drumingspz
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 04:31:59 AM |
|
GAP on the rise at Polo.... 
|
░░░░░░░▄▄█████▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░▄██████████████▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄██████▄▄░░░░░░ ░░▄██████████████████▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████████████▄░░░░ ░██████████████████████▄░░░░░░░░░░▄████████████████▄░░ ▄███████████████████████▄░░░░░░░▄████████████████████░ ██████████████████████████▄░░░▄███████████████████████ █████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀ █████████████████████████▀░░░░░▀████████████████████▀░ ░██████████████████████▀░░░░░░░░░▀█████████████████▀░░ ░░███████████████████▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀████████████▀░░░░ ░░░▀███████████████▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▀██████▀▀░░░░░░ ░░░░░░▀█████████▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
| mira | | ▀▀ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ▄▄ | | | ▀▀ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ▄▄ | | | |
[/center]
|
|
|
SRBOOTH
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 08:30:32 AM |
|
One miner with 6.8 million pps at pool? Really??
|
|
|
|
aakashkumar
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 08:36:26 AM |
|
One miner with 6 million pps at pool? Really??
Exploit .? hope pool owner not eating our coins  We need some p2pools .
|
|
|
|
SRBOOTH
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 08:40:37 AM |
|
Top 3 are rather large...admin, can anyone check for gpu signs please?? Rank Donor User Name PPS GAP/Day 1 Autolycus 6,803,197 2,775.754 2 gapcom 2,799,418 1,142.183 3 tomkan 2,389,423 974.902 4 anonymous 1,506,162 614.525 5 anonymous 530,526 216.458 6 Fablio 524,832 214.135
|
|
|
|
bsunau7
Member

Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 08:41:08 AM |
|
One miner with 6.8 million pps at pool? Really??
Is this a multiple choice question? a) BotNet b) GPU miner c) optimized CPU miner d) any of the above I know that one of them (red wine or not) is correct. Regards, -- bsunau7
|
|
|
|
Aleh777
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 09:20:12 AM |
|
One miner with 6.8 million pps at pool? Really??
Is this a multiple choice question? a) BotNet b) GPU miner c) optimized CPU miner d) any of the above I know that one of them (red wine or not) is correct. Regards, -- bsunau7 1. launched a computer class. 2. Network computers at work. 3. Rental power CPU May be.
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 10:25:41 AM |
|
One miner with 6.8 million pps at pool? Really??
Is this a multiple choice question? a) BotNet b) GPU miner c) optimized CPU miner d) any of the above I know that one of them (red wine or not) is correct. Regards, -- bsunau7 1. launched a computer class. 2. Network computers at work. 3. Rental power CPU May be. Yes I have seen even bigger fish with other coins. Remember that a lot of people have far more resources than typical miners like us. Btw I have great news. The main designer from Shadowcoin, who also designed a lot of others coins (IOC, CLOAK..) has agreed with me to redesign the GAP website and make the new logo. I will keep you inform. Regards,
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 11:16:16 AM |
|
Want to Buy GAP, a large batch. PM me.
There's a nice 60k sat sell order on polo now. I'm a miner, i dont understand how/why they sell so cheap.
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 12:31:20 PM |
|
this could indeed be GPU's in operation, he is scoring large number of blocks and consistent, he overrode others with 1 to 3 million and is trying to "corner" supply quick.. not good
that or he/she launched 100,000 PPS x 10 x 8 = 80 servers x 50 cents per hour each... (40$ an hour!, ~1000$ a day) AWS .. that would be down right brave
116 left Autolycus 11/03/2014 00:21:05 22.4675 22.4678 28,325 83,020 127,856 451.39
another forensic observation is "he/she" is donating, this can only mean a group of individuals trying to raise difficulty level for the "good of the coin" which makes sense if they don't pull back suddenly
|
|
|
|
dcct
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 12:38:28 PM |
|
this could indeed be GPU's in operation, he is scoring large number of blocks and consistent, he overrode others with 1 to 3 million and is trying to "corner" supply quick.. not good
that or he/she launched 100,000 PPS x 10 x 8 = 80 servers x 50 cents per hour each... (40$ a hour!) AWS .. that would be down right brave
116 left Autolycus 11/03/2014 00:21:05 22.4675 22.4678 28,325 83,020 127,856 451.39
With spot instances its a lot cheaper than that. One c3-8xlarge is ~25 cents per hour für ~135,000 pps. Thats ~15$ per hour with on average about 5 Blocks. Actually profitable!
