Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 10:44:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 606 »
1701  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust System Abuse By TMAN on: February 15, 2020, 01:15:56 PM
Hey TS.. how’s your dads arse hole feeling? What about yours?

Fucking dickhead wanknozz

You had warnings, you refused to a knowledge the warnings, now you are bitching?

You are a bully without any ammo you shitnugget

You don't get to use the trust system to threaten people into silence. That is not what it is for.

~TMAN

Your bullying ways need to stop, I told you what I was going to do yet you continued. I may be a 14 year old girl but I have bigger balls than you.

You are a cyber rapist

I am sure this is all very entertaining to you. As long as people like TMAN, Vod, Lauda have the ability to abuse the trust system at will and without reprecussion, it will remain a joke. Here is a list of people responsible for this failure of the forum systems through their own inaction:


Vod
monkeynuts
vizique
TheNewAnon135246
hybridsole
Avirunes
buckrogers
owlcatz
nutildah
dazedfool
LFC_Bitcoin
ezeminer
The Pharmacist
Jet Cash
bL4nkcode
Gunthar
finaleshot2016
xtraelv
crwth
krogothmanhattan
roycilik
bavicrypto
theyoungmillionaire
o_e_l_e_o
gospodin
Alex_Sr
Coolcryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
TalkStar


Shout out to Suchmoon for putting their money where their mouth is and taking action. The inaction of the rest of you is shameful, and you are responsible for the failure of the trust system.


1702  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: February 15, 2020, 12:23:20 PM
I am glad you are here. Perhaps you can substantiate the claims of your accusation, since Vod is basing one of his negative ratings on an accusation you have made. What substantiation do you have to support the claim that I was manipulating the trust system?

I wrote pretty extensively about it in the post that Vod is referencing in your feedback:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182530.msg52385837#msg52385837

You also never addressed this post where I correct your mistaken timeline of events regarding your involvement with the Turkish community:

That said, if you review the original thread Vod bases his accusation on, you will see I made an effort to mutually resolve a conflict between members of the Turkish community and Timelord. This lead to several interactions with several of the members of the Turkish community, of which I gained respect for because of how they handled the response. I must assume they felt the same way and this is why they added me. I didn't do anything I wasn't supposed to and these accusations are nothing but a tall tale designed to make sure I wasn't allowed to be put back on the default trust instigated by people with very long time, publicly documented animus against me.

Your timeline is off. The trust trading was happening well before your involvement with Timelord's fake flag bonanza.

The post you linked is dated September 7th, and you were playing trust games with Russian and Turkish local board posters from July through August. The only reason these users were on your radar was because they had recently been promoted to DT1, and like you, were either off or barely hanging on by 1-2 votes. Your other great rationale for adding local board posters is because somebody like Foxpup, suchmoon or myself distrust them, which according to you, "makes them interesting." Still a terrible reason to include someone in your trust list, and evidence you don't belong on DT.

Anything else?

I see lots of accusations. I see theories. I see assumptions. Where is the substantiation?
1703  Economy / Reputation / Re: [Cult of Lauda] An historic peace: Rome’s treaty with Carthage on: February 15, 2020, 12:07:01 PM
Sneak preview of my Trust list viewer:
Quote
Trust list for: Lauda (Trust: +34 / =2 / -0) (1390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-02-15_Sat_06.10h)
Back to index

~Lauda's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. Removed theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (62) 6521 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

I am sorry to say it Theymos, but you are a rube. I share a lot of the same ideological goals as you, but you are far too naive an idealistic to acheive any of them. It cost Lauda nothing to do this. There was no compromise, no sacrifice. If anything this act did nothing but serve Lauda by giving them cover for their other abusive behavior. Your little social experiment failed Theymos, and your willingness to be manipulated by people like this is responsible.
1704  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust System Abuse By TMAN on: February 15, 2020, 11:46:12 AM
Hey TS.. how’s your dads arse hole feeling? What about yours?

