No matter what the score when the game ends, this will be a good game to watch. As you said, both teams will be trying hard as they fight to keep their own ambitions alive. One team fighting for a Champions League spot and the other fighting to avoid relegation 

Finally, with delays to the first attempt being dropped by the network (and then another delay because of increased network fees), you received your prize

I need to organise another competition and try to increase both the participation of members and also the prize fund.

The Leeds United vs Newcastle United game is huge because of what is at stake for both teams. Newcastle trying to finish in the top four while Leeds are trying to fight off relegation.

Then look at Leicester City vs Liverpool on Monday, that could be a loss for Liverpool because Leicester will know the results of the other games from Saturday and Sunday. If they know at least one of the others lost they will give the extra mile to try to bring back 3 points.

Would we be surprised if Nottingham Forest went to Stamford Bridge and brought back either a point or all three? This part of the football season is far more exciting at the foot of the table than it is at the top 

I think it would be prudent to keep all of your options open and not just rely on your dealings with just one law firm, that way you can decide on which company you feel comfortable with representing you and most important you will be able to compare what they are offering in terms and then make a decision.

He might be able to find a lawyer who will fight the case for him on the basis he will only get paid if he wins. It is worth searching around because lawyers could be open to making arrangements if they are almost certain they will win. Again, as you mentioned it is about the country he is located in and also which country the case will be heard.

These are the games taking place on Saturday 13th May:

Leeds United vs Newcastle United
Aston Villa vs Tottenham Hotspur
Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest
Crystal Palace vs Bournemouth
Manchester United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers
Southampton vs Fulham

Leeds United and Nottingham Forest play their games on Saturday whereas Everton play on Sunday and then Leicester City play on Monday. It is going to be hectic this weekend but exciting too as the race to avoid relegation steps up another gear.

edit: According to the odds Leicester City and Leeds United are favourites to join Southampton as the three teams to be relegated but Manchester City will face Everton on Sunday and you would expect a big chance (on paper at least) Everton will lose which means both Leicester City and Leeds United can leapfrog Everton in the table. It is too tight in the relegation zone make a call.

The seller mentioned by the OP stated his prices but does anybody know what these ranking accounts are being sold for by other sellers on Telegram?

Considering any accounts for sale will ultimately be used either for nefarious purposes or specifically to join signature campaigns, the question arises: why sell these accounts when you can make a lot of money yourself by joining various campaigns?

By claiming to have an account does not mean they actually do. Maybe it is another way to simply scam by taking money from buyers and then not delivering the account because they simply do not have it.

--------------

Your account has rightly been tagged (whether it is a throwaway or not) because accounts sellers and not looked upon positively in the forum. Also there is no way of even knowing if the buyer will ever get to use any of the alleged accounts you claim to have. They do not know whether you will take the money and run because you might really have zero accounts.

Fanno89 definitely should have known better but if he did not know he was depositing at a highly dubious casino to some degree it is understandable considering the website looks reputable on the surface.

He never stated how he found the 1xbit/1xbit1 website nor did he mention how he found his way to this forum, that would be interesting to know. Having said that, would be impossible for him to know a lot more about this forum and the 1xbit/1xbit1 website than he mentioned?

The second semi-final 1st leg is being played this evening:

AC Milan vs Inter Milan

This will guarantee an Italian team will be in the final and this could be the time Italian football starts becoming a European force again.

--------

The result from the game yesterday was: Real Madrid 1-1 Manchester City

This one is almost finely balanced but Manchester City have the away goal advantage.

If the return leg ends 0-0 then Manchester City are through to another Champions League final. If the game ends 1-1 it will be decided in extra-time or on penalties. If the game ends in a 2-2 draw Real Madrid will play another final because of the away goals rule.

Kevin De Bruyne scored the all-important equaliser in some style with a brilliant powerful shot after Vinicius Junior scored a stunning goal himself to put Real Madrid in the lead.