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 12:39:57 PM |
|
this could indeed be GPU's in operation, he is scoring large number of blocks and consistent, he overrode others with 1 to 3 million and is trying to "corner" supply quick.. not good
that or he/she launched 100,000 PPS x 10 x 8 = 80 servers x 50 cents per hour each... (40$ a hour!) AWS .. that would be down right brave
116 left Autolycus 11/03/2014 00:21:05 22.4675 22.4678 28,325 83,020 127,856 451.39
With spot instances its a lot cheaper than that. One c3-8xlarge is ~25 cents per hour für ~135,000 pps. at 25c my instance was killed after 2 hours (trust me I tried) at 40cents it was killed, had to redo setup (this was few days back) so conservative is 50cents or 55 cents I was getting approximately 108K PPS consistent even at 25 cents.. (if survived and autolycus is surviving without interruption) it is still a lot of money, so something else is going on there I doubt he is operating at 25 cents , thats very low for AWS double that as said
|
|
|
|
dcct
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 12:45:54 PM |
|
this could indeed be GPU's in operation, he is scoring large number of blocks and consistent, he overrode others with 1 to 3 million and is trying to "corner" supply quick.. not good
that or he/she launched 100,000 PPS x 10 x 8 = 80 servers x 50 cents per hour each... (40$ a hour!) AWS .. that would be down right brave
116 left Autolycus 11/03/2014 00:21:05 22.4675 22.4678 28,325 83,020 127,856 451.39
With spot instances its a lot cheaper than that. One c3-8xlarge is ~25 cents per hour für ~135,000 pps. at 25c my instance was killed after 2 hours (trust me I tried) at 40cents it was killed, had to redo setup (this was few days back) so conservative is 50cents or 55 cents I was getting approximately 108K PPS consistent even at 25 cents.. (if survived and autolycus is surviving without interupption) it is still a lot of money, so something else is going on there Try us-east-1e. Also there is a beautiful api you can use. If it gets terminated just let it automatically spawn a new one in a different data center. Copy the miner and start it using a automated small script. Let me guess: Not optimized for avx, using stock libgmp. -O3 -march=corei7-avx -mtune=corei7-avx +tune for libgmp. And you are at ~144K pps
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 12:51:29 PM |
|
this could indeed be GPU's in operation, he is scoring large number of blocks and consistent, he overrode others with 1 to 3 million and is trying to "corner" supply quick.. not good
that or he/she launched 100,000 PPS x 10 x 8 = 80 servers x 50 cents per hour each... (40$ a hour!) AWS .. that would be down right brave
116 left Autolycus 11/03/2014 00:21:05 22.4675 22.4678 28,325 83,020 127,856 451.39
With spot instances its a lot cheaper than that. One c3-8xlarge is ~25 cents per hour für ~135,000 pps. at 25c my instance was killed after 2 hours (trust me I tried) at 40cents it was killed, had to redo setup (this was few days back) so conservative is 50cents or 55 cents I was getting approximately 108K PPS consistent even at 25 cents.. (if survived and autolycus is surviving without interupption) it is still a lot of money, so something else is going on there Try us-east-1e. Also there is a beautiful api you can use. If it gets terminated just let it automatically spawn a new one in a different data center. Copy the miner and start it using a small script. thanks! makes sense, would 1/2 my cost if successful, but from experience and I have done this before with primecoin in the beginning , it will go between 25 to 55 cents and costs pile up... also noticed one is much better off with solo mining at this level of computing as I did parallel test pool/solo , solo comes on the top , blocks are found.. so I don't really understand logic behind 8 mil PPS in the pool as you can "get to blocks" faster in solo and win that way , whatever wining word means here 