Fucking dickhead wanknozz

You had warnings, you refused to a knowledge the warnings, now you are bitching?

You are a bully without any ammo you shitnugget

You don't get to use the trust system to threaten people into silence. That is not what it is for.

~TMAN
1705  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: February 15, 2020, 11:38:58 AM
All of Vod's comments that you replied to were deleted for being off-topic.

As such, your replies were then rendered off-topic and also deleted.

Again, this is a very standard policy which you can't seem to grasp.

Your reply to me that was deleted and where my post wasn't deleted was this:

Quote
Wonderful! I look forward to not having to listen to clown music every time I use the forum.

Not exactly referencing the topic or adding to the discussion here.

The only thing you are demonstrating here is that after all these years you still don't understand how the forum works.

I am glad you are here. Perhaps you can substantiate the claims of your accusation, since Vod is basing one of his negative ratings on an accusation you have made. What substantiation do you have to support the claim that I was manipulating the trust system?
1706  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Coronavirus Outbreak on: February 15, 2020, 04:37:29 AM
"EXPERT: Coronavirus Outbreak “Just Beginning”"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdPVJJbnL8E
1707  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: February 15, 2020, 04:29:07 AM
Essentially the moderators are now even preventing me from defending myself against these negative ratings and false accusations. The rating by Nullius, by his own admission is based completely upon Vod's rating for me, which is based on another accusation with no basis whatsoever. The fact that Nullius is basing his rating upon Vod's rating means that Vod's rating is directly related to Nullius's abuse of the trust system. In spite of this, the moderators continue to remove my ability to defend myself against these accusations simply because, very likely the accusing party themselves, is spamming reports to get this defense removed. No bias whatsoever, I am sure.

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
Hhampuz is a coward for not speaking, yes.

Based on my experience with you, he probably has said the same thing over and over, with you ignoring the answer and asking the question ad infinitum.  Example - everyone has seen this quote, and I keep pointing out the quote (it is in the reference link of the trust) but you keep repeating your question:

P.S. Still waiting for you to quote that lie Vod.

Please consider me a coward as well.  Can't spend all my time explaining things to you.  :/

As usual, and time you are asked to substantiate your endless accusations, you pretend to be above it. Could it be you know you can't substantiate your claims and are avoiding the attempt at all cost? I think so.


Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
You admit it was wrong but you some how think you are above being penalized for it, and anyone who does rate you for it is abusing the trust?

I have been penalized.  DT1 strength went from 31 to 22. 

Now I am following the advice of Theymos and the wishes of the community, and I am going to stop regurgitating the same bullshit - like you not being able to read a reference link.

The community finds my rating on you acceptable.   That's all - sorry.  :/

None of that explains how getting a negative rating for your admittedly wrong actions is trust system abuse. You don't get to decide what the penalty is Vod, that is the nature of punishments. Also, might I remind you I am a member of this community, and I judge your actions to be not only well documented, wrong, but very worthy of a negative rating. Your ratings and accusations against me are completely baseless and a very transparent attempt to extort me into removing and or punish me for leaving you that perfectly justified rating.

P.S. Still waiting for you to quote that lie Vod.


Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
I didn't dox and report a user to the IRS, in a publicly documented thread Vod, so no, your rating is not identical to mine. Mine is well substantiated. Yours is baseless.

You did post private messages simply because the user ignored you, and then you lied about it twice.

My rating is well substantiated and identical to yours. 

What's more important is I removed my thread right away when I realized it was wrong.  Your trust abuse remains.

Still waiting for you to quote that supposed lie Vod. The act was done regardless of how fast you removed the thread. You admit it was wrong but you some how think you are above being penalized for it, and anyone who does rate you for it is abusing the trust?


Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
Techy, let it go.  You are acting mentally ill, and you lied (twice now) about why you post private messages.

There is nothing wrong with my trust since it is identical to yours.

Yes, I am sure you would prefer I stop bringing attention to your abuse of the trust system wouldn't you? You are rather fond of accusing me of lying to justify your negative ratings. Please quote this supposed lie.

