcoin.  

1) I thought I saw bankers influence in undertones (porno guy discussing Bitcoin with central bankers) and in general the presentations today seemed unfounded in fact.

2) on reflection Bernanke called Bitcoin an innovation in low cost payments (he knows it's a financial redistribution virus) and he went on to say he doesn't have the authority to regulate it - reading between the lines he stopped short of saying - he doesn't have the authority to regulate it yet. Implying law enforcement need to OK this for now.

3) yes that was very nice to see.

3) Schumer Shasky sounded like she was on the Bitcoin payroll today not nearly as confident and prepared as yesterday. All in all she was the highlight of the hearing.

Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
jojo69
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728



View Profile
November 20, 2013, 12:41:03 AM
 #6640


3) Schumer sounded like she was on the Bitcoin payroll today not nearly as confident and prepared as yesterday. All in all she was the highlight of the hearing.


This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable.
Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
Pages: « 1 ... 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 [332] 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 ... 1560 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!