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 12:53:14 PM |
|
this could indeed be GPU's in operation, he is scoring large number of blocks and consistent, he overrode others with 1 to 3 million and is trying to "corner" supply quick.. not good
that or he/she launched 100,000 PPS x 10 x 8 = 80 servers x 50 cents per hour each... (40$ a hour!) AWS .. that would be down right brave
116 left Autolycus 11/03/2014 00:21:05 22.4675 22.4678 28,325 83,020 127,856 451.39
With spot instances its a lot cheaper than that. One c3-8xlarge is ~25 cents per hour für ~135,000 pps. at 25c my instance was killed after 2 hours (trust me I tried) at 40cents it was killed, had to redo setup (this was few days back) so conservative is 50cents or 55 cents I was getting approximately 108K PPS consistent even at 25 cents.. (if survived and autolycus is surviving without interupption) it is still a lot of money, so something else is going on there Try us-east-1e. Also there is a beautiful api you can use. If it gets terminated just let it automatically spawn a new one in a different data center. Copy the miner and start it using a automated small script. Let me guess: Not optimized for avx, using stock libgmp. -O3 -march=corei7-avx -mtune=corei7-avx +tune for libgmp. And you are at ~144K pps awesome! you probably added few blocks for me just now.. be right back ok.. -O3 -march=corei7-avx -mtune=corei7-avx not much effect, optimizing for libgmp next... [2014-11-02 12:58:17] pps: 108848 / 108592 10g/h 15910 / 13667 15g/h 319 / 160 [2014-11-02 12:58:27] pps: 109088 / 108756 10g/h 9263 / 12198 15g/h 0 / 106 [2014-11-02 12:58:37] pps: 108834 / 108775 10g/h 15621 / 13050 15g/h 0 / 80 [2014-11-02 12:58:42] Got new target: 22.4406137 @ 22.4406137 [2014-11-02 12:58:47] pps: 108882 / 108796 10g/h 14987 / 13437 15g/h 0 / 64
|
|
|
|
dcct
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 01:01:12 PM |
|
awesome! you probably added few blocks for me just now.. be right back
ok..
-O3 -march=corei7-avx -mtune=corei7-avx
not much effect, optimizing for libgmp next...
[2014-11-02 12:58:17] pps: 108848 / 108592 10g/h 15910 / 13667 15g/h 319 / 160 [2014-11-02 12:58:27] pps: 109088 / 108756 10g/h 9263 / 12198 15g/h 0 / 106 [2014-11-02 12:58:37] pps: 108834 / 108775 10g/h 15621 / 13050 15g/h 0 / 80 [2014-11-02 12:58:42] Got new target: 22.4406137 @ 22.4406137 [2014-11-02 12:58:47] pps: 108882 / 108796 10g/h 14987 / 13437 15g/h 0 / 64
you did make clean first? While tune is running you need to stop the miner of cause.
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 01:02:59 PM Last edit: November 02, 2014, 01:44:21 PM by q327K091 |
|
awesome! you probably added few blocks for me just now.. be right back
ok..
-O3 -march=corei7-avx -mtune=corei7-avx
not much effect, optimizing for libgmp next...
[2014-11-02 12:58:17] pps: 108848 / 108592 10g/h 15910 / 13667 15g/h 319 / 160 [2014-11-02 12:58:27] pps: 109088 / 108756 10g/h 9263 / 12198 15g/h 0 / 106 [2014-11-02 12:58:37] pps: 108834 / 108775 10g/h 15621 / 13050 15g/h 0 / 80 [2014-11-02 12:58:42] Got new target: 22.4406137 @ 22.4406137 [2014-11-02 12:58:47] pps: 108882 / 108796 10g/h 14987 / 13437 15g/h 0 / 64
you did make clean first? While tune is running you need to stop the miner of cause. yes, sudo killall gapminer; make clean; building libgmp next and wiring, report soonish shoot.. gcc 4.8 uses older version of gmp/mpfr compiling my own verison quick linking with gmp 6.0.0 and latest mpfr.. might as well gcc 4.9 ... funny I think someone was doing what I am doing now.. building gcc 4.9 with 32 cores ... what I won't do for GAP lol
|
|
|
|
dcct
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 01:40:14 PM |
|
yes, sudo killall gapminer; make clean; building libgmp next and wiring, report soonish
shoot.. gcc 4.8 uses older version of gmp/mpfr compiling my own verison quick linking with gmp 6.0.0 and latest mpfr..
might as well gcc 4.9 ... funny I think someone was doing what I am doing now..
