I don't see any way this could reasonably be interpreted as a threat. I would suggest you drop this as it will acheive nothing.

This is asinine. You can't ban all physical items, so banning physical cash is pointless. This is just a transparent pretext to get rid of cash, and strip the rights of the general population. Of course people such as yourself will lap up this excuse and cheer for your own enslavement.

"Mike Bloomberg: I Will Charge Americans With 'Domestic Terrorism' For 'Hate Crimes' If Elected"

www.informationliberation.com/?id=61203

I have the ability to recognize a disingenuous snide remark intended as bait, not as an admission of being wrong. Speaking of being wrong, don't you have some more people to accuse of pedophilia or some abusive trust ratings to hand out Vod?

He was gone from my list before you even made your shitflinging post about it. Now, here is where you admit you were wrong. You were wrong weren't you Nutilduhhh?

update

update

Some more locked threads I am not going to waste time quoting:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2028513.msg20312025#msg20312025

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2028469.msg20310762#msg20310762

Vod is a compulsive liar that constantly runs around accusing people of exactly the things he does. That is his favorite game. He is abusive, manipulative, and mentally ill. Why the community tolerates you is beyond me.

The trust system is broken because Theymos refuses to restrict the trust system to purely objective uses and ignores the human element.  He had an opportunity to change that with the introduction of the flag system, but he wasted that perpetuating the same flaws that caused its failure to begin with. I warned that the ability to use the system for ambiguous reasons would result in its failure, but he persisted. Unfortunately this thing is such a mess now I am not sure it can be salvaged.

I don't need to get TMAN removed from the default trust, he removed his abusive negative rating. Is Lauda unblacklisted from the default trust now with Theymos's recent removal of their exclusion? I remember having a part in that blacklisting. I am sure the ratings left for me by Lauda in no way were retaliation for raising awareness of their abusive behavior were they? Vod will get himself removed from the default trust list because he has no control over himself.




I believe it because I have personally experienced it. Users have literally told me so in the past. You have fun telling me what my life experience is though while you have none of the same.

You are wrong, and you will never admit it. I can prove it.

"One way to get around [the problem] of unplanned pregnancies creating a permanent underclass would be to legally enforce universal uptake of long-term contraception at the onset of puberty… Vaccination laws give it a precedent, I would argue,"

https://www.rt.com/uk/480977-downing-street-adviser-sabisky-eugenics/

Is it becoming clear enough that compulsory vaccinations are simply a pretext for transforming the world population into chattel property and promoting eugenics and genocide yet?

It is nonsense. They could simply use chemical or UV disinfectant. Like I said, this just sounds like a good pretext for banning cash money and stripping more freedoms as usual.

Is that the issue with me? Perhaps the issue with me is I argue my points a little too well, and you have run out of logical arguments to justify your own bias. Please do tell me, what am I at fault for? Facts please, not assumptions, emotions, or projections. Users like me make it impossible to end the drama huh? Yes, I am sure this place would be a lot more drama free if everyone who wasn't one of the chosen were to just shut the fuck up and let you and your pals abuse the trust system at will and selectively and arbitrarily enforce its rules.

Certainly it is my fault for putting up such a vociferous defense of myself when the system is abused against me, and not the ones that abuse that system, or the people who enable that abuse by refusing to exclude those users. Obviously it is my fault multiple users are simultaneously abusing the trust system against me. After all, everyone knows the volume of accusations makes them more valid, regardless of the facts of the matter.

This forum doesn't respond to chill. It responds to cutting throats, because that is the only language it speaks. Pure control and power over others, which those currently holding it relish abusing. I am very sorry if me pointing out this dynamic bothers you so much, but passivity is never a solution to dealing with tyrants. No compromise will ever be enough, and there is no path to redemption with you people. This will never end until your power is removed, because that is all you value.

You feel free to wax poetic about my character flaws all you like. None of it excuses your willingness to abuse the trust system, your enabling of it in others, or your deflection from all of this.



