How I love it when someone opens another memcoin topic and puts a highly unrealistic prediction there  $1 is too high a price for this memcoin and it is unlikely to reach that price. Despite the fact that memcoin has a solid distribution and is traded on very large exchanges, it is unlikely to be a good catalyst for growth. It is likely that by the next bull run, this memcoin will at most be able to show a rise of 10 or 20 cents, but no more. In general, the chart looks more like a classic pump and dump scam. I am aware a market price of $1 is an unrealistic prediction for a "meme" coin like TAMADOGE. After all, there are too many coins in circulation. Not only that, but the coin also lacks utility. I've only said about the possibility of TAMADOGE going to $1 in the future due to the hype surrounding "meme" coins. All it needs is someone (particularly a celebrity) to endorse it, and prices should "pump" all the way to the moon. One thing about TAMADOGE is that it has fun play to earn games. I guess that will keep market demand from going all the way down the drain. With so many "meme" coins out there, it's hard to predict which one will "pump" next. You could lose more money than what you'll earn in the long run. Who knows how long TAMADOGE will last? Indeed, it is worth finding some opinion leader and the coin can rise sharply, but what is more profitable, to accelerate the price of an already released project or still to launch a completely new project, distribute the proposal among the right people and launch the token price into space? Something tells me that the second option is more profitable, considering the fact that launching a new memcoin is not at all problematic and requires minimal effort. I read somewhere on the forum that such tokens are created in a couple of minutes. |
|
|
|
This project has several factors that should alert any experienced investor. - The smart contract is deployed in the BSC network, where the largest number of different scam tokens appear
- The token is launched on some dubious lunchpad
- The coin is listed on some unknown exchange
How many of these gold-backed tokens have already tried to conquer the market? One more? |
|
|
|
You've made your stance clear on meme coins: risky, whimsical, and basically a roll of the dice. True, they might bring profit to the surfers of the hype wave, but its a tightrope walk. Yet, isnt investing always a gamble? Be it stocks, bonds, even gold, they all carry inherent risks. Granted, their swings aren't as fierce as meme coins, but the mantra is identical: buy at the dip, sell at the peak.
You advocate for safer, high-yield coins with credible histories. But, isnt the reward typically proportional to risk? While I'm not championing meme coins, outright dismissal isnt justified. They've minted fortunes. Maybe, rather than shunning them, mastering their rules of the game could be a wiser move.
So you're seriously trying to compare conservative investing to gambling? That's wrong and not serious. Conservative investing contains minimal risks and no serious capital would increase its risks by stuffing its portfolio with coins like memcoins, NFT, Game-Fi, etc. It's the same situation in stocks. A portfolio consisting of blue chips and a portfolio consisting of cheap stocks cannot be called identical portfolios which involve risks. There are risks everywhere, even in the safest investments, but the degree of this risk varies greatly. The lower the risk, the more professional your portfolio is. |
|
|
|
Hello guys,I learnt that pi network is a crytocurrency that is beneficial in the community ecosystem that you can mine with,I want to know their clarified differences and if the pi network and bBTC does same functions.
Are you seriously trying to compare some next shiatcoin to bitcoin? Bitcoin has the strongest reputation as a reliable asset with strong fundamentals and applications ranging from mining to institutional investments. Pi Network has none of this, you shouldn't compare altcoin and bitcoin. Bitcoin is a currency, an investment. Pi Network is a means of speculation, a way for the developers of this token to enrich themselves. |
|
|
|
Here I agree with Xal0lex. We have to take into account that there were, until now, only two cycles of about 4 years (2013-17 and 2017-21), the previous cycle had only 2 years, and the 2017-21 cycle is debatable due to the low in 2020 and the 2019 high (in some graphs, it's shown as two cycles: 2017-19 and 2019-21).
However I don't see really the connection to the SEC "securities" debate. That's clearly a move independent from market cycles, triggered by a identifiable event (or a group of events, as there are various lawsuits and SEC statements involved which have driven the value of those coins down).
The market is still very young, so these cycles can only be a coincidence and do not determine in any way what should happen in the future. I see these 4-year cycles mentioned very often on this forum, and in my opinion, cryptocurrencies are still too young to use this cyclicality as a pattern or something like that. It might make sense if, for example, 80 years go by and this cyclicality keeps repeating itself over those years. |
|
|
|
Old altcoins may have a high level of credibility, but they don't outperform bitcoin in terms of the amount of profit from investing over the distance. Then what is the point of investing in old altcoins at all if there is bitcoin, which will bring as much money if you invest in it? There is a sense to invest in old altcoins only when you are sure that $1 invested in old altcoins will bring much more profit than $1 invested in bitcoins. If there is no tangible difference, then why do we need these old altcoins?