I was using 4.8.2. 4.9 was about the same speed.
|
|
|
|
jadefalke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1014
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 01:45:10 PM |
|
./gapminer ./gapminer: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./gapminer) ./gapminer: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.16' not found (required by ./gapminer) ./gapminer: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./gapminer) ./gapminer: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not found (required by ./gapminer) ./gapminer: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./gapminer)
the static miner is btw. not working on any of my Nodes.
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 01:45:22 PM |
|
yes, sudo killall gapminer; make clean; building libgmp next and wiring, report soonish
shoot.. gcc 4.8 uses older version of gmp/mpfr compiling my own verison quick linking with gmp 6.0.0 and latest mpfr..
might as well gcc 4.9 ... funny I think someone was doing what I am doing now..
I was using 4.8.2. 4.9 was about the same speed. no problem appreciate it.. this will be fastest gcc build , its ok.. although I could use 40 extra kilos of PPS  it truly is however about GPU miner.. I feel we will have it in less that 2 or 3 weeks, it is important it is opened sourced and no freaking bounty or fee.. this so we reach high difficulty all of us very soon.. btw this is slightly easier to read and contains foundational code for fermat decomposition and sieve https://github.com/eXtremal-ik7/xpmminerwill take a specialist though versed in OpenCL and GAP POW ... above needs RPC for pool, as this would be the best option iif opened sourced if hidden it will be attacked solo and you will see this in the increase of block counts in the rapid fashion (if GPU farm) that would be bad
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
 |
November 02, 2014, 02:03:43 PM Last edit: November 02, 2014, 02:47:17 PM by q327K091 |
|
ok.. @dcct running lets see.. gcc 4.9 , latest gmp latest mprf latest mpc... intel opts flags set sorry not yet ldd gapminer libgmp.so.10 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgmp.so.10 (0x00007f76be2a4000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f76bd92e000 linking not right.. brb brilliant! you da' man BIG bump in PPS, if you have many instances for every 10 you can gain one server power with this.. nice one mate :~/GapMiner/bin$ ./run-gapminer [2014-11-02 14:12:25] Got new target: 22.4545401 @ 22.4545401 [2014-11-02 14:12:35] pps: 0 / 0 10g/h 0 / 0 15g/h 0 / 0 [2014-11-02 14:12:45] pps: 116851 / 116851 10g/h 13359 / 13359 15g/h 0 / 0 [2014-11-02 14:12:55] pps: 117309 / 117079 10g/h 17881 / 15620 15g/h 341 / 170 but you said ~ + 44K PPS hmmm... must be a different processor.. on the record link flags for compiler were: export PATH=/home/ubuntu/gcc-4.9.2/dist/bin:$PATH export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/ubuntu/gcc-4.9.2/dist/lib:/home/ubuntu/gcc-4.9.2/dist/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.2:/home/ubuntu/gmp-6.0.0/dist/lib:/home/ubuntu/mpc-1.0.2/dist/lib:/home/ubuntu/mpfr-3.1.2/dist/lib make -j32 Makefile: CXXFLAGS = -Wall -Wextra -c -Winline -Wformat -Wformat-security \ -pthread --param max-inline-insns-single=1000 -lm \ -Wno-write-strings \ -I/home/ubuntu/gmp-6.0.0/dist/include \ -I/home/ubuntu/mpfr-3.1.2/dist/include LDFLAGS = -lm -lcrypto -lmpfr -lgmp -pthread -lcurl -ljansson -lboost_system \ -L/home/ubuntu/gmp-6.0.0/dist/lib \ -L/home/ubuntu/mpfr-3.1.2/dist/lib OTFLAGS = -O3 -march=corei7-avx -mtune=corei7-avx and execute export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/ubuntu/gcc-4.9.2/dist/lib64:/home/ubuntu/mpfr-3.1.2/dist/lib:/home/ubuntu/gmp-6.0.0/dist/lib Also compiled gmp with the following flags: export CFLAGS="-O3 -march=corei7-avx -mtune=corei7-avx" export CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=corei7-avx -mtune=corei7-avx" I want you to all have extra PPS  see if you can repeat it and achieve maybe the 44K PPS + and report if you can thanks
|
|
|
|
|