I didn't dox and report a user to the IRS, in a publicly documented thread Vod, so no, your rating is not identical to mine. Mine is well substantiated. Yours is baseless.


Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
I posted a PM because the Hhampuz was insinuating I was PMing him abusive messages to justify his spineless behavior toward me because he was fearful of being drawn into the retribution thirsty mob of people of which you are a member. This is the same reason he refuses to comment on the situation now, he fears retribution for speaking the truth of the matter and derailing your obviously retaliatory and frivolous negative rating, on his behalf, with the truth.

So you are in contact with Hhampuz and he told you he is a jellyfish (your word) because he's afraid of retribution? 

I think you are lying again, since he and I are on good terms, and I don't see him as the coward you do.

I didn't leave you any trust about how Hhampuz feels about you, but that was just deflection, right you sick fuck

In your giant wall of text - you never provided me with any unsubstantiated negative trust I could remove.    That's probably so you can post and get paid again, right?   I'm still willing to remove any unjust negatives.  Smiley

I posted a PM because the Hhampuz was insinuating I was PMing him abusive messages to justify his spineless behavior toward me

Just wanted to point this out.  How does your typing something prove anything?  You know it doesn't - you left that feedback to be an ass, you lied about the reason then, and you lie about it now.

Edit:  I just received a message from Hhampuz.  He claims not to have spoken to you since you sent him an unsolicited PM asking him to attack me in this thread!  How many other people have you done this to?   Angry

Hmmmm... now I wonder if everything you've ever said has been as untrue...

Hhampuz is a coward for not speaking, yes. I think they are a good person, but simply don't have the strength to deal with people such as you. Unfortunately they could have just made a comment on the situation before as I requested and it would have been done, but now you are dragging them into this against their will so that might not be an option, who knows. Funny you would have to drag a user into a situation when you are leaving a negative rating on their behalf isn't it? Almost like you are a bigger problem for them than the thing you are negative rating for. No one said anything about how Hhampuz feels, good attempt at deflection, as you yourself deflect, then throw in a personal attack as a cherry on top.

"In your giant wall of text - you never provided me with any unsubstantiated negative trust I could remove."

What? Is that fucking English? Is that your semantic way of reversing the burden of proof? You haven't substantiated shit, I don't have to prove anything, that is your job as the accuser.

What did I do to Hhampuz? Ask him to tell the truth? OH THE HUMANITY!

Here is my PM to Hhampuz since you are intent on making shit up knowing he doesn't want to get involved leaving him in a position where you can either speak for him or he is forced to get involved. What a good friend you are selflessly using him to attack your enemies, on his behalf of course.

Any chance you could say something? This is horse shit and everyone knows it, but no one wants to say boo to this loon. He is essentially negging me in your name.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5221450.msg53774105#msg53774105

So where is the substantiation for the rest of your ratings Vod?


Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
I am not closing any thread, sorry. Unfortunately you will be seeing this thread for as long as it takes to have this false accusation neutralized, so enjoy the fruits of your labor. I am ready for the long haul. How about you?

I will neutralize any false accusations right away!   Did you post a PM of a user because they stopped chatting with you?   Did you then lie about it?  The quote is in the reference link.
 
I suggest everyone simply ignore you, so your threat to disrupt the forum for the "long haul" is neutralized, and we get on with our lives.  Smiley

Could you do me one favor?  Could you reply, denying you have ever done anything wrong, and use as many words as possible to justify your sig payment?   Thx.

I posted a PM because the Hhampuz was insinuating I was PMing him abusive messages to justify his spineless behavior toward me because he was fearful of being drawn into the retribution thirsty mob of people of which you are a member. This is the same reason he refuses to comment on the situation now, he fears retribution for speaking the truth of the matter and derailing your obviously retaliatory and frivolous negative rating, on his behalf, with the truth.