See how ETH went from $200 to a price of $4000 in just a few months when Bitcoin also hit ATH. here there will be 2 advantages gained. The advantages of Bitcoin are obvious and coupled with the advantages of Altcoin ethereum. Yes, ETH was a bit more attractive than bitcoin in the last cycle. We have to give credit to bitcoin, because it is still 5 years older than ETH, and the yield between March 2020 and November 2021 was not much less, a difference of a few hundred percent. It's worth keeping in mind that older altcoins are also slowing their growth, not just bitcoin. And over time, one should no longer hope that they will bring as much profit as they did before. |
|
|
|
I do not rule out that someone is trying to greatly reduce the value of this portfolio of altcoins in order to be able to buy them at a bargain price in anticipation of the impending bull run. The big cryptocurrencies are not affected simply because big capitals are already involved in these assets and such accusations could not badly shake their ecosystem and therefore their price. Personally I just think it's part of the 4 year cycle that occurs, the inner workings of it as it were. It's not just Bitcoin going up for a year, then correction, recovery and consolidation, but also the recovery year in the past has been with altcoins failing to keep up with Bitcoin (such as in 2019). 4 years later, we are at the same period as Bitcoin begins to recover in price and it's dominance recovers as a consequence. Then naturally next year the diversification will return to altcoins, in anticipation of another bull market. It's also not necessarily speculators selling altcoins for fiat currency in order to get them cheaper. They may well be more expensive next year against the dollar. But I'd say it's very likely they will be cheaper to buy with Bitcoin next year, hence there is no reason for speculating on them directly right now. All of this makes sense, unless we witness market cycles break down and stop working. Personally, I don't give much credence to all this crushing on cyclicality, because it could all break down at any moment and cycles, or market trends, could stretch out, over much longer periods, like 5 or 7 years. It would be too easy to hope that everything would repeat all the time every 4 years. |
|
|
|
It's not just about the use cases and demand for the blockchain space. We should not forget that well-known smart contract platforms, such as BNB, ETH, also have a combustion mechanism that saves them from increased supply and inflation. Despite the fact that coins with the combustion mechanism also have a maximum supply, it allows them to retain their value well, even during market dumps.
that's true, their burning mechanism somehow counter the total coins generated, sometimes the burning even more massive than the generation of the coin. to put it simply, the supposed infinite supply just an illusion but the total supply usually is rather stagnant, I call those really good coin with good planning. unlike general token that's infinite supply sometimes they even have method to generate and mint token as their devs will. it's just matter of how the token or a coin is designed I guess. It would be interesting to see statistics on how infinite supply and limited supply coins behave over a distance of, say, 3 or 4 years. I'm sure there isn't much difference there, the value is lost in both categories of altcoins. From which we can conclude that limited supply is not a guarantor of altcoin's falling value. What matters here is demand and support from the big players. These are much more important facts than the total supply of coins on the market. |
|
|
|
Holding meme coins is a matter of making the right decisions and holding a good project that has what it takes to make there investors profitable. There are some good projects that are in the major with good team and holding that kind of project can be very profitable whether for short term holding or long term holding. Pepe looks like a good project and it had top many crypto projects in the market except Bitcoin and Ethereum.
The buying momentum was so high that it ranked the third highest based on market cap. Those who might have hold pepe since the launching would have been in crazy profits by now.
Memcoin does not have any authoritative metrics that would allow us to decide whether it is the right project for the holding or not. Whereas in a regular altcoin we can look at development, developer activity, various updates within the network, availability of various investors, etc., to predict the advisability of further investment, most memcoins don't have all this. There are no institutional investors, there is no active development, there is no product at all. There's just an army of shillers and some opinion leader who can influence the growth of the coin. This is obviously not enough to be sure of the future hold of this or that memcoin. |
|
|
|
The criminal case is already a measure of last resort. Judging by how quickly Binance and SEC managed to agree, there was not such a serious situation, which could lead to such a sad outcome, as a criminal case or even the arrest of CZ. I'm more inclined to believe that it's all the usual market manipulation and FUD, and the situation itself is much less dramatic than various media are trying to describe it in the information field.
I'm pleasantly surprised to see the SEC and Binance come to an agreement. I was expecting the whole incident to be a lot more serious, which sheds doubts on how serious the confict actually a larger plan to plan to manipulate the market and/or hurt cryptocurrencies and analyze at what degree they were affected. It's too early to talk about any kind of agreement, because things can still go on. Binance has filed a lawsuit against the SEC, hired lawyers, and the fight is just beginning. The SEC may not be on the defensive in this fight either, but they will also attack, filing counter-suits and new charges that will be uncovered during the investigation. This could all drag on for years, like the Ripple situation, so I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that they have come to some kind of agreement. |
|
|
|
Also, keep in mind that older altcoins are the most inefficient assets in terms of future profitability. If such altcoins do not differ much in returns from bitcoin and do not outperform the bitcoin portfolio in terms of the same returns, then what is the point of investing in these old altcoins at all, especially over the long term. You won't get much profit from these coins, but they look much more risky than bitcoin.