Except I do already do that, but that doesn't serve your NO U narrative very well now does it? I regularly defend people I don't like or don't get along with if they are not in the wrong. This is just more pathetic projecting on your part. Not my standards, your standards. Yep, you seem to be out of deflection tactics. Time to move on and regroup with some new bullshit to accuse me of.

It is easy to tell everyone else not to rock the boat while you sit on shore sipping on a piña colada. None of this has any effect on your ability to use the forum. This does have an effect on my ability to use the forum.

It is always the same refrain from disinterested 3rd parties. Stop complaining at no cost to myself, because I don't like conflict. Lets not dwell on the cause of the conflict, the damages, or the solutions. What is most important is I don't have to think too hard about it and read critical words.

I disagree. He has no control. That is what got him here to begin with. The only reason he is able to continue is he is able to manipulate enough people into feeling sorry for him where he plays a pathetic game of pretending to be a victim while he cries out in pain as he lashes out at others. He is obsessive compulsive and suffers from several personality disorders.

The forum shouldn't be forced to be subject to his abuse regardless of what excuses he makes. He has more than sufficiently demonstrated he has no interest in reforming his behavior. The only way to end it is to remove his authority within this system, because that is what motivates him. He is motivated by his pathetic need to control, and lord over others, because he feels so out of control in his real life he needs to abuse others here to gain a sense of control. To Vod this community is little more than a toy to masturbate his ego with. The only solution is to take his toy away and remove his authority within the trust system.

Yes, everyone move along. Nothing to see here. Lets all maintain the status quo where we are in charge and continually excuse abuse of the trust system. No reason to argue about it when we can just keep things how I like them, and fuck anyone who has legitimate grievances. Unless they are one of the chosen of course, then burn the witch.



You don't need to say it. You implicitly support it by including those that regularly and willfully abuse the trust system by negative rating people for little more than speaking. Also, you did explicitly merit the accusation of trust system abuse against me, which is an implicit statement that you think the forum needs more posts like that. Like I said before, your role is to walk a fine line and maintain just enough legitimacy so you can leverage it to cover for the abuses of your friends.

Any principles regarding acceptable use of the trust system you enforce are calculated moves designed to give you the appearance of being reasonable while you ignore and cover for the self evident and regular abuse of the people in your inclusions, and make minimal compromises to maintain this image. You feel free to bring out more "NO U's" about that one time I did that thing you didn't like that happened a year ago. Maybe it will distract from the continual and current abuse you enable with your inclusions and cover for with your deflection and intellectually dishonest arguments. Tell me some more about how you don't proclaim to hold me to any standards, then in the same sentence do exactly that. You do not speak with candor.

More intellectually dishonest projection and attempts to confuse the situation in order to deflect repercussions from the trust system abuse of your friends.


More "NO U!". Are you sure you don't want to tell me " YOU MOM GAY!" too just to top it off?

You are justifying abuse by including people abusing the trust system. It has nothing to do with what I demand. That is not at all what I said. Now you need to resort to making straw man arguments as if I was the one to make them, then act as if I should defend myself from your own words. Everyone is free to include and exclude who they like, but if you and your friends don't like who I exclude or include then it is acceptable to negative rate me for "trust system abuse". Meanwhile you toss out a few more "NO U!s"' in the hope no one thinks too hard about the fact that you only want people you choose to be held to their own standards, and that you yourself don't even observe your own standards.

You could stop making excuses for him, and join me in advocating for his removal from the default trust.

Except we aren't talking about getting your feels hurt with words you don't like, are we? We are talking about the fact that the default trust abuses their authority to punish people for speaking when their own feels are hurt, thus making using alts perfectly logical.

This is yet another endless example of the kind of the intellectually disingenuous arguments, topic sliding, projection, hypocrisy, and semantics pushed by everyone trying to excuse the abuse of the default trust system for personal interests, or at the very least confuse the situation so much people give up trying to look at it in order to maintain the status quo.