Last I checked Hhampuz had me included on his trust list and had left a positive rating for me. Seems like odd behavior for some one you claim I some how in some undefined way caused damage to doesn't it Vod? Why is it that you care more about this than he does? Oh that's right, it is all you can muster to find even the most flimsy excuse for negative rating me in retribution for leaving you a perfectly justified rating for the publicly documented doxing of another user, in an obvious attempt at extorting me into removing it.

There was nothing controversial or secret about anything in the message, and the entire point of it was simply to demonstrate that we shared a friendly tone at the time. As you could see in the thread the you and the usual clowns were laying the pretext for this frivolous rating for later use by immediately trying to turn it into some crime. This whole accusation is just a sad excuse for you to get retribution, and this pathetic pretext is the best you could come up with.

I never lied about it, and your claims to that effect are yet more manipulation and deceitful accusations on your part in a pathetic attempt to try to inflate the importance of your accusations against me because you know very well they are weak as fuck. Tell me Vod, how am I "disrupting the forum" by challenging your and Nullus's obvious abuse of the trust system?

FYI, I get a flat fee for my signature with zero posting requirements. I know you are exceptionally thirsty to try to latch on to any little thing you can to impugn my character, but this is exceptionally pathetic. This isn't going to work out for you Vod, just like it didn't work out for you the last 3 or 4 times you abused the trust system against me and were forced to remove your ratings.

Now that we have covered that frivolous rating, what about the others? Do you have any substantiation whatsoever that I was "manipulating the trust?" It seems you are simply basing your accusation off of another baseless accusation from another user with clear animus against me, and nullius is basing his accusation off of yours, no one substantiating anything all through the whole process. You all sure sound like reliable unbias folk that wouldn't abuse the trust this community puts in you to retaliate and serve your own petty personal vendettas to me!


Can you name something that I've done against you Hhampuz? You've been awfully quiet in Meta for awhile now, but after going from trusting me to distrusting me without any explanation - here you are making it seem like you've been being harassed by me. Either your post is irrelevant or it's fan-fiction, can you help me pick which?

I don't lump people together in attempts to stir up drama. When I say "the ones calling "them" out" it necessarily doesn't mean you.

I've decided not to disclose why I Add/Remove/Exclude people from my trust list as someone will always be angry and send you nasty messages.

Quite convenient you never need to explain yourself because feels.

And why exactly would he have to explain himself?

Maybe because publicly he insinuated I was sending him nasty messages and privately we had perfectly friendly conversations and his public and private persona are inconsistent.

Hey there. Just wanted to maybe give you a friendly warning, this whole VOD thing is going to have fallout, he went way too far. I would advise you to disassociate yourself from him and this event. Again this is just a friendly suggestion as I see it this is going to go south pretty quick. If you would like I can talk to TeeGumes we have done trades in the past. If you were to first make a statement to the fact disassociating from this it would probably help me go a long way toward arguing for him to remove the rating. I don't agree with him leaving it, but I don't think what VOD did was at all acceptable either. Feel free to let me know what you think about all of this, or not if you want. Have a good one.

Hey Tecshare,

Thank you for reaching out, hope you are enjoying this BTC rally too!

I understand that me leaving merit to that thread may have been stupid and my judgement was clouded by my disliking of og. There is no way for me to remove merit but even if it were, as the thread stands right now, I'm not sure I would remove it. No need to argue on my behalf with teegumes, although it is much appreciated! I'll take his neg and wear it as a reminder to always think twice before taking any action here which can also be a good thing.

After beeing down and feeling shit for a couple of months I've come back now and have found joy in the small things, doing much better and will just try and be hard at work.

Again, thank you for reaching out, I appreciate it Smiley. Hope you are doing ok, too!

WOW. MUCH NASTY! SO ANGER!


With the given situation you are in the red tag Lauda gave to you is justifiable, your account is obviously created to complain about the DT system and it's probably you are one of the members who got tagged by a DT member one way or another. Based from what I have seen DT members are more lenient and understanding to high ranking members or at least the trustworthy ones since they have the balls to complain about it in their own account unlike you who just created an alt account to cover your identity. Keep in mind you are tagged because you are using an alt account that is trolling in the forum and not because you are standing up against them. You aren't even really standing up because you are just hiding in your alt account.