Need to see how the old Altcoin is developing. If the old Altcoin has good development like ETH, then it will be very good to be used as a long-term investment that will follow the price of Bitcoin. this is also related to the issue of the credibility of the old altcooin, if the old altcoin still outperforms and has a high level of investors it is still worth buying. But if the old altcoin turns out not to be developing, then don't choose the old altcoin. We know that new altcoins are also now more and more, but there are only a few that are successful and superior at this time. Old altcoins may have a high level of credibility, but they don't outperform bitcoin in terms of the amount of profit from investing over the distance. Then what is the point of investing in old altcoins at all if there is bitcoin, which will bring as much money if you invest in it? There is a sense to invest in old altcoins only when you are sure that $1 invested in old altcoins will bring much more profit than $1 invested in bitcoins. If there is no tangible difference, then why do we need these old altcoins? |
|
|
|
|
The funny thing is that the number 1 in the next few years may be another memcoin, which is not on this list. Although PEPE has a much better chance than other old memcoins. Those memcoins are already too old and expensive and well pumped, so you can't make much money on them. Memcoins will always replace one another, because the point of their creation is to increase the price many times over. After they are no longer able to cope with this task, they are safely forgotten.
|
|
|
|
ফোরামে Imgur সার্ভিস আর কাজ করে না। এর পরিবর্তে এখন অনেকে TalkImage সার্ভিসটি ব্যবহার করছে। তার ছবিগুলি প্রদর্শিত করতে একটি 1 Merit উপার্জন করতে হবে। |
|
|
|
Да и оффтоп вроде пошел, и ОП Ratimov затрет все. Хорошо, что сами понимаете ОП Ratimov не затрёт, топик не самомодерируемый, а я могу  А вообще-то, есть у нас по доллару топик, хотите продолжить, перебирайтесь туда. Этот топик не о долларе. |
|
|
|
Where are the links to the posts? Or do the moderators have to search for them themselves? If you make a report, you have to provide as much information as possible. None of the moderators will do the search, this is for you for future reference. And your report will remain unexamined. UpdateBanned |
|
|
|
What does everyone think?
If the source is cited, it is not considered plagiarism. Another thing is that such posts have nothing useful, users just copy articles and news, turning the forum into a newsfeed and repository of other people's articles. Such posts can be equated to paragraph 1 of the rules of the forum as low-quality posts. Unless, of course, the user did not leave a normal full-fledged comment on the news or article. |
|
|
|
I see ETH to become next blessing in disguise, I remember when it was around $100 people condemned it not to go anywhere within the space of a month interval ETH shuck the price in 500% increase and today is about $1800 let's watch and see ETH will create unbreakable records, channel some useless coins you have to ETH and relax in future.
 You have some kind of calculation problem. ETH cannot fall in price by 500%, it has fallen in price by 65%. Don't mix percentages and multiples. An asset can't go down in price by 500%. If we're talking about investing in ETH, you shouldn't expect any super return from this coin. The project can bring a few x's, but don't count on more. |
|
|
|
|
I have a few sure signs that a project is a scam. For example, the project only has a listing on DEX, such as pancakeswap, one wallet possesses most of the entire offering. The project's tokens are sold exclusively through the site, which can sometimes be freshly registered. The number of Twitter followers is fake. The project's website is single-page and some information is presented as pictures, not hyperlinks, when you go to which you can check the information provided. The roadmap is heavily delayed or, conversely, heavily ahead of schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
This looks very much like a scam. First of all, such large-scale projects would never be launched through selling tokens on some website, and secondly, there is no information about this sale on Amazon's official website. I would refrain from any investment until a clear connection between Amazon itself and this site and their token sale is proven.
|
|
|
|
Если есть руки и при них голова, то можно и "повторить/собрать". Все электрические схемы в открытом доступе. Даже приведены разводка печатных плат, список необходимых комплектующих и прочих материалов. Это хорошо. Осталось только дождаться, чтобы кто-то это повторил, тогда и скажем, что это возможно ). Дело за малым. Купить комплектующие, изготовить печатные платы и корпус и вперёд. Только никто находясь в здравом уме это делать не будет. Проще купить готовый продукт.
Конечно проще. Но неинтересно. Если кто-то что-то создает своими руками, а не покупает в магазине, это еще не значит, что он сумасшедший. Ну ладно, допустим. Passport - хороший кошелек, Jade, ColdCard - тоже, Но это чисто биткоин-кошельки. А что остается для альтов? Bitbox02? Для таких обсуждений есть топик Аппаратные кошельки. Перебирайтесь туда. Здесь топик о Леджере. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
