I have seen that this forum does not consider it inappropriate when some member makes a post or thread about a competing forum. I am a member of other popular forums and they do not allow mention of competing forums as it is free advertising for them.

What is the opinion of members about this? Is it fine allowing members here to promote or mention competing forums without paying this forum owner or taking his permission  ?

Does anyone know what email was used to create this forum?  BTC

Satoshi did not post on this forum. The forum was part of SourceForge before it changed to forum.bitcoin.org/XXX and then https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=XXX

Which forum do you mean?

After everything they are asking my customer to undergo KYC procedure which he AGREED ON now watch them ask him his mother birth certificate to be sure that he is born and it's not alien just to not release my money guys after sending so much evidences they are doing this just to let you know guys what they are doing watch this case extremely close they are doing revenge for us whistleblowing on their company

We cannot exchange or refund funds obtained through criminal means, as this may be interpreted as complicity in a crime. In order to continue the exchange or return the coins, we must make sure that the funds were received in an honest way

Have a look at the terms of service, it goes to the extremely impracticable extent to state in Section 19 Disputes Resolution (19.1): All disputes and disagreements that might arise from these Terms shall be resolved by means of negotiations.

There is zero recourse available for any customer/client to seek a legal dispute. They have not stated which country they will allow jurisdiction in the event there is litigation and for those very same reasons they cannot confiscate $8000 from the OP under dubious and deliberately worded terms and conditions of using their platform.

No government agency is going after them or will go after them if they return the funds to the OP but they are portraying themselves as a law abiding entity yet they themselves are not even registered as a company/LTD/LLC in any jurisdiction therefore they are claiming they are in the Seychelles is an attempt at a smokescreen.

Fury is never really 'in shape', but lots of people seemed to be of the opinion that he was just taking an easy fight, but I was quite vocal that Ngannou could quite easily KO him. I thought Francis would try get an early KO though and come out swinging but Francis was very reserved and tried to box instead which has its pros and cons. I don't know whether Fury will regret the Francis fight as he did get the win and got paid handsomely for it but maybe it was the wake up call Tyson needed as that fight definitely should have put his ego down a peg or two.

One thing that was interesting is we got another another lie/contradiction from Fury in that he admitted to not training for as long as he said he did for Ngannou. Tyson contradicts himself so much you never know what to believe is the lie or not. Something really fishy about all this.

OK, so based on this information I come to two conclusions:

1. Absolutely nobody should be using FixedFloat. The BTC taint analysis should be conducted before they send funds to the "main address." This way, the funds can simply refunded to the sender if they are found to be unacceptable according to their standards. What FixedFloat is doing is a bad business practice.

2. OP's employers are still on the hook for paying him the owed amount.

At least in the case of BitMixList, if it comes to the point where mixers are completely outlawed worldwide, I can just take the site down.

Sechyelles, and they're requesting it because they runs globally. The jurisdiction where they reside itself didn't ask them to provide such information.

Update: before fwe minutes my customer has updated me he provided all evidence regarding his company/group whatever and after he sended every evidence he could guess what my previous post made it true e they  are now ASKING HIS CUSTOMERS DATA TO BE DELIVERED TO THEM WHO ARE NOT EVEN CONNECTED TO THE CASE WHAT THE FUCK DO THEY HAVE TO DO WITH ME i am not sure am i dreaming or not on top of that customer has forced me for all evidence he had to be forced to send to build him almost 3k worth automated BOT that i am forced to build everyday they kill me more and more and more and more just update to everyone what absurd thing this is this got to go on live television man

Well, that's the sad truth. I refuse to believe someone makes an account there for other reason than money. However, I don't believe the overwhelming majority in bitcointalk would voluntarily contribute to their fellow forum users either. Perhaps occasionally, but certainly not with the same eagerness and frequency.

The lowest level of Bitcoin price I witnessed is something around $120, you can imagine selling BTC0,1 BTC at that time was just $12 and when you look today it is $4112 approximately. For sure I am disappointed and regretting selling with $4000 loss but when I do a transaction that's mean I need it at that time and life is opportunities to take or let go, just pass and don't look back.
I assume everyone who joined early are regretting selling his coins at a cheap price but it is life after all and we need to do that.

Yep.  I've written it probably dozens of times over the past few years that I feel like a complete dunce for not holding onto the cheap bitcoins I got my hands on years ago--and even more so for not believing in bitcoin and its ability to appreciate in value like it did.

But I could write pages and pages kicking myself for not being bitcoin-rich.  Instead, I'm just going to say that when it was worth $200-500, $1000 seemed so very far away.  And then when bitcoin finally reached $1k, I thought there would have to be some apocalyptic event before it ever reached $10k.  And then it reached that milestone, and all was relatively well in the world.  After that, it still seemed far-fetched that $50k would ever be a reality....and then it was.  I don't think my thought process and skepticism was so out of whack that I ought to be flagellating myself, but just looking back at what happened vs. what I predicted, I just want to forget about all of it or at least not think about it too much.

And then threads like this pop up.  Thanks, OP!

Can you prove that statement? I'm not sure if we know for sure that there couldn't be some way to inflate the supply in a controlled manner without doing a hardfork.

I disagree with you. I specifically said some alts are decent POW coins and I want to make up for the $5000 worth of BTC I had to refund to my prepaid mixer when bitcointalk ended mixers.

So at least one person is saying 2 reasons for being there.

1) to get my $5000 back
2) to support the handful of alt pow coins I like

Hello,

We received information from partners that the funds at the address were obtained through criminal means.

For this reason, the exchange was suspended. In order to continue the exchange or return the coins, we must verify that the funds were received by you in an honest manner, and also receive all the previously requested information from you by mail from the sender of the funds.

We receive information about thefts and fraud from our partners (other exchanges and cryptocurrency services) and victims who contact us. All evidence is carefully considered. We do not require KYC, and fair receipt of funds is usually easy to prove.

The rules of our service prohibit the use of the service for any criminal and fraudulent purposes, which we openly talk about in Terms of Service, sections 6-7. We never freeze users' funds for no reason, if the user has provided all the evidence that he is not involved in the crime - we unfreeze the funds and conduct an exchange or return the funds.

To put it in this way: is there any reason to migrate to altcoinstalks other than to advertise mixers? To me, the answer is no.

What the fuck?

Here on Bitcointalk, and with all due respect to Poker Player, I can disagree with him about something and not have to worry about getting red trust over it. But over there people can tag you because they are offended that you didn't call them "your highness"? What a joke.