Is that so? Maybe some one should tell that to the 13 cult members excluding me because they don't like my criticism of their pals. I am sure the long list of people on the list no one has ever heard of are far more trustworthy. My crimes are too numerous to count after all.

I can't speak for the other 12 cult members but I excluded you after you publically posted a PM between you and Hhampuz. I don't exclude people if I disagree with them or just because I think that they are assholes.

I see, so the fact that I posted that message is more of a problem than his duplicity and inability to have a conversation like an adult. Got it. You know what would have prevented that? Him willing to have a conversation about it, instead he chose to hide like a coward rather than explain himself. The message had nothing exceptional in it other than a demonstration of his duplicitous behavior, this is just a pathetic excuse for you to virtue signal to the DT mob. There is no presumption of privacy with personal messages. If this is your standard you should exclude Suchmoon too. I am sure I could find plenty of other examples of people on your trust list that have shared PMs as well, but oh that's right you people only apply these standards to others when it serves your bias. This is just a woefully pathetic pretext for retaliation.


Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
He hasn’t abused you. I’d be happy to show you some abuse if you do wish. nullius is excersising his right to tag you for being a cunt. Count yourself lucky fella, close the thread and stop the attention whoring,

We should just let him throw his temper tantrums and stop responding to his cries for attention, myself included. He's clearly put two feet down in this alternate reality of his and isn't leaving any time soon. Nobody can help him understand anything because he doesn't want to understand. The only thing we can do is just sit back and laugh at his magnificent display of douchebaggery.

Wonderful! I look forward to not having to listen to clown music every time I use the forum.


Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
Hey DireWolfM14, where are those principles now eh?

Lol, the ones you claim I sold to become a member of the mob?

My principals dictate that I refrain from engaging in personal disputes which have gotten so heated that neither side can discuss the situation reasonably and rationally.  I recon this is one such situation.  So, I won't be asking for anyone to substantiate anything they say in this tread, because there is very little substance to either side of the argument.

Besides, I know what you're really up to.  You're trying to bully me into removing Vod from my inclusion list.  Ain't gonna happen.

Heated? I have been quite civil for this thread. Funny, you thought it was appropriate to involve yourself in a heated dispute accusing me of "manipulating the trust" with zero substantiation behind it. You are just finding excuses to absolve yourself of guilt over your double standards serving your own personal bias rather than what is right or reality.

Very little substance on either side? What? Those ideas are mutually exclusive. Either the accusation is without substance and my argument is with substance, or the accusation has substance and my argument has no substance. You are literally just projecting whatever is convenient for you on to me to make excuses to ignore these obvious abuses of the trust system and avoid a discussion of the lack of facts in the matter.

You know what I am up to? Funny how many people around here can read my mind and my intent, fucking amazing. I had no idea we had so many people with telepathic powers around here. Rather convenient you can just dictate my own intent to me in order to dismiss everything I am saying isn't it? Bullying you? What are you 12? I am not bullying you into anything, I am shaming you for your double standards, there is a difference.
1708  Economy / Reputation / Re: Spineless cowards making posts on: February 15, 2020, 01:53:59 AM
While I do agree with TECHSHARE and eddie13 as far as sometimes the wrong road is taken by users, I believe that a person shows much more character by having the balls to say what they feel without fear of retribution.

I can see why you're taking it personally, I would too in your situation.  The idea that Hhampuz is responsible for paying the participants while he too is among those not getting paid is absolutely ludicrous.  Obviously Hhampuz is working for the same company, also expecting compensation.  Anyone with half a brain should understand that.  It's an audacious, tactless request.

He expects someone who also got scammed to pay him, so he's not the one getting scammed.  Someone who did actual work; auditing and counting many people's posts while he only had to make posts he would have made anyway.  Furthermore, it demonstrates that he cares more about the pay than he does for his fellow forum members, and being a contributing member of the forum.  I wish he had used his main account because now I'm curious who this shitbird is.