That is what you claim but they have not responded to your allegation. Going by the way their forum representative posts I doubt they will address your claim too.

Apart from the one screenshot can you provide the transaction id when you sent the crypto?

I have some recollection of downloading Exodus (and Coinomi) to see what they were like but cannot recall using them therefore I will not be able to vouch for either unless I download and test them. Like you, what I will say about Exodus is that I am not impressed with them for selecting partners that have some sort of bad reputation.

If this situation were to continue maybe the number of complaints against them here will increase but even then I see no reason why Exodus would be interested in addressing the issue.

Can you post any transaction ids that be seen on the blockchain or any screenshots of emails/chats? If you cannot provide any evidence it will be difficult for members in the forum to simply take your word for it.

A quick search of the forum would give you the answer. By far the majority would probably say 1xbit1.com and all associated websites are selectively scamming their customers but making an allegation is one thing and backing it up with some sort of evidence is another.

What are the odds being given on Leicester City being relegated just 7 years after winning the Premier League title in the 2015/16 season? It is not impossible but it is very hectic at the foot of the table. Any three of the bottom seven clubs could be relegated. Bournemouth need one point to ensure they cannot be relegated and West Ham United need three points to ensure they do not get relegated.

I think it is clear Southampton are certain to be relegated but it is too difficult to comment on which other teams will join them.

The way I see it they have no reason to delay transaction for this length of time and furthermore, if they decide to go down the AML/KYC route (as an excuse to indefinitely hold on to funds without returning them) then basically nobody should trust them.

The only time you should send KYC to an exchange is if they are 100% reputable and you are sure they will never sell your KYC/AML data on the black market to international criminals and scammers. If you are looking to receive fiat in to your bank then clearly exchanges have to enforce KYC therefore it is reasonable to send KYC to them for AML purposes.

This is a valid point but I would go one step further.

Let us say for example Manchester United beat Manchester City in the FA Cup final and Real Madrid beat Manchester City in the second leg semi-final of the Champions League, what remains is the Premier League. If Arsenal somehow manage to win the title and Manchester City lose against Real Madrid and Manchester United they end up with nothing.

If they stand any chance of winning the treble they will have to put out full strength teams for the FA Cup final and the Champions League semi-final but put out a strong enough team to win their Premier League matches while resting some of their top players.

Well from your perspective yes on the surface it is wrong but we have no idea what they will say in their defence. If they open an account here and post about it we can ask them for their version of events.

If what you stated earlier is true, maybe they are thinking if they returned your deposit they are sending out the wrong signal to members they suspect of trying to scam them. I am not saying what they did is right or wrong, all I am saying is we should hear from them. Personally, I would at least return the deposit and close the account but many of these online casinos are like the wild west they do whatever they want.

Do you have the transaction id which can be checked and confirmed on the blockchain? That would provide your claim with a little more substance. Right now, I cannot say if their reason for closing your account is a correct course of action or not because I do not know their side of the story.

At the very least they should return your deposit but the lesson for you and everyone else to learn here is you must read terms and conditions when you sign up to any casino or gaming website and you must be prepared to still not have your funds released even after you send your KYC.

There are many scam websites that claim to be legitimate but they are a front designed to fool people in to sending their personal documents to them. I cannot say this is what is happening here but you should be careful.

I agree, the case is pretty much closed because of the text you quoted. Even if either sympathy or mitigation is attached to the OP, he was in breach of the terms of service he signed up to.

For any user playing at their website (as with all other gaming and betting websites) and being in breach of the contract they signed up to when they registered, basically means they have to adhere to the rules otherwise they have to face the consequences.

If Sportsbet decided to make an exception with the OP that would be something generous but I do not see it happening.

Exodus should at the very least make exchange partnerships with third parties that do not have a tainted reputation. If people are using their service in good faith and are then being held in a system (that they did not ask to be held hostage to) then the onus has to be on Exodus to do something about it.