And that's why he used an alt.  Which is allowed, and I'm glad it's allowed.  Look at the responses in that thread he created.  Look at my reaction to his audacity.  If he had used his main account he very likely would have been tagged and/or excluded.  If not now, eventually.  He would have had his post history scrutinized, and likely would have been exposed for the sig-spammer he is.  

So, maybe this shitstick gets away this time.  Maybe he sees this thread, as well as the one he created, and takes all these responses to heart.  Maybe he turns a new leaf, and this is a good thing in the end.

Or, maybe he remains a sig-spammer and eventually gets found out.

So what exactly did he get away with? Questioning one of the chosen? Having opinions you don't like? Still looking for those principles you claim to maintain.
1709  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Murdered Seth Rich was the DNC leaker Not Russia on: February 15, 2020, 01:16:03 AM

You likely know this, but I'll say it anyway.

The DC police dept. cannot be trusted to prosecute, or even investigate these things.

They know better. They don't want to come down with a sudden case of Arkancide.
1710  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust System Abuse By TMAN on: February 15, 2020, 01:13:23 AM
you continued your cyberbullying - I warned you more than once.

I feel I have every right to react to your continued persecution of someone on DT-1 for your own Adenauer.

for once I hadnt talked about fucking your mother - I admitted to being a prepubescent girl, yet you continued with your cyber bulling attacks.

your behavior as a sexual predator is not acceptable, I stated my age, I asked you to stop, you raped me as a young girl... my profile states I am female, there is no barrier to entry into bitcoin.

why do you think its ok TECHSHARE? why do you think you are above the LAW?

I cannot do anything to protect myself from SEXUAL PREDATORS like yourself

WHY MAKE ME CRY?

WHY CONTINUE TO ATTACK ME?>

I SAID I AM A TEENAGE GIRL


I HAVENT EVEN HAD MY 1st PERIOD...


anyone with TS DOX - please PM me, if not I guess it will be a case for theymos and LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAIN!!!!!





You gonna report him to the IRS or something?
Accusations of rape is a bit far you think?

I really don't care about that. I care that he treats his power within the trust system like a toy and all of these members of the default trust enable his behavior.

    Vod
    Anduck
    monkeynuts
    yogg
    hybridsole
    greenplastic
    Avirunes
    owlcatz
    nutildah
    dazedfool
    BitcoinPenny
    LFC_Bitcoin
    The Pharmacist
    asu
    Jet Cash
    bL4nkcode
    finaleshot2016
    xtraelv
    crwth
    krogothmanhattan
    roycilik
    CryptopreneurBrainboss
    sheenshane
    o_e_l_e_o
    lovesmayfamilis
    DireWolfM14
    TalkStar
    DIKUL
1711  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust System Abuse By TMAN on: February 15, 2020, 01:09:27 AM
you continued your cyberbullying - I warned you more than once.

I feel I have every right to react to your continued persecution of someone on DT-1 for your own Adenauer.

for once I hadnt talked about fucking your mother - I admitted to being a prepubescent girl, yet you continued with your cyber bulling attacks.

your behavior as a sexual predator is not acceptable, I stated my age, I asked you to stop, you raped me as a young girl... my profile states I am female, there is no barrier to entry into bitcoin.

why do you think its ok TECHSHARE? why do you think you are above the LAW?

I cannot do anything to protect myself from SEXUAL PREDATORS like yourself

WHY MAKE ME CRY?

WHY CONTINUE TO ATTACK ME?>

I SAID I AM A TEENAGE GIRL


I HAVENT EVEN HAD MY 1st PERIOD...


anyone with TS DOX - please PM me, if not I guess it will be a case for theymos and LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAIN!!!!!

Now threats of doxing and reports to government agencies? This is the standard of the default trust currently ladies and gentlemen. How much more evidence does everyone need that the default trust is nothing but a small group of nepotists excusing eachother's abuse?
1712  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust System Abuse By TMAN on: February 15, 2020, 12:58:58 AM
I wonder how long it will take for the OP to realize what he is doing to himself... if he even cares.  :/

#peace2020

[uses the trust system as a tool of petty retribution]

"WHAT DID YOU DO TO YOURSELF?!"

Still waiting you to substantiate your ratings for me Vod. Of course you believe you are special and above justifying your actions, and are free to abuse this forums systems for your own personal satisfaction.
1713  Economy / Reputation / Re: Spineless cowards making posts on: February 15, 2020, 12:56:39 AM
While I do agree with TECHSHARE and eddie13 as far as sometimes the wrong road is taken by users, I believe that a person shows much more character by having the balls to say what they feel without fear of retribution.

I can see the argument both ways and it's a total bullshit situation. Veteran forum users also need to stop being bitches as well. If I have been a bitch I apologize. I would rather see users treat other with more respect vs having a dick measuring contest on here.

If we keep going the way we are going, this place is going to be a warzone. Who wants that? What will we accomplish positively that way?

It is almost like having a standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws before leaving a negative rating would solve a lot of these problems. I recall saying this before and being punished for it by you.
1714  Economy / Reputation / Trust System Abuse By TMAN on: February 15, 2020, 12:46:40 AM
Another day, another user treating the trust system like a toy in a lame attempt to silence criticism.


TMAN   2020-02-15   Reference   "cyberbulying is a serious offence in many duristictions, plus this user is a prized fucking wanknozzle - repeated attempts to de escalate (as per theymos's request) were ignored, TS believes he is bigger than bitcoin - i have it on good authority he actually has a micropenis - check the link - do not trust anyone who behaves in such a bullying manner, this is not the old draconian DT way! fuck you, your mum, your dad and smell your pillow as I just wiped my shitty dick after taking it out your dads arse "



~TMAN
1715  Economy / Reputation / Re: Spineless cowards making posts on: February 15, 2020, 12:39:52 AM
The situation has been resolved. What is the problem?
The problem isn't the situation or it being solved. The problem is pussies not having the balls to make a post without hiding.

I have no problem telling you you're an asshole from my account. You have no problem telling me what you feel either. That's how it should be handled everytime.  Whether we like or dislike each other, respect the person and the forum enough to say your thoughts or feelings without fear of retribution.

Unfortunately people abuse the trust system as a tool of retribution for speaking out. I don't blame them for using an alt to make that post. Many of the users here have repeatedly demonstrated their willingness to use the trust system as a tool to silence criticism from other users.
1716  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust System Abuse By Nullius on: February 15, 2020, 12:37:52 AM
"I am not lumping you into anything!" [proceeds to make false equivalencies lumping me in with Vod]
HOW?? I am barely insinuating that you and Vod both don't seem to get along well, so move past everything and with your lives.
 
I know its really easy for you as an uninterested observer to just throw your hands up an call it a wash, but if you bothered to look into this at all you would see all of his accusations against me are completely baseless and a transparent attempt at extorting me into removing the very valid and well documented rating I left for him. Him simply repeating me in a refractory manner doesn't make my statements any less valid, and false equivalence is exactly what he hopes to acheive with this childish behavior, eliciting exactly the response you are exhibiting here so he can create the appearance of this being a two sided thing. I did nothing to deserve any of this and there is no reason I should tolerate it. You aren't helping me, you are negating my claims here creating a false equivalence as if I deserve responsibility for his actions.
If you so want this thing to be done with, I suggest you to lock all threads you have opened against Vod(if any, I recall seeing one, i could be wrong), press the ignore button on Vod's profile and move on. There'll be no end to this, if either one of you keeps giving attention to the other. As for the negative rating, I don't think there will ever be a proper answer to it unless there is an adult conversation between you two without mere arguing. No one else can you help you with that.

Just as a fun little exercise to demonstrate you are projecting upon me, go back through this thread and count how many times you can see me insulting Vod. Weird... pretty sparse if any. You know why? I have explicitly refrained from doing so to prevent the exact false equivalency you are applying to me right now, of which Vod relies on to escape accountability from his own actions. I am very sorry that you don't like the conflict that results from me calling him out on his abusive behavior. I have tolerated it for over 5 years, and I am done putting up with it. The only thing I have been doing in this thread is making a critical examination of his, and Nullis's abuse of the trust system. Nothing more.
If you don't like Vod's interference in your threads, put a local rule and ask him to not reply to your threads, even better make it self moderated and delete his replies if you don't want to put up with him anymore.

Disclaimer: I am still not taking anyone's side in this whole scenario/s, so don't presume random crap.

Like I said, false equivalence:

You're just throwing words at each other at this point, you both aren't willing to have an adult conversation about it, nor are you willing to let it go. Y'all are acting worse than Kindergarten children for goodness sake.

I don't care what rambling Vod does. You are confused. I care that he abused the trust system against me with baseless accusations. There will never be an end to this until Vod loses his authority to abuse the trust system, because Vod doesn't want it to end. I made efforts to simply avoid interaction with him for years. He follows me around and injects himself into everything I do. Some how the drama he creates doing so is my responsibility now? Really, he is low grade entertainment to me at worst, that is until he abuses the trust system against me. That is not acceptable, and again, it is convenient for you as an uninterested observer to just tell me to drop it when I pay the price of his abuse and it costs you nothing to just tell me I should be let go.

I can't force Vod to have a logical discussion. All I can do is produce the facts of the matter that he can't substantiate any of his claims, as I have done here. He wants to avoid a critical discussion of his ratings at all costs because he knows he can't justify them. This is exactly why he is acting this way because he knows people like you will throw their hands up and call it a wash, not willing to dig through his copious amounts of bullshit.

Yes, others can help me with this.

~Vod

It is that simple.
1717  Economy / Reputation / Re: Vod's Change on: February 15, 2020, 12:25:26 AM
#Respect and I hope that you can end your battles with your perceived enemies over your philosophical differences..

.....

thx eddie13... that was quite unexpected from you.    I appreciate it!


So Vod, with your newfound change, when do you plan on removing your abusive trust ratings since you are all turning over a new leaf and everything?
1718  Economy / Reputation / Re: Spineless cowards making posts on: February 15, 2020, 12:23:20 AM
The situation has been resolved. What is the problem?
1719  Other / Meta / Re: unfair moderation, TS TOAA and all the cuntyfucks made me do this. on: February 15, 2020, 12:18:56 AM
Cyberbully you? What are you 12? but I don't respond to threats.

im a 13 year old pre pubescent girl actually sir.

as for threats I havent made one, I have made a promise. please stop bullying me, it is illegal in the EU to continue in the way that you are when I have requested for you to stop harassing me.

next post = I will have to post a negative on your account for your continued bullying of me when I have asked you to leave me alone, I have stated I am a 13 year old female (my profile states I am female) please Mr Techshare please leave me alone and stop posting in my threads.

I feel threatened by your behavior, does Theymos need the cybercrimes unit hitting him up? do you need your local police knocking on your door?

Please Mr Techshare I feel threatened by your behavior, please stop it sir.

Consent, something you obviously you are showing no respect for,

Sir, MR TECHSHARE leave me alone - any more of this and I feel you are virtually raping me

stop it

please stop this

please stop

enough

ow...


owie

TECHSHARE no please stop


MR PLEASE

NO YOU ARE RAPING MY THREADS


YET AGAIN THIS IS YOUR FINAL WARNING SIR<

Well, since you said please. No.
1720  Other / Meta / Re: Wall of fame / shame. Shit posts so bad that they are actually funny on: February 15, 2020, 12:16:19 AM
Satoshi constantly spoke of the prolapsed rectums of Bitcoin non-believers mothers.
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 606 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!